Author Topic: Mia Moist - Outcall - Central London  (Read 1609 times)


59 review(s) for MiaMoist (54 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Derrick101]

Offline gmoniey

External Link/Members Only
Rate: 220 for the hour (no extras)
Date: Within the last 6 months

Girl: The primary reason for the neutral is that I feel that her pictures (albeit limited) weren't an accurate reflection on her current body type. By her own admission, she has put on some weight recently. It was a bit of a letdown as I was expecting someone slimmer.

Action: The highlight was her OWO skills...as many others have mentioned, she's a pro here and really knows how to take it all down, gag properly and will go on until you tell her otherwise. The sex itself was ok...and to her credit, she was very eager to please. We went a second round just so I could get more OWO, but to be honest, I can't remember if I finished or not.

Overall, I will not be repeating.


Offline Richblackcock1996

Im trying to set up a booking with her, im booking a day pass hotel for an outcall session but she seems to be tight on the specific payment method for a deposit to be used. I dont have PayPal but shes sticking to that. Shame really i always wanted that slop

Offline shooter

Im trying to set up a booking with her, im booking a day pass hotel for an outcall session but she seems to be tight on the specific payment method for a deposit to be used. I dont have PayPal but shes sticking to that. Shame really i always wanted that slop

She does occasionally do incalls, worth checking her availability - looks like she will be offering some next week.  :hi:

Offline shooter

External Link/Members Only
Rate: 220 for the hour (no extras)
Date: Within the last 6 months

Girl: The primary reason for the neutral is that I feel that her pictures (albeit limited) weren't an accurate reflection on her current body type. By her own admission, she has put on some weight recently. It was a bit of a letdown as I was expecting someone slimmer.

In her photos, she doesnt look slim, more well built. When I saw her last year, she was a 12-14 I guess, was she bigger than that in your opinion?  :hi:

Offline gmoniey

In her photos, she doesnt look slim, more well built. When I saw her last year, she was a 12-14 I guess, was she bigger than that in your opinion?  :hi:

Correct...I wasn't expecting a toothpick, but I can say that she was bigger than her photos (to me at least).

But more specifically, the photo where she standing and her dress is halfway up her ass...it clearly shows a decent gap between her thighs, and in my opinion great legs...that was not the case. She also made the comment about having gained weight


Offline shooter

Correct...I wasn't expecting a toothpick, but I can say that she was bigger than her photos (to me at least).

But more specifically, the photo where she standing and her dress is halfway up her ass...it clearly shows a decent gap between her thighs, and in my opinion great legs...that was not the case. She also made the comment about having gained weight

 :hi: I didnt think she was bigger than the photos, but like you say, must have been recent. I still rate her as a SP (like your report, she does want to make sure you enjoy the booking). Maybe she will update the profile pics, they are a few years old for sure.

 :thumbsup: