Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Hello!  (Read 3357 times)

Offline HappyCappy

I can't be bothered with sex with a condom anymore.
I would rather try different things like Stuart does.
I like to have owo and cim.
With the cim in a 69 position.
I think I'll try the foot fetish the next time. Sounds like fun.

Yeah totally agree. Standard pumping is no longer really doing it for me these days. CIM in 69 is where it's at!


I like face fucking but there are few girls out there that can or will take that. Sin_de_cat (https://www.adultwork.com/2453282 or https://www.adultwork.com/Sin%5FDe%5FCat) in Edinburgh does and really, really gets off on it too.

If you're into kinky stuff you should see  Eva Xrx - https://www.adultwork.com/2296382 or https://www.adultwork.com/Eva+xrx - She's pretty kinky. I'm quite into Corporal punishment and she took it like a pro, really gets off on it too. An absolute stunner too.

Devyn Rose likes it rough but isn't really into pain. She's liked to be really fucked though, totally gets off on it which is great fun. She's seriously flakey though and doesn't have an incall location, lovely girl though. https://www.adultwork.com/2430777 or https://www.adultwork.com/DevynRose

She's not often in Scotland and when she is it's always Aberdeen but she was game for doing a roleplay rape scene. She's got that Posh English thing going on which just worked. Apparently she was a primary school teacher before she turned to hooking, thank fuck she did! She;s really hot and was well up for it. https://www.adultwork.com/2024527 or https://www.adultwork.com/sexyelisexxxx

There was a girl I fancied seeing but I've not had the chance yet - https://www.adultwork.com/2574274 or https://www.adultwork.com/roughandmessywhore - She looks pretty awesome but it's the outcall only thing that is a bit of a pain in the arse. She's also got a normal job so it has to fit around that. She looks great though.

Banning reason: Previously banned (Heyhoeletsgo) + Trolling on UKE (DavieBhoy)


1 review(s) found for Sin_De_Cat linked to in above post (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative)
16 review(s) found for sexyelisexxxx linked to in above post (15 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline Marmalade

He must be easy money for you Sophie. All he does is suck yer toes. That's one fetish makes me boak.
Doubtless it's Very 'Ard Work keeping a straight face. ...

Just a word about AW vs UKP reviews in case it helps anyone ...

AW reviews are not only mostly shite but they need to be unless you are bullet-proof. Imagine you give some flaky nutter a neg and she tells everyone you are a time-wasting, pox-ridden psycho that trashed her flat and fucked her in all holes without paying and so on. Prossies have been known to LIE. (Not all: most. It's part of the job but most of them stretch it).

When people start punting they often write AW reviews a)to keep track of their punts, b) cos the minger asked them to, c) cos they feel blown away with all these women being nice to them and want to 'return the favour). Sorry, but that's all crap tbh.

a) if you're registered on AW use the hotlist+notes facility to keep track. Quicker and easier.
b) say "I don't usually write reviews." This gets you out of the house with her thinking that you might and still being polite and saves telling any lies
c) they're nice cos you've paid them to be nice. You can be nice back by saying thank you, by being on time and not taking a dump on their carpet. Enjoy it. All service industry people should be nice and not expect more than a nice smile as thanks. You pay prossies for INTIMATE niceness. (Doesn't make her your girlfriend.

AW reviews are written mostly for the prossies' benefit. They are not reliable enough for punters to put much store in. UKP reviews are written for punters. Honesty is the always the best here (about the punt: not any personal details that could be added up over a series of posts to identify you). Unless it's too late, I recommend having a different username on UKP.

AW *feedback* as opposed to reviews is different. It helps to identify both parties as genuine. If I'm asked to give feedback, I will often say I don't always do so, but if I do it will be something generic (Like 'had a great time'). She'll understand and also realise you're not a beginner. It is helpful in some areas of the country, eg Scotland, to have a couple of fairly recent feedbacks to your name as some girls only want to see guys with feedback. Some people refuse to do it. Personally I have no problem with it: 2 seconds that increases my buying market. Best to let her give feedback first. Only give honest feedback, even if it is bland.

A lot of guys enjoy their "new found punting community" and want to share cum-stained details of their sexual adventures. Whatever does it for you, but remember the only thing that actually *helps* other punters are things like how much, for what services, did she have good/bad attitude, good/bad at what she did, good looker/pig, nice flat/dive. The AW reference link from the bottom of her profile (and if you want to save us time, a quick note about age, build, ethnicity helps, plus the city in the title.)

Apart from that, thanks to all reviewers. I've nothing to add since my last reported misadventure except a trip to LSS and Marie is still hot (though Seline have me a snippy look for not picking her). Have reviewed them both before though.

By the way if you look on Amazon, trip adviser etc reviews, which is the more helpful? Ten reviews that say nice things about Margate or the one that points out that it's cold, wet and not that exciting? Go figure ...

Offline Marmalade

Regarding face fucking, I also recommend Lanya (Edinburgh).

