Freya Le Roux - Gateshead

[Smeaton]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Happened around 4 weeks ago.

Very positive review. She’s well reviewed on here but my first time. Passing through on work and got in touch a couple of days before for a one hour incall. Quick replies, confirmed in the morning before 9am as requested.

Plenty parking nearby which she told me about in advance. Modern apartment with easy directions.

She’s shortly only seeing repeat clients so I’m glad I got in there before the cut off. Buzzed in, met at the door. Very attractive, dressed in nice underwear, friendly and smiley. She’s not alone, she mentioned another women but not sure who. One hour £200 then into the shower. Five minutes of chat then OWO until CIM

Twenty minutes of chat then at it again. OWO then rubbered up and a mixture of positions finishing in doggy.

She’s around size 6/8. Great figure, good make up and a real head turner. Fake boobs which I didn’t play about with much as they are new and she does have tape/plasters on them, so I’m guessing not yet fully healed.

Very nice, friendly goodbye and I’d return.

[LipLover]

She had them done in March 2025 (mentioned on EH) so does that mean they have been done again? I think her room mate is External Link/Members Only

[LondonDominic]

It's a shame she has fake tits, otherwise I probably would have given her a call.

[Snipper]

My understanding is that problems arose after the first operation and the second was necessary to put things right.

I agree that her flatmate is likely to be Amber as they work together.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

[Amberofnewcastle]

could some one kindly explain why we are being mentioned on here ? when we have strict information on both our profiles that we  do not wish to be reviewed here as in the past, we have found people share personal info , that could potentially out us ! Also very specific details of our work place etc. we both like to work as discrete as possible without our personal info be shared.

[The Outsider]

could some one kindly explain why we are being mentioned on here ? when we have strict information on both our profiles that we  do not wish to be reviewed here as in the past, we have found people share personal info , that could potentially out us ! Also very specific details of our work place etc. we both like to work as discrete as possible without our personal info be shared.

There's nothing in that review that would compromise yours or Freya's privacy or safety.  More generally, you don't actually get to choose whether you are reviewed here or not, so long as the site rules are followed. 

Your only sanction is to blacklist the client and refuse a repeat booking.  I suppose you could also mention something on one of your own warning sites/groups but Smeaton might not wish to be written about and I'm sure you'd respect his choice? 

[Amberofnewcastle]

i believe freya has this posted on her Aw too , she is not a member here so im posting on behalf of us both

Hidden Image/Members Only

[The Outsider]

i believe freya has this posted on her Aw too , she is not a member here so im posting on behalf of us both

Hidden Image/Members Only

That's just a request though, or a personal rule.  You've made a request, the reviewer has decided not to comply.  That's his choice.  All Freya can do is choose not see the reviewer again if she is able to work out who it is. You are being discussed here because this site isn't bound by your preferences. 

It's maybe a bit discourteous to ignore her clearly stated policy, but that's life.  The more you complain, the more attention you bring to the review. 

[Kev3773]

could some one kindly explain why we are being mentioned on here ? when we have strict information on both our profiles that we  do not wish to be reviewed here as in the past, we have found people share personal info , that could potentially out us ! Also very specific details of our work place etc. we both like to work as discrete as possible without our personal info be shared.

It's quite simple really, you have no say on what people choose to post on here.
If you want to stay totally anonymous, you may be in the wrong business.
Also where in the review shows "specific details of your workplace" ?

[Amberofnewcastle]

it says in the past we have had …….. I did not say in this review particular.  Yes they are requests, the same kind of requests made   by girls for  eg they do not wish to see black or asian clients or I dont wish to  be handled rough eg hair puling etc ! We may of chose to work in this industry however we do get to choose who we see. Our bodies ! our rules! maybe another reason why freya wishes to only entertain regular clients. As it seems OUR Rules do and donts are getting harder to abide by. Im not here to argue, I was just genuinely interested why this review had been posted when freya herself has requested not to be. I will leave it there, i dont wish to get in a heated debate.

[Shutty238]

Perhaps the request would be better if it accepts that punters will wish to review escorts, but asks that it is done with utmost respect for discretion.
I always write my reviews in a way that doesn't compromise personal details or could potentially identify either individual (although sure wouldn't take much for the SP to work out who's who). I review every new SP I meet and would ignore requests not to.

Some reviewers are clearly misogynistic delusional pricks but in the vast vast minority and these are usually held to account by other members and the mobs, most of us benefit from the layer of safety this site offers when it comes to spending our cash and placing ourselves in a position of vulnerability. As Freya moves towards regulars only as is her preference, I'm sure she will have benefitted from the excellent reputation she has gained here to do so.
Good luck to her.

[daviemac]

it says in the past we have had …….. I did not say in this review particular.  Yes they are requests, the same kind of requests made   by girls for  eg they do not wish to see black or asian clients or I dont wish to  be handled rough eg hair puling etc ! We may of chose to work in this industry however we do get to choose who we see. Our bodies ! our rules! maybe another reason why freya wishes to only entertain regular clients. As it seems OUR Rules do and donts are getting harder to abide by. Im not here to argue, I was just genuinely interested why this review had been posted when freya herself has requested not to be. I will leave it there, i dont wish to get in a heated debate.

This is an escort review site Amber and as such we encourage reviews but have no control over a client's decision to post a review or not, that is something between the provider and him.

We do however discourage misogynistic posts as well as having strict rules regarding what personal information can be posted. We do not allow social media links of any kind, we only allow pictures that are publicly available at the time of posting, we only allow a general description of the SP's location not street names etc and only phone numbers showing on a linked to advert or website can be posted.

It is not in a punter's best interest to 'out' an SP or cause them any issues, there needs to be a balance between discretion and the information a punters needs in order to make an informed decision whether to book or not.

[puntingking]

i believe freya has this posted on her Aw too , she is not a member here so im posting on behalf of us both

Hidden Image/Members Only

She may not want a review posted on here about a punter experience with her, however this site is to benefit punters and not service providers.

I don't want my mobile number posted on clienteye either, yet service providers do post my details on there in the past as "timewaster" when that is not even correct.

Go and tell sps about client eye if you truly believe in service providers rights to be protected here as well. Same rules should apply, no 

Edit - I am also wary off sps who do not want a review on here done of them, I expect shit service anyway so I safely ignore these sps anyhow 

[Foxtail17]

She may not want a review posted on here about a punter experience with her, however this site is to benefit punters and not service providers.

I don't want my mobile number posted on clienteye either, yet service providers do post my details on there in the past as "timewaster" when that is not even correct.

Go and tell sps about client eye if you truly believe in service providers rights to be protected here as well. Same rules should apply, no 

Edit - I am also wary off sps who do not want a review on here done of them, I expect shit service anyway so I safely ignore these sps anyhow 

Totally agree with what you say.

I had a ‘warning’ against me on SAAFE that was put up by a lady I not only never seen I had not ever visited the city she worked in.
I did know who she was and sent her an AW message telling her she was wrong. It got removed but she didn’t have the class or manners to explain why or apologise.

[AgedCases]

Just for the record, I didn't appreciate someone alerting an SP I gave a neutral review to just so she could harass me. It cuts both ways.

[puntingking]

Just for the record, I didn't appreciate someone alerting an SP I gave a neutral review to just so she could harass me. It cuts both ways.

Totally agree with what you say.

I had a ‘warning’ against me on SAAFE that was put up by a lady I not only never seen I had not ever visited the city she worked in.
I did know who she was and sent her an AW message telling her she was wrong. It got removed but she didn’t have the class or manners to explain why or apologise.

 

[MaxVerstappen]

She may not want a review posted on here about a punter experience with her, however this site is to benefit punters and not service providers.

