Fit Sarah GFE - Reading

[Tom Foolery]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Location - Reading RG2, Hotel near J11 M4

£160 - 1 Hour - October 2025.

Comms - SMS, quick reply

I had really looked forward to seeing Sarah, and she did not disappoint in the slightest.

I had question marks over her facial looks due to the obscured photos online, but I needn't have feared, as I found her really pretty. Not stunning, just really pretty. Her size surprised me too. She is tall and her frame matches her stature, but is very slim in proportion due to her height. To say the least I thought, as  a package, just WOW.

Greeted with a lovely, gentle, intimate kiss. No rush, and bloody lovely.

Paperwork sorted, and into shower quickly. Dried, and onto bed for a short kiss before she went down on me for a lovely blow job. Stopped her before I blew, and gave RO. Very nice, very fresh but very short as she prefers giving to receiving. Then condom on, into CG, missionary and I think Doggy (it was a few weeks ago). The condom off for more BJ with CIM that was great!

There was loads of FDK throughout and some chat - she really is quite lovely, and marked the start of a great 2 weeks (one exception).

All told, a really lovely GFE the I would love to repeat.

[LipLover]

Interesting that you were able to do RO, as she no longer has that on her likes list. Was it discussed or did you just go for it?

[Tom Foolery]

Interesting that you were able to do RO, as she no longer has that on her likes list. Was it discussed or did you just go for it?

Discussed, but she did warn it would be 'a taste'

[simon07]

My first time was joyful. A second visit was disappointing in her lack of interest and engagement

[deg_dilemma]

I saw her in Bracknell a few months ago and completely forgot to review her! It would have been very Neutral for me. She delayed the meeting and I didn't find her attractive, though she has a decent body. Mostly though it was her rushed and boring attitude that made the punt a waste.

[Monaco]

I must have tried for over 2 years to book her and now it seems she's over the hill,I gave up long ago anyway.

[stevesucks69]

Wow as you've not seen her you've decided that she's over the hill. Expect you are further over that hill fella!

[Cunning Punt]

I must have tried for over 2 years to book her and now it seems she's over the hill,I gave up long ago anyway.

I tried several times to book her and didn't manage to sort anything out. No response to any texts, she responded to emails but then just asked me to text and no reply. So I gave up. Poor comms + attitude on her posts on here + recent reviews + her recent reluctance over RO = I'm really not that fussed about never securing a booking.

[Tom Foolery]

I tried several times to book her and didn't manage to sort anything out. No response to any texts, she responded to emails but then just asked me to text and no reply. So I gave up. Poor comms + attitude on her posts on here + recent reviews + her recent reluctance over RO = I'm really not that fussed about never securing a booking.

I honestly found her quite a delight, maybe because of my MS? Lovely, caring and far from unengaged,  although I would have preferred a little more time
 DATY but I knew to expect that

[Tom Foolery]

 I've got to say, out of 4 girls this month, Sarah will definitely be the second I return to after Red Hot Brunette who blew my mind, and everything else. Weird she has bad reviews. I intend to see Sarah again (and again) but I always seem to be in the place she was yesterday 

[Fitsarahgfe]

I tried several times to book her and didn't manage to sort anything out. No response to any texts, she responded to emails but then just asked me to text and no reply. So I gave up. Poor comms + attitude on her posts on here + recent reviews + her recent reluctance over RO = I'm really not that fussed about never securing a booking.

We already discussed this under another review. I explained everything there and my attitude was calm and non argumentative, as it always is.
Sure assertive maybe, but there is nothing wrong with having boundaries.

Your number is clearly blocked on my end, just like many others. It is  probably about something minor and I’m sure I often misjudge and reject genuinely nice guys, but that’s the trade off.
I listen to my intuition and thanks to that I had zero bad experiences over a decade in this business. There are many men I simply won’t engage with purely for safety reasons. I’m not going to start replying just to avoid negative comments about my communication. They might have accounts here too.
But sometimes I feel like I should, ehh.
So I guess I will always get criticised for poor comms, or rather for a lack of them, by people I have blocked. Like the comment above, calling me over the hill, said by someone who couldn’t get hold of me 

Any constructive criticism is welcome and any exchange of views can be valuable, so it is fine that the topic is being raised, but let’s be fair to each other.

[nigel4498]

  Weird she has bad reviews.

She has only two negative reviews and the last was over eight years ago.

[Tom Foolery]

She has only two negative reviews and the last was over eight years ago.

just for clarity, I meant Victoria not Sarah. I don't actually know, it is just what others commented on a review of Red Hot Brunette.

Dont know how high someone's standards must be to moan about Sarah, other than 'please sit still long enough that I can book you'. Can't wait to meet her again

[stevesucks69]

We already discussed this under another review. I explained everything there and my attitude was calm and non argumentative, as it always is.
Sure assertive maybe, but there is nothing wrong with having boundaries.

Your number is clearly blocked on my end, just like many others. It is  probably about something minor and I’m sure I often misjudge and reject genuinely nice guys, but that’s the trade off.
I listen to my intuition and thanks to that I had zero bad experiences over a decade in this business. There are many men I simply won’t engage with purely for safety reasons. I’m not going to start replying just to avoid negative comments about my communication. They might have accounts here too.
But sometimes I feel like I should, ehh.
So I guess I will always get criticised for poor comms, or rather for a lack of them, by people I have blocked. Like the comment above, calling me over the hill, said by someone who couldn’t get hold of me 

Any constructive criticism is welcome and any exchange of views can be valuable, so it is fine that the topic is being raised, but let’s be fair to each other.

Just mentioning your FAQs the last one , I don't fit the poor personal qualities but would still love the hug  😘 ah come to Wales please

[Cunning Punt]

We already discussed this under another review. I explained everything there and my attitude was calm and non argumentative, as it always is.
Sure assertive maybe, but there is nothing wrong with having boundaries.

Your number is clearly blocked on my end, just like many others. It is  probably about something minor and I’m sure I often misjudge and reject genuinely nice guys, but that’s the trade off.
I listen to my intuition and thanks to that I had zero bad experiences over a decade in this business. There are many men I simply won’t engage with purely for safety reasons. I’m not going to start replying just to avoid negative comments about my communication. They might have accounts here too.
But sometimes I feel like I should, ehh.
So I guess I will always get criticised for poor comms, or rather for a lack of them, by people I have blocked. Like the comment above, calling me over the hill, said by someone who couldn’t get hold of me 

Any constructive criticism is welcome and any exchange of views can be valuable, so it is fine that the topic is being raised, but let’s be fair to each other.

As I explained I gave you no reason to block me (being polite etc) and also, over a period of time, I have changed my tel number. Several members similarly reporting being polite also have reported failed repeated attempts to get a response.

I very much doubt you've blocked all of our numbers and it's interesting to note that at the same time as not responding to people, you are clearly spending a lot of time reading posts here and sometimes replying to some rather mild posts on here.

Whether it's down to poor comms or blocking people for no proper reason (or most likely a combination of the two), the effect is the same. Of course you are free to do what you want but it's valuable to make other punters aware of all the above on what is a punters' forum.

[stevesucks69]

As I explained I gave you no reason to block me (being polite etc) and also, over a period of time, I have changed my tel number. Several members similarly reporting being polite also have reported failed repeated attempts to get a response.

I very much doubt you've blocked all of our numbers and it's interesting to note that at the same time as not responding to people, you are clearly spending a lot of time reading posts here and sometimes replying to some rather mild posts on here.

Whether it's down to poor comms or blocking people for no proper reason (or most likely a combination of the two), the effect is the same. Of course you are free to do what you want but it's valuable to make other punters aware of all the above on what is a punters' forum.

🍼👶🍼

[Fitsarahgfe]

As I explained I gave you no reason to block me (being polite etc) and also, over a period of time, I have changed my tel number. Several members similarly reporting being polite also have reported failed repeated attempts to get a response.

You don’t know why I blacklisted them. Those guys may have been flagged as timewasters or something much more serious.

I very much doubt you've blocked all of our numbers and it's interesting to note that at the same time as not responding to people, you are clearly spending a lot of time reading posts here and sometimes replying to some rather mild posts on here.

An interesting observation, but an inaccurate one.I have time for both. I don’t work shifts at a steel mill 

Whether it's down to poor comms or blocking people for no proper reason (or most likely a combination of the two), the effect is the same. Of course you are free to do what you want but it's valuable to make other punters aware of all the above on what is a punters' forum.

Someone might get the impression that there’s no point in messaging me because they probably won’t get a reply, but that isn’t true. My comms are good.

Thank you for a polite exchange of views and have a wonderful Christmas

[JonasG]

I've had the same experience as CP.

I'd also agree with him it is something that needs to be noted.

My comms are always exactly the same for every escort in terms of format i see and rarely have issues booking escorts. So if for you there's never any response, so there's something different going on.

Like he says, if you don't want to respond that's fine and it's not a big deal for me either.

But we should definitely mention this to other punters as we're getting dead air from a simple booking request. Whatever the reason.

[Cunning Punt]

You don’t know why I blacklisted them. Those guys may have been flagged as timewasters or something much more serious.

And nor do you, nor do you know that you definitely blacklisted any of us for definite at all!! Because you don't know the corresponding tel numbers or messages. Personally, I tried to contact you 3/4 times over a long period of time, and changed number once if not twice in that time.

Your statement is based on assumptions and a strong desire to maintain publicly here that your comms are good with everyone. In effect, you're accusing us of treating an escort poorly in our communications which is a wild claim and offensive, frankly. It's all deflection on your part.

If you're blacklisting guys for texting in normal hours: "Hi Sarah, are you free for a [length] booking at around [time/day] please? Many thanks, [name]" then, right okay. 

Someone might get the impression that there’s no point in messaging me because they probably won’t get a reply, but that isn’t true. My comms are good.

Well not really, as discussed. We're just stating how it is; what people take from it is up to them. You'll continue to be inundated with booking requests for some time yet no doubt.

[Cunning Punt]

.

I've had the same experience as CP.

I'd also agree with him it is something that needs to be noted.

My comms are always exactly the same for every escort in terms of format i see and rarely have issues booking escorts. So if for you there's never any response, so there's something different going on.

Like he says, if you don't want to respond that's fine and it's not a big deal for me either.

But we should definitely mention this to other punters as we're getting dead air from a simple booking request. Whatever the reason.

Indeed.

[Fitsarahgfe]

In effect, you're accusing us of treating an escort poorly in our communications which is a wild claim and offensive, frankly. It's all deflection on your part.

I haven’t- I would appreciate if my words weren’t twisted, as that no longer fits a civilised conversation.

At this point, anyone who wanted to understand already understands why I don’t respond to literally EVERYONE (even if it’s a polite message- as if that were the only thing that matters..) , and I doubt it comes as a surprise to many. Thank god my number isn’t 999, so it’s fine. So I have nothing else to add.  

[Cunning Punt]

I haven’t- I would appreciate if my words weren’t twisted, as that no longer fits a civilised conversation.

At this point, anyone who wanted to understand already understands why I don’t respond to literally EVERYONE (even if it’s a polite message- as if that were the only thing that matters..) , and I doubt it comes as a surprise to many. Thank god my number isn’t 999, so it’s fine. So I have nothing else to add.

No-one expects you respond to every text; you could have just said "I get a lot of enquiries and unfortunately I can't respond to every one" and adopted a less defensive tone but you didn't, you automatically responded and repeated that you would have blocked me and others (without our numbers to correlate no-one can say this for sure) ie down to how we approached you. So what I said wasn't really twisting what you said.

Anyway, we'll leave it there. There isn't really a need to respond to minor comments; you're very popular and will continue to be so.

[harryhavanagh]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Location - Reading RG2, Hotel near J11 M4

£160 - 1 Hour - October 2025.

Comms - SMS, quick reply

I had really looked forward to seeing Sarah, and she did not disappoint in the slightest.

I had question marks over her facial looks due to the obscured photos online, but I needn't have feared, as I found her really pretty. Not stunning, just really pretty. Her size surprised me too. She is tall and her frame matches her stature, but is very slim in proportion due to her height. To say the least I thought, as  a package, just WOW.

Greeted with a lovely, gentle, intimate kiss. No rush, and bloody lovely.

Paperwork sorted, and into shower quickly. Dried, and onto bed for a short kiss before she went down on me for a lovely blow job. Stopped her before I blew, and gave RO. Very nice, very fresh but very short as she prefers giving to receiving. Then condom on, into CG, missionary and I think Doggy (it was a few weeks ago). The condom off for more BJ with CIM that was great!

There was loads of FDK throughout and some chat - she really is quite lovely, and marked the start of a great 2 weeks (one exception).

All told, a really lovely GFE the I would love to repeat.

I read in her AW interview her pubic hair is natural. Is this accurate?

[nigel4498]

I read in her AW interview her pubic hair is natural. Is this accurate?

I’ve seen Sarah and it certainly wasn’t a wig