Author Topic: Sexy Anita_New - Birmingham  (Read 2000 times)


13 review(s) for Sexy Anita_ (6 positive, 2 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by RedKettle]

Offline Paul9144

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Booking Type & Length:

1 Hour - Standard booking fee paid £150.

Comms/Listed Services:

I reached out to her this morning to book for this afternoon.

Comms were reasonably smooth and straightforward via txt messages.

Extras services on offer (didn't take):

- French kiss - £20 extra.
- CIM - £40 extra.
- Anal - £100 extra.
- Rimming - £60 extra.

Included services on offer:

- Deep throat (we didn't do)
- 69 (we didn't do).
- All positions (we only did cowgirl, & doggy).
- Massage is included in 1h (we didn't do).
- Striptease (we didn't do).

Included Services (we did do):

- Licking pussy
- OWO (Included in the 1 hour booking, otherwise £20 extra if it's a half hour booking - not made clear in her txt messages).

Location:

B5 - Chinatown.

Attempting to find free/open spaces on street parking was horrendous, roads are all a one way system :dash:

I ultimately had to park in a multi-storey car park at the expense of £3.50 for less than half hour.

The apartment/her room was fairly clean and tidy (Although, no air conditioning as the apartment was high-up, it was very hot).

Even with the windows open, it was like being in a sauna.

Her Appearance/Attire:

To be fair, exactly as per her profile photos - fully accurate without any discrepancies.

She was wearing a fairly standard looking red bra and a thong.

The Booking:

I eventually reached the front entrance of the apartment after facing some parking issues as per the above. I buzzed the apartment number given to me from her txt message instructions (front door was broken anyway), but I was still considerate of the fact that some SP's do like us to buzz and wait for confirmation from them for us to go up before doing so as I've previously read this from SP 'does and dont's' on the SAAFE forum, so I was cognizant and considerate of this before heading up. I waited for her intercom confirmation to head up first. I then went up in the lift. I knocked the door, she answered and let me in. As per the above, she looks just as her photos (she is attractive, super fit body etc), so no complaints there. So, onto paperwork. Although, we initially agreed an hour booking via txt message, I wasn't really keen on going with £150 and then paying £20 extra for OWO on top of that, which would have brought the booking to a total of £170. So, she said, how long do you want to stay, I said half hour, which I would have then paid her an extra £20 on top of the half hour booking fee of £100 (£120 total), which she then immediately said. I'll do £150 for the 1 hour (which will include OWO). So, I thought ok, lets go with that and we did. Moving on from the paperwork onto the action. I'm afraid this is where it goes totally downhill readers. I undress, move to the edge of the bed, she sits on the edge of the bed and begins to give me OWO (it was toothy). Yes, I am girthy but her oral skills and technique did leave a lot to be desired...swiftly moving onto me going down on her. This is where I am extremely annoyed (even now, a few hours later writing this review), she starts using her phone whilst I'm down there. I said to her once "please come off your phone"...then she says, "oh, I just need to do something" the cheek of it! I then stepped my tone up a bit from polite to assertive (not something that I do lightly as I'm always incredibly respectful of SP's on bookings). She then puts the phone down but it's just totally unacceptable. I've gone soft at this point. Then, she moves back to sucking me off in an attempt to try and get me hard again (which I'm like a stallion usually when I'm into it). I eventually get hard by thinking about one of my favourite porn clips...I know, it's a sad state of affairs for £150ph paid, isn't it, but such is life at times...I then eventually get hard again. Rubber on and into cowgirl, she rides for a few minutes, then says doggy. By this point, I thought let's just get this over with. I then thrust away as hard and fast as I can in doggy with her moaning out (probably fake) as it felt and appeared that she had zero interest in providing a good service at all. I then cum in the bag as quick as possible. She attempted to make some small talk as I was getting my clothes back on again and said to me (you know, a lot guys keep going early before the booking end time) I thought "no shit sherlock" improve your services then, and we may just stick around, I thought to myself (but then again, that toothy blowjob)...perhaps not. She did offer for me to come back for the other half hour without extra charge next time (she probably realised that I wasn't best pleased with the service that she provided). I then left.

Overall Feelings:

Would I recommend - absolutely not, total waste of money.

One of the worst punts that I've had to date!

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline MaxVerstappen

Yeah the good old, let me check my messages while you eat me out or while you are fucking me in doggy = both of which have happened to me before.  :dash: such a mood killer. An instant red card for this offence.

Sorry you lost £150 for this 30 minute punt and you didn't even get her full undivided attention.  :thumbsdown:

Thanks for the review.

Offline HeadGame

Her tits and ass look insane though

Offline Paul9144

Yeah the good old, let me check my messages while you eat me out or while you are fucking me in doggy = both of which have happened to me before.  :dash: such a mood killer. An instant red card for this offence.

Sorry you lost £150 for this 30 minute punt and you didn't even get her full undivided attention.  :thumbsdown:

Thanks for the review.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts and your similar experiences Max.

Once upon a time, I would have taken her doing what she did very personally. I don't think some escorts fully realise the gravity of their actions sometimes, or some unfortunately do but just don't care at all. I have to say in her case though, the concerning part is that she didn't appear to think she was doing anything wrong. On what planet do some of these escorts think that using their phone when we're going down on them or at any point in the booking is in the least bit acceptable is totally beyond me.

Offline Paul9144

Her tits and ass look insane though

Yeah, she's 10/10 body wise.

Her good looks won't negate her incompetence or make her a professional escort though.

Offline chadpitt

Collarbone tattoo is always a red flag

Offline scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,503
  • Likes: 238
  •  
  • Reviews: 175
Collarbone tattoo is always a red flag

Why?   :unknown:

Is it just that you don't like them?  My personal hate is throat tatts.

Offline Paul9144

Collarbone tattoo is always a red flag

Why?   :unknown:

Is it just that you don't like them?  My personal hate is throat tatts.

Not a huge fan of throat tattoos either.

However, regardless of where them tattoos are on her. It's not going to help that toothy blowjob.

@Scouting - Question for you mate, any idea why she's indexed with Rita Margarita, as they're two different SP's?

Offline scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,503
  • Likes: 238
  •  
  • Reviews: 175
Not a huge fan of throat tattoos either.

However, regardless of where them tattoos are on her. It's not going to help that toothy blowjob.

@Scouting - Question for you mate, any idea why she's indexed with Rita Margarita, as they're two different SP's?

I've no idea mate  :unknown:

Usually it's because a girl starts a new profile so the old reviews get linked to it so as to maintain the record. In this way an SP trying to lose some poor reviews gets caught out. Of course it doesn't help when SP's sell-on their profile to another user, happens a lot with Thais.

I've gone through the old reviews of Rita Margarita, can see she had a couple of profiles, but haven't yet found the definitive piece of info saying Sexy Anita is the same girl. Scutty brown added most of the links for Anita to Rita Margarita, if he reads this he may recall it and shed some light.

Offline Paul9144

I've no idea mate  :unknown:

Usually it's because a girl starts a new profile so the old reviews get linked to it so as to maintain the record. In this way an SP trying to lose some poor reviews gets caught out. Of course it doesn't help when SP's sell-on their profile to another user, happens a lot with Thais.

I've gone through the old reviews of Rita Margarita, can see she had a couple of profiles, but haven't yet found the definitive piece of info saying Sexy Anita is the same girl. Scutty brown added most of the links for Anita to Rita Margarita, if he reads this he may recall it and shed some light.

I've just gone down the list again for all of Rita Margarita's reviews. I can see what's happened here.

Most of them are under AW profile reference '6989621' for Rita Margarita.

Sexy Anita now was originally Leticia26hottie X1 review under profile reference '5521890' with Rita then using that same profile from the 28/05/2021 - 02/11/2021, which would most likely fall in line with what you mentioned about AW profiles potentially being sold on which it appears that Sexy Anita/Leticia26hottie most likely did so to Rita Margarita hence the indexing issues.

So, we've got three different AW profile references indexed together under one section:

- 8199351 (Sexy Anita) now as per the correct index (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=39896).
- 5521890 (Leticia26hottie/Sexy Anita first then Rita Margarita) from the 28/05/2021 - 02/11/2021.
- 6989621 (Sexy_Rita Margarita) from the 24/11/2022 - 07/02/2024.

I suppose there is a case for them to be re-indexed separately, so I just thought to raise it with them both being different SP's.

I know it may be a pain to do but having them all bunched up together untidy like it currently is doesn't look the best/confusing.

Offline scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,503
  • Likes: 238
  •  
  • Reviews: 175
Well deduced Paul  :drinks:

I'm not sure what can be done about this. Helpers are able to add a profile for indexing, eg when an SP gets a new profile we will index her old profile to new reviews so they can't shed their history. This is all an "addition" to the indexing. To unpick the crossover however requires indexing to be removed, ie a "subtraction". Helpers are not able to do this which is why we have to be certain before indexing old profiles against new reviews.

Moderators can but have plenty on their plate. In the past where some of the Thais have handed/sold their profile on to another girl we've just lived with it and it sometimes gets mentioned when a new review is posted. I'll report it and see what they think.

Offline Paul9144

Well deduced Paul  :drinks:

I'm not sure what can be done about this. Helpers are able to add a profile for indexing, eg when an SP gets a new profile we will index her old profile to new reviews so they can't shed their history. This is all an "addition" to the indexing. To unpick the crossover however requires indexing to be removed, ie a "subtraction". Helpers are not able to do this which is why we have to be certain before indexing old profiles against new reviews.

Moderators can but have plenty on their plate. In the past where some of the Thais have handed/sold their profile on to another girl we've just lived with it and it sometimes gets mentioned when a new review is posted. I'll report it and see what they think.

Appreciated, thanks mate :drinks:

Offline chadpitt

Why?   :unknown:

Is it just that you don't like them?  My personal hate is throat tatts.

Tattoos are generally bad but collarbone can mean pimped

Offline scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,503
  • Likes: 238
  •  
  • Reviews: 175
Tattoos are generally bad but collarbone can mean pimped

Aah, like branding. Thanks.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,510
  • Likes: 553
  •  
  • Reviews: 505
Well deduced Paul  :drinks:

I'm not sure what can be done about this. Helpers are able to add a profile for indexing, eg when an SP gets a new profile we will index her old profile to new reviews so they can't shed their history. This is all an "addition" to the indexing. To unpick the crossover however requires indexing to be removed, ie a "subtraction". Helpers are not able to do this which is why we have to be certain before indexing old profiles against new reviews.

Moderators can but have plenty on their plate. In the past where some of the Thais have handed/sold their profile on to another girl we've just lived with it and it sometimes gets mentioned when a new review is posted. I'll report it and see what they think.

I’ll have a play later matey,struggling today to pull it in but will fix  :drinks:

Offline scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,503
  • Likes: 238
  •  
  • Reviews: 175
I’ll have a play later matey,struggling today to pull it in but will fix  :drinks:

Very good of you  :drinks: