Author Topic: Samantha Love! - Sunbury  (Read 1510 times)


7 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7968527) (2 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by southcoastpunter]

Offline Gynaemyte


External Link/Members Only  or External Link/Members Only

Possibly my worst ever punt, at the Russian house, earlier this month.
45 minutes £110 – counted in front of me, a pet hate.
Entrance hall and room were very dark – red flag.
~ 5’8”, quite a heavy build, ~ size 12, not toned, “B” natural boobs, slight tummy (not childbirth?), straight, shapeless hair and very bland face – profile photos completely misleading – nothing like.
Very bland lingerie, slippers and a flimsy ‘wrap’.
English not very good.
I wouldn’t look twice if I passed her but we live in hope that the performance might rescue the punt – some hope!

However, the silver ring on the non-wedding finger, the necklace pendant “A” and the belly piercing did tally so the face was completely photoshopped?
Also, tattoo above her right boob (airbrushed) and a ‘dragon’ on her right shoulder blade – anyone else confirm?
Because of the jewellery, I would have said it was shocking photoshop but because of some of the Positives here, it might have been B&S?
Also, some of the AW Ratings were plausible (@Avatar30, yes, I know) but includes the ubiquitous Russian “skillfulwand”.

Her gripe about cold hands (anyone else would have joked about it), “darling”, ticklish fanny (stubbly but completely unresponsive), no kissing and some other stuff chimes well with @edc770 and @Joe112.

Instructed to strip off and lie on the bed - she removed her bra and followed.
A long session of OW ensued and I was flaccid for the entire session, absolutely no arousal and no trace of acting with any passion from her – performance was abysmally cold.
I politely bailed early - never again.
I think this Crew is almost beyond redemption.

Jewellery is accurate but face, hair and general build of her body are a total travesty : -



Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline southcoastpunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,044
  • Likes: 159
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
Op - please see rule 4 re what should be (and should not be) in a review heading

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=405790.0


Offline scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,621
  • Likes: 530
  •  
  • Reviews: 125

Online da26

 Probably because Hot beauty was her previous profile.

Offline Justanotherman

What has that review got to do with this one other than both being in Sunbury?
Different girls

same face, and service standards

Offline Gynaemyte

What has that review got to do with this one other than both being in Sunbury?
Different girls

 and it’s indicative of the B&S + photoshop deception that this Russian crew regularly gets up to -

Offline Gynaemyte


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Oh, dear, it looks as if she’s trying to re-invent herself with a modified Name and different starting photo on her Profile.

Rating/feedback is still hidden.

Proceed with care.

Online PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,001
  • Likes: 322
  •  
  • Reviews: 205
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Oh, dear, it looks as if she’s trying to re-invent herself with a modified Name and different starting photo on her Profile.

Rating/feedback is still hidden.

Proceed with care.

She's using all the same pictures, but they're now blurred.

One to avoid me thinks.

Offline Gynaemyte


Yep, I would say that the original Sunbury/Farnborough/Chelmsford/Hatfield Crew (as opposed to the Splitter group) has now collapsed - it’s their own silly fault.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=264025.450

Offline simon07

Agree, the Russians have joined the majority of Romanians as buyer (punter) beware. I will not be spending money on this group