Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: New profile feature coming to UKPunting  (Read 8228 times)

Offline CBPaul


How long do you spend searching AW for WG's only to find no reviews or negative reviews here?  All that time is wasted and I suspect you have better things to do than spend hours searching AW then correlating here?  If you could search here on positive reviews that meet your criteria wouldn't that be easier / quicker?

Also the search facility on AW is a blunt tool at best and one which we have zero control over.  If we have input into the key search capabilities that will also make the whole process much quicker.


Honestly, not that long. 

I conduct the same search, incalls, age restriction, include pictures and limit search area. Ignoring the same old profiles that are of no interest leaves relatively few profiles and searching on UKP for them doesn't take long.

That said this is the 'sticks' and a dumping zone for Romanian rubbish - those in the big cities may well have more hits to contend with.

Offline Corus Boy


Regarding creating an AdultWork rival, i.e. allowing girls to create profiles, upload pics and post tours or discounts, etc.
That is not planned for now but possible to happen in 2015.
But it must be 100% free for both the girls and punters, no private gallery nonsense.
If anyone is in favour or not then speak up.


The new updates sound good and I thank you for all the effort.

My concern of the ongoing site development plans is the volume of work it may generate!  I worry that the work load may overwhelm a mere mortal and as time passes the mere mortal may tire.

Pro$$ie backlash is not something I fear on a personal level, but don't want to see this forum filled with "he said" / "she said" threads bickering about who is telling the truth.

I just wasted 15 mins of my life reading the West8, Dee, Lucy 12 page bollox. My choice to read it this time I know, but it is likely to get worse with a greater pro$$ie membership & punters/pro$$ies alike, inflaming each side of the arguments  :(

Offline Andrew Sanderson

In respect of the propsed service change on this website:
I've noticed that many adverts for escorts have inconsistent info on the likes of nationality, despite this being a matter of fact.  (Eg some from Scotalnd are called British whilst others are called Scottish.)
Would it be possible that after a visit, instead of the reviewer entering a nationality, they enter these three:
'apparent ethnicity',
'apparent country of origin'
and
'apparent level of English, categorised as UK English /non UK English / not their first language' ?
« Last Edit: December 16, 2014, 04:49:19 PM by Andrew Sanderson »
Banning reason: Whiteknight + Likely previously banned member

Offline CBPaul

In respect of the propsed service change on this website:
I've noticed that many adverts for escorts have inconsistent info on the likes of nationality, despite this being a matter of fact.  (Eg some from Scotalnd are called British whilst others are called Scottish.)
Would it be possible that after a visit, instead of the reviewer entering a nationality, they enter these three:
'apparent ethnicity',
'apparent country of origin'
and
'apparent level of English, categorised as UK English /non UK English / not their first language' ?

Did you register just to add this ?

I think the main issue is the provinces of Romania the rest of the planet know as Italy, Spain, Greece etc etc.

If you ever contribute a review then fair enough, put these things in there, but I wouldn't like to take a wild stab in the dark at someones ethnicity or country of origin.

Offline Ali Katt

In respect of the propsed service change on this website:
I've noticed that many adverts for escorts have inconsistent info on the likes of nationality, despite this being a matter of fact.  (Eg some from Scotalnd are called British whilst others are called Scottish.)
Would it be possible that after a visit, instead of the reviewer entering a nationality, they enter these three:
'apparent ethnicity',
'apparent country of origin'
and
'apparent level of English, categorised as UK English /non UK English / not their first language' ?
I agree Scottish and Irish should be separate search criteria as some punters looks specifically for this and British or English as another search. I think the like\services list is problematic as kissing might be offered to one punter, but not another.

Offline Andrew Sanderson

Regarding creating an AdultWork rival, i.e. allowing girls to create profiles, upload pics and post tours or discounts, etc.
That is not planned for now but possible to happen in 2015.
But it must be 100% free for both the girls and punters, no private gallery nonsense.
If anyone is in favour or not then speak up.

