Any WG over £100 an hour is . . .

[jesus_jones]

Something that I feel is worth mentioning is photos.

I find a lot of these more expensive £100+ ph girls have misleading photos, especially those working for agencies. They are often horribly photoshopped and you don't get a proper idea of what the girl truly looks like. I have walked out many times in my early days when booking with agencies, Thai's being the worst offenders, with the women sometimes looking double the age of the photos.

I generally feel I am more likely to find genuine, honest photos in the £70-100ph bracket.

[Jimmyredcab]

Something that I feel is worth mentioning is photos.

I find a lot of these more expensive £100+ ph girls have misleading photos, especially those working for agencies. They are often horribly photoshopped and you don't get a proper idea of what the girl truly looks like.

For once I agree with you a zillion %. ------------- however the photoshopped pictures are fairly easy to spot. 

[jesus_jones]

Haha, I knew there was common ground there somewhere!

Yes they are easy to spot, it's more the fact that at the higher price bracket, you aren't often given a choice. They just shove these professional photos down your gullet and expect you to blow £200 or £300 based on that. The fact they are afraid to post 1 or 2 natural pics using an iPhone makes me incredibly weary - and based on my experience, usually with good reason.

[punk]

Yes, and I would do it again under identical circumstances -------------------- £50 for 30 minutes with an English girl is far too low.

no its not, they're competition from abroad,so some are adjusting their prices in response.

[cylon]

i find that sad. Its the gift of the gab that counts.

As overs have said higher the price and looks do not mean you will get a better performance, of course its your business.

Yes you're right price has little if anything to do with quality of performance. But there are stunners out there that do give excellent service and I'm happy to pay that bit extra. On the other hand here is one I would not pay a penny to see. External Link/Members Only she is absolutely stunning in my opinion but from her likes, mainly dislikes she does fuck all. I can't understand how she's got so much positive feedback. She must be hypnotising them.
She is a perfect example of fluffy fuckers who must go weak at the knees just to be in her presence.

[punk]

Yes you're right price has little if anything to do with quality of performance. But there are stunners out there that do give excellent service and I'm happy to pay that bit extra. On the other hand here is one I would not pay a penny to see. External Link/Members Only she is absolutely stunning in my opinion but from her likes, mainly dislikes she does fuck all. I can't understand how she's got so much positive feedback. She must be hypnotising them.
She is a perfect example of fluffy fuckers who must go weak at the knees just to be in her presence.

thats the trouble there are a lot of mr fluffy out there.

[ArtVandalay]

If you are a management consultant I'm not sure you are right about being ostracised by the wider community

Ha! Touche 

[hockogrockle]

I can understand girls in London thinking they can charge rip-off prices. After all, there are plenty of Arabs, Chinese, Russian oligarchs, and so on, over on business, and with no idea of the going rate.
What I can't understand is how (looking at the BA postcode as an example) there is one woman who describes herself as "11 miles south of Bath" (nowhere in particular, in other words), who charges £250 for an hour. Even crazier, she charges £120 for 30 minutes. so you could save a tenner by making two consecutive thirty minute bookings. Pictures aren't anything special, by the way. I haven't bothered with a link.
Just as crazy is the forty-something woman based in Shepton Mallet (a rather dreary little market town some twenty miles south of Bath), who thinks she can charge £160 per hour. She says "she'll send you away with a smile on your face". Frankly, I think it will be her with the smile on her face as she stashes your money away.
Both strike me as completely up themselves. I wouldn't patronise either.

[hendrix]

As others have stated, price has nothing to do with the quality of service. My issue was always that I simply could not find girls able to provide all the services I insist on for less than £150 - I don't think anyone on UKP was able to help either. If I "just"  wanted owo/sex and maybe cim or swallow, then yes, around a £100 should be sufficient, but that's not what I wanted.

[Jeff_withpetersen]

Where are all these great WGs for £100 an hour or less? I live near Peterborough, hardly the most glamorous of places in the UK and it's £140 an hour for anyone passable.

[west8]

... likely earning more per hour than 90% of the board membership.

£100 per hour really isn't that much to sell a small piece of yourself to someone you might detest.

Or to put it another way, I wonder how many guys on here would fuck a 65-year-old granny for £100.

Exactly.

[385North]

... likely earning more per hour than 90% of the board membership.

£100 per hour really isn't that much to sell a small piece of yourself to someone you might detest.

Or to put it another way, I wonder how many guys on here would fuck a 65-year-old granny for £100.

Exactly.

Couldn't have put it better myself.

[Tjkooker]

Up this neck of the woods it's a rip off. Average prossies are looking for £150
We have a few decent reliable and really good girls @ £130 with an occasional girl asking a sensible £100.

[Old monk]

If you were a millionaire, you wouldn't drive a fiesta, youd have a Ferrari or similar, if your middle management your in a Beemer or its like,if your a shelf stacker it could well be a second hand Skoda. All these car makes are the same, they get you from A-B, the only difference is that ones more expensive. Why anybody thinks whores are different is beyond me, the ride is pretty much the same, face down, arse up, on the whole it's pretty much the same motions with pretty much the same result.
The only difference is the looks, the extras, the stuff!
Ive punted with an agency girl in her upmarket west end apartment, bottle of wine on the go £350 for 2 hours, is she any different than the girl I saw last year for £80 for an hour in a grubby, pokey room. Well the sex was slightly better in fact but the BJ was not quite as good, both were pretty fucking fit and both delivered well.
Guess which one i revisited? It's got nothing to do with what the girls charge, it's down to what you can afford. If you were rolling in it you aren't spending £80 an hour, your buying the stuff and going up market, if you say not then your kidding yourself.
One thing I do agree with though, whatever price bracket the girls are in, post real photos! You can't advertise your car as a Bentley when in fact it's a beetle!

[Quesadilla]

If you were a millionaire, you wouldn't drive a fiesta, youd have a Ferrari or similar, if your middle management your in a Beemer or its like,if your a shelf stacker it could well be a second hand Skoda. All these car makes are the same, they get you from A-B, the only difference is that ones more expensive. Why anybody thinks whores are different is beyond me, the ride is pretty much the same, face down, arse up, on the whole it's pretty much the same motions with pretty much the same result.
The only difference is the looks, the extras, the stuff!
Ive punted with an agency girl in her upmarket west end apartment, bottle of wine on the go £350 for 2 hours, is she any different than the girl I saw last year for £80 for an hour in a grubby, pokey room. Well the sex was slightly better in fact but the BJ was not quite as good, both were pretty fucking fit and both delivered well.
Guess which one i revisited? It's got nothing to do with what the girls charge, it's down to what you can afford. If you were rolling in it you aren't spending £80 an hour, your buying the stuff and going up market, if you say not then your kidding yourself.
One thing I do agree with though, whatever price bracket the girls are in, post real photos! You can't advertise your car as a Bentley when in fact it's a beetle!

+1 oh wise one! 

I think the car analogy has legs - or wheels anyway.  Of course we should think of it as the second hand car market rather than new.  very few brand new WG's out there!

I think there are lots of punters who just need something to get them from A to B without any fuss or bells and whistles.  A Fiesta might do you fine.  A Mercedes CL is still doing the same job just with more style and at a premium price and likely more reliably.  If you can afford the Merc you don't buy a Fiesta even if all you want to do is go from A to B. 

But a lot depends on the mileage and how well a car has been treated.  A second hand Merc with a lot of miles that's been badly maintained can be a lot less reliable than a well looked after Fiesta.

And most people know better than to buy a Dacia but every now and then it might do the job!

Personally I like to have a Merc as a run around (GFE regs like Lovely Isabell who are hardly cheap but give great / reliable service and never fail to put a smile on my face through the whole ride) and an SUV for a bit of luxury, versatility and the ability to carry any load I throw at it with ease (hardcore regs like Hayley XX and MissKDD). I have no problem paying that bit extra for the quality / versatility so why shouldn't I?  To me these are seriously sweet rides that never fail to impress and in most cases going back to a Fiesta seems a bit dull.

Of course this is definitely not to say that all SUV's are immediately better than all Fiesta's - or that all SUV's have to cost an arm and a leg. I picked up a very nice Lexus SUV with all the bells and whistles for a song and it's been the most reliable / comfortable / versatile car I've ever owned. (Not an analogy - genuinely great car) My analogy would be someone like Platinum Cindy who is a luxury / versatile sporty little number at a Fiesta price.

