Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Adultwork feeback is a load of bollocks!  (Read 2638 times)

I've noticed another favourite punter's cliche on AW feedback is "well, what can I say?". Which is invariably followd by nothing worth saying. Like most of the feedback, in fact. Indeed, so predictable and cliche-ridden is the feedback that it almost looks as though it was all written by the same five people. But I suppose there are just so many different ways of describing a shag, and Adultwork has them all several times over.

    The only point to AW feedback is does she have negatives or is it withheld , in both cases best to just move on.

Is the correct answer.

Offline helmsdale

I pride myself on being a gentleman and also being kind and courteous to all women whatever their chosen profession, so I have no problems with being called a 'gentleman' and 'lovely' on my AW feedback.

It is a generational thing which is why the number of WGs who don't want to see young men are far more in number than those who exclude older men.
Banning reason: Making race postings after being barred from Off-Topic section for racist comments. Used up all chances.

Offline Trevor12

As I've said in another post I use the aw feedback to cross reference whether a wg is fake or not. The "wow" and "special" etc have no meaning to me but real punter and real wg do.

This is the only thing I use AW feedback for too. If a girl has feedback from a punter who has feedback from girls I have seen or know to be genuine, then I know she is a real WG. But this is no indication of her quality of service.

A few sentences on here by a credible punter carries much more weight than dozens of AW feedbacks.

Offline 306

feed back from a punter with 3 or less feed back himself cant be relied on
but feed back from a punter with 20-30 can often be used to find other wg you may like ?
 :manhater:
Banning reason: Constantly making nonsensical useless posts + Constantly ignoring admin requests

Offline 306

also check feed back even is number is zero as may have some feed back shown from non confirmed meetings ? :vomit:
Banning reason: Constantly making nonsensical useless posts + Constantly ignoring admin requests

Offline cueball

Quote from: Trevor12 link=topic=45625.msg603124#msg603124 date=1420304083
A few sentences on here by a credible punter carries much more weight than dozens of AW feedbacks.
[/quote

Agreed, credible to me means more than one post and a few reviews, especially more than one post. I'm a bit cagey when I see a review from a punter with only one post

feed back from a punter with 3 or less feed back himself cant be relied on
but feed back from a punter with 20-30 can often be used to find other wg you may like ?
 :manhater:

That rules me out, as I have only 4 feed back, as I don't punt a lot, due to poor health, but I find when I email an escort, even the ones who say, will only see someone with  5+, there willing to see me, as Im always polite in my email

also check feed back even is number is zero as may have some feed back shown from non confirmed meetings ? :vomit:

Also check the feedback of the person who left the feedback, see who he has been seeing,

For instance did one of the guys who left feed, has he seen an escort who offer bareback

This is the only thing I use AW feedback for too. If a girl has feedback from a punter who has feedback from girls I have seen or know to be genuine, then I know she is a real WG. But this is no indication of her quality of service.

A few sentences on here by a credible punter carries much more weight than dozens of AW feedbacks.

I agree with this. The only other thing I look for if profile has no face pics, are there comments on her looks. If LOTS say she is pretty, I hope that she might be half decent but if NOBODY comments on her looks, I assume 5/10 at best.

Offline sam55

Also check the feedback of the person who left the feedback, see who he has been seeing,

For instance did one of the guys who left feed, has he seen an escort who offer bareback

I always check the feedback of guys who left feedback.
As has been said on here before, there are a few professional feed backers! We've all seen examples of the guy with 4 FB's, all in a week for the same WG.
I always feel more comfortable if the guy has seen someone else that I've seen as well.

I pride myself on being a gentleman and also being kind and courteous to all women whatever their chosen profession, so I have no problems with being called a 'gentleman' and 'lovely' on my AW feedback.

Completely agree - equally I do not ask for FB either - if it happens then so be it

 :rolleyes:

Offline 385North

One thing I've recently noticed is that punters book two single hours back-to-back instead of one single two hour booking, allowing them to double-up on the feedback for what is essentially one session. A crafty trick for increasing your feedback count, if that sort of thing matters.

Offline Sedlmayer

This is the only thing I use AW feedback for too. If a girl has feedback from a punter who has feedback from girls I have seen or know to be genuine, then I know she is a real WG. But this is no indication of her quality of service.

A few sentences on here by a credible punter carries much more weight than dozens of AW feedbacks.

Yes, of course, but the cross-referencing that you describe is something that I do myself, and I think it's well worthwhile. Screens out all sorts of scammers and timewasters in my experience.


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)