Author Topic: FYI: Timewaster london_chloe  (Read 1281 times)

Offline rups

Just wanted to alert members that I found this English girl called "London Chloe" on Adultwork (see links below) to be a timewaster.  Her profile is light on detail, but I thought she might be worth exploring.  Received 3 short responses from her in response to successive messages that I sent.  Everything seemed to be progressing absolutely fine and then suddenly I was ghosted.  From my perspective there was nothing that I said in communications to prompt this - just all of a sudden she stopped communicating for no apparent reason.  Fully appreciate that it is a girl's prerogative to see whoever they like, but for 3 friendly received messages and then to just vanish is rather inexplicable.  I just wanted to flag to members that it might not be worth engaging with her.  Just to also note that there is small discrepancy on the profile (23 years old in her narrative vs 25 in the summary field information) although query whether this itself is material.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Any punter getting into a back and forth of text ping pong risks being considered a timewaster also.  All you have to do is ask if she's available at the date and time you want, confirm the services you want if any extras are involved and the postcode for the location of meet.  Takes 1 short opening message to communicate that. If call-taker is evasive, erratic and/or has limited English that can drag things out.  If c-t is responsive then they're keen to make a sale but if you stretch it out and start talking about something other than the booking you're the one wasting time. Consider all the calls they receive and the whackos involved, you want to meet an SP and have a chat that's fine once you've paid for their time.

This "alert" from you after just 3 messages speaks to your presumptuousness.  If it was the SP answering she may've had a punter arrive, if just a maid they may've had another phone to answer a call on, etc. There's no obligation for either to pick up on comms if they get busy or are dealing with people who are more efficient in confirming a booking.
Just because you're frustrated because you couldn't make a booking doesn't mean the SP isn't busy taking clients, especially if she's young and attractive. You aren't entitled to a booking.

Offline Stevelondon


Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,656
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
Any punter getting into a back and forth of text ping pong risks being considered a timewaster also.  All you have to do is ask if she's available at the date and time you want, confirm the services you want if any extras are involved and the postcode for the location of meet.  Takes 1 short opening message to communicate that. If call-taker is evasive, erratic and/or has limited English that can drag things out.  If c-t is responsive then they're keen to make a sale but if you stretch it out and start talking about something other than the booking you're the one wasting time. Consider all the calls they receive and the whackos involved, you want to meet an SP and have a chat that's fine once you've paid for their time.

This "alert" from you after just 3 messages speaks to your presumptuousness.  If it was the SP answering she may've had a punter arrive, if just a maid they may've had another phone to answer a call on, etc. There's no obligation for either to pick up on comms if they get busy or are dealing with people who are more efficient in confirming a booking.
Just because you're frustrated because you couldn't make a booking doesn't mean the SP isn't busy taking clients, especially if she's young and attractive. You aren't entitled to a booking.

+1

Offline rups

Any punter getting into a back and forth of text ping pong risks being considered a timewaster also. 

Simplistic viewpoint. You don't how the dynamic and the message flow.  Sure have you strong opinion based on pure guesswork.  I was just trying to help the community.   

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,001
  • Likes: 322
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Simplistic viewpoint. You don't how the dynamic and the message flow.  Sure have you strong opinion based on pure guesswork.  I was just trying to help the community.   

I'm inclined to agree with LLP.

Please share the message flow to give us more context.


Just wanted to alert members that I found this English girl called "London Chloe" on Adultwork (see links below) to be a timewaster

How did she waste your time?

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Simplistic viewpoint. You don't how the dynamic and the message flow.  Sure have you strong opinion based on pure guesswork.  I was just trying to help the community.   

What dynamic?  It was in your own words "3 short messages"... 

- Cum baby, I want you

- I suck you good

- When you cum baby?

Offline thisisitfororen

I've actually seen this SP last year and can confirm she's a great meet. Age is likely early/mid twenties, very GND vibe, slim body with slightly droopy tits. Facially about 5/6 but great service and conversationalist as a whole. I remember the OWO was fantastic.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,001
  • Likes: 322
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
I've actually seen this SP last year and can confirm she's a great meet. Age is likely early/mid twenties, very GND vibe, slim body with slightly droopy tits. Facially about 5/6 but great service and conversationalist as a whole. I remember the OWO was fantastic.

Shame that wasn't put in a review  :unknown: as she has none on here

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,296
  • Likes: 179
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I've actually seen this SP last year and can confirm she's a great meet. Age is likely early/mid twenties, very GND vibe, slim body with slightly droopy tits. Facially about 5/6 but great service and conversationalist as a whole. I remember the OWO was fantastic.

In the last 6 months?
Thanks for the counterpoint, please do review if still in statute of limitations  :hi:

Offline thisisitfororen

No unfortunately this was last year more than 6 months ago hence no review. Probably even more than a year ago, i dont recall when exactly as I've gotten a new phone since.

Offline Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,596
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Someone at least isn't keeping decent punts on the QT.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=454920

Coming in late to the thread but it feels like an overreaction from OP to call her a time waster. Some SPs are a little flaky on comms so a little patience might be required. Personally I would have just tried contacting her again on another day. If I'm getting nowhere, I might ask here to see if anyone is getting a response from her. If I'd made a booking and were ghosted, then that's a different story.

Offline thisisitfororen

Dont jump to conclusions too hard mate. I only joined UKP in the past year, and this profile is new. I saw the same SP but she had a different AW profile back then. My experience was nice enough, and would have been positive but at the price point, there are much better from my experience hence why I've not seen her again under this new profile. But you're right, what the OP is saying is a little too hard and in person, she is actually quite lovely and eager to please.