But the bottom line for me is that buying a car is an emotional decision. We buy cars out of brand loyalty, fond memories, a sense of excitement. It's not simply a pragmatic / practical choice and neither is choosing a WG.

Obviously if I could get a Merc or a Lexus SUV for £100 I'd want to  snap it up but I'd look very closely at the paperwork and under the chassis to make sure it wasn't a ringer.

[smiths]

If you were a millionaire, you wouldn't drive a fiesta, youd have a Ferrari or similar, if your middle management your in a Beemer or its like,if your a shelf stacker it could well be a second hand Skoda. All these car makes are the same, they get you from A-B, the only difference is that ones more expensive. Why anybody thinks whores are different is beyond me, the ride is pretty much the same, face down, arse up, on the whole it's pretty much the same motions with pretty much the same result.
The only difference is the looks, the extras, the stuff!
Ive punted with an agency girl in her upmarket west end apartment, bottle of wine on the go £350 for 2 hours, is she any different than the girl I saw last year for £80 for an hour in a grubby, pokey room. Well the sex was slightly better in fact but the BJ was not quite as good, both were pretty fucking fit and both delivered well.
Guess which one i revisited? It's got nothing to do with what the girls charge, it's down to what you can afford. If you were rolling in it you aren't spending £80 an hour, your buying the stuff and going up market, if you say not then your kidding yourself.
One thing I do agree with though, whatever price bracket the girls are in, post real photos! You can't advertise your car as a Bentley when in fact it's a beetle!

This is a generalisation, i know a few millionaires and none have a Ferrari, they dont have a Fiesta either but have decent 4 by 4s among other non supercars. One has a Mercedes though.

So according to you i am kidding myself. You couldnt be more wrong. Having paid £350 an hour to find NO difference to other WGs i punted with at £80 an hour i choose to punt with WGs who charge under £200 an hour and can locate many good WGs for that. I require VFM as i see it and its got NOTHING to do with what i can afford, but ALL to do with requiring VFM, as i do with things outside punting. For me it feels sweeter to me to get VFM than not. Sure i sometimes splash the cash on things i want but not in punting as it wont necessarily help as i have learned over 30 years.

 In punting if as i know there is NO correlation between what a WG charges and how good a WG she might be i dont waste my money paying rates over £200 an hour as i can find plenty of WGs who charge less than that and offer a great service.

A WG is different to an inanimate object as unlike them she is a unique individual with her own brain, and its her individual attitude that determines whether she is a good WG or not.

[password02]

This is a generalisation, i know a few millionaires and none have a Ferrari, they dont have a Fiesta either but have decent 4 by 4s among other non supercars. One has a Mercedes though.

So according to you i am kidding myself. You couldnt be more wrong. Having paid £350 an hour to find NO difference to other WGs i punted with at £80 an hour i choose to punt with WGs who charge under £200 an hour and can locate many good WGs for that. I require VFM as i see it and its got NOTHING to do with what i can afford, but ALL to do with requiring VFM, as i do with things outside punting. For me it feels sweeter to me to get VFM than not. Sure i sometimes splash the cash on things i want but not in punting as it wont necessarily help as i have learned over 30 years.

 In punting if as i know there is NO correlation between what a WG charges and how good a WG she might be i dont waste my money paying rates over £200 an hour as i can find plenty of WGs who charge less than that and offer a great service.

A WG is different to an inanimate object as unlike them she is a unique individual with her own brain, and its her individual attitude that determines whether she is a good WG or not.

+1000% Agree

[Old monk]

A WG is different to an inanimate object as unlike them she is a unique individual with her own brain, and its her individual attitude that determines whether she is a good WG or not.

Smiths, I could not agree more, perhaps I was trying to be a bit too smart with my analogy. The point I was trying to make is that whilst I agree there is no correlation between price and service, there is definitely a correlation between the looks and the setting and price. As Jason pointed out earlier there are more V good looking WGs in the higher price bracket, these girls will also be more likely to be situated in a nice apartment, with nice facilities. My point is exactly as you state, the ride is pretty much the same, some are a bit nicer but essentially its the fluff around the outside your paying for.

From my point of view Id rather pay slightly more for a nicer setting, better facilities and a cleaner environment. Now this indeed might be a generalisation and there will always be an exception that disproves the rule but for example I don't hear of to many reports on guys moaning about showers etc in the £150 upwards bracket.
And I bet the girl you paid £350 an hour for wasn't in a grubby bedsit in Harrow or wherever, now you may not think the "extras" are worth anything and therefore won't pay any more and I can understand that but for me, if its in a "nicer setting" its worth a little extra.

[GreyDave]

 
As a user of the Soho walk ups I can say that some times (to use the car comparison) I have had Bentleys and Astons ( and other Exoctics ) for the price of an old Fiesta  .
Some of the girls have been fab and at a real bargin 20 - 30 quid  .
On the odd time I have paid a 1er+  it has been something I`d looked forward to but really it has been pretty close to the 20 job  the higher cost has not meant better service.
Best value was early this year at the paradise spa 2 beautiful South Americans 1 African belle a :yahoo:nd an English Milf all for the entrance price and a blue pill 
Steve2 knows value better than most on here his tips are mostly the right price for me 

[smiths]

Smiths, I could not agree more, perhaps I was trying to be a bit too smart with my analogy. The point I was trying to make is that whilst I agree there is no correlation between price and service, there is definitely a correlation between the looks and the setting and price. As Jason pointed out earlier there are more V good looking WGs in the higher price bracket, these girls will also be more likely to be situated in a nice apartment, with nice facilities. My point is exactly as you state, the ride is pretty much the same, some are a bit nicer but essentially its the fluff around the outside your paying for.

From my point of view Id rather pay slightly more for a nicer setting, better facilities and a cleaner environment. Now this indeed might be a generalisation and there will always be an exception that disproves the rule but for example I don't hear of to many reports on guys moaning about showers etc in the £150 upwards bracket.
And I bet the girl you paid £350 an hour for wasn't in a grubby bedsit in Harrow or wherever, now you may not think the "extras" are worth anything and therefore won't pay any more and I can understand that but for me, if its in a "nicer setting" its worth a little extra.

And i disagreed with Jason about a correlation between price and looks, you now add setting. When i paid £350 sn hour and £300 an hour a number of times the WGs premises were no plusher than some other WGs i paid £80 an hour to.

Your business what you pay and why, i will stick to what works for me. I am more than happy to punt with some stunners as i view them at the price i am prepared to pay.

[Old monk]

When i paid £350 sn hour and £300 an hour a number of times the WGs premises were no plusher than some other WGs i paid £80 an hour to.

Ok all I can say to this is, if I had the opportunity to shag Kiera Knightly for £350 in a shabby bedsit, i would pass. I for one can't help looking at the mantelpiece whilst poking the fire!

Your business what you pay and why, i will stick to what works for me. I am more than happy to punt with some stunners as i view them at the price i am prepared to pay.

Never a truer word said!!! 

[Mr Farkyhars]

£100 per hour really isn't that much to sell a small piece of yourself to someone you might detest

I wouldn't pay anything just to soothe the feelings of a WG who detests her clients and is therefore in the wrong job

[Jimmyredcab]

£100 per hour really isn't that much to sell a small piece of yourself to someone you might detest.

You do talk bollocks.     

If a girl hates being a prostitute the price is irrelevant.   

[Hobbit]

Once thing I don't understand are escorts that charge £200 per hour or more but have very limited like lists. I personally wouldn't pay that amount without receiving CIM at the least. In the past I may have done but not anymore.

[Sedlmayer]

You do talk bollocks.     

If a girl hates being a prostitute the price is irrelevant.   

Precisely - attitude is the absolute key to a good punt, and unfortunately paying more doesn't guarantee a good attitude.

On another thread Snake8 criticised me for saying that there is no correlation between price and quality, in that it was a self-evident truth that didn't need to be stated. And yet here is, proving that he doesn't understand that at all.....

If a girl hates being a prostitute, £10 per hour would be expensive.

[Aspen]

Yes, and I would do it again under identical circumstances -------------------- £50 for 30 minutes with an English girl is far too low.

Far too low for what?

They get bookings at that sort of price. Almost with exception the ones that charge more are complaining about how quiet it is and they can't get enough bookings. Delusional people who tell them they are worth a lot more are raising their expectations to unrealistic levels and stuffing up their trade.

