First things first.....calm down upsi, something like this is not new, just dont rise to it....
So, lets get started, and before anyone reacts, READ further first
Virtually any WG is capable of having BB sex, Nancy included infact I dont think anyone will think that WGs dont have and or havent had BB sex and cip at some point, be it with a partner/husband/boyfriend etc maybe they have had a knee trembler after a night out and a few may even had this with punters
Anyone whom really knows Nancy knows that she is no different, infact i can say with hand on heart that i know SHE HAS had BB sex and CIP....because she has kids but that does not mean she does with her customers
Like as been stated, a member of 4+ years with NO reviews and no posts all of a sudden decides to state that he met Nancy for the first time and not only had FS but also BB sex and cip
He must be one hell of a good looking bloke with a fantastic personality and a great big fat wallet, i mean, so many punters have visited her and have never had FS and definitely not on visit 1, infact i know one member (in civvie life) that as been seeing her nearly as long as myself and as never managed to have FS with her, so regardless of this reviewer thinking that he convinced her that he as seen her in the past, im sure she would have remembered him had this been the case and had she not then it would be likely that she would have twigged he was trying to pull the wool and would possibly have limited her services.....
Throw in the fact that she as been around for many years now and in all that time there as never been any mention of BB in any form from any of the other punters on here and i mean all punters whom have seen her regardless of their credibility until now!
Add to the fact that as Upsi as just pointed out, Nancy left Pannarai at the end of Feb and went off the radar for a few weeks before turning up at Cleckheaton and then again at Yonlanda and as only just returned to Pannarai c/w a new VS profile and a couple of up to date pics
I also have to agree with Upsi when he states that virtually all the details of Nancy and Pannarai in this review could have been gleamed from other reviews and once again, the timing of the meet does not coincide with Nancy being at Pannarai, so IMHO i think that this review is too flawed to be true
To summarise
I am old enough, wise enough and experienced enough to be able to accept that it is not unbelievable to think that a WG has or even does have BB sex with someone, in Nancys case i know she as kids so yes she as had BB sex with someone
BUT IMO this review is not from a credible source and that alone would be enough for me to dismiss the allegation and if there are any doubters out there then the timing of this alleged meeting at Pannarai is way out as she was not there, so how can i possible even consider the review as being truthful
What others choose to believe is up to them but for me, the facts dont add up and coupled with the info coming from an unknown source gives me the confidence in my own beliefs
I have said this before and i will say it again, Punting safety is about risk management, if you act in a safe manner try to visit known safe places avoiding known suspect places and girls and you ensure any services you receive are within your parameters of that risk management then you should not have any issues with anyone you see or meets you have