The attraction of this site is that it appears unrestricted for male customers to give their opinions. 
There is much sexism against men masquarading as equality.
Thankfully there is little of such on this website.
Introduction of female escort profiles may tend to reduce this given that many escorts seem not to respect their customers (you and me).
Still, if the potential feature is done in the easy going style of UKP, it'll be better than Adultwork!
Banning reason: Whiteknight + Likely previously banned member

Offline Andrew Sanderson

Did you register just to add this ?

I think the main issue is the provinces of Romania the rest of the planet know as Italy, Spain, Greece etc etc.

If you ever contribute a review then fair enough, put these things in there, but I wouldn't like to take a wild stab in the dark at someones ethnicity or country of origin.

I registered to join the various discussions, I'm a keen reader and interested in the overall topic of this website.  Was a punter back in the day, potential punter now.

Wild stab is akin to what I see on many escort adverts and reviews when nationality is stated, eg 'Eastern Europe', 'black', 'asian'. These are more akin to etnnicities and so my suggestion of entering 'apparent ethnicity', which acknowledges the subjective element.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2014, 05:09:44 PM by Andrew Sanderson »
Banning reason: Whiteknight + Likely previously banned member

Offline Mansell

Well done Admin on starting this. I am sure it will end up evolving over time and can only add to the site. Sure to be hiccups on the way, but I for one trust UKP for reviews of girls and prefer to only see ones that have a positive review on here. Worked so far  :lol:

Offline Andrew Sanderson

Well done Admin on starting this. I am sure it will end up evolving over time and can only add to the site. Sure to be hiccups on the way, but I for one trust UKP for reviews of girls and prefer to only see ones that have a positive review on here. Worked so far  :lol:

Said perfectly.
It's a great idea admin, it's this site I will be using on the way back to spending my hard earned with the ladies.
Banning reason: Whiteknight + Likely previously banned member

Offline Quesadilla

Honestly, not that long. 

I conduct the same search, incalls, age restriction, include pictures and limit search area. Ignoring the same old profiles that are of no interest leaves relatively few profiles and searching on UKP for them doesn't take long.

That said this is the 'sticks' and a dumping zone for Romanian rubbish - those in the big cities may well have more hits to contend with.
I'm on the outskirts of London. 

My standard search is now out to a 20 mile radius having plummed all the locals and I filter based on age (18-30), pictures, and mandatory services like CIM, FK, OWO, rimming (receiving). Currently this search returns 469 profiles. :)

It's a slow and painful process and no obvious way to filter out the dross.  Of course many I blacklist immediately as not my type but some just have no fb yet and you never know, in future they may be worth a TOFTT.  So I regularly go through batches of profiles before finding one that actually has reviews at all on UKP.   Then I add them to my HL which of course doesn't remove them from the search. I obviously never finish the search with so many to go through and when I start again I have to figure out where I left off. 

It's a pain in the arse frankly.

Certainly London is going to be the worst. Great for choice, but too much choice. Others in large cities will have less of a problem but even a few hundred is a lot of profiles.
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Dodo

Is there an option to have an FBSM filter?? We have a very popular thread in the WM section dedicated to FBSM but its sucess is its downfall. It is difficult to dessemination the quality info that runs to over 50 pages.......an inclusion into what you are suggesting allowing for a more meaningfull 'search' would be most welcome. But as other have said bring on what is proposed.
Banning reason: Making false claims against moderation

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

I'm on the outskirts of London. 

My standard search is now out to a 20 mile radius having plummed all the locals and I filter based on age (18-30), pictures, and mandatory services like CIM, FK, OWO, rimming (receiving). Currently this search returns 469 profiles. :)

It's a slow and painful process and no obvious way to filter out the dross.  Of course many I blacklist immediately as not my type but some just have no fb yet and you never know, in future they may be worth a TOFTT.  So I regularly go through batches of profiles before finding one that actually has reviews at all on UKP.   Then I add them to my HL which of course doesn't remove them from the search. I obviously never finish the search with so many to go through and when I start again I have to figure out where I left off. 

It's a pain in the arse frankly.

