Author Topic: Gabi - Edinburgh Incall.  (Read 3393 times)


30 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7744229) (25 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Davey Dykes]

Offline Bazookaswagger

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I noticed Gabi's profile had returned to Edinburgh, and she's been on my hotlist for a while.
 Found myself at loose end recently after a shift got cancelled, enquired night before, confirmed by text on the day.

Comm's we're all by sms, quick to respond. Called me when at location, to direct me to her door.

Located in, nice cosy apartment near the Ingleby Gallery. Good shower, just off boudoir.

Paid £160 for 1 hour of Gabi's company.

Girl - would pass for younger than 29, photos on profile are good representation , she's even better in the flesh...Very attractive face, attached to a banging body. Soft boobs, slight scarring, doesn't detract from her lovely curvy physique. Firm bottom, she's all in great proportion.

Was very happy with Gabby's look, all in white - lingerie, suspenders, fishnet stockings,& heels.
Hug hello, through to room, requested shower, left donation on bedside.

Freshened up, and joined her in room, light chat led to mutual touching, kissing, as we sat on side of bed.
Gabby got down between my legs, and was expecting her to take me in her mouth, but she reached into drawer, and produced a dom. Asked if she did oral without, and she said, she did in the past, but not anymore. :cry:

Tbh, I did note this from her likes list, but having read her previous reviews,  where she had provided this service, i was hopeful.
Oral was still decent, but I did feel disappointed, though tried not to let it ruin the moment.

Progressed to 69, and she has a great ass to fondle. Tasted nice, & fresh, enjoyed giving her clit a good tongue lashing, and probing her pussy. :P
Got gabby on her back she was juicing up nicely, and even though she wasn't keen on fingers inside, I managed to get her making the right noises.

Highlight for me next was CG, and she does it well, good rythym, and varying her speed, & movements - Twerking, leaning back, and leaning in as I licked, & sucked her responsive nipples.

G then squatted on me, pumping my cock,  as I savoured the view, and cupping her bum cheeks...

Onto mish, slow build up, more kissing, feeling her all over, had her legs in various positions, felt fab, her pretty little feet around my ears, dipping deeply.
Doggy followed, and what a figure she has, FAF !
Had to get G to ease off, as she bucked herself into me - ( using her mini vibrator, was doing the trick)...
Couldn't get enough of her firm butt sliding onto my pole - I reached around cupping her breast, and gave it some pelvic, and couldn't hold back, shot my load, a very satisfying finish.

Had a quick clean up, declined the shower, accepted the glass of water, as we chatted, and I got dressed.

 Gabi's English is very good, which helped the session flow smoothly. Not a clock watcher, never saw her check time, and never came up. Left with a kiss, and a hug at door, glad I'd paid her a visit.

A hot, horny Brazilian delight, she definitely is!
Despite the OWO, being off the menu, i would return for more fun with Gabi  :thumbsup:
 

« Last Edit: May 20, 2026, 07:04:50 pm by Head1 »

Offline Bazookaswagger

Yeah mate, I know, it's just she contacted me yesterday through text& WhatsApp, having a big rant, about how I stole her photos, and threatening to report me to escorts site, and AW.
I was going to try, and explain to her she's the one who put these images out there for public viewing,  in the 1st place, but didn't want to wind her up anymore, as she came across quite hostile.
She was okay about the review, it was the images, & her privacy, that she had a grievance about.
I'm not fussed, if you want to remove it altogether , save some hassle.
Thanks for reading. :thumbsup:

Offline Hottest Kat

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 5
  • Likes: 14
  •  

Its a requirement by AW that the front 3 pics on your profile are not published anywhere else or they may remove your profile.
« Last Edit: May 20, 2026, 07:07:35 pm by Head1 »

Offline Bazookaswagger

I wasn't aware of that Kat, thanks for the info.
Needless to say I wont be attaching anymore images to reviews, and I'd be quite happy if one of the moderators, could cut these pics from Gabi's reviews, or remove the whole thing altogether.
Cheers.

Offline KatieEdinburgh

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 140
  • Likes: 71
  •  
Its a requirement by AW that the front 3 pics on your profile are not published anywhere else or they may remove your profile.

Yes claiming she is being “hostile” wanting the images taken down and that she’s ranting when she wasn’t even asking for review to be deleted only the images

Rather doing this risks her literally getting banned from AW. Punters never consider it from our side  :thumbsdown:

Edit-Got a reply before I’d finished posting. Glad you know this now  :hi:
In your defence there’s no way of being aware of that rule without being told. Its confusing
« Last Edit: May 20, 2026, 01:49:26 pm by KatieEdinburgh »

Offline Artigas

Let’s be clear - the person who has broken Adultwork rules and breached the SP’s copyright is the reviewer.  Adultwork is very clear that a girl’s photos belong to that girl, and she can delete them anytime.  (And some do, when they take a break or retire.)  By pilfering the images from Adultwork and putting them on display here he has deprived her of control of her own image.  The public domain argument doesn’t wash - an Adultwork image is temporary and the SP can remove it at any time without anyone’s permission.  But once posted on UKP it is permanent and she has no power to remove it.  That is a big difference.  I would hope that a reputable site like UKP will not allow itself to be made complicit in image theft when the victim has made it quite clear that she does not consent and it is against her will. 

« Last Edit: May 21, 2026, 08:47:38 am by Iloveoral »

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,547
  • Likes: 730
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Let’s be clear - the person who has broken Adultwork rules and breached the SP’s copyright is the reviewer.  Adultwork is very clear that a girl’s photos belong to that girl, and she can delete them anytime.  (And some do, when they take a break or retire.)  By pilfering the images from Adultwork and putting them on display here he has deprived her of control of her own image.  The public domain argument doesn’t wash - an Adultwork image is temporary and the SP can remove it at any time without anyone’s permission.  But once posted on UKP it is permanent and she has no power to remove it.  That is a big difference.  I would hope that a reputable site like UKP will not allow itself to be made complicit in image theft when the victim has made it quite clear that she does not consent and it is against her will. 
Escorts are advertising sexual services and use photos to attract customers, on here we only allow pictures that are on general display, free to view and showing on a current advert. We do not allow any from private galleries, social media or any other source and that includes reposting those already on the site.

Personally I think you should concentrate on making meaningful contributions to this escort review site you are a member of and leave the service providers to raise any concerns they have directly.