Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Bareback and HIV+  (Read 4611 times)

Dave2014

  • Guest
I punt on the presumption that anyone who offers bareback is also HIV+

Obviously, I know know if they actually are, but I cannot understand why anyone would otherwise offer bareback.

Am I alone in this presumption, or do you guys also view bareback in this way?

Offline hendrix

Every escort offers bareback to somebody so I'm not sure I view the open offering of bb any differently tbh :unknown:

Offline SmackmaBitchUp

Seems to be popular with the Romanian chicks ( probably because they got shit all else to offer)

Offline smiths

I punt on the presumption that anyone who offers bareback is also HIV+

Obviously, I know know if they actually are, but I cannot understand why anyone would otherwise offer bareback.

Am I alone in this presumption, or do you guys also view bareback in this way?

I view it that ALL WGs could be infected with something nasty and take the risks i am prepared to take for the rewards on offer as i see them, backed up by going to the GUM.

What must certainly be the case by the number of WGs who say they offer BB is there is a market for it, if there wasnt such WGs wouldnt offer it over offering it in my view.

Offline punk

wonder how many of them and the punters who bare back are knowing HIV

Offline maxxblue

Seems to be popular with the Romanian chicks ( probably because they got shit all else to offer)

I always thought that Romanians apparently offer bareback on AW because they can't speak English, but in reality, don't actually offer bareback.

dilettante

  • Guest
They either don't really offer it, or charge extra for it - which is the same thing, I suppose.  Though that is gleaned from my sole experiences with two of the lowest order of skanks.

Offline Trevor12

I always thought that Romanians apparently offer bareback on AW because they can't speak English, but in reality, don't actually offer bareback.

True for many I think. Some confuse OWO with bareback. Some just tick every box- a lot think they own a sybian.

Offline CBPaul

Can't say I've given it much thought really, I avoid those openly offering bb and unprotected sex irrespective of whether they really know what is being offered. It stands to reason though that any prossie going bareback with punters is bound to contract a range of infections, HIV included.

I also assume that all prossies have barebacked at some point and don't believe it when they make a big point of saying they don't go bareback on their profiles. I take the risks I'm willing to take based on the prossie and how I feel.

No doubt there is a market for bareback out there and there are enough prossies willing to do it. It's difficult to judge how many because all these Romanian profiles have zero fb due to it being seen as the darker side of punting shrouded in more secrecy than usual.

I've been told by a few prossies that they are asked about bareback quite often, seems that there is an added sense of achievement amongst some punters when they get a non-barebacker to go uncovered. One reckoned she'd been offered a grand - but didn't explicitly say she'd said no, so work the answer out.

Another, earlier this year, who categorically stated on her profile that any mention of bareback would result in blocking etc, asked me if I was local to the area, then followed that by asking where she could get the morning after pill  :scare: I was getting dressed at the time having just gone two rounds of sex with her.   

dilettante

  • Guest
I often see* a BBer I fancy, and think that so long as I don't have unprotected sex with her the risk is limited to nasties like gonorrhoea (ie via OWO) rather than actual HIV - and this is what people most commonly complain about in relation to a "BB skank".  This is OUR counterpart of what ladies like Dani mean when they say that they never do anything with anyone that would put them at risk - as lots of punters could be HIV+ too.

*see as in 'browse on AW', not actually visit
« Last Edit: December 07, 2014, 12:35:03 am by dilettante »

Offline myothernameis

I punt on the presumption that anyone who offers bareback is also HIV+

Obviously, I know know if they actually are, but I cannot understand why anyone would otherwise offer bareback.

Am I alone in this presumption, or do you guys also view bareback in this way?

I would say, maybe at first the escort is clear of hiv or anything else, but if she see 6 guys per day, and this adds up to 240 punts in a month, thats 240 times to cartch something you dont want, and as for the guys, you could be the first guy through the door, knowing your hiv+, and not make it known infect the escort, and inturn she infects everyone else

or the 235 gys are lucky, and everyone is clean, but the 240 guy isnt, so its noit realy worth having bareback sex, it is truly russion roulette

Offline tbrad

barebackers are not all doing it because they are hiv positive, some do it for money, some have habits to pay for, purses to buy, children to look after, etc etc

some are total sluts, some just risk takers, some destitute,

Offline punk

barebackers are not all doing it because they are hiv positive, some do it for money, some have habits to pay for, purses to buy, children to look after, etc etc

some are total sluts, some just risk takers, some destitute,

all fucking mad