Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Savanna - From Diamonds and AdultWork  (Read 13089 times)


1 review(s) for lovelylucylou4u (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline AnthG

I am posting this as a somewhat semi-negative review. People reading it can take it whether they would agree its somewhat negative or should be a full on negative or I am just being too harsh.  It really is as I am just frustrated, so I am giving it.

But anyway for a good few months I have been wanting to book External Link/Members Only. The reason for this is I like to ask the girls for other recommendations and a few had said you definitely must see Savanna. The problem is she is never available in my region.

Today I look and they have new apartments in Newcastle City Centre and she is there so I readily book for today.

As I had never been there before so ask where to go, they said they will confirm the street name in a text message and to phone up before you get there for the  exact building number.

I get the text and in it they say there is a concierge on reception and do not tell him why you are there.

I go there and phone to confirm and I get told where to go and to dial a room number and ring the intercom, I ring it four times and keep getting and error code on the intercom.

I phone back up saying I got no answer and I get told the street I was told to go to is not actually the street I need to go to but its close to it, and do I know where a certain bar is as its near there.

I say I do not know where that bar is, I am on the street and building number on that street they said to go to, so they said for me to ask someone where the bar is. I flat out refuse to do this.

I am walking and believe I find the right building. And it ain't no concierge its two burly security guards standing literally 1.5-2m from the front door.

I ring the intercom the girl says hi, the doors fly open, intercom cuts off and I am standing there not sure if I should ring again or what.

One of the two security guards starts to walk towards me so I panic and just charge past towards the stairs. Forcing a third phone call asking the room number again as I forgot it in the panic and is it ok to just go there.

I get to the room and the girl seems nice enough but she does not look 25. I would say older than this, she probably is 25 and I am just bad at guessing ages but I would put her closer to 30.

She is available on AW too and in there she has both OWO at discretion and also OWO as an enjoy.

External Link/Members Only

Not for me she wouldn't do OWO. I have done it a few times with a condom on due to the girl wanting this and am not that bothered, but am thinking at the back of my mind she must find me repulsive if she offers it on AW but not to me.

In the appointment I felt awkward around her, the best girls are able to put me at ease, this appointment was seriously awkward and I am nervous throughout. For one thing she did not seem to want to maintain eye contact which is a biggie for me.

Later on in the appointment after sex she offers oral again, and I ask if its ok for just a handjob as I did not want to wear the condom.

I get a really awkward couple of minutes as she says she does not do a handjob without a condom. The reason for the awkward couple of minutes is because I could not believe what I was hearing and thought there was a crossing of wires.

But nope she will only do a handjob with a condom on! And to make matters worse she had run out of condoms so I needed to wait for her to run out the room to another to get more condoms out of her bag just for a handjob.

While doing the handjob I ask her to look at me but she does not want to really do that either which was not too nice.

It ended as she said she wanted to check the time and it was a, "its half past that is it" and I am like can I just have a couple of extra minutes to come quickly. But nope its half past and that it. I left frustrated.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

softlad

  • Guest
Sorry to hear about this Anth, but well done for posting this review.
No question about it, it belongs in this section.
Wear a condom for hand relief !  :scare:

TeenKylie

  • Guest
I HATE girls like this! I've never said 'times up' in the whole year and a half I've been doing this! And I would hate the guy to leave without cuming. These girls need to get a grip :dash:

Online finn5555

Its a bit like shagging to the countdown clock  :yahoo:

Offline AnthG

Thanks TK. The really hurtful thing of this (I am not sure if hurtful is a right word, a bit too feminine a word).

Is she has 8 positive reviews on %%%s field reports, more than any other Diamond Escort.

Reviews there say

External Link/Members Only

Quote
Start with a back rub, then Oral without & her on top. Good eye contact through-out

And another

External Link/Members Only

Quote
This ultimately had a positive effect on the below stairs region, and I turned over for some nice owo.

The same guy then said

Quote
Then a curious urge took me. I'm not usually one for the 69,

I asked her and she flat out refused a 69 with me. And she also stipulated only use one finger during stimulation of her not two together as she said she is too tight (bull, if a baby can come out there then two fingers is nothing) but I obliged.

External Link/Members Only

Quote
She then treated me to some extremely erotic oral, with her eyes contacting mine to flash some very horny electric sparks into me. It seemed like a natural progression to re arrange ourselves into a nice 69 for some mutual stimulation, till it was soon time to put on a condom

A list of positive reviews of her doing stuff she refused to do with me. It just screams your an ugly ogre.

I go to see Escorts to get my confidence with the opposite sex increased, not stepped on.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

whiterussian

  • Guest
maybe the reviews are from members of the never had a shite punt brigade?  just reading your posts Anth it comes accross like this birds proper done your head in. From what i can see  you need to toughen up a bit with wg's.  some who sense your nerves and overpoliteness will take the piss Anth n before you know it the clocks stopped!
I now you may have dificulty with it but before you give them a penny confirm there n then what exactly will you get in return for your hard earned dough.

Fatpro$$ie

  • Guest
Ant as has been said above, ALWAYS check the services on offer before handing over any money.  This girl could either see you were a 'soft touch' and wouldnt complain or she really does not give a shit.  The fact she made you insecure is disgusting and should never happen but unfortunately it does.
On here you come across as a lovely guy and always very polite so dont worry it is not you, it is her and her stinking attitude.  Chalk it down to experience but leave a damning field report.  You have every right to leave a negative inthis situation. Wanking with condom on ffs. That is seriously taking the piss

Offline AnthG

Thanks Fatprossie, and Softlad and whiterussian earlier (and everyone else too, already thanked TK).

I have left a negative FR on %%%, its just waiting approval.

I am concerned it may come back and bite me as it seems Newcastle is a punting wilderness and don't want to pee off future girls from the same agency.

To clarify the appointment was not *that* bad it would have been ok if it weren't for the Handjob with Condom which was the kicker which caused this post and the FR. Even Adultwork doesn't have an enjoy list for this as its kind of a given that an Escort would give a handjob.

Plus to clarify before every punt, literally just before I leave for the punt, I get a bath and clean everywhere of relevance to the punt.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
Sounds as if it started badly (with the directions mix-up), and just got worse. I am a little confused regards your wilderness, I was under the impression there were quite a number of indies and agencies over in the North East - or am I missing something?

Offline Matium

Truly awful experience you had.

That girl deserves to be named and shamed.

State how much money you lost so that others will avoid her.

Offline Matium

The cheek of the girl!

She's got this tagline on her Adultwork page:

Quote
ENJOY THE ULTIMATE GIRLFRIEND EXPERIENCE BEYOND YOUR WILDEST EXPECTATIONS!

Lying prossie.

TeenKylie

  • Guest
Oh my god look at all her reviews on the other site! Maybe she was just having a really bad day :scare:

MidlandsMaidens

  • Guest
These girls need to get a grip :dash:

A better gripping technique at least  :D

Offline AnthG

I am a little confused regards your wilderness, I was under the impression there were quite a number of indies and agencies over in the North East - or am I missing something?
There has not been a genuine girl under 30 join AW in an age, maybe two months, or at the lest one month.

I have been eagerly awaiting new girls arriving but none do. The ones there are leaving (I presume as were uni students).

The agencies, Dreamgirls has shut down which was the biggie in Newcastle. Leaving only Diamonds for girls in the 20 yr old region (Other agencies all seem to have girls for £150 aged 35..

State how much money you lost so that others will avoid her.
It was a £100 for 1 hour.

Oh my god look at all her reviews on the other site! Maybe she was just having a really bad day :scare:
She did say she had a slight shaving knick on her vagina, and I said no problem will avoid it and made absolute sure I did avoid it.

