Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: New profile feature coming to UKPunting  (Read 8233 times)

Online James999

Whichever way you look at it, your integrity as a bonafide punter is lower than any other member of the forum.

So say YOU who has been repeatedly been shown to be a liar, you are so desperate to gain credibility and throw shit at others in an attempt to do so, I couldn't give a fuck if you think I punt or not, the difference is I'm not a lying cunt like you are  :hi:

Offline west8

So say YOU who has been repeatedly been shown to be a liar, you are so desperate to gain credibility and throw shit at others in an attempt to do so, I couldn't give a fuck if you think I punt or not, the difference is I'm not a lying cunt like you are  :hi:

If you are indeed a bondfide punter, why spend your considerable efforts writing nonsense in an attempt to advance your limited, populist and rather narrow political agenda?

Instead, why not contribute by writing even brief reviews of all the ladies you have seduced across the British Isles, Europe, The Americas, Asia and beyond?

Come on, humour us James.

What is the real reason you contribute precisely zero factual punting-related comment to this forum?

Online James999

Come on, humour us James.

It's not us, it's YOU, and if you think I'm jumping to your tune  :lol:

You have repeatedly been caught out lying and as stated above I couldn't give a fuck what you think  :music:

Now stop hijacking the thread with your agenda  :thumbsdown:

If you have any more issues PM me or contact Admin.
« Last Edit: December 17, 2014, 09:07:09 PM by James999 »

Offline Delta

In an idle moment I was pondering these proposed enhancements.

I'm sure there are exceptions but currently most posts / reviews on here are by those who have visited, tried to book or booked but been let down not anyone associated with the girl.  Because there is no risk of any negative feedback received in response potentially jeopardising future bookings the comments, while of course subjective, are fundamentally accurate. I'm sure after a poor visit or cancellation many simply do not leave feedback on AW so others fall into the same trap as they only see all or mostly positive feedback. Hence while the aim is to link to the girls AW profiles there must not be similar links to client profiles.

Another aspect to be considered is pimps and girls creating accounts here to create fictional glowing reviews and posts. This would spoil the site.

Offline west8

It's not us, it's YOU, and if you think I'm jumping to your tune  :lol:

You have repeatedly been caught out lying and as stated above I couldn't give a fuck what you think  :music:

Now stop hijacking Admons thread with your agenda  :thumbsdown:

There is one difference between us James.

I don't run when questioned by other members. Instead, I do my best to set their minds at rest by answering said questions as transparently as possible.

Perhaps that is why most regard my reviews with either indifference or appreciation.

I will therefore ask one last time: why do you decline to write about punting matters on a punting forum?

We both know you won't answer because the truth is a sad one indeed. So scuttle off back to dailymail.co.uk.

Offline west8

Another aspect to be considered is pimps and girls creating accounts here to create fictional glowing reviews and posts. This would spoil the site.

That already happens. But unlike the 'other' site, the staff here are tireless in keeping the forum clean of such detritus.

I foresee no increased danger to the integrity of the forum from pimps pitiful attempts to promote their wares.

Online James999

There is one difference between us James.

Yes I don't lie you do  :hi:

Now see above my edited post you quoted, not playing to your agenda  :sarcastic:

Offline Ali Katt

In an idle moment I was pondering these proposed enhancements.

I'm sure there are exceptions but currently most posts / reviews on here are by those who have visited, tried to book or booked but been let down not anyone associated with the girl.  Because there is no risk of any negative feedback received in response potentially jeopardising future bookings the comments, while of course subjective, are fundamentally accurate. I'm sure after a poor visit or cancellation many simply do not leave feedback on AW so others fall into the same trap as they only see all or mostly positive feedback. Hence while the aim is to link to the girls AW profiles there must not be similar links to client profiles.

Another aspect to be considered is pimps and girls creating accounts here to create fictional glowing reviews and posts. This would spoil the site.

This has happened before and Admin usually spots it quickly. It could happen on any punting site really.

