Leeds Ruby Chai / Mia Chai

[basedbunny]

I am quite picky with WG's and haven't had a punt in a few years in the UK as I usually reserve it for a treat abroad but I thought I would write a review seeing as there has been some recent heat (to my surprise) on my last SP.

It appears she has now changed her name but I saw her two weeks ago when she was still Ruby External Link/Members Only

Piad £120 for 1 hour as I don't like a rushed service but ending up extending to 90 minutes for £180. Ended up finishing three times. Once in her mouth.

Met her at the Malmaison in Leeds. I booked for 6pm but she told me she could actually see me earlier. Worked out better for me, as it was only a short drive and I had nothing else to do. Upon arrival, she gave me the room number and I walked up the steps to the first floor and reached her room in about 45 seconds. Didn't even need to take the lift. Knock on the door, she opened it with a devilish smile and I was slightly taken aback at how prettier in person she was. Very young looking, dressed in white lace and smart trousers. Nice classy look with a hint of girlish sexiness. She apologised for the coldness of the room and offered me a shower if necessary. I declined, we started off with some small talk about when I saw her profile. She has a sweet demeanour that puts you at ease without trying too hard. Clothes were off and we soon got to business. Nice kissing. not exactly French kissing but she wasn't uptight or stringent with her soft plump lips. OWO was very tight and sloppy, Deepthroat was fantastic, I could feel all the way down the back of her throat and she only came up for air every 2 minutes or so it seemed. I applauded her for being a trooper. I told her I was cumming and she suctioned around the tip and then released just in the time for the big finish. She had that big grin on her face again as she wiped me clean and then went to wash her hands. We layed together on the bed whilst my champ was having some downtime.  Within 5 minutes of conversation it became clear she is obviously very intelligent and worldly, clearly opinionated and not afraid to show it. Has a certain addictive charm to her. This little rest and play routine repeated a further two times before the 90 minutes were up and we hugged and said our goodbyes. Told her I would definitely be back and she said she was glad.

An interesting and very fun experience with a lovely young girl who seemed like she was in her element. I must admit I was very shocked upon seeing the other less pleasant reviews. Perhaps she was just having a bad day but I wouldn't write her off for it.

As someone that does not shy away from criticism, I can overall recommend and would say to give her a chance! Cheers and happy exploring 

[VitIron]

Very first review.

Very first post, in fact...

Is anyone thinking what I'm thinking?

[gentlemencaller]

Cod, haddock or herring?

[DThunter01]

Hi basedbunny

Welcome

Now… did she let you face fuck her? Did she gag with the deepthroat and her eyes water??

[DThunter01]

Cod, haddock or herring?

More like bull shark 

[SolidJohn]

Very first review.

Very first post, in fact...

Is anyone thinking what I'm thinking?

Who knows. I see your point about first review on a new profile. I also see his point and maybe she was having a bad day When she was asking about reviews on here I asked if she was on this and she said no and mumbled something about a couple of regulars.

If it was just a bad day and this is the way she's trying to rescue her reputation I think she'd be better reaching out to us guys she's let down and ripped off to try make things up in some way. But like I said, who knows.

[VitIron]

Who knows. I see your point about first review on a new profile. I also see his point and maybe she was having a bad day When she was asking about reviews on here I asked if she was on this and she said no and mumbled something about a couple of regulars.

If it was just a bad day and this is the way she's trying to rescue her reputation I think she'd be better reaching out to us guys she's let down and ripped off to try make things up in some way. But like I said, who knows.

Who knows?

I think it's pretty obvious what going on with that 'review'.

[FLYING BLUE]

Very first review.

Very first post, in fact...

Is anyone thinking what I'm thinking?

Yes
I can smell a certain smell......

[Aji81]

Hilarious. Literally addresses all the negative aspects of the two negative reports. Even the changing of the appointment time is presented as a good thing.

[SolidJohn]

Who knows?

I think it's pretty obvious what going on with that 'review'.

You're probably right. I was just giving the reviewer the benefit of possible doubt.

[wakefieldlad13]

Strangely enough her first review on here was from a relatively new member, positive too, his first and only review and nothing since ?

[Jomoore]

Is anyone thinking what I'm thinking?

Very much so, in fact it also answers how she gets to read the reviews 

[VitIron]

You're probably right. I was just giving the reviewer the benefit of possible doubt.

I think it’s almost certain that the reviewer is Ruby/Mia or someone posting an unreliable review for her.

Also, when you take into account that she:

-   has never had a boyfriend
-   has never kissed a boy
-   doesn’t get on with her flatmates
-   has difficulty making friends

and then throw in her questionable comment about Jewish people, it adds up to much more than just having a bad day.

[VitIron]

Strangely enough her first review on here was from a relatively new member, positive too, his first and only review and nothing since ?

Well spotted 

[Millward85]

Given one of the negatives mentioned her on ecstasy, perhaps this is what she is like sober.

Though I'm I'm leaning more to agree with the general consensus of suspicious review, but always something to consider

[Kipkayaks]

Strangely enough her first review on here was from a relatively new member, positive too, his first and only review and nothing since ?

Her first review on here was actually on the 26th of October by me. The OP’s review was his first review of her as stated. Just posting in the interest of being accurate.

[Upsndowns79]

Her first review on here was actually on the 26th of October by me. The OP’s review was his first review of her as stated. Just posting in the interest of being accurate.

I believe Wakeylad was referring to the review below which appears at the bottom of her linked reviews as yours has been commented on later. This review is the only review/comment by the member so similar to this one.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=439576.0

I’ve mentioned before but this SP sits below my minimal age threshold anyway but its reviews like she’s had this week that convince me that (for me anyway) it’s the right choice. She appears to be very immature and not cut out for this line of work. Her no penetration rule (and not hiding her apparent virginity) are big red flags for me and she is at risk of attracting the wrong sort of interest and by default sets off lots of alarms for me.

Each to their own.

[basedbunny]

I am really not sure where this speculation is coming from as I had originally stated in my post that I decided to leave a review as Ruby was the first SP I had seen in a while and was surprised she was attracting some negative attention.

She also told me that she’s never had a boyfriend and I think it’s really unfair to discount this against her as it is some kind of abnormality or sign of bad character?? She’s 18 for Christ's sake! I found her earnestness endearing and direct nature refreshing. But then again I like real people, not performative sex dolls.

My experience was wildly different to yours and you have the right to state your opinion but nitpicking and dogpiling on a young girl that was clearly not in the right state of one day is rather cruel and unbecoming.

I think it’s almost certain that the reviewer is Ruby/Mia or someone posting an unreliable review for her.

Also, when you take into account that she:

-   has never had a boyfriend
-   has never kissed a boy
-   doesn’t get on with her flatmates
-   has difficulty making friends

and then throw in her questionable comment about Jewish people, it adds up to much more than just having a bad day.

[basedbunny]

I hate to be vulgar but yes and yes. 

Hi basedbunny

Welcome

Now… did she let you face fuck her? Did she gag with the deepthroat and her eyes water??

[DThunter01]

I am really not sure where this speculation is coming from as I had originally stated in my post that I decided to leave a review as Ruby was the first SP I had seen in a while and was surprised she was attracting some negative attention.

She also told me that she’s never had a boyfriend and I think it’s really unfair to discount this against her as it is some kind of abnormality or sign of bad character?? She’s 18 for Christ's sake! I found her earnestness endearing and direct nature refreshing. But then again I like real people, not performative sex dolls.

My experience was wildly different to yours and you have the right to state your opinion but nitpicking and dogpiling on a young girl that was clearly not in the right state of one day is rather cruel and unbecoming.

Would you mind answering my questions regarding her DT skills and face fucking ?  Or are you here just to defend her rather than reply to questions relating to her service?? That just adds to the suspicion in my eyes

[wakefieldlad13]

External Link/Members Onlytopic=442609.msg4363988#msg4363988 date=1762264265]
I believe Wakeylad was referring to the review below which appears at the bottom of her linked reviews as yours has been commented on later. This review is the only review/comment by the member so similar to this one.[/img]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=439576.0

I’ve mentioned before but this SP sits below my minimal age threshold anyway but its reviews like she’s had this week that convince me that (for me anyway) it’s the right choice. She appears to be very immature and not cut out for this line of work. Her no penetration rule (and not hiding her apparent virginity) are big red flags for me and she is at risk of attracting the wrong sort of interest and by default sets off lots of alarms for me.

Each to their own.

That is correct Upsy, thankyou for the link

[VitIron]

'a young girl that was clearly not in the right state of one day is rather cruel and unbecoming.'

You didn't read my message properly, did you, Ruby?

Sorry... Mia.

[basedbunny]

Are you off your nut or what? I did reply, check above. But for further clarification, yes she responded to my facefucking enthusiastically and yes she gagged and her eyes watered blah blah. I didn’t mention it in my OP but I actually told her she could slow down on the deep-throat as after the second round I was slightly concerned about the state of her oesophagus, she continued with great vigour anyway. Hope that answers your question.

Would you mind answering my questions regarding her DT skills and face fucking ?  Or are you here just to defend her rather than reply to questions relating to her service?? That just adds to the suspicion in my eyes

[Upsndowns79]

See what I mean 

[I like natural boobs]

Well spotted 

That is well spotted indeed. I didn't notice that. It isn't the first review however. The first review has gone above it in the list due to having had more replies. The first review was written by Kipkayaks who has written 8 reviews. A small detail I know and it doesn't excuse all the poor services she's given but that first review looks legit. Gone downhill since it would seem.

[I like natural boobs]

Yeah already been pointed out. Ignore my comment above.

[wakefieldlad13]

The first review has gone above it in the list due to having had more replies.
#
The first review was written by Kipkayaks who has written 8 reviews. A small detail I know and it doesn't excuse all the poor services she's given but that first review looks legit. Gone downhill since it would seem.

