Hannah Ranel - Durham

[Mick2342234]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Possibly a bait and switch but I'll go through it and let you decide.

Location - Village about 15 minutes from Durham. Terraced house on the main road. House itself is decent inside so you don't walk in sensing something is wrong.

Date -  In the past couple of weeks.

Girl -  This is the issue. The woman on AW is athletic/toned with fake tits. This woman was still attractive but was much more curvy, and had scars I would presume were from weight loss surgery. Weren't overly visible when we got down to it and frankly if she'd been the woman I saw on AW I'd have still probably booked her. Her tits weren't fake like the AW profile suggested but seemed like she'd had breast reduction surgery, but they were still quite big and felt good. The tattoos don't match either. Her english was really good, and she presented as really friendly. I just don't think she's ever been the woman in the pictures.

Price - £70 for 30 minutes. I did have an idea that this was ridiculously low for a woman as attractive as the AW profile shows.

Services -  I'm aware her profile includes anal and things like that but I didn't ask for that (I'm also never bothered about kissing or CIM so didn't ask). We got naked, she gave me a protected BJ whilst I stood, then we got on the bed. We only ended up fucking in 3 positions before she then moved onto the handjob and finished me off. She is good at it, but she really rushed me through it. I was out of there in about 15 minutes including changing. I don't know if she generally rushes people through it or if she had another meeting booked and wanted to rush me out of there.

Overall I've given a negative by default as I think there was a bait and switch, but also because it was like speedrunning sex, far too rushed. I'm not actually overly bothered but I want other people to be aware of the experience you might get. Had this been a 15 minute booking pump and dump I'd be considering overlooking the bait and switch for a neutral to be honest.

[The Outsider]

For me, any bait and switch would be a negative for dishonesty.  I'm tempted to say the same for any profiles with ASCII "art".   

This particular SP has 55 viewable free photos.  That should be enough to work to for certain if it's who you saw.  I'd have thought a bait and switch would keep photos to a minimum to make it harder to spot the deception. 

[Mick2342234]

Yeah you’re probably right. It’s just that part of me isn’t actually disappointed in the person I saw as I’d gladly pay £70 to see the worker I saw, just not as a B&S or for a shortened meet.

 I probably should be clearer that I absolutely do not beleive I saw the woman in the pictures. Either she’s taken over the account or the original lady just lends it out to anyone vaguely similar (blonde big tits and tattoos) looking when she’s not around.

She’d have to have gained enough weight since the profile photos were taken to justify weight loss surgery, had the surgery and then change up the tattoos completely with no trace of the change. Facially she wasn’t particularly close either.

[The Outsider]

Yes, it could be the person in the photos has sold the profile. 

I know some reviewers happily give a positive if they enjoy the meet regardless of it being a B&S and I can see the logic.  Anyway, thanks for the heads up that there's something not quite right. 

[Snagbadjer]

She's in my city currently. I noticed she has positive reviews going back ten years. So the likelihood is she's long gone and has sold the profile on. OR it's her but she's well into her forties or and bears little resemblance now to the photos likely taken ten years ago.