I don't want my mobile number posted on clienteye either, yet service providers do post my details on there in the past as "timewaster" when that is not even correct.

Well said.

Believe it or not some of these girls report your number because you simply walked as the pictures did not represent the girl whatsoever, taken 10 plus years ago etc etc... but they will put it down to as you being a timewaster. 

[Shyandrew2001]

My number has been posted on clienteye or saafe in the past, unsure which. And oddly enough a few years ago I had a booking 'cancelled' by amber herself while I was on my way to a bookinh with her, quite a way into a 45 minute journey. She would only see me once contacted her on aw so she could see my feedback.

No idea who posted my number as I've never had an issue with any girl I've seen to be outed as either dangerous or a time waster

[Foxtail17]

I notice another couple of SPs kicking off about this thread over on EH.

Maybe us punters should put on our profiles ‘it is a condition of accepting our money that you provide the services you agreed to at the time of booking!!’

[The Outsider]

I totally understand why an SP doesn't want to be reviewed, even if it's a positive like this one.  It's a private, intimate and very personal thing that is being reported on.  I can also see that reviewing a session is objectively a breach of trust.  However, this is an expensive and occasionally dangerous pastime.

Good SP's (like those involved here) assume that most other providers are like them, just like a good punter assumes all other punters are also clean, respectful, etc. 

One look at the red reviews on here shows why punters need some sort of protection from scams and bad service.  That's why I breach that trust and would most likely still do a review despite a generic request not to.  We need this place, and SP's need Client Eye. 

[Amberofnewcastle]

rather than breach trust why not just go see a sp that doesnt mind being reviewed ? than go see one that DOES !!! its a bit like going seeing a sp who does Ow but you want owo ! u gonna breach that too ? just a thoight    Its called respecting some ones wishes 

[Kev3773]

rather than breach trust why not just go see a sp that doesnt mind being reviewed ? than go see one that DOES !!! its a bit like going seeing a sp who does Ow but you want owo ! u gonna breach that too ? just a thoight    Its called respecting some ones wishes 

Thought you were " leaving it there" ^ Can't help yourself can you, it's a punters review forum 

[The Outsider]

rather than breach trust why not just go see a sp that doesnt mind being reviewed ? than go see one that DOES !!! its a bit like going seeing a sp who does Ow but you want owo ! u gonna breach that too ? just a thoight    Its called respecting some ones wishes 

Assuming that's aimed at me, I don't agree that you're comparing like for like.  To respectfully review a punt for the benefit of others is nothing like pushing for services that are not on offer.  I condemn any actual physical boundary pushing, or anything that affects your safety.  I don't imagine any SP actually enjoys being reviewed, but it is part of the deal in any service industry. 

For what it's worth I personally will be reducing my hotlist to reflect the strength of feeling on the subject.  That's a shame because I have enjoyed the company of some of those involved, and I'm sure there are many worse punters around here than a few of us who report online on our activities. 

[Shyandrew2001]

rather than breach trust why not just go see a sp that doesnt mind being reviewed ? than go see one that DOES !!! its a bit like going seeing a sp who does Ow but you want owo ! u gonna breach that too ? just a thoight    Its called respecting some ones wishes 

Genuine question, if no one did reviews, here or aw and work dried up, what would you do? It's the reviews that make girls popular, without them your client base likely drops off a cliff.

[puntingking]

rather than breach trust why not just go see a sp that doesnt mind being reviewed ? than go see one that DOES !!! its a bit like going seeing a sp who does Ow but you want owo ! u gonna breach that too ? just a thoight    Its called respecting some ones wishes 

no different than typing up a google review of another type of business   

[Iloveoral]

rather than breach trust why not just go see a sp that doesnt mind being reviewed ? than go see one that DOES !!! its a bit like going seeing a sp who does Ow but you want owo ! u gonna breach that too ? just a thoight    Its called respecting some ones wishes 

10 Review deletion
That is impossible, as the notice on the review creation page made clear.

That’s the site rules.

