Belsize chicas – Adultwork – Group of Spanish & Latin girls (solo £80/hr, duo £120/hr)
MEETING DETAILS: Group name: Belsize Chicas
Adultwork Group profile: External Link/Members Only (image form
External Link/Members Only)
Group phone number: 02036951778
Current girls’ profiles: 1. Candy (aka Lovely__candy):
External Link/Members Only (image form
External Link/Members Only)
2. Brenda (aka teeny_brenda_ ):
External Link/Members Only (image form
External Link/Members Only)
3. Sandra (aka lollypop_sandra):
External Link/Members Only (image form
External Link/Members Only)
4. Lora (aka Lora_babybella):
External Link/Members Only (image form
External Link/Members Only)
5. Deborah (aka deborah__):
External Link/Members Only (image form
External Link/Members Only)
Time of Visit: 21:10, Time Spent: 2 hours, Type of Visit: Incall (Belsize Park, NW3)
Total Fee Paid: £200 (1hr 121 with Candy for £80; then 1hr duo with Candy & Brenda for £120)
PREAMBLE:Here is my own account about my own experience with Belsize chicas which for yet another time shows that in punting there are no guarantees and also it is horses for courses. So, Belsize chicas is a group of Spanish and South American girls-I am pretty sure the arrivals in this group are somehow orchestrated in the background but the girls are nonetheless doing this job freely and are pretty much independent. There is a lot of profile swapping going on with the chicas so to avoid confusion in the future I include the profiles in an image format as well. This review is about my experience with the current crop of chicas that took place earlier this week and as a whole I left satisfied. On the same night I first had a mediocre
solo session with
Candy and immediately afterwards a rocking
duo session with
Candy & Brenda. A duo for £120ph btw…
ABOUT THE CHICAS’ VENUE: (mostly positive) The chicas keep changing locations working from several serviced apartments/studios in the NW3 area that can be booked online from websites such as trip advisor or booking.com. The one that I visited this week (nb. I am pretty sure that a Spanish girl I met in a different studio in NW3 last year was belonging to the same orchestrated group) is a block of around 30 serviced (nb. some are privately owned) ensuite studios (nb. weekly rent rate around £350-£400) in a Victorian terrace located in a safe, residential road situated between Swiss Cottage, Chalk Farm and Belsize Park tube stations about 10 mins walk from each. I believe each chica rents their own studio but perhaps not as some studios can accommodate more persons. Anyway for what is worth I only entered 2 studios on my recent visit – the first where the selection process took place and the second was Candy’s studio. Just to be clear the studios are separate much like hotel rooms are and they are on the same floor (ground floor). The studio that I spent my time with Candy and then Brenda also joined us was about 30 square metres in total (bedroom, dining area, kitchenette, small corridor all in an open plan studio arrangement plus a bathroom). Bathroom was clean albeit small; about 2 square metres (toilet, sink and power shower with curtain) – fresh towels provided. Anyway clean and fairly tidy I can’t really fault the premises for the purpose especially at this punt price but of course anyone can resort to nitpicking pointing out things such as the height and size of the bed (not a high divan and size only double - not king size), the energy coefficient being only 73% so not good for green punting, etc...
ABOUT THE CHICAS’ PHYSICAL APPEARANCE: I saw all 5 current chicas during the selection process but I can only recall the appearance of 4 (sorry I was distracted). Anyway I will describe the 4 girls that I remember but obviously start from and focus on the chicas that I shagged and are the two girls that I will review in detail later i.e. Candy and Brenda.
Candy (reviewed girl): (mostly positive) Candy es una chica bonita de España (ella tiene 26 años, nacido en 1988). She has dyed blonde hair and dark-green eyes. Ella se mide 5ft3in/1.60m (descalzo). She has very nice, natural, non-saggy 32D boobs with inverted nipples, a petite-slim (size 8) figure and a nice arse. If I were to nitpick I would say that her tummy is not flat; she does have a little tummy but nothing off-putting - just don't expect a girl ‘without an ounce of fat’ in the abdomen area. The other parts of her body (thighs, hips, arse, arms, etc) are perfectly slim. She also has several discreet tattoos which you can see on her pics.