But regarding the feedback on Diamonds I think they make a lot of it up. The thing that makes me believe this is there is a girl on %%%s Field reports who got a bunch of the exact same bad reviews after saying to guys she does not let them touch her breasts, or anywhere else for that matter. But on Diamonds she got multiple over and over 5 stars, never once lower than this. You just think who would ever give her a 5 star.

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline AnthG

And if you don't believe me about the none stop 5 stars here is her review page (she has left there now though it seems)

External Link/Members Only

This is the same girl that got none stop bad reviews on Pnet.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

softlad

  • Guest
Plus to clarify before every punt, literally just before I leave for the punt, I get a bath and clean everywhere of relevance to the punt.

I'm glad you made that point, because I'm sure some people reading this thread may have wondered about personal hygiene issues.
The fact is you are a clean well mannered guy and got a shit service, which.... when you're paying the kind of sums involved is not on.

Better luck next time.

Offline Daffodil

Sounds terrible Anth. I think, if anything, you are being too kind.

Protected handjob?  :lol: Punting will become a non-contact sport at this rate.

Offline Marmalade

What a disgusting piece of shite and that goes for the agency too. She might have been cheap but the report sounded like it was an experience in some backwater of a third world country with beefy fuckers ready to muscle in to you or the girl. I've known misunderstanding occur with an agency over the phone routine, but that sounds less than pleasant. Hardly the caring agency (The best one ever I knew from that area used even to make a courtesy call back to the client after the punt to see if everything was up to expectation - and they genuinely wanted to know!) If any word gets round at all it I hope it is that they don't really deserve good custom and hopefully they will either get new management or get replaced. I can understand your concern though - they do seem to have a rather large number of girls. 

Offline Marmalade

I notice even prossienet has 15 bad FRs if I'm not mistaken out of 49 for Diamonds - an unusually high number for such a grovellingly easy-to-please website.

"Oh dear. Told the price was £50 for 30 mins so I handed over £60 but I didn't receive my change."

"then started the list of what she does not do : No kissing, Oral without, receiving oral, be gentle with my breasts, don't touch there  etc etc. etc "

"Initial perception was that she was cold and disinterested. CBJ and light touching only, where the reviews came from on the profile beats me.Not a total waste of time but I left after an hour when I really needed two."

"didn't even take her bra off . . . half hearted oral followed by ten minutes of desultory wanking which left me with a friction burn on my penis"

"After trying to break the ice with a few pleasantries she said "I don't do that stuff, I just like to get on with it". Doesn't like kissing or cuddling either. After 20 minutes of cold mechanical sex during which she avoided any unnecessary physical or even eye contact, I decided this wasn't fun and left (unsatisfied)."

"The only thing she did with any enthusiasm was say 'goodbye'."

"immediately she pulled out a condom, put it on my uninterested penis and proceeded to give oral and vigorously wank me at the same time... clearly trying to make sure I cum as fast as possible"

"when I touched her breasts, she simply removed my hands and shook her head... making me wonder, absolutely, what the hell I was doing there"

"I complained to the agency who told me that they'd take her off the calendar until they had a chance to investigate - they seemed to take her off for the day and then put her back on the next day."

"met me at the door and rather brusquely told me to take my clothes off and lie back on the sofa which I did"

"I tried to touch her boobs but she knocked my hand of and advised, no touching,"

"This was probably one of the worst places I have ever visited."

"I had paid for one hour but decided to leave after 25 minutes."

"The minute I saw her I new it was a mistake, she looks a lot fatter in real life."

"After the money was sorted out she kept on leaving the room saying she had some sex toys only to return with nothing"

"Website says size 10, very much doubt, probably nearer size 16"

"no kissing and everything seemed rushed"

"perfunctory service, all over after 10 mins"

"at first i thought she was playing with her self . then i realised she was in my wallet stuffing money under the bed"

"was pleasant enough but wanted to get rid of me as quickly as possible"

"Clearly second round was not on offer. . . . £100 for 15 minutes = rip off."