There’s nothing in the review that would identify you or compromise your privacy.
If you feel there is, you are welcome to message me, I’ll review it again but we don’t delete reviews.

[Mr Garmin]

Once a girl gets a really good reputation on here she will probably get inundated with messages to meet.  There have been instances where a newish girl gets good reviews here and is so overwhelmed by enquiries that she stops working.

I have a girl on my hot list who's been around for a while.  I put her on my list because she fits the profile, demographic and location of who I'd like to see.  She had little feedback until a couple of good ones here and then her popularity took off and she is now a low level forum darling with no negatives on here.

Funnily enough, I've had Freya on my HL forever but I almost never get that far north.

[puntingking]

rather than breach trust why not just go see a sp that doesnt mind being reviewed ? than go see one that DOES !!! its a bit like going seeing a sp who does Ow but you want owo ! u gonna breach that too ? just a thoight    Its called respecting some ones wishes 

The only ones who should not want a review done of them is the sps who offer a rubbish service. Good sps have nothing to fear from a few positive reviews, if anything most of them would be delighted with it. 

[nightdriver76]

I was told by a SP once that she hates reviews on here as afterwards she just gets inundated with time wasters

[Shutty238]

I'm not sure there'll be any more SP comments here, but I'm personally interested to know what it is about this particular site that is so triggering.
Amber's screen shot of Freya's request suggests she welcomes feedback and field reports on AW as these are more respectful, but the last one states "Freya sucks and fucks and takes every inch" and goes into incredible detail. This is far more disrespectful than this review in my opinion.

Being honest the speculation about an intimate procedure is perhaps a bit OTT, but my recollection is this was openly shared on her profile along the lines of "be gentle" or something.

I did think it had been a bit calm in the NE for a while...

[alabama1]

rather than breach trust why not just go see a sp that doesnt mind being reviewed ? than go see one that DOES !!! its a bit like going seeing a sp who does Ow but you want owo ! u gonna breach that too ? just a thoight    Its called respecting some ones wishes 

Sounds to me that some of you lot want your cake and to eat it ! 

[MaxVerstappen]

I'm not sure there'll be any more SP comments here, but I'm personally interested to know what it is about this particular site that is so triggering.
Amber's screen shot of Freya's request suggests she welcomes feedback and field reports on AW as these are more respectful, but the last one states "Freya sucks and fucks and takes every inch" and goes into incredible detail. This is far more disrespectful than this review in my opinion.

Being honest the speculation about an intimate procedure is perhaps a bit OTT, but my recollection is this was openly shared on her profile along the lines of "be gentle" or something.

I did think it had been a bit calm in the NE for a while...

  Talk about being a hypocrite.

[Foxtail17]

Amber's screen shot of Freya's request suggests she welcomes feedback and field reports on AW as these are more respectful, but the last one states "Freya sucks and fucks and takes every inch" and goes into incredible detail. This is far more disrespectful than this review in my opinion.

I think it is probably about trying to control the narrative.
My guess is that the explicit field report was left by a regular the escort doesn’t want to lose and so approved it to be published on her profile (I believe escorts can choose if a FR is used or not)

[RandomGuy99]

I think most SSs think of reviews as being helpful to both the SP and other SSs. They don't see them as negatively affecting the SP unless it's a negative review.

I think SPs have a different view, which is that they just want to quietly and discreetly get on with their business with as little drama as possible. SPs tolerate reviews on here because they must help drive business their way and when a review gets posted they must see an increase in contact from SSs and know that they're members on here. SPs also experience stress and pressure as a result of reading reviews as SSs read them and expect the exact same service which is unlikely to happen. The SP will still endeavour to deliver a good experience but having a good experience with an SP takes the SP and the SS to work together on the booking to make it happen and that sometimes doesn't happen for a variety of reasons - sometimes the fault of the SP and sometimes the fault of the SS and sometimes through misset expectations from reading a review. Everyone has a unique experience.