Offline HappyCappy

Oh Aye? Duly added to the list!  :hi:
Banning reason: Previously banned (Heyhoeletsgo) + Trolling on UKE (DavieBhoy)

Offline JazzMan

Regarding face fucking, I also recommend Lanya (Edinburgh).

Keeymi (Glasgow) who I seen last week was OK with it.
https://www.adultwork.com/2384421 or https://www.adultwork.com/keeymi
Banning reason: Slagging off membership


3 review(s) found for keeymi linked to in above post (1 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline stuart_gla

Hmm, interesting points about non-shagging bookings/encounters.

I have had the pleasure of meeting stuart_gla...
He must be easy money for you Sophie. All he does is suck yer toes...
Doubtless it's Very 'Ard Work keeping a straight face. ...

I do hope the ladies genuinely enjoy the attention on their feet (or at least pretend to!) as I certainly do.  Easy money?  Well, yes I can accept that argument.  For example, I'd recently booked CANADIAN WENDY at £160 an hour (specifically for a foot worship session) and spent more than half an hour with her relaxing on the bed and me doing all the work, so to speak.  But for me, very exciting and enjoyable -- and she didn't even have to take her pants off during the booking(!).  As for keeping a straight face, well, a bit of piss taking / humiliation can add to the fun!

Stuart.

Offline stuart_gla

Just a word about AW vs UKP reviews in case it helps anyone ...

Useful contribution, thanks!  Especially this "template", so to speak.

but remember the only thing that actually *helps* other punters are things like how much, for what services, did she have good/bad attitude, good/bad at what she did, good looker/pig, nice flat/dive. The AW reference link from the bottom of her profile (and if you want to save us time, a quick note about age, build, ethnicity helps, plus the city in the title.)

Offline HappyCappy

Hmm, interesting points about non-shagging bookings/encounters.

I do hope the ladies genuinely enjoy the attention on their feet (or at least pretend to!) as I certainly do.  Easy money?  Well, yes I can accept that argument.  For example, I'd recently booked CANADIAN WENDY at £160 an hour (specifically for a foot worship session) and spent more than half an hour with her relaxing on the bed and me doing all the work, so to speak.  But for me, very exciting and enjoyable -- and she didn't even have to take her pants off during the booking(!).  As for keeping a straight face, well, a bit of piss taking / humiliation can add to the fun!

Stuart.

Nothing wrong with that sir, whatever works as they say.

I don't judge anyone.

If you want a T-girl to bang you - who am I to judge?

If you want to spend an hour doing down on a working girl not not have her do anything for you at all - it's your time so do as you please!

If you want to spend an hour foot worshipping - power to you dude and I hope you enjoyed your experience.

Just because I'd not want to do these thing doesn't mean no one else should. Not all of us are always content with the same fucking pumping exercise, it gets a bit fucking boring after you've been through hundreds of girls. So nothing wrong with trying something a bit new.

Well done on being honest and open.  :hi:
Banning reason: Previously banned (Heyhoeletsgo) + Trolling on UKE (DavieBhoy)

Marmalade,
Excellent post I couldn't have expressed it any better.
It should be used as an aide memoire for any punter  intending to write a UKP review.


Stuart,
It's another Hmmm! once again from me.
Having a prossie come on here confirming "he's a genuine punter/client" just makes me even more suspect re your quantum of posts & motive as a recent joiner here.
It's well known that reviews on UKP are now considered of great value to genuine punters. Its also apparent many trolls pimps and prossies also know this so fairly often arrive heralding good things from a particular prossie.
Its also apparent many AW reviews are manufactured and written enmasse. to falsify a prossie's rating number so how long before same logic thinking gives a 'may work here too'.
What I would say having net Miss Summer previously she seemed a good reliable prossie so I'll accept her post as reliable
BUT
I still find it a little odd that a prossie would voluntarily choose to post in support of any punter on here unless he was more than just another punter to her?

Offline Drillakilla

As a someone who has been following the theme of these particular threads closely, it did strike me as a case of 'mutual verification' the instant miss summers posted her comments. Makes perfect sense from a business/marketing point of view of the wg.

It could all be one big coincidence, the proof of course will be in Stuarts future posts!
Banning reason: Creating multiple accounts + Trolling

Offline JazzMan

Haven’t had a personal message yet from Stuart_gla recommending “Miss Summer x” like I did with “ich will”
I’m trusting Stuart_gla for the moment.
Both “Stuart_gla” and “ich will” never have a bad word to say about anyone and both recommend  “Miss Summer x”.
Any new punters who recommend “Miss Summer x” should be treated with suspicion.


« Last Edit: November 26, 2014, 04:54:50 PM by JazzMan »
Banning reason: Slagging off membership

Offline Tjkooker

Haven’t had a personal message yet from Stuart_gla recommending “Miss Summer x” like I did with “ich will”
I’m trusting Stuart_gla for the moment.
Both “Stuart_gla” and “ich will” never have a bad word to say about anyone and both recommend  “Miss Summer x”.
Any new punters who recommend “Miss Summer x” should be treated with suspicion.

