Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Koa32  (Read 3826 times)


16 review(s) for Koa32 (16 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Admin]


Because ****s like you find it totally acceptable for a girl to put up a profile without a single photo ----------- that's why.    :bomb:
"Acceptable" haha
The girl has done nothing wrong at all. Your comments are basically entitled nonsense.
I made a few comments, about good experiences of incognito girls and why I think they can be good then get called a @&*t
You crack me up.

Online Jimmyredcab

"Acceptable" haha
The girl has done nothing wrong at all.


Another fucking white knight, that's all we need.     :bomb:

Another fucking white knight, that's all we need.     :bomb:
Again, your posts seem to be rather like UKIP policies.
Rhetoric without substance.
« Last Edit: December 03, 2014, 06:42:40 AM by Meursault »

Offline Quesadilla

"Acceptable" haha
The girl has done nothing wrong at all. Your comments are basically entitled nonsense.
I made a few comments, about good experiences of incognito girls and why I think they can be good then get called a @&*t
You crack me up.
+1 - 2 of the best girls I've seen have had no profile pics KDD and Koa32 - Koa32 was happy to provide on request.  Missing out on a great fuck because of some pre-conceived notion about what is "acceptable" in a profile seems kind of dumb, but to each their own.

The only time I've NOT had a good experience with no face pics there was no review here so I knew I took a punt and regretted it.  That's the whole point of UKP IMHO - reviews from trusted members are a more reliable indicator of a good time than ANY amount of pics on a profile.

I can understand people not choosing to see KDD because she simply will not share pics - maybe some people just don't fancy insatiable, petite, curvy blue-eyed blondes - but Koa32 is a different story as she says in her profile. "Please message me and I will send you a picture".  Not rocket science.

Whatever - their loss and more for us!  :hi:  :drinks:
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline The_Don


I booked 90 mins @ £220.00.
Brief chat/drink downstairs then up to the bedroom.

May I ask who paid the hotel (or location) costs?

Offline hendrix

Another fucking white knight, that's all we need.     :bomb:

Bit harsh given the girl has done NOTHING wrong. It's not as if he's asked her to up her rates :lol: :hi:

Online Jimmyredcab

Bit harsh given the girl has done NOTHING wrong.

I hate white knights more than I hate Dianne Abbott, that takes some doing.     :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:


The girl has done nothing wrong, it's the pussies who book her with that useless profile that I have a problem with.

If no one booked her she would be forced to put up a few photos or go back to stacking shelves.   :bomb:

Offline finn5555

I hate white knights more than I hate Dianne Abbott, that takes some doing.     :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:


The girl has done nothing wrong, it's the pussies who book her with that useless profile that I have a problem with.

If no one booked her she would be forced to put up a few photos or go back to stacking shelves.   :bomb:

Jimmy why so angry  :angry: she sends good clear photos if you ask her to and doesn't seem to have a dusty phone so works for her. Not all pro$$ies are going to post clear face pics to appease you or anyone else  :hi:

Offline Quesadilla

Jimmy why so angry  :angry: she sends good clear photos if you ask her to and doesn't seem to have a dusty phone so works for her. Not all pro$$ies are going to post clear face pics to appease you or anyone else  :hi:
JRC thinks the world should conform to his preferences and will have to live with disappointment the rest of his life.  It's a tragedy. Think I'm gonna... :cry:

Don't worry JRC, plenty of other fish in the sea for you with pics.  How is your punting success rate these days?  :sarcastic:

Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Online Jimmyredcab

How is your punting success rate these days?  :sarcastic:

I now keep that to PM's ---------------------------- too many lurkers and white knights on here.     :bomb: :bomb:

Jimmy why so angry ...
It's the thought that Dianne Abbott might put up a profile with no pictures ...

Offline The_Don

I now keep that to PM's ---------------------------- too many lurkers

That of course that is a personal preference.

And I must admit it taken over 3 years for me to join and add to this forum.

But most import to me is service that a W/G provides. If you're not willing to share (the good ones) please post about bad ones?
So others here can know that, may'be (only may'be) that she could be or is a wrong'un (bad language I know, but I'm just simple and from North London)  different horses for courses


It's the thought that Dianne Abbott might put up a profile with no pictures ...

Then its time to walk if a punter, don't like what he see or feels at that time

 
« Last Edit: December 03, 2014, 11:56:46 AM by The_Don »

Offline hendrix

I hate white knights more than I hate Dianne Abbott, that takes some doing.     :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:


The girl has done nothing wrong, it's the pussies who book her with that useless profile that I have a problem with.

If no one booked her she would be forced to put up a few photos or go back to stacking shelves.   :bomb:

Your punting style, and many others, insists on pictures. Mine, and some others,  doesn't. Why should she be forced to cater for you? Lots of profiles meet your requirements, or if you don't think they do (I think you've complained before that you can't find anybody suitable) then a change of strategy might land you a decent punt. :hi:

In Koa's case, your issue isn't even relevant as she'll send you clear pictures, including full face. If you can't be arsed to simply ask her for pictures, that's your lookout not hers :unknown:

Seriously, do you ever leave a shit punt thinking "recommended, the profile was great!!" :lol:

Offline kazred

As per my original OP this girl is great and going by no photo's the best punts I've had are with KDD who errrrr has no pics.....the clue is in the word 'punt' although thesedays I rely on some of the more experienced on here to point me in the right direction. Koa IMO is a great sex experience but unless you take the plunge how would you ever find out....I don't see how you can criticise w/out a meet.....

I now keep that to PM's ---------------------------- too many lurkers and white knights on here.     :bomb: :bomb:
The Oracle has spoken.
Farage for PM!
Cheers all round.
Isn't he French really?
Shurely shome mistake.
Ed


I hate white knights more than I hate Dianne Abbott, that takes some doing.     :bomb: :bomb: :bomb:
Why do you hate Dianne Abbott in particular?
She was a bit of a Blairite for my tastes and not without foibles, but she is also a very good and committed constituency MP doing a lot for the down trodden in Hackney. I know. I live there.
She speaks passionately and knowledgably about the screwed up London housing market for starters.
Hate is a strong and angry word Sir.
What's she done to you to deserve your ire?
« Last Edit: December 03, 2014, 11:27:37 PM by Meursault »

Your punting style, and many others, insists on pictures. Mine, and some others,  doesn't. Why should she be forced to cater for you? Lots of profiles meet your requirements, or if you don't think they do (I think you've complained before that you can't find anybody suitable) then a change of strategy might land you a decent punt. :hi:

In Koa's case, your issue isn't even relevant as she'll send you clear pictures, including full face. If you can't be arsed to simply ask her for pictures, that's your lookout not hers :unknown:

Seriously, do you ever leave a shit punt thinking "recommended, the profile was great!!" :lol:
+1

Offline Quesadilla


Your punting style, and many others, insists on pictures. Mine, and some others,  doesn't. Why should she be forced to cater for you? Lots of profiles meet your requirements, or if you don't think they do (I think you've complained before that you can't find anybody suitable) then a change of strategy might land you a decent punt. :hi:

In Koa's case, your issue isn't even relevant as she'll send you clear pictures, including full face. If you can't be arsed to simply ask her for pictures, that's your lookout not hers :unknown:

Seriously, do you ever leave a shit punt thinking "recommended, the profile was great!!" :lol:
+1
+2!  :hi:
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE




Latest media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)