[Jimmyredcab]

Far too low for what?

They get bookings at that sort of price. Almost with exception the ones that charge more are complaining about how quiet it is and they can't get enough bookings. Delusional people who tell them they are worth a lot more are raising their expectations to unrealistic levels and stuffing up their trade.

I repeat --------
I would do it again under identical circumstances.   

[The_Don]

If you were a millionaire, you wouldn't drive a fiesta, youd have a Ferrari or similar, if your middle management your in a Beemer or its like,if your a shelf stacker it could well be a second hand Skoda. All these car makes are the same, they get you from A-B, the only difference is that ones more expensive. Why anybody thinks whores are different is beyond me, the ride is pretty much the same, face down, arse up, on the whole it's pretty much the same motions with pretty much the same result.
The only difference is the looks, the extras, the stuff!
Ive punted with an agency girl in her upmarket west end apartment, bottle of wine on the go £350 for 2 hours, is she any different than the girl I saw last year for £80 for an hour in a grubby, pokey room. Well the sex was slightly better in fact but the BJ was not quite as good, both were pretty fucking fit and both delivered well.
Guess which one i revisited? It's got nothing to do with what the girls charge, it's down to what you can afford. If you were rolling in it you aren't spending £80 an hour, your buying the stuff and going up market, if you say not then your kidding yourself.
One thing I do agree with though, whatever price bracket the girls are in, post real photos! You can't advertise your car as a Bentley when in fact it's a beetle!

As for cars I've driven a few. I own (at present) a fiesta External Link/Members Only with all the extras, apart from satnav

Also driven BMW (a few) / VW passat cc / Merc's and 1 Audi 

Been in a few nice ones as well:

Jags / Range rovers (top spec) / Roll Royce etc / high end

Civic Type R / GTI (205/6 - Golf etc) / Cosworth / Fto 

The fact of the matter is these car have a market place (even the  External Link/Members Only )

But for me I chose a titanium X, because if offered a good over-all package/price (and handles great vs other in the price range).
Nippy little thing (some BMW, Merc driver are surprised at the lights when I keep up with them, External Link/Members Only )


That what it comes down to for me a market place / price / package

This is a generalisation, i know a few millionaires and none have a Ferrari, they dont have a Fiesta either but have decent 4 by 4s among other non supercars. One has a Mercedes though.

So according to you i am kidding myself. You couldnt be more wrong. Having paid £350 an hour to find NO difference to other WGs i punted with at £80 an hour i choose to punt with WGs who charge under £200 an hour and can locate many good WGs for that. I require VFM as i see it and its got NOTHING to do with what i can afford, but ALL to do with requiring VFM, as i do with things outside punting. For me it feels sweeter to me to get VFM than not. Sure i sometimes splash the cash on things i want but not in punting as it wont necessarily help as i have learned over 30 years.

 In punting if as i know there is NO correlation between what a WG charges and how good a WG she might be i dont waste my money paying rates over £200 an hour as i can find plenty of WGs who charge less than that and offer a great service.

A WG is different to an inanimate object as unlike them she is a unique individual with her own brain, and its her individual attitude that determines whether she is a good WG or not.

This is to the point, I've been with £180+ and £60+ and the W/G makes the difference not the cost


As for super car, I Know and have meet also worked with some millionaires, some own nice cars. They also have run a rounds, Jason Donovan (meet him back in 2002) he had a Range Rover (back then and not top spec) and when I asked why (he could buy better) he answer was its practical for my needs.  Mariella Frostrup had a mid range Audi.

But one of old my bosses had a Maserati, but he started with nothing and made he self million's. My point of view the car was a present to him self, (even took me for a drive in it)

[smiths]

I repeat --------
I would do it again under identical circumstances.   

You have made that very clear redcab. Your an absolute disgrace advising any WG to raise her price, something i bet you dont do with others outside punting you do business with.

[punk]

Most people drive a flash car because they think it makes them look the business.

[Dodo]

Yes, and I would do it again under identical circumstances -------------------- £50 for 30 minutes with an English girl is far too low.

Given the commendable effort this guy puts into making contributions it is such a pity that most of his posts contain such shite. But then I suppose he can only work with what the good lord gave him........bless.

[Jimmyredcab]

Given the commendable effort this guy puts into making contributions it is such a pity that most of his posts contain such shite.

I don't have to answer to a nobody like you.       

[yumyum3]

. . . taking the piss, in my opinion.

I've punted all over the world, and have thrust the pink log into both tres expensive and tres cheap fireplaces. And upon reflection have concluded that, actually WG vaggies are pretty much the same the world over at both ends of the price spectrum . . .

Every time I see a WG with £STUPIDPRICE per hour I think, why would anyone pay that rate for this?

Ceteris paribus, I just do not believe that the level of service for a £500-1000 per hour WG is 5-10 times better than a £100 per hour WG.

Thoughts?

Good post. Come late to the thread but I generally pay £100 for 45 mins or £70 half hour. I keep an open mind and would make exceptions if I really wanted to see someone. I was on the verge of seeing Dior recently but some reports by the good members here put me straight and she, like many others charge "extras" which really gets on my nerves but I have to admit to being guilty of  handing over 30 quid for the pleasure of Scarlet's bottom. There are some members on here who clearly think nothing of handing over what I would consider silly sums of money for sex but that is their business. I lean towards the views of the OP 

[Sedlmayer]

As for cars I've driven a few. I own (at present) a fiesta External Link/Members Only with all the extras, apart from satnav

Also driven BMW (a few) / VW passat cc / Merc's and 1 Audi 

Been in a few nice ones as well:

Jags / Range rovers (top spec) / Roll Royce etc / high end

Civic Type R / GTI (205/6 - Golf etc) / Cosworth / Fto 

The fact of the matter is these car have a market place (even the  External Link/Members Only )

But for me I chose a titanium X, because if offered a good over-all package/price (and handles great vs other in the price range).
Nippy little thing (some BMW, Merc driver are surprised at the lights when I keep up with them, External Link/Members Only )


That what it comes down to for me a market place / price / package


This is to the point, I've been with £180+ and £60+ and the W/G makes the difference not the cost


As for super car, I Know and have meet also worked with some millionaires, some own nice cars. They also have run a rounds, Jason Donovan (meet him back in 2002) he had a Range Rover (back then and not top spec) and when I asked why (he could buy better) he answer was its practical for my needs.  Mariella Frostrup had a mid range Audi.

But one of old my bosses had a Maserati, but he started with nothing and made he self million's. My point of view the car was a present to him self, (even took me for a drive in it)

Winner of the Most Boring Post Of 2014 Award (non-prostitute-related). Congrats, etc....  Yawn
What gave you the edge was Mariella Frostrup's Audi.
FFS.....

[The_Don]

Winner of the Most Boring Post Of 2014 Award (non-prostitute-related). Congrats, etc....  Yawn
What gave you the edge was Mariella Frostrup's Audi.
FFS.....

Thanks, glad I entertain you sir 

The point I was making is their is a market for all tastes, (even if you or I don't see value in it!)

 BUT:

That what it comes down to for me a market place / price / package


This is to the point, I've been with £180+ and £60+ and the W/G makes the difference not the cost

[Dodo]

I don't have to answer to a nobody like you.       

Well don't fucking answer then 

Anyway BTTT, there are are any number of really fit girls who earn some very positive positive reviews on the Midlands thread and who give you an hour for less than £100. In particular a group of Czech girls and a group of Hungarian girls who will do you an hour for £70. These are stunners with good attitude so in this catchment area there is no real need to fork out some of the figures mentioned above.

[webpunter]

Reckon in the south east / london that 120 to 150 respectively per hour is a minimum requirement
Would rather have 2 * 150 rather than 1 * 300
Whatever the pricing is IMO then if massage / HJ / BJ [typically OW] is what you're after then dipping to 80-100/hr is fine
My experience is that the girlies are fitter & better looking - and compare favourably to the more expensive FS options - minus the shagging obviously
I like to mix it up a bit depending on my mood at the time.  Massage or FS etc.  My favourites are where there is what i call "dual option pricing".  Massage / OW with @ £x and +£y if you want FS.  I always take the cash for an 'upgrade'
Must have a play @ Sandys / other NW parlours where its 100 all-inclusive for the hour & some of the birds are as 'fit as..'