Certainly London is going to be the worst. Great for choice, but too much choice. Others in large cities will have less of a problem but even a few hundred is a lot of profiles.

Some good suggestions overall on here.

To me, the most crucial thing with ages and sizes is the potential ability to pick more than one 'dropdown' when doing a search. I would tend to go for girls from 18-30 and size 6-10, but I need to do 4 separate searches on AW for that.

Also radius is a pain in the arse on AW, especially in London where some WG's post themselves as being located in so many parts of London that they always irritatingly show up in searches.

Any improvement to this, with the added benefit of UKP punters information, would be great.   

I'm a newcomer to the site - it's great and I'm glad I found it.

2 things that struck me with this idea

1. Adult work - copyright? Can you just peel off profiles on to here without them sueing you?

2. Them ladies may kick off a stink having their profiles lifted and put on here without say so?

Offline Ali Katt

I'm a newcomer to the site - it's great and I'm glad I found it.

2 things that struck me with this idea

1. Adult work - copyright? Can you just peel off profiles on to here without them sueing you?

2. Them ladies may kick off a stink having their profiles lifted and put on here without say so?
I think the idea is to get the details off, not the whole profile word for word. As far as I know no-ones been sued for posting an AW link.

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
1. Adult work - copyright? Can you just peel off profiles on to here without them sueing you?

As I said only phone number, city and hourly rates. Not the pics and the rest of their war-and-peace dos-and-donts FAQ bollocks.

Over the years I've gotten hundreds of threats of being sued, including from English solicitors. I couldn't care less. Most prossies don't have money saved to pay next months bills, nevermind spend thousands to sue anyone, especially someone like me who doesn't even live or hold UK citizenship.

2. Them ladies may kick off a stink having their profiles lifted and put on here without say so?

Tough shit would be my response to them, like when some of them kick off not wanting any reviews. Other sites might give them option to be excluded from their review system, but no such nonsense on UKPunting.

Prostitutes are service providers just like plumbers or builders, they will have their services reviewed and their business info, phone number and pricing published by consumers or anyone else, whether they like it or not.

dress size can be made easy
Stick insect
Slim
Average
Chubby
Fat
Grossly overweight

This, basically. Using dress size numbers only works when used together with stature, and even then people could easily make mistakes with it.

Offline Quesadilla


dress size can be made easy
Stick insect
Slim
Average
Chubby
Fat
Grossly overweight
This, basically. Using dress size numbers only works when used together with stature, and even then people could easily make mistakes with it.
Don't disagree in principle but disagree with the definitions and I'm sure this could be a subject of some debate. 

I have WG's who are slim but with what I can only describe as an hourglass figure - ie round hips, perky boobs, perky butt.  I've seen others who might well be described as "slim" but are neither stick insects nor have any curves - either of which is a complete turnoff to me.

Also "average" is not good - especially given the "average" dress size in the UK is actually a 16!! 

I would also like to see fit/toned on the list. 

Here's my straw man to be torn down or set alight as you see fit...

Stick insect
Slim (straight lines)
Slim (with curves in the right places)
Fit / toned
Voluptuous
Cuddly
BBW
OMFG
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline smiths

As I said only phone number, city and hourly rates. Not the pics and the rest of their war-and-peace dos-and-donts FAQ bollocks.

Over the years I've gotten hundreds of threats of being sued, including from English solicitors. I couldn't care less. Most prossies don't have money saved to pay next months bills, nevermind spend thousands to sue anyone, especially someone like me who doesn't even live or hold UK citizenship.

Tough shit would be my response to them, like when some of them kick off not wanting any reviews. Other sites might give them option to be excluded from their review system, but no such nonsense on UKPunting.

Prostitutes are service providers just like plumbers or builders, they will have their services reviewed and their business info, phone number and pricing published by consumers or anyone else, whether they like it or not.

Thnaks for this confirmation that no WGs will be able to opt out as incredibly happens elsewhere, and if any dont like it tough shit. I 100% agree with this after seeing what happens elsewhere. A prime example of putting the punter first. :thumbsup:

This, basically. Using dress size numbers only works when used together with stature, and even then people could easily make mistakes with it.

