I have been active on the NE forum on UKP for some time now & you DO get a feeling about certain folk - I'm sure we all do - we think we know who is honest & who isn't....
My thoughts are not just based on why on earth she would want to do it, or if its totally out of her character to do have done it either. It also just doesn't seem actually feasible for it to have been her/her husband either.
I say this as I am fairly certain Stacey has 4 children all under 5 years old. As a result on the agency website she makes it clear its impossible to get in touch with her after 7pm. So it just seams totally un-feasible for either her or her husband to start a campaign till 4am in the morning like this with four rampaging kids in the house (imagine being in the house with four under 5s it would be bedlam).
After it happened when i emailed admin to ask for it to be locked i kept getting private numbers calling me all through the night til 4am giving me anxiety
Plus greychap immediately posted on the forums the result of his chat with her
Plus after phoning Amour and just mentioning the 2 girl situation in a polite way to see what they said was told
"This does not happen at Amour some people on ukp like to make up things to cause trouble they have nothing better to do and only have there computer to hide behind so please don't listen to any of it"
So Stacey/her husband would know anything else that would happen would be posted by greychap on the forums too. So it just seems unlikely Amour would specifically leave a voicemail (a provable thing) that all he needed to do was upload to the forum the very next day and they'd be ruined in the north east with cast iron proof showing what they did as there is the voice mail on his answer machine with her husbands voice as 100% proof this took place and they are threatening punters.
Plus if this was a case of a momentary lapse of anger by her husband who just done out of seeing red type anger from him seeing greychap posted the result of the last conversation online. Then again this is not the case as the person was phoning repeatedly all night till 4am. So this is not him doing something crazy out of seeing red. Its a prolonged campaign taking place all night. So if the guy was annoyed. He would have calmed down by way before 4am when he seen greychap was not answering the phone.
The other thing to add and that is greychap pretty much announced he had spoken to amour that night on the phone in his post on the forum so if anyone did have his number and wanted to screw amour over this is their perfect opportunity to. The fact that the number was withheld on his phone display means the person specifically done means to block the identifier of the call. So if they did that why would her husband then leave the physical proof of leaving a voice mail? As it would be obvious
it would be amour phoning him back that night (which is the exact issue now) so why then make the call withheld? Also greychap phoned her personal mobile that she gave so it wont have the withheld feature turned on by default as none of the girls who work for her would ever answer the phone to her when she rung them as WGs never answer withhelds for safety.
This is my thoughts. And I really don't think there are logic gaps in it. If there are people will highlight them.