External Link/Members Only is her official verification photo but it is very unflattering as most verification photos are. However the verification photo I display below (first from the left) from her gallery is very representative/accurate. In the second picture you can see the little tummy I referred to above. According to my (subjective and criticised) quasi-scientific female beauty scale which you can read in
this thread Candy’s face score is 8.0/10 and her body score is 7.2/10 (most points lost ‘unfairly’ due to her short height). Overall attractiveness score 7.6/10. She certainly floated my boat.
Hidden Image/Members OnlyBrenda (reviewed girl): (mostly positive) Brenda is a cute girl born in Paraguay (from Pedro Juan Caballero) but living in Spain. She is 21 years old (born in 1993). She is 5ft2in/1.58m tall, fairly slim (dress size 8-10) with 32D boobs. The pictures are genuine and some fairly accurate and if anything most are unflattering like for example this
External Link/Members Only which really doesn't do her any justice about her face or body (e.g. it is as if she has tummy which she does have a bit but not that much) although it is accurate about her boobs. She wears teeth braces but not the old fashion ones like ugly Betty – they are pretty discreet. Below you can see some pics from her gallery that
are representative (especially the rightmost one). According to my beauty scale her face score is 7.5-7.6/10 and her body score is 7.0/10. Overall attractiveness is 7.3/10.
Hidden Image/Members OnlyThe other chicas (for reference only): Sandra: Sandra looks to be in her mid-20s – again of Spanish nationality. Perhaps the current leader of the group. In my opinion she is the second prettiest of the chicas almost tied with Candy in first place (the third is Brenda). She looked very different from the photoshopped pictures appearing on her profile. I can't say better or worse- just different. There is
External Link/Members Only in her gallery – again different but the resemblance is there and in my opinion she was better in flesh. I can't comment on her body as she was clothed – I can only say she was slim and around 1.63m/5ft4 tall (barefoot) - with shoes she’s taller.
Deborah: Lora is a Brazilian in her early 30s (she is 31y.o born in 1983). She is the tallest of the current crop of chicas – around 5ft7in. Facially she was OK/cute
Lora: I can't recall her, sorry. She was perhaps standing behind another girl or so. I remember I kissed her (on the cheek) but sorry. This memory lapse is unusual for a person with an elephant memory like me but anyway.
Hidden Image/Members OnlyABOUT THE MEETING: (A) Meeting arrangement: (mostly positive) The phone call was answered promptly either by one of the girls (I reckon Sandra) or a secret receptionist (my impression is that there is no receptionist). You don't need to book a specific girl (and if you book a specific girl you might get bait and switched) and you don’t need to book a specific time (btw opening hours are 11am-4am … the chicas live in the premises and are available for work when they don't sleep). I just called the landline number and got the address (they texted me it from a mobile number) after expressing a vague same day interest and indicating a rough time (around 9pm) and when I was outside I gave them a call on the landline number and I was texted directions of where exactly the entrance is - a girl (Sandra) came to pick me up from there and guided me into a studio. I wouldn't advise to book traditionally i.e. in advance requesting a specific girl - you're a very likely to get switched with one of the available girls plus you will be missing the very fun part of the selection process…
(B) Selection process: (mostly positive) Unlike the shitty Euston/Kings Cross brothel’s
modus operandi the chicas didn't come wearing bra and knickers standing in a line like soldiers ‘instructed’ by a maid. They came fully clothed and it felt like visiting a flat of 5 friendly Spanish/Latin girls all coming to warmly welcome me by each introducing themselves with a greeting, a handshake and exchanging cheek kisses. Then it was selection time. Asked each girl separately about services although the language barrier of some girls meant that one or two chicas who speak English more ‘proficiently’ assisted in translation. I had originally planned to start with a duo with Candy and Sandra who are the 2 prettiest chicas from the current crop but Sandra said she doesn't offer sex, only blowjobs – perhaps she was on her period or she was tired. Brenda also caught my eye but I ultimately decided to start with a 1-2-1 session with Candy. Then I was guided into Candy’s studio.
(C) Accuracy of the chicas’ enjoy lists: (negative) The enjoy lists of the girls as you could expect are a pile of shit ticking almost any service. Filming, facials, CIM and ‘exotic’ services like A levels, double penetration, fisting, gangs bangs, hardsports, rimming, enema, car meets are NOT available. Not that I would opt for most of these services but I would have loved to film the duo. I am flagging this up so to know that the way they advertise is dishonest and to not take the enjoy list for granted. Similarly with confirming things on the phone other than the price - meaningless. Anyway more about services in section D.
(D) During the meeting:
PART I. Solo session with Candy: (mixed) Services that I made use of: Kissing/lipkissing, protected vaginal sex in several positions, OWO, 69, COB, ball-licking, cunnilingus, clit stroking, handjob, titjob, massage, shower together .
Once inside Candy’s studio I paid the fee (£80 for one hour) and she left the studio to go back to the other one to store the money. I could have a shower if I wanted while waiting but I was already freshly showered. She came back after 7-8 minutes but time started ticking AFTER she returned (fair play). For the record I entered the flat at around 21:10, with the selection process and her out of the room the session eventually started at 21:25 and finished at 22:25 (only to immediately recommence for duo). Anyway we started ‘FK’ (just lipkissing with *very minor* almost reluctant lip-locking) and rapidly undressed – I then started going downwards neck-kissing, kissing body, licking and sucking her inverted nipples and finally diving south of the border for some oral and clit stroking to which she seemed to be responsive. We changed for 69 after some time it was shagging time. She put on the condom and we started in missionary for 5-6 mins, then went for a brief 2 min reverse cowgirl, then doggy for 7-8 mins, then back to missionary (different variations) for another 5-6 mins. It was time for a break for blowjob and some mouthfucking (another good 5-6mins) and finally a handjob and DIY to completion with COB. We are still in the 40min mark and we go for a shower together (6-7mins) while we washed each other and had some chat. Coming back from the shower we still have time so we exchanged relaxing massages with her starting first. I started body kissing again from behind and with my cock doing the thinking I decided to extend for another hour. But another 1hr solo with Candy didn't seem promising so I opted for a duo (as per my original plan). She asked me which lady to bring in. I said Brenda … I asked if she is good she told me ‘she is brilliant’– I thought inside bullshit that will be even more money wasting – anyway I handed over the £120.
But the friend down there was right after all… (see PART II) POSITIVES:
1. Very friendly and polite
2. Obliging to any (within her service limits) request without reluctance.
3. Nice OWO technique and also plays with and licks the balls.
4. She took a long hard pounding in several positions - she didn't rush me to cum.
5. Responsive during reverse oral.
6. She looks sexy at all angles.
7. Good handjob and finally I cummed on her tits.
8. The relaxing massage and the showering together after the intercourse added to the “GFE”.
9. She was showered/clean.
10. No clockwatching and no rushing. No maid, neither other girls came knocking the door to indicate time is up. Time management is done by the WGs themselves and Candy is not a clockwatcher.
11. Presumably multiple pops allowed (although I went for one long 40min round personally).
12. Tight pussy
NEUTRALS:
1. No COF/CIM available (the absence of these services doesn't personally bother me).
2. No fingering (there was clit stroking though)
3. No or very light make up (but anyway she is naturally pretty so not a problem). Also her lower legs were not freshly depilated/waxed – not that you could see hair but you could get a slight rough feeling (I guess she left them for some days without grooming). Her thighs and rest of her body was ‘baby-smooth’ though.
4. She declined getting into more acrobatic positions (she was slightly injured)
5. She seemed a bit tired and sex was a bit perfunctory.
6. Not keen to cowgirl a lot. After just 2 mins of reverse cowgirl she asked to change to doggy.
7. Her English level is only A2 (elementary) as that is defined by (
External Link/Members Only).
NEGATIVES:
1. No proper FK. Just lip kissing with very very minor and almost reluctant liplocking. Very far from proper French Kissing and obviously even farther from DFK.
continue to PART II here