I think SPs dislike the sometimes graphic or unfaltering language some SSs sometimes use to describe the physical appearance of an SP and they dislike the oversharing of private conversations that take place in bookings and their personal information being added to a review for all to read forever more. They probably don't want their medical history shared on websites as that in itself could help someone identify and out them.

Some SPs do request that SSs don't review them as they just don't want the drama that can happen because of a review especially if they already have plenty of reviews on here that prove they deliver what they say for the fee you pay them. It doesn't matter if the review is positive or negative. They can all cause drama or even just a huge spike in enquiries that an SP may struggle to handle.

It's down to personal choice and whether you want to respect the wishes of the SP.

[daviemac]

I think SPs dislike the sometimes graphic or unfaltering language some SSs sometimes use to describe the physical appearance of an SP and they dislike the oversharing of private conversations that take place in bookings and their personal information being added to a review for all to read forever more. They probably don't want their medical history shared on websites as that in itself could help someone identify and out them.

Some SPs do request that SSs don't review them as they just don't want the drama that can happen because of a review especially if they already have plenty of reviews on here that prove they deliver what they say for the fee you pay them. It doesn't matter if the review is positive or negative. They can all cause drama or even just a huge spike in enquiries that an SP may struggle to handle.

It's down to personal choice and whether you want to respect the wishes of the SP.

We don't allow personal or medical information to be posted?   

Have to say this review is tame compared to the field report on AW that Freya sanctioned to be published. Doesn't make sense.

[RandomGuy99]

We don't allow personal or medical information to be posted?   

Have to say this review is tame compared to the field report on AW that Freya sanctioned to be published. Doesn't make sense.

Isn't saying she's recently had boob surgery and had similar surgery before medical history?

I agree that this review is tame though but clearly there's a sensitivity possibly from previous experience.

[daviemac]

Isn't saying she's recently had boob surgery and had similar surgery before medical history?

It's no secret she's had a boob job, however if she's working before they're fully healed that is something we should be aware of.

Do you actually mean we should never mention an escort has fake tits because of the medical nature of the operation? 

[RandomGuy99]

Do you actually mean we should never mention an escort has fake tits because of the medical nature of the operation? 

Definitely not. That's fine. I was thinking that this is two boob jobs in succession and that might be unusual and potentially usable to identify her.

[daviemac]

Definitely not. That's fine. I was thinking that this is two boob jobs in succession and that might be unusual and potentially usable to identify her.

Like I said if she still has plasters / tape on them it's something we should be aware of. If she'd waited until they were fully healed the only mention would have been that they were fake not that they had been redone.

[puntingking]

Sounds to me that some of you lot want your cake and to eat it ! 

Without sounding sexist here, it does seem women these days are like this now. A lot of women like everything to be female centric and spoken only from a female perspective with no male view points are allowed in their eyes. 

They seem to want all the power all of the time. Not all women obviously but a lot of them modern ones. 

[puntingking]

I was told by a SP once that she hates reviews on here as afterwards she just gets inundated with time wasters

But for the sp to avoid the time wasters she can simply block them and move on from them. Then she would only see good guys that saw a review of her on here and thought they would like to spend some time with her.
I don't think this is a reason to hate reviews.

Most members on here I would think are gentlemen and have courtesy and politeness when seeing sps.

[RandomGuy99]

But for the sp to avoid the time wasters she can simply block them and move on from them. Then she would only see good guys that saw a review of her on here and thought they would like to spend some time with her.
I don't think this is a reason to hate reviews.

Most members on here I would think are gentlemen and have courtesy and politeness when seeing sps.

There's a lot that don't chat in the forums, so difficult to say.

