Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: The 2014 UKP punting awards  (Read 9880 times)



30 review(s) found for cute doll86xxx linked to in above post (28 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline unclesweetheart

Tie between Adele4U and LilyHart. Because they're both really bright, funny, sexy AS fuck and the 3some I had with them was sublime.
Banning reason: Prossie fanboy + Sharing account with banned member (Atticus Finch aka Sylvester)

Emily's Creme Brulee by far my best. She's probably the best fuck I've ever had. Gorgeous with a sweet and flirty personality.

Seeing all the love for Adele it seems like I need to pay her a visit pretty sharpish!

Offline Sparky22

No votes for Maggie21 ????

I am surprised. Have seen her twice in the last month. My No1 only reason not to review is that there is nothing more to be said !


Ravanelli

My Top  punts of 2014 in no particular order are:

1. Mara of Derby
2. Miss HollyGolightly
3. Vicki Diamondintheruff
4. Chelseahart
5. Louise Naturallyblonde
6. Jemma  MissNaughtygirl66

All great girls but it possibly says something that the only girl I'm interested in booking at the moment is Mara of Derby.

Offline Quesadilla

Three fab regs who have literally made my year:
1) MissKDD
2) Hayley X X
3) Lovely Isabell

Four honourable mentions:
Platinum Cindy
Madlin Moon
Horny Polish Girl (formerly New Polish Girl)
BritBabeTamara

The latter are either out of my usual stomping grounds or just difficult to book or would have become regulars as well.
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE


88 review(s) found for MissKDD linked to in above post (88 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
71 review(s) found for Hayley-x-x linked to in above post (71 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
6 review(s) found for Lovely Isabell linked to in above post (6 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)
74 review(s) found for X PLATINUM x CINDY X linked to in above post (71 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative)
28 review(s) found for MadlinMoonXXX linked to in above post (27 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
42 review(s) found for horny slutty girl linked to in above post (40 positive, 0 neutral, 2 negative)
1 review(s) found for BritbabeTamara linked to in above post (1 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)

In no particular order:

Suzi @ Sandys Manchester www.sandys.co.uk Probably my girl of the year.
Harriet @ La Maison Bury www.lamaisonbury.co.uk Sweet, porcelain skinned beauty.
Ellie @ Manchester Elite www.manchester-elite.co.uk Best Body on any WG I have seen
Sian @ Sandys Superstars www.sandys.co.uk Uncompromising deep throat. fine fuck!
Billie P AW Indie(Manchester) https://www.adultwork.com/Billie+P+x best ass and fine GFE

I don't have a top 5 as such as it depends whether I want GFE or filth. I have six girls that I've punted 1-2-1 that either I have returned to or plan to in the future, each offering something different to the other.

Then there was Rebecca More who's exactly how I like a girl to be, a 3-girl in Liverpool and LMP which were all memorable. Haven't done many parlours, but Suzi at Sandys is very good indeed

That said, I haven't finished yet with 3 more punts planned for this year and one of those may well top the lot!

Other highlight was being crowned WotW back in August, never had that sort of honour bestowed on me before. I wanted to tell the wife but she wouldn't have believed me :lol:

Perhaps we should have a 5 worst punts of the year thread, which would be extremely useful IMO, though I doubt it would be as well subscribed.....

tcm

Offline west8

this means that Mel belongs in the current top 150 most facially beautiful young white females in the world (in my book). If that sounds over the top then so be it – it is my own opinion but this is what mattered the most when I spent a little fortune on her in the space of 4 months that I kept meeting her.  :hi:

Agreed she's something special, but top 150 GLOBALLY?

Jesus, get real. Even I'm never that fluffy!

Offline Jason

Agreed she's something special, but top 150 GLOBALLY?

Jesus, get real. Even I'm never that fluffy!

