He must be easy money for you Sophie. All he does is suck yer toes. That's one fetish makes me boak.
Doubtless it's Very 'Ard Work keeping a straight face. ...
Just a word about AW vs UKP reviews in case it helps anyone ...
AW reviews are not only mostly shite but they need to be unless you are bullet-proof. Imagine you give some flaky nutter a neg and she tells everyone you are a time-wasting, pox-ridden psycho that trashed her flat and fucked her in all holes without paying and so on. Prossies have been known to LIE. (Not all: most. It's part of the job but most of them stretch it).
When people start punting they often write AW reviews a)to keep track of their punts, b) cos the minger asked them to, c) cos they feel blown away with all these women being nice to them and want to 'return the favour). Sorry, but that's all crap tbh.
a) if you're registered on AW use the hotlist+notes facility to keep track. Quicker and easier.
b) say "I don't usually write reviews." This gets you out of the house with her thinking that you might and still being polite and saves telling any lies
c) they're nice cos you've paid them to be nice. You can be nice back by saying thank you, by being on time and not taking a dump on their carpet. Enjoy it. All service industry people should be nice and not expect more than a nice smile as thanks. You pay prossies for INTIMATE niceness. (Doesn't make her your girlfriend.
AW reviews are written mostly for the prossies' benefit. They are not reliable enough for punters to put much store in. UKP reviews are written for punters. Honesty is the always the best here (about the punt: not any personal details that could be added up over a series of posts to identify you). Unless it's too late, I recommend having a different username on UKP.
AW *feedback* as opposed to reviews is different. It helps to identify both parties as genuine. If I'm asked to give feedback, I will often say I don't always do so, but if I do it will be something generic (Like 'had a great time'). She'll understand and also realise you're not a beginner. It is helpful in some areas of the country, eg Scotland, to have a couple of fairly recent feedbacks to your name as some girls only want to see guys with feedback. Some people refuse to do it. Personally I have no problem with it: 2 seconds that increases my buying market. Best to let her give feedback first. Only give honest feedback, even if it is bland.
A lot of guys enjoy their "new found punting community" and want to share cum-stained details of their sexual adventures. Whatever does it for you, but remember the only thing that actually *helps* other punters are things like how much, for what services, did she have good/bad attitude, good/bad at what she did, good looker/pig, nice flat/dive. The AW reference link from the bottom of her profile (and if you want to save us time, a quick note about age, build, ethnicity helps, plus the city in the title.)
Apart from that, thanks to all reviewers. I've nothing to add since my last reported misadventure except a trip to LSS and Marie is still hot (though Seline have me a snippy look for not picking her). Have reviewed them both before though.
By the way if you look on Amazon, trip adviser etc reviews, which is the more helpful? Ten reviews that say nice things about Margate or the one that points out that it's cold, wet and not that exciting? Go figure ...