Offline smiths

I think it's a case of if it ain't broke. We don't need badges or forum rep or anything else. They actually detract from forums.

I agree, its fine as it is on that. With admins developments as outlined on this thread it will be even better. :thumbsup:

Offline CatBBW

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,972
Get real the market for Fat birds is miniscule so no need to over categorise them,  Cuddly = Fat as do all the BBW shit,

Petite,
Slim,
Average,
Fat


is all you need  :hi:

You don't know the market like wot I do.  :hi:

"Fat" is too broad a term. It covers anyone from size 10 with a bit of junk in their trunk, to size 50 who has eaten the whole trunk. "Fat" is also not a primary search term when it comes to looking for an escort via search engines. BBW is the industry term for a fat lady, SSBBW is for a massively fat lady. Likewise, "Slim" is too broad a term. It doesn't take into account the very skinny ladies (who can't be called "petite" if they're 5'8 in their bare feet), or the "curves in all the right places" slim, or the "muscular" slim...

Anyway, it's all about SEO - and I'm sure Admin knows a lot more than you or I about that.


Petite,
Slim,
Average,
Fat


is all you need  :hi:

They might be all you need. But there are other people on this forum.

Something like:

Skinny / Boney
Slim - straight lines
Slim - with curves in the right places
Fit / Toned
Muscular
Cuddly
BBW - Voluptuous
BBW - Large
BBW - Extra Large
SSBBW - Huge

And the ONLY reason I am suggesting all the BBWs is that these are standard marketing terms for larger women and therefore key search words. I love the "OMFG" but that's not what people will search for, either on here or on Google.

I thought the idea was to distinguish using terms punters would use, not using terms WGs would use (for whatever reason). :hi:
« Last Edit: December 18, 2014, 02:19:03 AM by Mr Farkyhars »

Offline CatBBW

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,972
I thought the idea was to distinguish using terms punters would use, not using terms WGs would use (for whatever reason). :hi:

BBW *is* one of the search terms that punters use. It's a HUGE (no pun intended!) market.

Fat, Phat, Big, Large, Huge, Massive, Voluptuous, Overweight, Obese...none of these feature anywhere close to BBW in the amount of successful hit/click through rates.

Again though, only Admin knows what works for his specific SEO regarding UKP.
« Last Edit: December 18, 2014, 02:32:30 AM by CatBBW »

BBW *is* one of the search terms that punters use. It's a HUGE (no pun intended!) market.

Fat, Phat, Big, Large, Huge, Massive, Voluptuous, Overweight, Obese...none of these feature anywhere close to BBW in the amount of successful hit/click through rates.


It may be a "huge market", and I think Quesadilla used the term in this thread before either of us. But is it only used as much as you say because WGs use it as a catch-all term for 'larger than average' and hence punters must follow this usage when searching escort directories like AW? I say yes - and hence, on a punting forum, we punters wouldn't need the subdivisions of the term that you introduced :hi:

Offline CatBBW

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,972
But is it only used as much as you say because WGs use it as a catch-all term for 'larger than average' and hence punters must follow this usage when searching escort directories like AW? I say yes - and hence, on a punting forum, we punters wouldn't need the subdivisions of the term that you introduced :hi:

I say no - because it's not just used on escort directories, but in mainstream porn, and it's a (very successful) marketing term within the Adult industry.  AW is RUBBISH with regard to "BBW/SSBBW" - their standard search sizes dumps anyone over size 14 in the same results together.

Fair enough if you personally don't agree with my subdivisions, but discarding the industry standard "BBW" and "SSBBW" terms would be silly, IMHO.

Offline mh

Only in your internet centric world could a status marker on a forum count as being 'part of an elite'.

... I do believe anyone who devotes considerable time and resources to punting and reviewing 25 ladies is worthy of some minor accolade of sorts.

 :dash: :dash: :dash: :dash:

SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSStrike one for West8 (well more like multiple baker's dozens by now...).

Online James999

You don't know the market like wot I do. 