Unlike you I never make a claim without unbiasedly believing it and backing it up although of course on this topic of beauty everything is subjective. What I mean is that, yes, Mel is one of my favourites prossies and yes beauty is subjective but I would never say that she is in the top 150 current young white females globally without truly believing it- setting aside the fact that she is one of my favourites. For the record facially (according to MY OWN TASTE) I rank Mel *higher* than the likes of Irina Shayk, Kelly Brook, Alessandra Ambrosio, Emma Stone, etc and I estimate that only 4-5% of the top tier has the luck to become famous or semi-famous and that many are hidden. I am in the process of completing a study that I will publish on beautiful-women-pedia-more on this when it is ready with GIFs and embedded pics and I will re-post it on UKP at some point. :hi:

Offline Quesadilla

« Last Edit: December 15, 2014, 09:52:55 PM by Quesadilla »
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Sedlmayer

I don't have a top 5 as such as it depends whether I want GFE or filth. I have six girls that I've punted 1-2-1 that either I have returned to or plan to in the future, each offering something different to the other.

Then there was Rebecca More who's exactly how I like a girl to be, a 3-girl in Liverpool and LMP which were all memorable. Haven't done many parlours, but Suzi at Sandys is very good indeed

That said, I haven't finished yet with 3 more punts planned for this year and one of those may well top the lot!

Other highlight was being crowned WotW back in August, never had that sort of honour bestowed on me before. I wanted to tell the wife but she wouldn't have believed me :lol:

Perhaps we should have a 5 worst punts of the year thread, which would be extremely useful IMO, though I doubt it would be as well subscribed.....

tcm

You people always want to try to pretend that it's some sort of honour - Wank8 has done it, Infocunter... blah blah
It's not an honour - we think you're a wanker.
That simple.

Offline Sedlmayer

Agreed she's something special, but top 150 GLOBALLY?

Jesus, get real. Even I'm never that fluffy!

yes you are - your reviews are so fluffy as to be fucking useless.
Jason is entitled to his (often somewhat strangely-arrived-at) opinion, you snake.

Offline west8

Unlike you I never make a claim without unbiasedly believing it and backing it up although of course on this topic of beauty everything is subjective.

That little jibe was beneath you Jason. Plenty have disputed my honesty and integrity as a reviewer, but as time has passed it's fairly obvious to see that my reviews mirror the experiences of others. Moreover, as you were the one who decided to subject me to your own little Q&A, I would have thought you'd be man enough to stand up and admit your scepticism was misplaced.


Offline west8

yes you are - your reviews are so fluffy as to be fucking useless.
Jason is entitled to his (often somewhat strangely-arrived-at) opinion, you snake.

Touche. You of all people know all about fluffiness - particularly given your track record of 0 Negative reviews.

Moving slightly off point, I hope your mother used to wash out your mouth with soap before you went to the synagogue and uttered such inane profanities in your every outburst.

 :hi:

Offline Quesadilla

Unlike you I never make a claim without unbiasedly believing it and backing it up although of course on this topic of beauty everything is subjective. What I mean is that, yes, Mel is one of my favourites prossies and yes beauty is subjective but I would never say that she is in the top 150 current young white females globally without truly believing it- setting aside the fact that she is one of my favourites.
Sorry Jason, usually your attention to detail is frankly mind-boggling but I'm struggling to deal with the contradiction here - you admit beauty is subjective, and that you are clearly biased, but at the same time you claim you can set aside your preference to unbiasedly assert she is in the top 150 best looking white ladies in the whole wide world? 

Or are you just saying she is without question in your top 150?

Because you can't possibly even guess that she would automatically be in my top 150, or any of the other guys on here let alone a wider audience?  I mean, who is the audience that you think would agree she is a top 150 looker?  Every male in the world?  Men and women alike?  Punters?  White men?  She's advertised as a Latina which is not to everyone's taste - some Brazilian women have a certain look that some men find exotic, others not so much. 

Don't get me wrong - I've just been through her PG and based on the pics of her bod alone (assuming they are accurate) I would put her easily in the top 5 WG's I've seen, and I will definitely put her in my short list to meet but the pics that do show parts of her face didn't jump out at me as better than many other Latina's I've seen e.g. Larissa Naughty on AW.

Just a bit confused why someone so detail-oriented as you would make such an utterly unprovable and subjective statement as if it's objective?  :unknown:


Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Sedlmayer

Touche. You of all people know all about fluffiness - particularly given your track record of 0 Negative reviews.