Offline Marmalade

Northern Pleasures - a rather small forum that has sponsorship from Diamonds and potential conflict of interests - even manages to have as much criticism as praise:

"If your after a PSE with lots of dirty talk and a quick wham bam thank you mam then look no further!!  Personally it's not for me as I much prefer the sensuality of a GFE. I think I was in and out in about fifty minutes, I'm not used to that level of service. I've come to expect a lot better in the NE."

The heavies guarding the door might be related to External Link/Members Only earlier in the year.

Perhaps it is unfair to blame the agency for an ex-employee that they sacked, but clearly they are not very good at hiring - with so many complaints and taking on criminal elements, even unknowingly. No doubt some people have been lucky. But would you take a chance once you knew the dissatisfaction rate was almost one in three? And it is maybe even higher if one accounts for people feeling too embarrassed to complain. This hardly looks like a well run agency.

Offline AnthG

The heavies guarding the door might be related to External Link/Members Only earlier in the year.
Thanks for all this Marmalade, especially the Chronicle link as I never knew about this.

But the two heavies on the door I am believing they were the buildings security. As they just rent a few apartments in a large 6 floor apartment complex block, which is also (I am guessing) why they said not to say anything to them as they did not want to have their apartment leases revoked.

Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline smiths

Oh my god look at all her reviews on the other site! Maybe she was just having a really bad day :scare:

Feedback that has as many holes in it as a string vest making it all a fairy story in my mind with zero credibility.

Offline smiths

It is 15 negative FRs out of 49 on Pnet, a very poor record and many punters either dont know about Pnets FRs or they dont do negative FRs out of embarrassment or looking bad in front of other punters so chances are many more punters have had bad punts and if i were in the area researching they would be a never for me.

Well done Anth for informing others and doing a FR, sorry to hear about this experience. ;)

Offline Marmalade

Thanks for all this Marmalade, especially the Chronicle link as I never knew about this.
No worries mate, I think we all feel for a fellow punter going through that. And after all, you did the real work Anth by providing such a detailed report to enable us to nail them. As Smiths said, a lot of guys would want just to gloss over a bad experience. Hopefully people will be able to avoid them easier now, and any other agencies with such a bad track record.

TeenKylie

  • Guest
Oh dear at the response she gave you on your PN Feild report. I would like to think it's not true although she does sound very believable. She could of just asked you to shower at hers. And the down stairs comment well really hope that's not true Ant. :blush:



Offline AnthG

I am quite offended by that and could get into an argument with her, but what is the point.

Do I have the ability anyway to respond to that rebuttal anyway?

*Edit* On reflection I would like to confirm one or two things as a rebuttal so can you rebut to a rebuttal?
« Last Edit: September 29, 2011, 05:05:38 pm by AnthG »
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Marmalade

It's a weakness of both the PN and AW field report system. It's one thing if you have lots of FRs to your name or, on AW, plenty of good feedback. But if you are in the position of 'new kid on the block' when you try to rip someone to shreds then it's harder. It's not about honesty so much as about perception.

Offline AnthG

It's a weakness of both the PN and AW field report system. It's one thing if you have lots of FRs to your name or, on AW, plenty of good feedback. But if you are in the position of 'new kid on the block' when you try to rip someone to shreds then it's harder. It's not about honesty so much as about perception.
Exactly and now the perception is I have been some ogre. And I will be blacklisted with the other girls there.

And she will be the one believed as she has made the standard replies of rebuttal.

I "prodded" and had "long fingernales"; as I confirmed here and there in the FR I asked if I could put a finger in beforehand and she said use only one finger as she is tight. There is no way she could have known technique or saw my finger nails at the time of asking.

The refusal for the 69 was like I said here but not there was as she said she had cut her vagina shaving.

The problem with my downstairs, the only thing I have down there is hair. I am not someone who shaves bald and just trims.

Theoretically the only other thing that could be there is smegma (unless I am forgetting my male anatomy), and I am taking it this is what she is suggesting was there. People can ask themselves am I the sort of person that would go to an escort appointment with smegma down there.

Its quite offensive that she is suggesting there is a problem with my downstairs. As this is something that causes other girls to not want to see you.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Marmalade

By your downstairs I take it you mean your knob. So simply talk about how meticulously you clean under your foreskin (assuming you do), that you weren't dripping with sweat (assuming you weren't) and so on. It's hard to prove material facts online but there are things you can maybe do to improve your chances. Most girls will notice a guy's fingernails as quickly as a guy will notice a woman's tits, so that sounds a less promising tack. At the end of the day, all one can say is that one punter had an unsatisfactory experience and the hooker concerned 'didn't think much of him either.' After that, assuming there are no facts that can be clearly demonstrated as such, it's a) a numbers game - how many bad reports the hooker or the punter accumulated, and b) credibility of reports, which may include how well they're written and how much of a hearing you get on any one online source.

Factually, it can be ascertained from PN records that the agency itself has a worryingly high proportion of reports by unsatisfied customers. That's in your favour, whether or not she personally has good reports elsewhere. If she were that choosy, with the consistently high standards that she would have us think, then she is doing herself no favours by being associated with a group that has very low entrance criteria.

Offline AnthG

By your downstairs I take it you mean your knob.
What else can she be meaning

Quote
When i went down stairs i was mortified at how unclean this was i won't go into detail too much but i could clearly see it still even after putting a condom on it.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Marmalade

I merely suggest calling a spade a spade, though you were maybe making an ironic reference to her euphemism. By using such innuendo she is suggesting your knob could be covered in cauliflower sized warts, big red herpes blisters, oozing gonococcal puss and probably has enough smegma to kill a wasp factory. Her 'ladylike' approach means she can not only avoid facts but imply things without making an outright accusation - a good technique if there is fuck all substance to her complaints of course.

Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
Ant

I'm going to pm you about this type of situation if you don't mind.

Offline AnthG

Last post I think I need to make on this. But I PM'ed Gallahad for advice, I got a very helpful reply posted to the forum so will post it here. (I hope this is ok for me to do as I feel it would be helpful to others with regards to field reports)

Quote from: Galahad
I got your PM but will reply here as the information may be useful to others as well.

There are no rebuttals to rebuttals. I don't want a FR to turn into a back-and-forth mud-slinging match. That just makes everyone involved look bad.

The author always has the option of having the report deleted, and ladies and establishments can always choose to have no reports here at all. The rule for providers is "all or nothing" though, they can't pick and choose which ones to keep.

However, it is best to leave reports like the OP's online, as they can add weight to future reports by the same author on other ladies, as well as by other punters on the same lady.

As you can see it has the option to delete the entire report if the poster wants, I will leave it up.

I know it may cause problems for me with other girls at Diamonds (which I would like to still use as I have had some very good punts with Diamonds - Paige was literally a dream come true).

But I will have to simply try and deal with that when the moment comes.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Marmalade

A minor victory with Galahad showing a bit of decency on his site:

Quote
No more reports by first-time authors will be accepted for that agency, and all reports will be subjected to a higher degree of scrutiny.

Bravo.

It seems particularly appropriate as

a) the 'good' %%% reports were, I gather, one of the reasons you booked her, and

b) the damning evidence is contained in the conglomerated reports and those that came so suspiciously hot on the heels of yours - which you managed to follow up and draw people's attention to Anth.


Offline AnthG

Yes Gallahad seems quite a fair guy in all considering. I was not expecting this response from him.

I do feel bad for Diamonds as I have a feeling they had nothing to do with these brand new reports coming up in 24 hours rubbishing my negative report.

I also intend to use them again as I have had some very nice service from them (but phoning them up for my next booking request would be a bit daunting incase they say are you that swine that has caused us all this trouble - hopefully they will too see it as it truly was though).

Will say again Paige (who unfortunately recently left) is easily one of the most gorgeous, friendly, fun girls I have ever met. If girls like her were there, I would like to continue seeing them to hopefully find another like her.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline smiths

Just to give my opinion, i think it highly unlikely its Savanna who has created 2 false FRs, my money is on the Agency and their already poor FR record of about 75% positives tells me they arent up to the level i require. Obviously Anths business who he punts with.
« Last Edit: September 30, 2011, 02:37:14 pm by smiths »

Offline Marmalade

Check it out - it was a well-written rebuttal (if she wrote it herself, which had also been called into question) but the evidence is so suggestive of Anth being stitched up that even the normally prossie-biased %%% has supported Anth against what looks increasingly like faked reports generated by that agency.

I also noticed that prossienet has had quite reasonable traffic this afternoon, some of it possibly driven from this thread (many of our regulars signed in but posting there). We don't have anything to worry about traffic-wise - UKP's reputation is growing by leaps, but I hope Galahad maybe sees that giving punters a fair break now and then is actually good for his site as well. Quite interesting watching his feminazis trying to retract their claws after Mr G piped in.

Bet you knew they were 'just joking' when they were trying to crucify ya, eh Anth? Did ya not see that little old smiley after a long paragraph of prossie's-always-right rant? ;)

Only kiddin' :sarcastic: I think Anth has perhaps scored something of a diplomatic triumph so I'll try just to see the good in people. There's not thatmuch wrong with %%% being jumping to the defence of prossies if UKP can stand up for punters. Anything for a fairer playing field. :) And increasing the integrity with how complaints aree dealt with is ultimately good for decent prossies, decent agencies, and decent PUNTERS.

:) :) :) :)
« Last Edit: September 30, 2011, 04:58:08 pm by Marmalade »

whiterussian

  • Guest
i agree, well done Anth for outing the lying cnut.  some people would have just swept it under the carpet.

these bad wgs will love getting paid 100 smackers to do fuck all.  that would take some a day of blood sweat and tears to earn the same.  arrrggh it riles me at times! :diablo:

Offline Matium

It's good to see you persevere with this but her response to your FR shows that WGs are able to shred a man's reputation without fear of comeback.

Naive to think there'll ever be a fair hearing on Prossienet.

Offline AnthG

It's good to see you persevere with this but her response to your FR shows that WGs are able to shred a man's reputation without fear of comeback.

Naive to think there'll ever be a fair hearing on Prossienet.
Some of the Escorts there are not daft, they know when its time to jump ship from blindly supporting their fellow escorts and climb aboard the other sides.

Some of them like the one who posted this morning bumping the thread back up is beyond comprehension. I had said to myself I was not posting there in that thread again as there was no need to as it was all said, but then that crazy idiotic bump today.

All these times I have said I would never ever leave a girl a bad FR. The one time I do and leave only a semi bad one with the intentions of it being constructive and ruddy world war 3 breaks out. Typical Anthony situation. :)
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Strawberry

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,790
  • Likes: 47
Some of the Escorts there are not daft, they know when its time to jump ship from blindly supporting their fellow escorts and climb aboard the other sides.

Some of them like the one who posted this morning bumping the thread back up is beyond comprehension. I had said to myself I was not posting there in that thread again as there was no need to as it was all said, but then that crazy idiotic bump today.

All these times I have said I would never ever leave a girl a bad FR. The one time I do and leave only a semi bad one with the intentions of it being constructive and ruddy world war 3 breaks out. Typical Anthony situation. :)

I've given Ant my support in this, I have however also seen malicious reports written by punters and girls threatened with this by guys who can't get their way. I usually try to read both sides and the truth usually lies between the two, often more to one side than the other.

Offline Marmalade

The PN thread dealing with this encapsulated almost everything good and everything bad about %%%. Galahad showed some momentary sense in his ruling on Diamonds FRs, but the thread soon descended into the howling of vicious witches, interspersed (but mostly shouted down) by the occasional sensible post from members who post on UKP as well. Some of those women shriek like brain-curdled vixen deprived of their HRT. They lower the tone and common sense as swiftly and efficiently as a pile of steaming hot turd thrown forcefully at families having a picnic on the beach.

If ever anyone needs a reminder of why they lost patience with %%%, some of those excuses for women are ever ready to supply one. 

Jacob

  • Guest
..... like the one who posted this morning bumping the thread back up is beyond comprehension.

If you are referring to the person I think you are then there is no chance of understanding, banned at least a dozen times from UKP and still lurking I expect. An 'attention whore' flashing her signature wherever she can. Best ignored. I sincerely doubt she read the thread properly, from my experience is blinkered seeing and hearing only what she wants to.

For what it's worth you were right to post as you have and a great shame that, as usual, some automatically take the view of it's a case of sour grapes or whatever. Savanna did not provide anywhere near the level of service expected and when these poor practices are put under the spotlight they try and make it the Punters fault. I think anyone with a modicum of common sense can see what's what.


Offline AnthG

If you are referring to the person I think you are then there is no chance of understanding,
The person I am meaning is the one who yet again bumped the thread today at 12.05am.

Every post has had extreme aggression from her. Multiple insults towards me and just nastiness. If she is the one who lurk reads here maybe she has taken offence to one of my posts here perhaps?

I wish she would stop bumping my thread or acting like a hypocrite giving me insults and acting like I am slime and the one time I suggest she is wrong about siding with the girl she goes crazy with 5 ranting replies suggesting don't dare "try to besmirch my good name". Contradiction she has tried to destroy mine with her insults and tone of posts.

Very unpleasant character. And am saying it here if she reads it as a lurker as if I said it there likely 10 Escorts will come and lambast me.

Be more polite to people it gets you respect and politeness back. Just be nice to people. Its a forum trying to help one another.
Banned reason: To much drama, account closed
Banned by: Iloveoral

Mancspunter

  • Guest
Don't worry about her, she is clearly mental and loves the attention, just pretend she does not exist.

Offline Jerboa

The PN thread dealing with this encapsulated almost everything good and everything bad about %%%. Galahad showed some momentary sense in his ruling on Diamonds FRs, but the thread soon descended into the howling of vicious witches, interspersed (but mostly shouted down) by the occasional sensible post from members who post on UKP as well. Some of those women shriek like brain-curdled vixen deprived of their HRT. They lower the tone and common sense as swiftly and efficiently as a pile of steaming hot turd thrown forcefully at families having a picnic on the beach.

If ever anyone needs a reminder of why they lost patience with %%%, some of those excuses for women are ever ready to supply one.

Were you and I reading the same PN thread? Anth posted what he says happened, not everyone has to blindly believe him, some of the posters were taking a balanced view, there was no howling of vicious witches, I think you better go and have your afternoon knap Marmalade.  :)

Mancspunter

  • Guest
Were you and I reading the same PN thread? Anth posted what he says happened, not everyone has to blindly believe him, some of the posters were taking a balanced view, there was no howling of vicious witches, I think you better go and have your afternoon knap Marmalade.  :)


Does Marmalade break stones as a hobby?  ;)

Offline Jerboa

The person I am meaning is the one who yet again bumped the thread today at 12.05am.

Every post has had extreme aggression from her. Multiple insults towards me and just nastiness. If she is the one who lurk reads here maybe she has taken offence to one of my posts here perhaps?

I wish she would stop bumping my thread or acting like a hypocrite giving me insults and acting like I am slime and the one time I suggest she is wrong about siding with the girl she goes crazy with 5 ranting replies suggesting don't dare "try to besmirch my good name". Contradiction she has tried to destroy mine with her insults and tone of posts.

Very unpleasant character. And am saying it here if she reads it as a lurker as if I said it there likely 10 Escorts will come and lambast me.

Be more polite to people it gets you respect and politeness back. Just be nice to people. Its a forum trying to help one another.

You are a big girls blouse aren't you Anth? I've just read back that thread, and didn't see much extreme aggression from her, you need to grow some balls, and take constructive criticism on the chin, and not go taking everything that you don't agree with as an Insult, or the nasty ladies ganging up on me.  :rolleyes: