Author Topic: Nice Friendly Girl, But I Don't Fancy Her - What Would You Do?  (Read 5616 times)

Offline Mr Garmin

Last year I met up with a new girl with, at the time, zero reviews on here but she did rack-up a lot of good feedback quickly on AW.  She now has mostly good reports on here.

Now here is my quandary.  I got on really well with her, she was fun and chatty and the sex was quite good.  However, she'd had loads of cosmetic work done with big fake tits and the skin on her face was stretched taught like a balloon.  I just didn't fancy her and wouldn't have given her a second look in the street.

I thought for a long time about leaving a report on here, but how to rate it?  It would have been +ve for her service and attitude but -ve for her looks.  While her appearance did almost nothing for me, some will almost certainly like it.

So while I deliberated, it's now over 6 months and I can't leave feedback anyway.

My question is, what would you have done, do a report saying that while friendly she looked a fright (which is subjective) or keep quiet as it's only my opinion and others seem to like her look (from reports) so a -ve or even NEUT seems harsh?

Offline RandomGuy99

A positive as she did a good job.

Offline scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,503
  • Likes: 237
  •  
  • Reviews: 175
There are many reviews where the member says either sex excellent but body/looks poor, or vice versa. Generally SPs get a better rap if their performance outweighs their appearance, but however you choose to score doesn't really matter provided you supply the information. It's your call and if you say there are caveats we can decipher as we wish. You have done exactly that with your question. If you had reviewed her you could have said I'm scoring this positive/neutral based on her performance but be aware I didn't find her attractive personally for these reasons and ymmv.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2026, 10:23:54 am by scouting »

Offline Skeleton

You’ve basically written here exactly what you should have put in a report. I think you may be overthinking it a bit, I’d grade it as positive on the service but with the caveat that her looks were not your usual tastes so won’t revisit.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,354
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Links to her current ads please

In future just review

Offline Mr Garmin

Links to her current ads please

In future just review

As you know that would effectively make it a review and that's against the rules as it's out of time.

If I'd wanted to do a review, I'd have done it 6 months ago.
« Last Edit: March 04, 2026, 11:21:37 am by Mr Garmin »

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Board Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,535
  • Likes: 728
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
As you know that would effectively make it a review and that's against the rules as it's out of time.

If I'd wanted to do a review, I'd have done it 6 months ago.
It wouldn't make it a review, if a review is posted after the 6 month limit it's moved to discussions exactly as it is, including the link but without the rating. This is already in discussions so doesn't add to your or the SP's review total.

I can't really see the point of posting so much detail about an escort then not saying who it is.

As far as reviews go as long as they're factual post them with the rating you want to give them not what others think they should be.

Offline southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,056
  • Likes: 160
  •  
  • Reviews: 27

I thought for a long time about leaving a report on here,


i thought about my response - it took me a few minutes not 6 months. Are you a slow thinker? (sorry Op but really??)


So while I deliberated, it's now over 6 months and I can't leave feedback anyway.

so what about the "sharing info" ethos of this site? You don't seem to have given that much thought!!


My question is, what would you have done, do a report saying that while friendly she looked a fright (which is subjective)?

any comment about looks , having nice boobs etc etc is subjective. its far more helpful imo to say something like "she looked like her pics on AW" or maybe "her pics are her but she has since had cosmetic surgery which....."

I really can't see what your issues were - it wasn't rocket science! (Just my opinion)

Offline Arripotter1971

Ive been with some women when swinging who had stunning bodies in their lingerie, but once out of it, they looked like a melted candle.
I am not a visual person so to speak where the girl is concerned, but if they are operating out of a total slum then that is a cause of concern - although while in calcutta I did not have such reservation as I had blue balls and just went for it, then the next day the room cleaner offered her services so I need not have bothered !!!!!

Offline RogerHealey

A positive as she did a good job.

Agree. And I also hate cosmetic work preferring authentic wrinkle and sag if there's a choice... though it might not extend to a Buddha. However personality and attitude are far more important and usually make for a great time so there's no contest. This rule is also true in civvy world, the popular girls are often not the stunners but the ordinary ones who can make the guy feel special, be tactile and laugh at his shit jokes. On the other hand show me a gorgeous princess who's cold and indifferent and I'll be as flaccid as the day I was born.

Offline Mr Garmin

i thought about my response - it took me a few minutes not 6 months. Are you a slow thinker? (sorry Op but really??)

You've got me taped SCP

so what about the "sharing info" ethos of this site? You don't seem to have given that much thought!!

So you review every punt that you have then?

any comment about looks , having nice boobs etc etc is subjective. its far more helpful imo to say something like "she looked like her pics on AW" or maybe "her pics are her but she has since had cosmetic surgery which....."

I really can't see what your issues were - it wasn't rocket science! (Just my opinion)

As with many/the majority of girls, it's impossible to say whether she looked like her pictures or not as the bits I mentioned have been blurred out.

Thank you for your input and letting me know that you would definitely have left feedback - which was the question that I asked

Offline alabama1

My opinion OP, start thinking for yourself  :hi:

Offline Malvolio

You must have fancied her enough to be able to get it up and penetrate her, rather than turning around and leaving?

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,270
  • Likes: 338
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
My opinion OP, start thinking for yourself  :hi:

Exactly, say it as you see it.

It's your review, your rating, you've written enough reviews to know what to do.

Offline jseop109

If her attitude was good I would tend to class it as positive but put enough qualifying detail in the text to be informative to other potential punters.

Online Thephoenix

There's a very popular SP up my way who has regular clientele, and always gets positive reviews based on her excellent fbsm.
She is a very friendly and confident lady, but her appearance is borderline anorexic, with pout lips and hard false boobs.
Certainly not everyone's cup of tea looks-wise.
However her highly recommended service has become almost legendary and hard to come by, so IMO good service always comes first.

Online advent2016

Call me shallow, but many SPs when I have my cock in their mouth become much prettier and fanciable in my mind

Offline RandomGuy99

Call me shallow, but many SPs when I have my cock in their mouth become much prettier and fanciable in my mind
Dear Shallow, I also find that this happens.  :unknown:

Offline Stevelondon

I’ve thought long and hard about this one.
In fact the OP deserves more of my attention and I’ll be back with a reply pretty soon.

In about 6 months to be exact.

Offline Jonestown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,781
  • Likes: 136
  •  
  • Reviews: 55
There's a very popular SP up my way who has regular clientele, and always gets positive reviews based on her excellent fbsm.
She is a very friendly and confident lady, but her appearance is borderline anorexic, with pout lips and hard false boobs.
Certainly not everyone's cup of tea looks-wise.
However her highly recommended service has become almost legendary and hard to come by, so IMO good service always comes first.

There is a massage girl in west London, been around for years, always heavily booked; she’s skinny, has dreadful teeth and some dubious body attributes and her flat is like the back of a dustbin lorry. This is acknowledged in reports of her but doesn’t stop people lining up to get her brilliant edging service.

Offline Colston36

Call me shallow, but many SPs when I have my cock in their mouth become much prettier and fanciable in my mind

You're just a good old-fashioned romantic.

Offline Munter84

If I had a "punt of two halves" - some great aspects, but some that really make you stop and think - I would probably make it a neutral and then put the reasoning in the body of the text.

A Neutral isn't a "soft negative", it's not necessarily even critical of the SP, it just means the SP probably won't be for everyone and they should make up their own minds based on the review.

Offline jimbobted

I don't see how it would be any different to writing a review of a stunning girl who gave a shite service?  :unknown: Don't understand the moral quandry.
« Last Edit: March 07, 2026, 10:58:28 pm by jimbobted »

Online Heph

There's a very popular SP up my way who has regular clientele, and always gets positive reviews based on her excellent fbsm.
She is a very friendly and confident lady, but her appearance is borderline anorexic, with pout lips and hard false boobs.
Certainly not everyone's cup of tea looks-wise.
However her highly recommended service has become almost legendary and hard to come by, so IMO good service always comes first.

Lucy Czech!
Yes, her face, whilst not quite yet totally out-of-bounds plastic fantastic, is swiftly and inexorably heading in that direction, which is a terrible pity as I have a sense she was a naturally pretty young woman

Offline tp69

Positive but not visually your thing. Mine neither.

Offline Steely Dan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,531
  • Likes: 76
  •  
  • Reviews: 154
External Link/Members Only
Quote
Overall Rating

The overall rule is “your review, your rating.”

Your rating is your recommendation to other punters about whether to visit. Ratings are summarised in aggregate beneath posts that include the AW link included in your review. Ultimately the impact of your rating on the aggregate will be the only part of your review readers may see - rate accordingly.

Give a positive rating if you want to unequivocally recommend the provider to other punters. If you would repeat the punt as it was, or plan to revisit, you should probably give a positive rating. Many punters believe B&S bookings should not be recorded as a positive rating against original profile, even if you had a good experience. However, the idea of posting a negative review of a positive experience is also misleading. In the end, YR,YR.

Give a neutral rating when you have reservations about recommending the provider to other punters. Describe your reservations in your review.

Give a negative rating as a warning to other punters about the provider. There is a range of opinion about how you should treat dishonesty, misrepresented services, fake pictures and poor value in terms of the overall rating. In these instances, pointing out how you arrived at your rating will leave the punter better informed about whether they want to visit.

It should go without saying that if you just choose never to repeat that you should give a positive to an escort that is worth a repeat if you did such things. The words on this page are meant to be helpful not restrictive.

So to answer your question, neutral.  With the often repeated caveat YR,YR.

Offline Stevelondon

External Link/Members Only
So to answer your question, neutral.  With the often repeated caveat YR,YR.

YR, YR. ???

Obviously I’ve heard of YI, YI.

Ok I’ll get me 🧥

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,270
  • Likes: 338
  •  
  • Reviews: 206