JessicaLiverpool - Liverpool

[Resources3xx]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


PRICE: 100

COMS: always been good. seen here 4 times in total. the only prolem was once she said it was the wrong hotel  however this was a genuine mistake so i had no issue with it, infact she gave me some extra time so i was happy with that.

LOCATION: well known hotel in town


LOOKS: says 37 on AW, personally i think she looks a lot younger but for a 37 year old shes got a great bod and very attractive. if you go to see her expecting a 19 year old and are disapointed... thats your proplem. cute ass and great tities. MILFtastic

SERVICE: as ive seen her a few times now this is a general review for all 4 occations. service is just fucking outstanding. cant stress this enough. she really is something else. sex and BJ was just awesome. but the best thing for me is just how passionate the kissing was. maybe we just clicked i dont know but shes up there for me with one of the best serivices ive ever had.

Overall: shes had a couple of non positive reviews lately which im genuinly shocked about but we all have our own experiences. i can only speak for myself and ive had an amazing time every time, and ill definatly be back.
one thing that comes to mind is on the occasion she gave me the wrong adress. after appologising and giving me a towel for she shower she said. "go on take your time and when youre ready... well have a laugh". i repeat WE'LL HAVE A LAUGH. ive never heard an SP say that or something similar to that. and its true we really did have a laugh. ive seen some increadibly stunning escorts in my time. theyd be perfect for a porno or dancing on a pole but i wouldnt have them as a girlfriend. in contrast this girl is perfect girlfreind material. looks wise, the perfect amount of natural georgousness. and personality wise the right amout of bonkersness. i could spend hours with her "having a laugh" dont get it twisted i know its business at the end of the day. but if there was a girl out there with a similar amout of natural gorgousness and bonkersness... i may consider giving up punting.
if your boarderline i say fuck it take a punt. the coms seem to be the recent issue (not with me though) just bare that in mind and who know your may click like we did

[PilotMan]

Thanks for the review, even if a little scant on the actual services provided.

Was that £100 for 30 minutes?

[Resources3xx]

Thanks for the review, even if a little scant on the actual services provided.

Was that £100 for 30 minutes?

yeh like i said mate was more gereralising all the punts ive had with her instead of one perticular. basically owo, 69, her on top and lots of snogging, rimmed her lots, but wouldnt me finger her bum.  id never make a great erotic novalist im afraid 

ye 100 for 30 mins

[lewisjones23]

suggest that anyone considering seeing this WG gets access to her private gallery

photos may not do her justice but they indicated to me that she is late 40's or had a hard paper round, I took her straight off my list once I paid for access

[Resources3xx]

suggest that anyone considering seeing this WG gets access to her private gallery

photos may not do her justice but they indicated to me that she is late 40's or had a hard paper round, I took her straight off my list once I paid for access

I’d like to correct what I said. I said she looked “a lot” younger. I was thinking 35 so should have written “slightly younger” my bad


As for the private gallery, I agree people should pay for the private gallery and decide for themselves. I’m 44 and I’ve just looked at my Facebook and skimmed through the girls who were in my year. Every one of them looks older than “Jessica” so I have to honest and say “late forty’s” seems pretty nuts to me. But hey, we are all entitled to our opinion so as you suggested people should pay for the gallery and decide

[lewisjones23]

hey, we are all entitled to our opinion so as you suggested people should pay for the gallery and decide

100% agree, PG a must before thinking about seeing this WG

[Tommygunn81]

suggest that anyone considering seeing this WG gets access to her private gallery

photos may not do her justice but they indicated to me that she is late 40's or had a hard paper round, I took her straight off my list once I paid for access

If I were you I would reserve judgement until you’ve seen her in the flesh. I’m early 40’s and look a little younger for my age but I think Jessica looks a little younger than me. Still photos never give a true indication. Trust me! She is and looks younger than 40.

I myself had exceptional service. Not the most fun I’ve had with an escort, but the potential was certainly there for it and I only saw her once.

[lewisjones23]

If I were you I would reserve judgement until you’ve seen her in the flesh. I’m early 40’s and look a little younger for my age but I think Jessica looks a little younger than me. Still photos never give a true indication. Trust me! She is and looks younger than 40.

I myself had exceptional service. Not the most fun I’ve had with an escort, but the potential was certainly there for it and I only saw her once.

There is no way on earth that this woman is in here 30's, unless she has had the hardest life ever.

That coupled with the frankly odd behaviour being reported, everything from not being able to give the right hotel she is working from, turning up to bookings drunk, punching fans off the bedside table and generally erratic comms means I wouldn't see this WG for free, never mind paying a fee

Also forgot to mention she doesn't consider punter discretion, leaving one punter covered in scratches

[Tommygunn81]

There is no way on earth that this woman is in here 30's, unless she has had the hardest life ever.

That coupled with the frankly odd behaviour being reported, everything from not being able to give the right hotel she is working from, turning up to bookings drunk, punching fans off the bedside table and generally erratic comms means I wouldn't see this WG for free, never mind paying a fee

Also forgot to mention she doesn't consider punter discretion, leaving one punter covered in scratches

There is absolutely no way you could say that without seeing her and speaking to her. A rather naive opinion based on some sketchy photos. I admit that they aren’t the best but she is much better looking in person. Regarding the other reviews, I can only go off my experience which was pretty damn good. I found her fun and she got well in to it. I would have gone back again but I prefer to move around and try new things.

[lewisjones23]

There is absolutely no way you could say that without seeing her and speaking to her. A rather naive opinion based on some sketchy photos. I admit that they aren’t the best but she is much better looking in person. Regarding the other reviews, I can only go off my experience which was pretty damn good. I found her fun and she got well in to it. I would have gone back again but I prefer to move around and try new things.

The photos aren't sketchy, they are terrible and are clearly a woman well in to her 40's

Multiple punters on here have reported odd things about how she operates and thats only a tiny fraction of the punters who are seeing her, God knows what other stuff she is doing to/with punters who aren't members on here or haven't reviewed

[daviemac]

Just a reminder only pictures showing publicly on a current advert can be posted.

22 Privacy of service providers
Personal information about service providers, including real names, social media profiles (including business pages), and photos from platforms like WhatsApp, cannot be shared. This applies to all photos not currently on an advert, including reposting images previously uploaded to UKP. Phone numbers can only be posted if publicly available in current ads. Personal numbers and room numbers are prohibited. Hotels can be named, but not specific rooms or addresses. Descriptions of in-call locations are allowed, but not exact house numbers or street names. Media-related work, including modeling or porn, can be shared even with real names, as these individuals sought publicity. News items are also allowed. These rules do not apply to individuals with criminal convictions or past name changes, which are never censored.

[Tommygunn81]

The photos aren't sketchy, they are terrible and are clearly a woman well in to her 40's

Multiple punters on here have reported odd things about how she operates and thats only a tiny fraction of the punters who are seeing her, God knows what other stuff she is doing to/with punters who aren't members on here or haven't reviewed

You seem to have it in for this one for some reason. Statistics tell me that the positives and neutrals outweigh the negatives by 8 to 1. Ok there is a slight risk associated but aren’t all SP’s a little unhinged?

She isn’t over 40. I have eyes that have seen the person. Case closed on this part please! Pointless rambling on about it if you haven’t seen her.

[lewisjones23]

You seem to have it in for this one for some reason. Statistics tell me that the positives and neutrals outweigh the negatives by 8 to 1. Ok there is a slight risk associated but aren’t all SP’s a little unhinged?

She isn’t over 40. I have eyes that have seen the person. Case closed on this part please! Pointless rambling on about it if you haven’t seen her.

I could quite easily turn this around and say that you seem to be very defensive of this one for some reason, some would even say cunt struck 

Since when did neutrals get grouped in with positives? multiple punters have reported strange behaviour but you want to overlook that as you had a good time 🤷🏻‍♂️

How do you know for certain that she isn't over 40? have you seen her ID? if you haven't then its just an opinion, far from being " case closed " unless I missed the part where you were designated the forum authority over all things like this?

[Tommygunn81]

I could quite easily turn this around and say that you seem to be very defensive of this one for some reason, some would even say cunt struck 

Since when did neutrals get grouped in with positives? multiple punters have reported strange behaviour but you want to overlook that as you had a good time 🤷🏻‍♂️

How do you know for certain that she isn't over 40? have you seen her ID? if you haven't then its just an opinion, far from being " case closed " unless I missed the part where you were designated the forum authority over all things like this?

Cunt struck!!  I’ve only seen her once and I don’t intend on returning any time soon, however I’m straight up with my opinion on her, yet alls you have to go off yourself are other people’s opinions, therefore my opinion takes precedence over yours in this case! 

I definitely however do not know for certain she isn’t over 40, but again! I’m in a better position than you to advise people on this because I’ve seen her and paid for the privilege whereas you’ve paid £6 to look at a few crap photos. “Case closed” was a metaphor for “just give up”. There’s no grand idea of authority here for sure!

I agree that from the negative and neutrals that some people have caught her at a bad time. It isn’t acceptable what has happened in those instances. I would say to go and put your money where your mouth is and come back with an informed opinion, but I’m sure you will just come back with a justification not to which is fair enough. 

[lewisjones23]

Cunt struck!!  I’ve only seen her once and I don’t intend on returning any time soon, however I’m straight up with my opinion on her, yet alls you have to go off yourself are other people’s opinions, therefore my opinion takes precedence over yours in this case! 

I definitely however do not know for certain she isn’t over 40, but again! I’m in a better position than you to advise people on this because I’ve seen her and paid for the privilege whereas you’ve paid £6 to look at a few crap photos. “Case closed” was a metaphor for “just give up”. There’s no grand idea of authority here for sure!

I agree that from the negative and neutrals that some people have caught her at a bad time. It isn’t acceptable what has happened in those instances. I would say to go and put your money where your mouth is and come back with an informed opinion, but I’m sure you will just come back with a justification not to which is fair enough.

As stated, I wouldn't see this WG for free never mind paying whatever her rates are

Glad you've agreed with my points though that you can only offer an opinion on her age. As I said in my first post, anyone thinking of seeing her should pay for her PG

Bad photos or not, she looke terrible on them and you'd imagine that a WG trying to see herself would be putting up the better ones that she has

[Twotall]

Question for OP- when was your last visit? Why didn’t you review at the time and waited until 3 Ropey reviews came up?

SERVICE:[/b] as ive seen her a few times now this is a general review for all 4 occations. service is just fucking outstanding. cant stress this enough. she really is something else. sex and BJ was just awesome. but the best thing for me is just how passionate the kissing was. maybe we just clicked i dont know but shes up there for me with one of the best serivices ive ever had.

Overall: shes had a couple of non positive reviews lately which im genuinly shocked about but we all have our own experiences. i can only speak for myself and ive had an amazing time every time, and ill definatly be back.
[/quote]

[Resources3xx]

Question for OP- when was your last visit? Why didn’t you review at the time and waited until 3 Ropey reviews came up?

SERVICE:[/b] as ive seen her a few times now this is a general review for all 4 occations. service is just fucking outstanding. cant stress this enough. she really is something else. sex and BJ was just awesome. but the best thing for me is just how passionate the kissing was. maybe we just clicked i dont know but shes up there for me with one of the best serivices ive ever had.

Overall: shes had a couple of non positive reviews lately which im genuinly shocked about but we all have our own experiences. i can only speak for myself and ive had an amazing time every time, and ill definatly be back.

Have a read of this mate and please check out the date. It was back in August 7th and I made clear I intended to write a review WAY before her first ropey review which was on the 6th sept. The problem is I’m a lazy bastard with ADD so I started and it’s just been sat there with about 50 other open windows on my laptop

If u look at my reviews the vast majority are TOFTT. For me TOFTT reviews are the most valuable so I give these a priority and want to get them on to UKP asap. But the more reviews an sp has the less urgent I feel. I’ve seen poppy more than any sp. She’s the gold standard of escorts for me. Yet I still haven’t done her a review even though intend to. That’s because she already has about a million reviews so i feel no urgency.

That’s just me mate I explained this to someone else before and he told me I was in the wrong for prioritising TOFTTs. others appreciated it. You’re not going to please everyone

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Tommygunn81]

Have a read of this mate and please check out the date. It was back in August 7th and I made clear I intended to write a review WAY before her first ropey review which was on the 6th sept. The problem is I’m a lazy bastard with ADD so I started and it’s just been sat there with about 50 other open windows on my laptop

If u look at my reviews the vast majority are TOFTT. For me TOFTT reviews are the most valuable so I give these a priority and want to get them on to UKP asap. But the more reviews an sp has the less urgent I feel. I’ve seen poppy more than any sp. She’s the gold standard of escorts for me. Yet I still haven’t done her a review even though intend to. That’s because she already has about a million reviews so i feel no urgency.

That’s just me mate I explained this to someone else before and he told me I was in the wrong for prioritising TOFTTs. others appreciated it. You’re not going to please everyone

Hidden Image/Members Only

100% with you on this. Definitely the right approach!