Jazz I struggle to go along with that theory. Sophie really is the ideal first punt for any newbie. She's pretty hot without being intimidatingly gorgeous. She loves a good fuck, her oral is brilliant and she's just an all round nice girl. Can chat for hours though not in your time. So for me a newbie reporting on Sophie is highly likely, after all most of us here recommend her.
I'm coming round to Stuart but can't for the life of me imagine punting that often without fucking. Done it once and although I got what I wanted I still felt a bit cheated. Thank fuck I can always get it up them!
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Offline ich will

Haven’t had a personal message yet from Stuart_gla recommending “Miss Summer x” like I did with “ich will”
I’m trusting Stuart_gla for the moment.
Both “Stuart_gla” and “ich will” never have a bad word to say about anyone and both recommend  “Miss Summer x”.
Any new punters who recommend “Miss Summer x” should be treated with suspicion.

Are you still coming out with this Jazz,you keep questioning posters integrity yet you are the one who lied in my thread stating hysterically that i gave out Miss Summers and Summers address to you something that did not happen and i had to clear it up with a screen grab so maybe you are the one who arouses suspicion?

If you go back and re read that thread you will see that Miss Summers came in to back me up as did Lily White so by your thinking maybe anyone who has been with Lily and has had a good time should be "one to watch" from now on...and while you are at it maybe you should skim over the posts from Taz and TJ from now on as im known to them too so obviously they are "at it too"

I joined PN in 2008 using the same user name i honestly don't think you would have lasted a minute on there as a pm from someone on PN suggesting good reputable girls would have you reaching for your comfort blanket and putting a tin foil cap on your head and listening to police scanners while trying to shake off the conspiracy theory :)

My first AW activity was on 2008 again under my ich will user name not long after i was on PN and i seen Scottish girls such as Raunchy Geri and her threesome partner at the time Perfect Catch/Angel/Emma Bradford the reason i did not list girls like that in my reviews was simple they are long gone from Escorting so i thought i would try and list girls who are active.

As for not having a bad word to say about any of the girls,i enjoy my punts and pick girls carefully although some recent girls i have seen did not get positive reviews from everyone on here such as Sexy Horny Tammy,i had a great time with her others did not it's all about opinions,look at Taz's recent glowing praise about Sweet Kimmy and then read Seekers report on her you would be mistaken for thinking it's 2 different girls,the bottom line being it's what makes YOU happy in a punt that counts.


Banning reason: Undesirable fluffy

Offline Drillakilla

If you go back and re read that thread you will see that Miss Summers came in to back me up


All this 'mutual verifications' and 'backing up' from punters to prossies and prossies to punters, is it normal? Do I need to find myself a prossie who I can rave about and then she can come on here doing the same for me?
Banning reason: Creating multiple accounts + Trolling

Offline Tjkooker

All this 'mutual verifications' and 'backing up' from punters to prossies and prossies to punters, is it normal? Do I need to find myself a prossie who I can rave about and then she can come on here doing the same for me?

Not at all. Just sometimes helps if other members are unfairly having a go at you. I've done it myself and only backed down once a prossie has spoken up.
In Stuarts case the fact he reviewed some seriously shit prossies aswell as some good ones as positive all in one go aroused suspicion.

I haven't ruled out marmalades theory yet though. As much as I believe the verification you can never be certain.
Banning reason: Outing and trolling a punter because he posted a negative about his favourite prossie. White-knight fluffy that pretends otherwise.

Offline ich will

All this 'mutual verifications' and 'backing up' from punters to prossies and prossies to punters, is it normal? Do I need to find myself a prossie who I can rave about and then she can come on here doing the same for me?

Only if it's a WG who is trusted and not a Magalie type then i would say yes :)

Drillakilla not sure if it is normal but a WG coming in and trying to set some issues straight is always going to set some people off but why should she remain silent when her name is getting dragged into it unfairly too.

Banning reason: Undesirable fluffy

Offline Lilywhite

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 328
To add another two cents from a WG...

Many of my clients lurk on here and have wanted to post but felt they needed to 'do reviews' first to be accepted. And in order to do a review, they felt they needed to do more than one- so they weren't just championing one girl.

Offline stuart_gla

Hi.

I have read all the posts, and understand concerns fwiw.  Really, no one has just joined and dumped a stream of back-reviews before?  To be clear, my reviews are from punts/bookings circa late Sept, through Oct and Nov.  If you are nosey enough, I'm sure you can find some feedback on AW with dates.  I did try to post as one big meta-review, but hit a character limit here on the forum software -- so split them all up.  Of course I typed them up beforehand and cut-and-paste them in, posting in quick succession.  I take notes on my phone after a booking, so I think all the juicy details were fairly accurate IMHO.  Further, these reviews are not solicited, nor do I get any benefit.  Yeah, maybe they were a bit soft, being all positive, but for my first posts I thought they were OK.  Hope you had fun reading them, they were fun to write!

Stuart.





Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)