Thanks ILNB, i had noticed Kipkayaks review but not the date, i wrongly assumed the first review was at the bottom of the list, good info for me going forward

IMO there is no excuses for poor service, if the WG doesnt like the look of the OP then she should say so and refuse service, just as a OP should walk if her is not happy

I dont think anyone including myself would be questioning Kips review of this girl especially considering the number and quality of his contributions in his short time on here, however, i do feel that the other 2 positive reviews seem a bit out of place...time may tell and hopefully us doubters will be proved wrong

[VitIron]

I dont think anyone including myself would be questioning Kips review of this girl especially considering the number and quality of his contributions in his short time on here, however, i do feel that the other 2 positive reviews seem a bit out of place...time may tell and hopefully us doubters will be proved wrong

The above review is totally out of place.

There are so many issues with it that it's natural to assume that it was written by Ruby/Mia.

[wakefieldlad13]

The above review is totally out of place.

There are so many issues with it that it's natural to assume that it was written by Ruby/Mia.

I agree regarding Basedbunny's review but imo, there is nothing amiss with KIPKAYAKS account

[VitIron]

I agree regarding Basedbunny's review but imo, there is nothing amiss with KIPKAYAKS account

I'm not saying there was.

When I said the above review, I was referring to the one from the OP but, looking back, I didn't make that very clear.

I've got not issues at all with Kipkayaks' review. It's a reliable account with no agenda.

But everything about Ruby's...

Sorry, Mia's...

Sorry, basedbunny's review smacks of a desperate attempt at face-saving and damage limitation.

An attempt that has simply backfired.

[wakefieldlad13]

I really liked the look of this one so its a shame she as fucked up her reputation so early on

However, assuming the suspect reviews are directly related to her and she is reading these threads then she should now realise that her cover is blown, as for damage limitation, the best thing she can do is make serious adjustments to her profile and her attitude, then get her knickers off, provide a full on quality service at an acceptable price and she will then find many will forget her more recent activities

[VitIron]

I really liked the look of this one so its a shame she as fucked up her reputation so early on

However, assuming the suspect reviews are directly related to her and she is reading these threads then she should now realise that her cover is blown, as for damage limitation, the best thing she can do is make serious adjustments to her profile and her attitude, then get her knickers off, provide a full on quality service at an acceptable price and she will then find many will forget her more recent activities

The very best thing she can do is to get out of this work and put it behind her.

[SolidJohn]

I really liked the look of this one so its a shame she as fucked up her reputation so early on

However, assuming the suspect reviews are directly related to her and she is reading these threads then she should now realise that her cover is blown, as for damage limitation, the best thing she can do is make serious adjustments to her profile and her attitude, then get her knickers off, provide a full on quality service at an acceptable price and she will then find many will forget her more recent activities

I'd say the best thing she could do is contact those she booked and ripped off and try put it right by way of a free re-booking but offering what's expected or giving a refund. All in the hope that the negative reviews would at least be uplifted to a neutral on the back of the apology.

[raging_bull]

LOL at this thread.

I agree with other posters. She definitely wrote this review. The replies have a feminine tone and the username basedbunny also just sounds suspiciously Gen Z

[DThunter01]

Are you off your nut or what? I did reply, check above. But for further clarification, yes she responded to my facefucking enthusiastically and yes she gagged and her eyes watered blah blah. I didn’t mention it in my OP but I actually told her she could slow down on the deep-throat as after the second round I was slightly concerned about the state of her oesophagus, she continued with great vigour anyway. Hope that answers your question.

That’s exactly the reply I was expecting, after insisting you reply to a DT and face fuck question if you were indeed ruby then you would defend and that’s what you did

Made my assumption.. end of

[bestofthebest]

There's also a chance the reviewer may be a pimp. Did anyone who saw her feel she was forced into this?

[VitIron]

There's also a chance the reviewer may be a pimp. Did anyone who saw her feel she was forced into this?

I certainly didn't get that impression.

[puntingking]

Thank you for your first review 

Welcome to the forum   

Welcome on board mate   

[VitIron]

Thank you for your first review 

Welcome to the forum   

Welcome on board mate   

You are joking, aren't you?

[puntingking]

You are joking, aren't you?

no 

[VitIron]

no 

You might want to read the rest of the thread... 

[puntingking]

You might want to read the rest of the thread... 

read it
oh dear 


 

[VitIron]

read it
oh dear 

And there's this review, written by someone posting not only their first review but also their first post who hasn't posted anything since:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=439576.0

[puntingking]

And there's this review, written by someone posting not only their first review but also their first post who hasn't posted anything since:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=439576.0

 

[SolidJohn]

And there's this review, written by someone posting not only their first review but also their first post who hasn't posted anything since:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=439576.0

I agree, it's all very suspicious. Add in that she asked me (and others) if we'd read her reviews and it's starting to add up to someone manipulation this site.

She's got 3 red and 3 green here but 2 of those greens are seriously questionable and probably her own doing.