Author Topic: stunning.bia - Cambridge  (Read 2752 times)


3 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7894091) (1 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline Currywurst

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
 
Also advertises on VS as Laura. 
 
£100 for 30 mins. Excessive some might say. Perhaps, but I was happy in the end. Meet happened last week. Lady claims she's been around for a week, & will linger for another week.
 
Comms: Had almost given up. Messaged the night before, since I knew I had a specific time availability. Confirmed. Messaged again the next morning, silence. Closer to time, was told to come an hour later than agreed. Not possible, so started walking back to work. But then 10 minutes before agreed time, got message saying that after all she could manage the originally agreed time. About turn, rushed off.
 
Location: So, haven't yet grasped anyone mention this location. It's on the north side of the river from Stourbridge common. Only 1 row way from the river, so can imagine the real estate being fairly prime. Location quiet, residential, other than the singular pub around the corner. Recent built apartment, great condition. Didn't inspect wc, as fresh on arrival, and straight into business.
 
Bia: Pictures are accurate, incl hair style & color. She's about 5 feet. Pleasant (& persistent) smile on her face. Natural breasts, tiny (but not bony or skinny) arse, narrow waist. Fair English, not as bad as some Brazilians, nowhere close to needing any translation apps. No discussion on kissing or OWO.
 
Experience: Relaxed OW BJ, progressed to her on top. Gentle grinds, which then morphed into doggy. This was the best part, and she didn't resist my grabbing her waist, and having my way with her. Played her part until the eventual, until I was ready to withdraw.
 
Overall: Certain positive. Price point is high, so if my hormones are messing me about, and nobody else responds, might then find my way back. Otherwise, nice to have crossed paths, have a nice life!
 
VS & 1 representative AW screengrab below (if I can figure out how this works ... ) -
 
Hidden Image/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline moonlight_lad

Laura(Bia) claims to be 22, I would guess she is over 35 for sure. Her body is too good to resist.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,991
  • Likes: 322
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Laura(Bia) claims to be 22, I would guess she is over 35 for sure. Her body is too good to resist.

How do you arrive at that conclusion?

Offline Currywurst

Her demeanor suggested over 22, and yet her body suggested under 35. So something within those bounds.
 
That said, while admitting my utter failure at any useful assessment of her age, however, wanting to peg her age on the lower end of the range established.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,991
  • Likes: 322
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
Laura(Bia) claims to be 22, I would guess she is over 35 for sure. Her body is too good to resist.



Her demeanor suggested over 22, and yet her body suggested under 35. So something within those bounds.
 
That said, while admitting my utter failure at any useful assessment of her age, however, wanting to peg her age on the lower end of the range established.

I'm confused, are you one and the same member?

Offline Currywurst

The intention was convergence rather than confusion.
The first age estimate suggested 22 to infinity with a likelihood >35 based on (pending tbc?).
The second put a cap at 35, and hinted at the lower end based on visual confirmation.

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 5,991
  • Likes: 322
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
The intention was convergence rather than confusion.
The first age estimate suggested 22 to infinity with a likelihood >35 based on (pending tbc?).
The second put a cap at 35, and hinted at the lower end based on visual confirmation.

22 - 35 is a vast canyon of an age difference.

I was trying to understand how @moonlight_lad arrived at his age conclusion?

Offline moonlight_lad

22 - 35 is a vast canyon of an age difference.

I was trying to understand how @moonlight_lad arrived at his age conclusion?

just by looking at her pics and heavily airbrushed wrinkles. My experience assessing girl's age and I don't think I am bad at it. I am poor at working out which country a girl belongs to apart from guessing the region.

Profile(AW) has been updated to 24years!!
« Last Edit: July 22, 2025, 07:25:56 am by moonlight_lad »