You don't even escort and when you did you had 2 feedbacks in 5 years, and you will only know the market from the guys that contact you, how many brothels have you been into  and line ups have you seen, they are a true reflection of the market.

Offline CBPaul

I think it's a case of if it ain't broke. We don't need badges or forum rep or anything else. They actually detract from forums.

Summed up perfectly.

Offline CBPaul

Yes they are.....  Ranking members by review count is a non-starter. Nobody else is supporting it. A review is a review. I'm not going through all the reasons again just for your sake.

Nik has stated that there are no senior members of UKP, and I believe that this is definitely the wish of the majority if the members here. Your main reason for wanting review count to be a status marker is, as you say, that you think you will be there in the foreseeable future, and you desperately want to be part of that elite.

Why aren't you satisfied with your current elite status - that of Uberwanker, the guy who could win WOTW every week?  :unknown:


Bang on.

It was also made perfectly clear when the review count was introduced that it wouldn't become a source of competition - None of the I'm more worthy because I have more reviews to my name crap.

Accolades for contributions will be cherished and coveted by some - their pursuit will inevitably have a negative effect on the quality of reviews IMO.

1. A punter who sees 2 or 3 regulars will never achieve the accolade even though his reviews may be top quality.
2. A punter who has few punts but provides top quality reviews will take longer to achieve his accolade than one who punts often but leave poor quality reviews of little use to others.   

A fundamentally floored system that is totally unnecessary IMO.

Offline Sedlmayer


Bang on.

It was also made perfectly clear when the review count was introduced that it wouldn't become a source of competition - None of the I'm more worthy because I have more reviews to my name crap.

Accolades for contributions will be cherished and coveted by some - their pursuit will inevitably have a negative effect on the quality of reviews IMO.

1. A punter who sees 2 or 3 regulars will never achieve the accolade even though his reviews may be top quality.
2. A punter who has few punts but provides top quality reviews will take longer to achieve his accolade than one who punts often but leave poor quality reviews of little use to others.
   

A fundamentally floored system that is totally unnecessary IMO.

Very well put - spot on.

I think it's a case of if it ain't broke. We don't need badges or forum rep or anything else. They actually detract from forums.

This is spot on .

The two things that really matter are YOUR opinion of the reviewer and others opinion of you as poster/reviewer/member.

A review from someone who is new with a high post count that feels the need to post an opinion in any thread and is constantly bickering or posting bs would carry little weight for me , an established member with a lower number of far more useful or informative posts would  get my attention far more .

Numbers of posts/reviews don't count , quality does.

BB

Offline Jimmyredcab



Nik has stated that there are no senior members of UKP.

That may well be true but who would you trust the most, someone who has been a member for 12 months or someone who has been a member for 12 hours.       :unknown: :unknown:

Offline Jimmyredcab



Numbers of posts/reviews don't count , quality does.

BB

Agree totally, I no longer read the reviews from certain members because they will shag anything with a pulse.    :thumbsdown:

Offline smiths


Bang on.

It was also made perfectly clear when the review count was introduced that it wouldn't become a source of competition - None of the I'm more worthy because I have more reviews to my name crap.

Accolades for contributions will be cherished and coveted by some - their pursuit will inevitably have a negative effect on the quality of reviews IMO.

1. A punter who sees 2 or 3 regulars will never achieve the accolade even though his reviews may be top quality.
2. A punter who has few punts but provides top quality reviews will take longer to achieve his accolade than one who punts often but leave poor quality reviews of little use to others.   

A fundamentally floored system that is totally unnecessary IMO.

Good post. :thumbsup:

Offline kenw1

Right now the 'profile' pages only contain reviews for each girl.
Example: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=227

These profile pages will be extended to add things like - hourly rates, location, phone number, nationality, age group.


I use public transport so distance from the rail station would be very helpful.

Offline Sedlmayer

I use public transport so distance from the rail station would be very helpful.

Yes, absolutely - nearest station and how far from that station, can be perfectly simple, ie 10 minutes walk from Fulham Broadway tube.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)