[koshkaj]

i have never really understood why SPs complain about UKP.

the most common reason seems to be "i don't like how they talk about women". i have also seen "i am going to get killed one day because of that site" and both SPs allowed and encouraged reviews and field reports on AW in as much graphic detail as possible. we may not like how SPs talk about us on their forums, but we don't expect them not to do it because it is against our wishes. and they would laugh in our face if we made that request. trying to equate this with pushing an SP's stated boundaries/preferences is being wilfully disingenuous.

it's essentially the same information here that is on AW, but without the fakeness of feedback - SP gives a bad service, but SS feels unable to leave a negative review due to fear of a retaliation neg from the SP which has a much wider effect on the punter only - which is a good thing for punters. The mod team here do not allow anything such as too much personal detail, exact location, real names etc. Also, if an SP is unhappy with a review, they can report it to the mod team to be reviewed and edited as needed

Talking about respect after reading Freya's last field report is bonkers 

Unless.... The reason SPs don't like UKP is because they don't have the option to hide their feedback here like they can on AW?

[puntingking]

There's a lot that don't chat in the forums, so difficult to say.

 

[puntingking]

i have never really understood why SPs complain about UKP.

the most common reason seems to be "i don't like how they talk about women". i have also seen "i am going to get killed one day because of that site" and both SPs allowed and encouraged reviews and field reports on AW in as much graphic detail as possible. we may not like how SPs talk about us on their forums, but we don't expect them not to do it because it is against our wishes. and they would laugh in our face if we made that request. trying to equate this with pushing an SP's stated boundaries/preferences is being wilfully disingenuous.

it's essentially the same information here that is on AW, but without the fakeness of feedback - SP gives a bad service, but SS feels unable to leave a negative review due to fear of a retaliation neg from the SP which has a much wider effect on the punter only - which is a good thing for punters. The mod team here do not allow anything such as too much personal detail, exact location, real names etc. Also, if an SP is unhappy with a review, they can report it to the mod team to be reviewed and edited as needed

Talking about respect after reading Freya's last field report is bonkers 

Unless.... The reason SPs don't like UKP is because they don't have the option to hide their feedback here like they can on AW?

Well said 

[The Outsider]

Talking about respect after reading Freya's last field report is bonkers 

Unless.... The reason SPs don't like UKP is because they don't have the option to hide their feedback here like they can on AW?

Isn't it just? Apparently it's OK to be vulgar and overshare on AW, but not here.  Or is it only OK if you book 6 hour appointments with them?  This isn't about respect, privacy, or safety.  It's about control, and the fact that we can report accurately on here without censorship or retaliation unlike on AW. 

The great irony is that the person I can remember doing most damage to Freya's privacy is Freya herself.  She used to post face pictures online then wonder why people around her knew what she did as a job.  You couldn't make it up. 

As for Amber, am I the only one that remembers when it was widely reported that she tried to "out" a relative of hers to their family for doing the very same job?  And yet, we're supposed to be the bad guys?  It doesn't stack up. 

[MaxVerstappen]

Isn't it just? Apparently it's OK to be vulgar and overshare on AW, but not here.  Or is it only OK if you book 6 hour appointments with them?  This isn't about respect, privacy, or safety.  It's about control, and the fact that we can report accurately on here without censorship or retaliation unlike on AW. 

Bingo. Well said my friend, well said 

[Kev3773]

It seems like Ambers complaining and trying to censor reviewers has backfired massively 

[MaxVerstappen]

It seems like Ambers complaining and trying to censor reviewers has backfired massively 

Yeah go figure.

It was just another day in the office when the OP posted his review, which didn’t reveal anything personal etc and by the sounds of it he had an amazing time with Freya.

Then all of the sudden, Freya’s mouthpiece aka Amber starts piping up out of nowhere for no reason at all.

Hopefully Freya has told Amber to stop posting on her behalf as she has done more harm than good with her posts imo.

[puntingking]

It seems like Ambers complaining and trying to censor reviewers has backfired massively 

+1

we don't tell them how they should operate the sex workers forum or client eye, so sex workers should not try to tell us who we can or can't review on a site that is dedicated for punters.