Author Topic: Kate, London Royal Massage - Chancery Lane  (Read 1311 times)

Offline Ninja42

I was up in Holborn for a rare visit to Central London and fancied a massage with extras, was tempted by First Health in Little Turnstile  but opted for London Royal Massage as they'd pretty good reviews on here. Kate was at Chancery Lane and the photo on their website peaked my interest. Appointment made by text and 10mins later I was knocking on the door. Unfortunately Kate was the same girl as the website photo but she was young (25), pretty and charming so I upgraded from the £60 30min plus HJ to £80 b2b and handjob. Took a shower and onto the table. She stripped naked and looked mighty fine. Applied copious amounts of baby oil and commenced a very soft body rub. You couldn't call it a massage. It was pleasant and she allowed touching of her legs and pert bottom.
On the turn she applied more oil and continued the body rub. She had nice pert breasts which she allowed me to play with but when I sat up to hopefully give them some attention I was swiftly told no extras. She then commeded a nice slow hj with lots of ball play. Plenty of eye contact and smiles. There was no B2B whatsoever. Once I was done had a nice long shower and a pleasant chat with her. Got dressed and was on my way.

Rating this as a neutral as there was no b2b whatsoever and I should have stayed with the original option.

Will I return...no

External Link/Members Only


Offline Ninja42

Meant to add that Kate was Polish and been in the UK for 11 years

Online Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,593
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
... Unfortunately Kate was the same girl as the website photo but she was young (25), pretty and charming so I upgraded from the £60 30min plus HJ to £80 b2b and handjob...

I assume that's a typo?

Thanks for the review. I've been planning to see Kate but this sounds very disappointing. LRM standards keep slipping.

Offline Ninja42

Yes, apologies...I typed the review on phone which was a bit of a ball ache. Yes unfortunately she WASN'T  :rolleyes:


Offline Ninja42


Online Fuzzyduck

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 9,593
  • Likes: 130
  •  
  • Reviews: 133
Mistype...wasn't her unless its been heavily edited but still great looking

LRM often use bullshit, but similar, pics on their profiles. When making enquiries, there's no harm asking if the masseuse is definitely the one shown on the website.

Online Stevelondon

Yes, apologies...I typed the review on phone which was a bit of a ball ache. Yes unfortunately she WASN'T  :rolleyes:

You mean fortunately she wasn’t a ball ache   :D :lol: