Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Advice needed (latex, strapon, kinky) - also, how many Vanessas?  (Read 2414 times)

First post, long time lurker. So I know James will freak out about the strapon mention (I think we should club together and hire him a dominatrix to provide a thorough pegging, convert him over like).

So, visiting London, got plans for 4 punts. However, need advice.

I'm looking for an escort that's kinky and has a diverse latex wardrobe (latex stockings, suspenders, shoulder length gloves), in addition to liking strapon play and snowballing (or CIM with DFK).

Was planning on seeing Vanessa Sin at Anna's Angels. I also planned to pay an extra £100 for filming, so a total of £350 for what should be the filthiest latex shoot this side of the Thames. But then I discovered in a topic on a rival (banned) forum, where they stated that Vanessa Sin is the same as Vannesa$.

So apparently Vanessa$ from AW is Vanessa Sin from AA. But on AW charges £100 less! So, I thought, right, I'll have that. £250 for filthy latex sex with filming is acceptable (£350 is a bit flamboyant).

But now I find that Vanessa$' profile on AW can't be accessed anymore:
https://www.adultwork.com/ViewProfile.asp?UserID=799764

I tried Google and Bing caches, but they only bring up the "Continue" screen on AW, not the profile itself.

So, has anyone else seen one or both of these ladies? Are they the same person? If anyone has the direct phone number for Vanessa$ on AW could you share it? Or are they different people?

Also, any recommendations for alternatives?

Help me make a shortlist.

EDIT: I should add, I am not a member of the banned forum, I just went Googling and found the info of the WG. I am sorry if mentioning this broke the forum rules.
« Last Edit: November 12, 2014, 12:24:46 PM by Tsar Nikolai II »


11 review(s) found for Vanessa$ linked to in above post (8 positive, 3 neutral, 0 negative)

Anyone?

Most latex fetish escorts I've seen charge £250 for an hour. The cheapest I've seen is £200.

Unfortunately AW does not allow you to search based on the term "latex", meaning it's difficult to narrow it down. One has to use agencies, which always charge more.

Does anyone even know of a WG who has a latex wardrobe and charges under £150? Do they exist? Latex is quite expensive, so I have my doubts.

Offline stayer

The profile for Vanessa$ came up for me. Perhaps you need to clear your browser cache and try again.

Offline Quesadilla

The profile for Vanessa$ came up for me. Perhaps you need to clear your browser cache and try again.
Works for me too. Bit older than I usually go for but looks fit as fuck, HL'd her. 

Anyone paid for her PG? Any face pics?

Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline stayer

Sorry, I didn't look into her PG but trust me you won't be disappointed with her face of figure.

However, my review of her was neutral as her service and attitute were not quite as good as I'd expected.

Offline Quesadilla

Sorry, I didn't look into her PG but trust me you won't be disappointed with her face of figure.

However, my review of her was neutral as her service and attitute were not quite as good as I'd expected.
Cheers, appreciated, back out of the HL for me. :)
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Old monk

Hmmm, I don't think these Vanessa's are the same at all.
Vanessa sin is a lot slimmer than the one you mentioned on AW and more tellingly is very very busy at the higher rates from Annas Angels and another agency, I can't recall which, that she won't be putting out for considerably less.
I have used Annas Angels a few times, ring James on Weds or Thurs, he will tell you what you want to know. The other girls who answer the phones there tend to tell you what you want to hear!
I can highly recomend Katie moist, but if cim is a deal breaker then she isn't for you, you could try Amelie from the same sight or Surrey Independant from AW. These girls both have latex, both like a bit of kinky stuff and both should meet your needs.
Personally I can't vouch for Amelie but she is one I want to try out but I have had the pleasure of both Katie and Surrey Independant.
Im sorry im on my iPad at the moment and am struggling with the links.

Also if you wish to see Vanessa Sin she is retiring very shortly!!

Offline Old monk

Sorry 1 more piece of info, Vanessa sins incall address is Paddington, W 2 not Kensington W8 as is AW Vanessa's.

Offline Quesadilla

Hmmm, I don't think these Vanessa's are the same at all.
Vanessa sin is a lot slimmer than the one you mentioned on AW and more tellingly is very very busy at the higher rates from Annas Angels and another agency, I can't recall which, that she won't be putting out for considerably less.
I have used Annas Angels a few times, ring James on Weds or Thurs, he will tell you what you want to know. The other girls who answer the phones there tend to tell you what you want to hear!
I can highly recomend Katie moist, but if cim is a deal breaker then she isn't for you, you could try Amelie from the same sight or Surrey Independant from AW. These girls both have latex, both like a bit of kinky stuff and both should meet your needs.
Personally I can't vouch for Amelie but she is one I want to try out but I have had the pleasure of both Katie and Surrey Independant.
Im sorry im on my iPad at the moment and am struggling with the links.

Also if you wish to see Vanessa Sin she is retiring very shortly!!
Surrey Independent has been on my HL a while and quite local but a little on the premium price side - not many reviews on here, care to share one? :)
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Offline Old monk

Of course, it's about 5 months old if that's acceptable. I am aware that I must catch up with a few reviews but I only punt about 4-5 times a year. My last few were katie moist( twice) and Cindy. In the last 18 months I can add I have had Surrey ( twice) and Suzi Lap dancer ( once).
Before this, going back more than 2 years, I used the really shit cheap 100 pound an hour agencies, hence why I bang on about cheap is also no guarantee for value. I just don't remember the girls.
If the fact that up to a year has elapsed I will add Suzi and Surrey independent  over the next day or so.

Offline Quesadilla

Of course, it's about 5 months old if that's acceptable. I am aware that I must catch up with a few reviews but I only punt about 4-5 times a year. My last few were katie moist( twice) and Cindy. In the last 18 months I can add I have had Surrey ( twice) and Suzi Lap dancer ( once).
Before this, going back more than 2 years, I used the really shit cheap 100 pound an hour agencies, hence why I bang on about cheap is also no guarantee for value. I just don't remember the girls.
If the fact that up to a year has elapsed I will add Suzi and Surrey independent  over the next day or so.
As long as you state when the meet happened it shouldn't be an issue.  A WG's attitude can change overnight let alone over a year but anything that helps to paint a picture is of value IMHO.  For me, your opinion is especially valuable given that you switched from the "shit cheap agencies" to trying someone like Amelia who IIRC is twice the price. I am constantly having that debate with myself about whether you get what you pay for or not when a WG charges premium rates. 

Personally I'd rather have one amazing shag a week as opposed to 2 or 3 "average or crap" and have three or four regulars in this price bracket who have yet to let me down. But obviously when trying someone new at the premium end if they're not thoroughly reviewed on here it's much more of a risk.
« Last Edit: November 17, 2014, 10:45:00 AM by Quesadilla »
Banning reason: Obnoxious and arrogant + Veiled threat of outing punter on UKE

Tah for the advice. Will add SurreyIndependant to the HL.

If older reviews are acceptable, I should write a proper one for Lucy Jade. Quick and dirty overview: from AA, loves latex, and was most excellent at £220. I saw her one year ago, and booked her since Vanessa was unavailable that day.

Large selection of toys and outfits (literally a big crate of them), friendly, great oral, and very kinky (CIM followed by snowballing as requested).

Apparently though she gets a lot of bookings requesting latex, and then they don't turn up. She said she was actually very surprised when I knocked on the door. As such she hadn't yet put on the shoulder-length latex gloves, since they take time to put on and remove afterwards. Time wasters ruining it for the rest of us. :angry:

To add, there's no directory security on AA, so you can browse the folders. They've got videos of Vanessa dancing in the rain. Nice.

http://www.annas-angels.co.uk/london_escorts/images/video/


Pantherinae

Tsar,

I can confirm 100% that Vanessa on AA is not Vanessa$. I've seen Vanessa Sin about 5-6 times & all bar one encounter she has been amazing. Another to consider (she has a fantastic body, amazing latex wardrobe & plenty of toys is Kim Bentley). She's much taller the Vanessa Sin & has a striking face. I like her as we has a really good laugh whilst being utterly filthy with it. I click with Kim whereas I always feel a little 'staged' when I see Vanessa.

Hope this helps.

Offline kong

Hmmm, I don't think these Vanessa's are the same at all.
Vanessa sin is a lot slimmer than the one you mentioned on AW and more tellingly is very very busy at the higher rates from Annas Angels and another agency, I can't recall which, that she won't be putting out for considerably less.
I have used Annas Angels a few times, ring James on Weds or Thurs, he will tell you what you want to know. The other girls who answer the phones there tend to tell you what you want to hear!
I can highly recomend Katie moist, but if cim is a deal breaker then she isn't for you, you could try Amelie from the same sight or Surrey Independant from AW. These girls both have latex, both like a bit of kinky stuff and both should meet your needs.
Personally I can't vouch for Amelie but she is one I want to try out but I have had the pleasure of both Katie and Surrey Independant.
Im sorry im on my iPad at the moment and am struggling with the links.

Also if you wish to see Vanessa Sin she is retiring very shortly!!

As a word of warning, Amelie looks alot older than her pictures and her body is badly photoshopped. she isn't fat by any means but has a large frame for a woman. still provides a great service though

Offline Old monk

Hi kong, can you elaborate please about Amelie. I have been on the verge a couple of times but have gone for Katie. I was told by James that she is indeed larger than Katie, who is a size six with huge tits, but Amelie was described more as a size 10-12 but not fat just bigger.
Also facially is she pretty, im expecting a lady in her early to mid thirties in decent nick, would this be a fair assessment?
How is the service? Does she kiss well etc
Looking forward to your response.
Cheers OM

Offline kong

hey i'd say she's probably mid-late 30's, definitely a pretty face and nice big fake tits. i'd say she's a size 12 and not fat at all, just a large frame for a woman (her body is acutally not like anything i've ever seen before).

i didn't kiss her but she has a very willing to please attitude and is easy going. wasn't up for a levels but i am on the large side so i cant fault her for that.

i think if you're up for a mild dom session with an attractive woman who is prepared to really earn her cash then i think you'll have a great time. if you want something more hardcore that kate girl is probably more appropriate although i haven't seen her

the young, slim, model-type is more my preference but amelie is in a very convenient location for me and would certainly revisit

kong

Offline Old monk

Thnx kong, might give her a go, but with all Katie's outfits bet I end up seeing her again :D

Offline kong

i saw a girl from the same agency called ingrid who was great, sadly i think she has retired :(

Offline StevenS

I'd suggest red haired cutie. Great location, fantastically equipped playroom and shitloads of outfits.

There have been suggestions that she has become mechanical and possibly that's true for vanilla sex but for a kinky twist she is excellent. I've not had her use a strap on but she did tell me out of all the services, that's her favourite.

You'd have to ask about filming, I don't know about that.

https://www.adultwork.com/384265
« Last Edit: November 30, 2014, 11:01:31 PM by StevenS »


7 review(s) found for redhaired Cutie linked to in above post (6 positive, 1 neutral, 0 negative)

Offline west8

Tsar,

I can confirm 100% that Vanessa on AA is not Vanessa$.

+1

Different girls.

Offline firemansam

i saw a girl from the same agency called ingrid who was great, sadly i think she has retired :(

I think she is involved in running the agency

Offline kong

^ ah shit where did you hear that? i heard she had left the country.




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)