Author Topic: CurvyBritishLou2 (Lancaster Gate)  (Read 3328 times)


3 review(s) for CurvyBritishLou2 (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Dark_Gable]

Offline PeterPebble

Link: External Link/Members Only (Formerly: External Link/Members Only)

Meet: Late 2024

Cost: £150 for 1 hr + Filming (£20) & Swallow (£20)

Comms: Very quick and easy. I’ve messaged her a few times now and she’ll reach out when in town and sometimes throw in a free vid or pic.

Venue: Last meet was at a hotel near Lancaster Gate. Decently discreet, couple mins walk from station with street parking outside.

Services: Kissing, OWO, Protected sex, Filming (Paid), Swallow (Paid), Squirting

Meet: I’ve met Louise a couple times now. She usually operates from her home in Cheltenham but will often tour in London.

She’s full-figured with reddish hair and a generally unassuming appearance. Definitely not for those looking for sexier and fitter SPs but I like the “normal” look of her. Feels more like a casual encounter than a blatant transaction. Plus, I’m quite partial to a BBW.

Louis will start her timer and get straight into it with kissing. She gives pretty good blowjobs and can deliver for some time. We cycle between that, reverse oral and protected sex. She’s also a big squirter and I’ve had her drench me a couple times when eating her out - lucky for me I like that sort of thing :thumbsup:

The sessions feel very casual as stated earlier - we’ll chat throughout, do some dirty talk, and try different positions, toys etc. I often have her suck me to completion and swallow as an extra. She also offers her worn panties as another extra for those who are sentimental.

Would I return / recommend? Yes and yes - she’s a positive for me. I’ll likely see her when she’s back in London again around the end of April.

Offline Jon Smith

I'm glad you enjoyed it, OP. I appreciate BBWs, but she doesn’t really have any appeal . From her AW profile, her face isn’t quite my type, and her body lacks the curves I typically prefer. She also seems to have noticeable skin imperfections (including red, raw marks) and looks older than her stated age of 33. I have to admit, I’m surprised you’ve seen her more than once. Personally, she has zero appeal to me. Her overall vibe feels more like a casual, no-frills encounter with someone you might meet at the pub.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline rebelscum

I guess it's no surprise when it comes to WG and their stated ages, but I agree that she's definitely not her stated age-if the profile didn't have her 'age', I'd be putting hers at in her 40s.  Maybe very late 30s at a push if I was feeling charitable.  Glad the OP had a good time though, as that's what matters. 

Offline tg

I've seen Lou at least three times now and I would say her stated age of 33 is bang on.

Offline Jon Smith

She appears to be nearing 50; her features and physique are striking enough to warrant a disclaimer.