Don't disagree in principle but disagree with the definitions and I'm sure this could be a subject of some debate. 

I have WG's who are slim but with what I can only describe as an hourglass figure - ie round hips, perky boobs, perky butt.  I've seen others who might well be described as "slim" but are neither stick insects nor have any curves - either of which is a complete turnoff to me.

Also "average" is not good - especially given the "average" dress size in the UK is actually a 16!! 

I would also like to see fit/toned on the list. 

Here's my straw man to be torn down or set alight as you see fit...

Stick insect
Slim (straight lines)
Slim (with curves in the right places)
Fit / toned
Voluptuous
Cuddly
BBW
OMFG

Yes, more detail is usually good :) though if excluding 'average' then maybe have 'unfit/untoned' before 'voluptuous' :D

Offline aardvark

That would exclude both me and Adam, and of course James
Every cloud has a silver lining ............... :lol:

Offline CBPaul

This, basically. Using dress size numbers only works when used together with stature, and even then people could easily make mistakes with it.

Don't disagree in principle but disagree with the definitions and I'm sure this could be a subject of some debate. 

I have WG's who are slim but with what I can only describe as an hourglass figure - ie round hips, perky boobs, perky butt.  I've seen others who might well be described as "slim" but are neither stick insects nor have any curves - either of which is a complete turnoff to me.

Also "average" is not good - especially given the "average" dress size in the UK is actually a 16!! 

I would also like to see fit/toned on the list. 

Here's my straw man to be torn down or set alight as you see fit...

Stick insect
Slim (straight lines)
Slim (with curves in the right places)
Fit / toned
Voluptuous
Cuddly
BBW
OMFG

With all the drop down menus I can see punters outside the big cities ending up with a grand total of zero possibilities. But I can also see how all of this would be useful for those in and around London and other areas. So providing the ability to not make a specific selection is available then all options are covered.

My concern is anything subjective is bound to lead to disagreements and reduce the perceived usefulness. Age ranges are a great idea, can't go too far wrong with that but body dimensions blur into each other, especially at the larger end. One's mans voluptuous is another mans cuddly with big tits. Having said that this list is pretty good IMO.

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

This, basically. Using dress size numbers only works when used together with stature, and even then people could easily make mistakes with it.

Don't disagree in principle but disagree with the definitions and I'm sure this could be a subject of some debate. 

I have WG's who are slim but with what I can only describe as an hourglass figure - ie round hips, perky boobs, perky butt.  I've seen others who might well be described as "slim" but are neither stick insects nor have any curves - either of which is a complete turnoff to me.

Also "average" is not good - especially given the "average" dress size in the UK is actually a 16!! 

I would also like to see fit/toned on the list. 

Here's my straw man to be torn down or set alight as you see fit...

Stick insect
Slim (straight lines)
Slim (with curves in the right places)
Fit / toned
Voluptuous
Cuddly
BBW
OMFG

Good strawman/strawlady - but need something inbetween top and bottom 4 categories.

Offline CoolTiger

This, basically. Using dress size numbers only works when used together with stature, and even then people could easily make mistakes with it.

Don't disagree in principle but disagree with the definitions and I'm sure this could be a subject of some debate. 

I have WG's who are slim but with what I can only describe as an hourglass figure - ie round hips, perky boobs, perky butt.  I've seen others who might well be described as "slim" but are neither stick insects nor have any curves - either of which is a complete turnoff to me.

Also "average" is not good - especially given the "average" dress size in the UK is actually a 16!! 

I would also like to see fit/toned on the list. 

Here's my straw man to be torn down or set alight as you see fit...

Stick insect
Slim (straight lines)
Slim (with curves in the right places)
Fit / toned
Voluptuous
Cuddly
BBW
OMFG

Where's the "Should Have brought the Wide Angle Lenses" Category?  :lol:

Offline Quesadilla

Where's the "Should Have brought the Wide Angle Lenses" Category?  :lol:
OMFG was shorter to type!  :lol:
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE


Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)