Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.

Author Topic: Lux.Lucie - 833180 - Byfleet / Surrey based outcall  (Read 1413 times)

1 review(s) for lux.lucie (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]

Offline Quesadilla

On the first lay of Christmas my true lust gave to me - Lux Lucy - all over me!

Who Lux Lucie - https://www.adultwork.com/833180 or https://www.adultwork.com/lux%2Elucie
What 2 hour outcall to my place
How Much? £240 + £30 for A levels
When Christmas Eve '14!! :)
Why Had her in my HL for a while as she came up on my usual search for someone local who does all the services I like including A Levels.  She only has one pic on her profile which gives little away - I'd say is quite uninspiring to be honest.  And for some reason I'd stuck her in my HL without actually looking at her PG which is unlike me.  In the run up to Christmas I was going through my HL looking for girls who were showing as available over Christmas and she came up so I went ahead and checked out her PG.  Wow!

From her pics she looked just my type - a curvy brunette. Her face is mostly blocked out but enough shows to suggest she's quite cute / pretty.

Scores on the doors

Comms 9/10 - Responded promptly and positively to everything I threw at her.

Looks 6/10 - I find myself in the odd position of not being 100% sure I got the girl in the photo's.  Lucie tells me she was ill and has lost 3 stone in weight. She is currently listed as 7 1/2 stone / dress size 8. You can see immediately from the pics that's wrong - so it certainly makes sense that she may have lost all that weight. Obviously that would radically change someone's appearance but really she should get the pics updated as if you are expecting a cute curvy girl you will be disappointed. Also she is listed as 30 C boobs - clearly since losing weight this is also no longer accurate - I would say more B or even A cup.

Now, usually when a WG's pics don't match it's because she's put on weight which is usually not great, so actually I didn't mind.  She is certainly pretty in a girl-next-door way, has a sexy little bod although a little loose in places - e.g. the way her butt felt which was soft and squeezable rather than firm and pert I guess it would make sense that she lost a lot of weight.   She was not not unattractive to look and if you like your ladies slim she is definitely slim and sexy.
Attitude 9/10 - Very good service provider for sure - confident, easy to talk to, lots of energy and enthusiasm.  For me the only negative was that she is quite a take-charge lady and likes to lead.  I tend to prefer to be more on top but it's clear on her profile that she prefers to be more dom than sub so I went with it. Lucie likes to tantalise and tease which I did actually really enjoy.

Personality 9/10 - very friendly, natural, easy-going, great to talk to, puts you at ease. All the traits I look for in a WG. She has a real job which she was happy to talk about and is very much a part timer. Says on her profile she rarely sees more than 2 clients a day, but tells me that since her illness she now rarely seems more than 2 per week and is often difficult to get hold of. 

Services 7/10 - GFE  - slow sensual seduction, lots of teasing and tantalising, passionate DFK, OWO / RO / 69 / rimming / lots of sex in lots of positions, A levels.
However, no CIM which in the cold light of day I have to mark her down on! "CIM at discretion" is in her likes list and I had put it on my booking request. It's the first time I've had a WG not deliver on a service I've explicitly included in my booking. 
Her reasoning was that she has family commitments straight after our booking, and maybe as it's Christmas Eve I'm being a bit harsh given how good the rest of the services were. 

VFM 8/10 - £135 ph on Christmas Eve including A Levels is not bad at all for such a sexy, filthy little minx. Only really marking her down for the CIM.

Total 7.5/10

Very friendly, not at all intimidating.
Tantalising / teasing seduction
Great skills in the sack
Game for trying all sorts


No longer looks like her pics - not as curvy.  She did keep asking if I was disappointed and I genuinely was not disappointed with her - I would have definitely booked her if she had recent pics of herself, but you know when you've got a picture of someone in your mind and they don't match up it's slightly disappointing.  There are a couple of partially blocked out face pics in her profile and she really did not resemble these to me which was a let down.  If she genuinely was ill then that can't be helped but as I say she needs to update her pics.
A bit too dom for me personally - but indicated in her profile.
Oh, she slightly overdid the dirty talk once or twice for my taste. 

Visit again? - Actually, I'm not sure.  I would definitely have other girls I've seen higher up my list to revisit.  For me it's mainly because she was a little too take charge and not quite as cute / curvy as I was expecting from her pics. As I said she needs to update the pics.  This was nearly a neutral for me because of that and the lack of CIM, but her personality / attitude and service delivery otherwise was excellent. Trying to be objective about the punt and forgetting the pics it was definitely a positive.
Reccommend? - Yes definitely - if you prefer someone a bit more take charge then she's your gal and is a great, filthy punt!
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

1 review(s) found for lux.lucie linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)