Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Pro$$ie Pops out for a Fag and Fucks off  (Read 2383 times)

Offline James999

According to this FR

https://www.adultwork.com/ViewFieldReport.asp?FRID=48391

the guy paid £470 had a Fuck, then she popped out for a Fag and pissed off  :scare:

She says
"NEVER MET - Booking did not take place - Total Timewaster who keeps harrassing me"

Which is odd as she clearly confirmed the booking and marked it as taking place thus allowing hm the opportunity of feedback & FR

Whatever the situation is she's clearly a money grabber, as just one picture in her gallery (repeated from main page) but of course you can pay her £5 to see her PG  :scare:

Offline Jimmyredcab

According to this FR

https://www.adultwork.com/ViewFieldReport.asp?FRID=48391

the guy paid £470 had a Fuck, then she popped out for a Fag and pissed off  :scare:

She says
"NEVER MET - Booking did not take place - Total Timewaster who keeps harrassing me"

Which is odd as she clearly confirmed the booking and marked it as taking place thus allowing hm the opportunity of feedback & FR
Whatever the situation is she's clearly a money grabber, as just one picture in her gallery (repeated from main page) but of course you can pay her £5 to see her PG  :scare:

Good point, you can only leave feedback when the girl has confirmed the booking, sounds like another con merchant to me.    ;)

Offline James999

Well the profile also states she is a Model, and then that she will not allow pictures to be taken.  A camera shy model  :kiss:

Perhaps the fact that she had a picture taken for her AW profile makes her a model in her mind  :dash:

To be fair she only has one bad review and the bloke that wrote it has his feedback hidden, I would say its false feedback, maybe he turned out to be a tosser and she fucked him off but only after she accepted the booking?

Offline James999

To be fair she only has one bad review and the bloke that wrote it has his feedback hidden, I would say its false feedback, maybe he turned out to be a tosser and she fucked him off but only after she accepted the booking?

His feedback is all positive  ;)


How can you read it? it says its hidden for me? Is it you?  :P


Ah, very good :) makes you wonder why he has hidden it? Unless he sees BB providers and he asked her for it and she refused?

Offline Jimmyredcab

Ah, very good :) makes you wonder why he has hidden it? Unless he sees BB providers and he asked her for it and she refused?

You seem very supportive of the "lady" -------- any reason why. ??????

Offline AnthG

Ah, very good :) makes you wonder why he has hidden it? Unless he sees BB providers and he asked her for it and she refused?
I believe it auto goes to that. The reason I say this as I got a positive review. And a while later I clicked on my number 1 and it said I have chosen to make my feedback private.

I had done no such thing, don't even know how to. I then googled and figured how to make it open though.

You seem very supportive of the "lady" -------- any reason why. ??????

Because she has quite a few good reviews and then suddenly not just a bad one, a bad one saying she is a thief, just strikes me as odd, surely you can see that's a bit strange?

Offline softlad

Which is odd as she clearly confirmed the booking and marked it as taking place thus allowing hm the opportunity of feedback & FR

I don't think this is an open and shut case as first it seems.

1) She might have confirmed the booking upon receiving it, some do.
Not good practice granted, as it leaves them open to abuse/neg's like this, but none the less they do.

2) It is strange his feedback is hidden, I have never heard of what Anth refers to as it happens automatically.
There is an option to hide feedback.
Hovering over may show you his good ones, but as there is a dispute I don't think that would show.
If there was two disputes, then only one would show. (I think)

3) She has 46 good feedbacks, with not a mention of anything untoward.

4) The way the neg' is worded, sounds to me like it's from someone who's been rejected by her:

Everything i said on the feedback was true, she just can't take criticism.
The booking did happen thats why she accepted and confirmed, live with it.
How can I be the timewaster when shes the one that came, stole and left after only an hour and half of the 3 hour booking.
She has a daughter, how can i lie about that. She'll be the one lying as her daughter doesn't know shes a hooker.
She wasted her own time, came all the way from leeds just to fucking con someone, while she could have stayed at home and done some incalls.

I have seen women younger than her that show alot more respect and passion and are actually worth the time and money and are nicer, kinder, pleasant, cleaner than Chloe.

Face it Chloe the booking happened so live with it, your just lying to yourself.
Plenty more fish in the sea, much much nicer ones:)

Ain't worth the time, money or fuck!!!!!!
score 1 - for turning up and the fuck, thanks.


5) It sounds like he knows too much about her,
ie, The reference to her daughter.
The comment "Plenty more fish in the sea" like he's trying to make her jealous.

I'm not a psychologist but I'd defo say there are grounds for suspicion here.

Always good to keep an open mind.  ;)

Offline Matium

It's suspicious that he's chosen to hide his feedback and the reference to her daughter makes him definitely sound creepy.

He admits she had sex with him.

Something must have happened that neither side has chosen to reveal so far.

Offline James999

If the meet didn't take place and she confirmed it did (by accident prior to the meet) then she can easily get AW to delete it.

But it seems that whenever it goes wrong the Pro$$ie denies the meet  :dash:

Offline Alexandra

That neg report looks suspicious to me also, particulary as his feedback is hidden. 

Sometimes I confirm bookings and then clients cancel so the booking is already confirmed by me, but doesn't go ahead. 

She could well have confirmed it and then he became a problem.   All her other feedback is very positive so I wouldn't take much notice of that one bad report. 

Incidentally,

But it seems that whenever it goes wrong the Pro$$ie denies the meet  :dash:

Funnily enough a positive report has recently been put up for me on auto-censored and the meet did most definitely not happen even though it's a positive one!  Can't understand what the author is gaining by putting it up and if you check you will see he put up 3 the same day for two other ladies.  I have made contact with both to try to get hold of a contact number of the offending author and, surprise surprise, no luck.........makes me wonder what is going on. 

Any thoughts you guys might have?

Alexandra


Offline softlad

Any thoughts you guys might have?

Very honest of you to admit that Alexandra.
I would ony ever take recommendations off punters who I know and respect.
The PN system is open to too much abuse.

Offline James999

Funnily enough a positive report has recently been put up for me on auto-censored and the meet did most definitely not happen

Report ot to Galahad and get it removed ASAP then.

There can be a number of reasons why the guy has  done the Allegedly Fake FR

Offline James999

Very honest of you to admit that Alexandra.

It's called damage limitation  :dash:

If she outs it as fake herself then G will probably delete it, if shedoesn't then at a future date if it is outed as Fake G would apply his Fake FRs rule and delete all of her FRs and add her to his banned list.
« Last Edit: October 06, 2011, 01:04:53 PM by James999 »


Offline eli69

That neg report looks suspicious to me also, particulary as his feedback is hidden. 


Any thoughts you guys might have?

Alexandra

I have also sen good feedback left on AW where the WG has replied claiming she never saw the guy.

I think some sad desperate blokes (fluffy types probably)  are just looking to garner attention from the WG, or maybe they are taking their fantasy of seeing a girl to the next level by then pretending it happened and reporting it.

I would imagine its mostly the first type, maybe the guy would then email the WG after writing a fake good report looking to have communication with them in exchange for the good report, its like some sort of sad arse licking of WG's in the hope of getting some attention back?

Offline Pisko

It's called damage limitation  :dash:


No, it's not. Its not like she posted about it first on this forum, in case Galahad would question it. She already posted on the Saafe forum before: http://www.saafe.info/main/index.php?topic=6716.0

Some pimps posting reports on the random prossies, so thiers other reports looks genuine, and he is appears to be a
trustfull reporter with lots of other pubslished.

Yanek

Offline James999


Offline Alexandra

Just to add that I have made contact with the other two girls that fellatiosurfer wrote reports on. 

They are both on aw. 

I emailed both, one has not replied to my email but it has been read. 

The other has told me that her telephone is in for repair and she doesn't know if the numbers will be saved or not..................... 

I have posted up blogs on aw and on my site and have openly asked for the offending author of that report to make contact with me.  Surprise surprise, no response to date. 

I have submitted a rebuttal form to auto-censored and this is already posted up with the fake report. 

Initially, the report quoted me as being Alexandra of Central London - I have disputed this in the rebuttal form and you will note from auto-censoreds comments on there that they have changed my location. 

To be honest, I am livid about this, as I don't see what this person is trying to do?  Damage my good reputation or as has been said on here and on saafe - a pimp putting up reports for other girls so that he can then produce more fake reports as and when he chooses. 

Don't you think it's odd that someone would post 3 reports on one day and they way they read, well he has clearly taken lines off my other reports which I can see. 

I was in two minds whether to post about this on here, on saafe and even refer to it in my blog as one wonders if drawing attention to something makes the matter worse but quite frankly I know I didn't see him so why should he get away with it. 

Someone has posted on auto-censored asking about one of the girls as the author isn't posting on the forums. 

Well, I guess I could pursue trying to trace him through the other two ladies but very much doubt that any information will be forthcoming so can only deduce that they are in cahoots with him.

Alex

Offline James999

I was in two minds whether to post about this on here,

Why? you are more likely to get an honest answer on here than any other forum, and you probably have the audience of the more experienced punters on here.

Have you E mailed G ?

As surely the easiest option is if you are sure you did not see the guy and advise G of this he will do some checks and delete it (Problem solved)

As for the reasons behind it, 

could be a fake FR to then be outed later and get your FRs deleted,
could be a fake FR to damage your rep,
could be a Fake FR to make the author look genuine,
could be a genuine report and your pissed off he mentioned OWO,
could be a fake FR you put up and are using for publicity saying it's fake
could be a genuine FR and you have forgotten the meet


lots of options and only the Author will know.

And before you rant about the possible reasons you don't like, any outsider should consider all options  :cool:

Offline TeenKylie

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 835
If the meet didn't take place and she confirmed it did (by accident prior to the meet) then she can easily get AW to delete it.

But it seems that whenever it goes wrong the Pro$$ie denies the meet  :dash:
No it's not that simple at all and especially if it was confirmed by mistake. It reads like a malicious punter anyone can see that. All her positive reviews prove that she is genuine and good.


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)