Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: New profile feature coming to UKPunting  (Read 8237 times)

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Right now the 'profile' pages only contain reviews for each girl.
Example: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=227

These profile pages will be extended to add things like - hourly rates, location, phone number, nationality, age group.

The phone number, location and hourly rates will be taken from their A/W pages or website.
The nationality and age group will be provided by the punter when a review is submitted (drop-down menu).

Then to the main feature - search profiles by location / distance.

It'll be possible to make this kind of search - all girls within 10 miles of London Euston who charge less than £120 per hour and are British and younger than 30.

The results will be ranked by most reviewed girl (or nearest by distance) and only include girls who are working (not 'retired' or deleted AW profile).

Any suggestions / opinions?

Sounds good


Though I can see Nationality causing a few issues !

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Also the advantage of this over the current review section is that if a girl re-locates, then her profile / reviews will be visible sooner to punters in her new area.

Offline mh

Who needs AW?!  :D

This will be a useful feature, for sure, I just hope the server(s) can handle the search load...

Offline superchamp

Do the one thing AW doesn't do - exclude by nationality - and you've got a winner.

Offline Zalaroon

Yeah... And tick Romanian by default

Offline Trevor12

Maybe a punter-verified 'enjoys' list which includes fingering.

Offline Mr Br1ghts1de

Sounds good and potentially better than AW.
AW's search criteria can be too restrictive at times, e.g. in terms of girls sizes and age bands.
Look forward to seeing.

Offline monstar

Great idea. :thumbsup:

My initial thoughts:
Will the age drop down answer be based on our best guess?

Will there be a 'no answer' selection? For example the girl clearly isn't "Spanish" as stated but I would not want to guess an answer either.

My suggestion may be too much work but could you include an optional (to keep review writing as accessible as possible) tickbox list for us to complete when submitting a review, this allows us to produce a more accurate 'likes list' for each girl? Possibly including more detailed options, for example kissing - lips only, kissing - deep French, OWO - deep throat. Would this also allow searches or filtering by services similar to the AW search?

Cheers, looking forward to the update.  :hi:

Offline Sedlmayer

Not sure I've got my head round this fully yet - obviously it will be much clearer once it's up and running.
However, sounds like this is going to be a massively useful new tool which will enhance the site greatly.
Well fucking done, Admin  :drinks: :thumbsup: ;)

Offline Quesadilla

Great idea. :thumbsup:

<snip>

My suggestion may be too much work but could you include an optional (to keep review writing as accessible as possible) tickbox list for us to complete when submitting a review, this allows us to produce a more accurate 'likes list' for each girl? Possibly including more detailed options, for example kissing - lips only, kissing - deep French, OWO - deep throat. Would this also allow searches or filtering by services similar to the AW search?

Cheers, looking forward to the update.  :hi:

+1 to the punter validated likes list although agree it could be a lot of work.
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

+1 to the punter validated likes list although agree it could be a lot of work.

Yeah, a comparative likes list. What they state v what you got. ukp to challenge aw? Let's get it on....

tcm

Online smiths

Great idea. :thumbsup:

My initial thoughts:
Will the age drop down answer be based on our best guess?

Will there be a 'no answer' selection? For example the girl clearly isn't "Spanish" as stated but I would not want to guess an answer either.

My suggestion may be too much work but could you include an optional (to keep review writing as accessible as possible) tickbox list for us to complete when submitting a review, this allows us to produce a more accurate 'likes list' for each girl? Possibly including more detailed options, for example kissing - lips only, kissing - deep French, OWO - deep throat. Would this also allow searches or filtering by services similar to the AW search?

Cheers, looking forward to the update.  :hi:

I wouldnt call it a likes list, to me its an offers list. I wouldnt know what a WG actually likes as most are complete strangers to me.

Agree about nationality, i only speak English so only have what the WG tells me to go on if she is foreign in most cases. But i just say she said she was whatever nationality in my reviews, thats obviously not a guarantee she is.

Same with age but admin has said age group i see so i assume that allows for saying early-20s or late-20s etc which will be my best guess but could be wrong as some women age better than others of course.

Online smiths

Right now the 'profile' pages only contain reviews for each girl.
Example: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=227

These profile pages will be extended to add things like - hourly rates, location, phone number, nationality, age group.

The phone number, location and hourly rates will be taken from their A/W pages or website.
The nationality and age group will be provided by the punter when a review is submitted (drop-down menu).

Then to the main feature - search profiles by location / distance.

It'll be possible to make this kind of search - all girls within 10 miles of London Euston who charge less than £120 per hour and are British and younger than 30.

The results will be ranked by most reviewed girl (or nearest by distance) and only include girls who are working (not 'retired' or deleted AW profile).

Any suggestions / opinions?

Linking an A/W WGs reviews in to her other reviews as you have done this year has been very handy to me, this sounds like another good idea. :thumbsup:

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
I'll do all the suggestions above about 'services done' when posting review and excluding nationalities in search.

To start off, only girls who have reviews on UKP will have profiles made for them.
The only info I will take from the girls profiles (or website) is their location and rates and phone number.
The rest of the info is all provided by punters who've seen the girl in real life (services done, age group, nationality, etc).
That should make our profile system as reliable / accurate as possible.