Moving slightly off point, I hope your mother used to wash out your mouth with soap before you went to the synagogue and uttered such inane profanities in your every outburst.

 :hi:

That's the spirit, Snakey Boy! If you can't find a rational argument, a bit of utterly gratuitous anti-Semitism always does the trick! :wacko:
It's hilarious that you think that Sedlmayer is a Jewish name, and also that you seem to think it's my real name  :crazy:

Offline Sedlmayer

Touche. You of all people know all about fluffiness - particularly given your track record of 0 Negative reviews.

Moving slightly off point, I hope your mother used to wash out your mouth with soap before you went to the synagogue and uttered such inane profanities in your every outburst.

 :hi:


"your track record of 0 Negative reviews" -
I have adopted a policy where I don't review girls I saw before I joined this site.
Since joining this site I have reviewed girls I have seen.
Largely thanks to the advice posted here, and crucially, from information exchanged with other member via PM, I haven't had a downright bad punt since joining this forum.

If you think I'm going to post inaccurate Negatives, and mislead punters, just to earn a bit of street cred in your eyes, you're an even bigger wanker than I take you for.

I invite anyone who may be interested (don't all rush at once, now) to read my reviews for themselves and judge whether they think they're fluffy.


« Last Edit: December 16, 2014, 01:02:55 PM by Sedlmayer »

You people always want to try to pretend that it's some sort of honour - Wank8 has done it, Infocunter... blah blah
It's not an honour - we think you're a wanker.
That simple.

No, still haven't got it. Can someone explain?

tcm

Offline Jason

Sorry Jason, usually your attention to detail is frankly mind-boggling but I'm struggling to deal with the contradiction here - you admit beauty is subjective, and that you are clearly biased, but at the same time you claim you can set aside your preference to unbiasedly assert she is in the top 150 best looking white ladies in the whole wide world?  Or are you just saying she is without question in your top 150?   Just a bit confused why someone so detail-oriented as you would make such an utterly unprovable and subjective statement as if it's objective?  :unknown:
Yes, that’s correct. I have enough evidence that makes me believe that even if I were a judge in a hypothetical global beauty contest with participants all white women born between 1980 and 1996 (an estimated of 150 million females) that after examining each one by one I would still conclude that Mel belongs in *MY* top 150 most facially beautiful girls and I say this without the bias of knowing Mel or being fluffy with her or anything. She could be a skank, a murderer etc... I would still rate her looks the same way i am doing now - I don't let my feelings affecting my judgement about looks.

Don't get me wrong - I've just been through her PG and based on the pics of her bod alone (assuming they are accurate) I would put her easily in the top 5 WG's I've seen, and I will definitely put her in my short list to meet but the pics that do show parts of her face didn't jump out at me as better than many other Latina's I've seen e.g. Larissa Naughty on AW.
Take a look at these pics of her famous look alike.

That little jibe was beneath you Jason. Plenty have disputed my honesty and integrity as a reviewer, but as time has passed it's fairly obvious to see that my reviews mirror the experiences of others. Moreover, as you were the one who decided to subject me to your own little Q&A, I would have thought you'd be man enough to stand up and admit your scepticism was misplaced.
As I said and before I am certain that your posted reviews are genuine, i.e. you met the girls and you are a genuine punter. But for me you are misleading even when it comes to the very basics like for example verifying pictures’ accuracy - as clearly illustrated in this thread about Sasha. :hi:

Offline Sedlmayer

No, still haven't got it. Can someone explain?

tcm

OK - you're taking it with some humour. That's fair enough. To be truthful, I don't think you're in the same league as Masturb8 and the unlamented Infocunter.
Re-reading you post I think you were tongue in cheek about it being an honour etc, so no worries.

OK - you're taking it with some humour. That's fair enough. To be truthful, I don't think you're in the same league as Masturb8 and the unlamented Infocunter.
Re-reading you post I think you were tongue in cheek about it being an honour etc, so no worries.

 :hi:

tcm

Offline Quesadilla

Yes, that’s correct. I have enough evidence that makes me believe that even if I were a judge in a hypothetical global beauty contest with participants all white women born between 1980 and 1996 (an estimated of 150 million females) that after examining each one by one I would still conclude that Mel belongs in *MY* top 150 most facially beautiful girls and I say this without the bias of knowing Mel or being fluffy with her or anything. She could be a skank, a murderer etc... I would still rate her looks the same way i am doing now - I don't let my feelings affecting my judgement about looks.
Take a look at these pics of her famous look alike.
Sorry I'm being pedantic.

The definition of beauty is a quality that when perceived gives you a feeling of pleasure or satisfaction.  You have absolutely zero conscious control over what gives you pleasure/satisfaction.  Those feelings are guided by a much more primitive part of your brain.  What you find beautiful in a woman is is guided by all sorts of cultural as well as personal influences at a very deep level.  So I don't see any way that anyone can claim to be completely unbiased and objective about beauty. That's why I was confused. You admit beauty is subjective but claim you are able to somehow be objective. 

Clearly Mel is just your type and of course she could easily be in your "global 150".  In fact, given the strength of your conviction on the subject I think we'd all be surprised if you somehow managed to do your survey of the white women in the world and Mel didn't feature in the top 150! 

But that doesn't really prove anything at all does it? Just that you believe she's beautiful, to your personal taste, entirely subjectively.  Which is absolutely fine!  :drinks:

The comparison with Ms Richards is more useful.  Personally I'm not a huge fan - she's a looker sure and I wouldn't kick her out of bed, but I'm not convinced she would pop into my head if I tried to list my top 150 good looking actresses let alone top 150 women in the world.  Not particularly my type - but it's certainly helped pique my interest to meet Mel at some point for sure so thanks for that.   :thumbsup:  :drinks:
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline west8

As I said and before I am certain that your posted reviews are genuine, i.e. you met the girls and you are a genuine punter. But for me you are misleading even when it comes to the very basics like for example verifying pictures’ accuracy - as clearly illustrated in this thread about Sasha. :hi:

Glad we cleared that up.

As mentioned on a previous thread, I believe Sasha is both beautiful and a good SP. Not once have I ever left feeling less than 'satisfied'.

Moreover (and you won't like this), I believe she is a better SP than Mel / NewBrazilian. Granted, Mel is stunning - I wrote as much in my first review here after meeting her.

BUT .. I have a predilection for brunettes. Always have and likely always will. I also prefer Slavic girls over Latinas. Mel is still - if memory serves me right - the only Latina WG I have met.

So, whilst I do agree with you that Mel is unique in many ways, her service (in my experience) is inferior to that provided by Sasha.

I think we'll have to disagree on which girl is 'better', but as that is largely subjective there is no possibility of either of us being proven to be correct as it were.

But to state that I have 'mislead' anyone vis-a-vis Sasha's pictures is a nonsense. She looks FAR better in real life than in the 'mugshot' you linked to in the other thread. Having met her, that is not simply my opinion. It is a fact.


Offline Sedlmayer

Glad we cleared that up.

As mentioned on a previous thread, I believe Sasha is both beautiful and a good SP. Not once have I ever left feeling less than 'satisfied'.

Moreover (and you won't like this), I believe she is a better SP than Mel / NewBrazilian. Granted, Mel is stunning - I wrote as much in my first review here after meeting her.

BUT .. I have a predilection for brunettes. Always have and likely always will. I also prefer Slavic girls over Latinas. Mel is still - if memory serves me right - the only Latina WG I have met.

So, whilst I do agree with you that Mel is unique in many ways, her service (in my experience) is inferior to that provided by Sasha.

I think we'll have to disagree on which girl is 'better', but as that is largely subjective there is no possibility of either of us being proven to be correct as it were.

But to state that I have 'mislead' anyone vis-a-vis Sasha's pictures is a nonsense. She looks FAR better in real life than in the 'mugshot' you linked to in the other thread. Having met her, that is not simply my opinion. It is a fact.

No - it is an opinion.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)