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
Regarding creating an AdultWork rival, i.e. allowing girls to create profiles, upload pics and post tours or discounts, etc.
That is not planned for now but possible to happen in 2015.
But it must be 100% free for both the girls and punters, no private gallery nonsense.
If anyone is in favour or not then speak up.

Offline Quesadilla

Regarding creating an AdultWork rival, i.e. allowing girls to create profiles, upload pics and post tours or discounts, etc.
That is not planned for now but possible to happen in 2015.
But it must be 100% free for both the girl and punter, no private gallery nonsense.
If anyone is in favour or not then speak up.
I think this is a great idea - AW is crap and we have no control over searchability - a properly searchable database here could be much better.  The challenge I had in my mind was the sheer amount of data to be setup as there's no easy way to extract it from AW; but if we let WG's create their own pages here that would definitely be a head start. 


Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline west8

That should make our profile system as reliable / accurate as possible.

That is the sole reason why this site could evolve into an 'Adultwork killer'.

But I foresee problems. More after my Coco-Pops.  :cool:

Offline akauya

Looking forward seeing the new features - thanks Admin  :hi:


Offline west8

Since joining this fine forum, I have often thought that one thing is missing: the girls.

It seems there are a handful of survivors, but most have been culled or feel too intimidated to post, either due to their lacklustre written English or the (unjustly in my view) misogynistic reputation that the membership here have in the minds of a great many WGs.

But wouldn’t a sub forum for ‘rated/respected/reviewed’ girls be beneficial to us punters and the WGs alike? If the proposal is to provide reviewed girls with a ‘voice’ in the form of a free profile and the massive oxygen of (also free) publicity that this site consistently affords them, perhaps the girls would like the opportunity to respond to reviews – and to occasionally participate in a Q&A with prospective punters – if only once a week or monthly. I think many new punters would find this appealing and it would give a clearer idea of a girls personality and attitude.


Specifically on the proposal to move further:

Adultwork is clunky, cumbersome, barely navigable and reminds me of the game ‘Tea Shop’ I used to play on BBC Micro when at Secondary School. It’s also populated by more scammers than genuine, service-minded WGs.

UKP on the other hand is streamlined with a clearly delineated navigation ‘tree’ and is already a veritable treasure trove of useful information. Plus of the course the more often than not invaluable reviews.

However …

I would also propose an ‘upgrade’ of sorts to membership levels.

eg. Any member who has written more than 25 reviews should be given a ‘Verified’ or ‘Trusted’ Reviewer badge. Let me explain why …

If the girls are to have any degree of trust in the forum as a means of self-promotion, they will have one concern: the authenticity of reviews and the integrity of the reviewers. But there are a few girls who don’t grasp PR quite as well as Dee, Platinum Cindy and MissKDD.

I know this as two girls I have reviewed have specifically told me on subsequent visits that if I write -anything- else about them on the forum, I will be ‘persona non grata’ in their eyes. Their reasons for this are not important, but they are valid (in my opinion) so I have agreed to their requests.
So, whilst a significant majority of the reviewed ladies will be delighted to have an alternative to Adultwork, there are a few who are possibly too sensitive to see the potential upside of a listing on UKP.

But we all know that any WG we meet is invariably a ‘closet’ UKP reader, so why not encourage those who have, say, 5+ positive reviews to join and actively participate on the forum. Heck, UKP could then replace Adultwork, SAAFE and PN in one fell swoop…

But we all know that any WG we meet is invariably a ‘closet’ UKP reader, so why not encourage those who have, say, 5+ positive reviews to join and actively participate on the forum. Heck, UKP could then replace Adultwork, SAAFE and PN in one fell swoop…

Given the flakiness of many previous wgs on here and the aggressive nature of some punters, I'm not sure the punter first ethos of UKP can be maintained if wgs are invited to respond and retaliate to comments written about them.  :bomb:

Offline yorkshire123


eg. Any member who has written more than 25 reviews should be given a ‘Verified’ or ‘Trusted’ Reviewer badge. Let me explain why …


How does the number of reviews signify anything?
You could be a prolific review writer & still be a cunt or even telling porkies.
Personally I wouldn't want any advertising at all as I believe that the site would lose some of its putting the punter first ethos & the fan boys would have a field day.

Admin - sorry to disrupt your thread as I'm sure you didn't want to turn into a debating circle. Its your site & I'm sure you know what's the best way forward.
Banning reason: Making false malicious allegations against admin

Offline west8

How does the number of reviews signify anything?
You could be a prolific review writer & still be a cunt or even telling porkies.

How does it not signify anything?

The great thing about the membership here is that the forum is virtually self-policing. Reviews are read and questioned and discussed.

I don't think anyone who has 25 reviews would have made it that far without a LOT of scrutiny from other members.

Online Vivago

Admin - sorry to disrupt your thread as I'm sure you didn't want to turn into a debating circle. Its your site & I'm sure you know what's the best way forward.

What's the view like from up 'Admin's' arse? :rolleyes:  I'm sure that debate is welcome particularly when it appertains to major changes to the forum structure.

Personally i think that as a punting site, allowing shitloads of flaky prossies on here would muddy the waters somewhat and devalue the site.  But improvements to the review and ratings system can only be welcomed.

Whether a system that restricts full access to reviews to those members who had contributed to those reviews is implementable, is debatable. But if it were, it would certainly encourage the submission of reviews and cut down on the number of non-contributing lurkers who use the forum without giving anything in return.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2014, 02:31:29 AM by Vivago »


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)