Author Topic: "Senior Massage Technician" Anna, Croydon (Bareback)  (Read 29233 times)

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
External Link/Members Only

Short version: great BJ, great bareback fuck and creampie, nice lady, friendly, reasonable prices.

Anna is working from a flat in Croydon. She is independent and answers her own calls/texts. She resembles the photos but with more weight, she has used some filters. She is probably late 40's and a nice friendly lady. Bodywise she is probably size 12/14, with a nice pair of big tits. Pussy is fully shaven.

Anna gave me the address and asked me to call when outside. Once outside she gave me the flat number and buzzed me in. Flat was in a new build apartment block and she was on one of the higher floors. The building looks nice from outside but the flats are seriously small. I feel sorry for people expected to live in these shoeboxes.

Once inside was greeted by Anna, she is friendly and can hold a conversation. We chatted about how long she has been in UK, and where she was living before she came here. In to the bedroom I handed over the money, £60 for 30 mins, she told me to get comfortable while she went to stash it. I got undressed and lay on the bed. Anna returned in a few mins later and immediately stripped. She is quite playful and was lightly spanking my bum telling me I am a naughty boy. She commended on my cock size and began to stroke it. She then began to kiss and lick it, and then took it fully in her mouth, and proceeded to give a very good blow job, nice and deep, sucking like she was enjoying it. I took the opportunity to play with her tits, they are big and natural. Her blow job was very good and it was tempting to blow in her mouth, but I was there to fuck so after a few mins I suggested we start. She asked if I wanted a condom, stupid question! I said I'd rather without, and she told me it would be £20 extra. She then guided me inside, her pussy was quite wet, no lube needed. She fucked me on top for a while, then we changed to missionary so I could control the pace. With the warm up from the great blow job I felt like I was going to blow early so I withdrew and went down on her for a while, which she seemed to enjoy, but she didn't orgasm. Then we resumed missionary and it didn't take me long to blow. Before I reached the point I checked if she was ok for me to unload inside, once confirmed I went full throttle and deposited my load inside, and continued thrusting until I was fully satisfied. I stayed inside for a few mins longer until my cock became limp and fell out. I looked down to survey my work and saw my cum leaking out. I asked Anna to play with her pussy, she obliged and massaged my leaking cum in to her pussy and clit. It was a very nice sight. We then both cleaned up with wet wipes and I was on my way.

I have been back to see Anna a few times and she delivers consistently good service. I don't think she plans to stay in UK long term so I recommend you see her sooner rather than later.

Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac


Offline sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,157
  • Likes: 172
  •  
  • Reviews: 141
I've seen and been tempted by this ad for a while now.

Thanks for letting us know she's a BB-er.

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
I've seen and been tempted by this ad for a while now.

Thanks for letting us know she's a BB-er.

Why don't you use condoms?!
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,157
  • Likes: 172
  •  
  • Reviews: 141
Why don't you use condoms?!

I do but you and she didn't? There's a thread for that sort of thing.

Offline puntingking



thanks for the review pumpdump.  :thumbsup:


Offline puntingking

I do but you and she didn't? There's a thread for that sort of thing.

if you use a condom then it doesn't matter if the wg is a barebacker or not  :thumbsup:

Offline Bigjimmyjones

if you use a condom then it doesn't matter if the wg is a barebacker or not  :thumbsup:

Haha it does matter

Online scouting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,164
  • Likes: 225
  •  
  • Reviews: 173
if you use a condom then it doesn't matter if the wg is a barebacker or not  :thumbsup:

It's just a matter of controlling the probabilities. Having skimmed through a few of the OP's reviews he would appear to be a serial BB'er and as such I would not knowingly follow him into any girl, even though I would be covered. Not passing judgement, just working the odds in my favour.

Offline ArnoldClark

So allow me to get this right,
You participated in BB for an extra £20. An amount that is easy accessible to anyone, even the homeless people who are on state benefits. No results provided.

You have now put a review boasting about it so people in the same demographic as yourself can also attend to the SP.

You are aware that you’re not the only person she has offered this too. You are going to catch something.

You’re better off going to the SP who openly offer BB for £1000 extra. Even that I find it to be a low sum. It’s not easily accessible to any Tom and dick and at least they have precautions in place to make it safe. 

Let’s hope that you have made an appointment with the clinic before you continue seeing anyone else.

Offline Garyhart

So allow me to get this right,
You participated in BB for an extra £20. An amount that is easy accessible to anyone, even the homeless people who are on state benefits. No results provided.

You have now put a review boasting about it so people in the same demographic as yourself can also attend to the SP.

You are aware that you’re not the only person she has offered this too. You are going to catch something.

You’re better off going to the SP who openly offer BB for £1000 extra. Even that I find it to be a low sum. It’s not easily accessible to any Tom and dick and at least they have precautions in place to make it safe. 

Let’s hope that you have made an appointment with the clinic before you continue seeing anyone else.

My assumption is that he simply doesn’t care or he has already caught something fairly extreme, which can’t be treated for, hence, he’s laissez-faire about BB’ing countless women 

Offline ArnoldClark

My assumption is that he simply doesn’t care or he has already caught something fairly extreme, which can’t be treated for, hence, he’s laissez-faire about BB’ing countless women

He needs to be sectioned, eradicated and needs a warning under his name.
I do not wish to see any SP who has seen OP to where they have given him something small such as OW.

Offline Hobbit

So allow me to get this right,
You participated in BB for an extra £20. An amount that is easy accessible to anyone, even the homeless people who are on state benefits. No results provided.

You have now put a review boasting about it so people in the same demographic as yourself can also attend to the SP.

You are aware that you’re not the only person she has offered this too. You are going to catch something.

You’re better off going to the SP who openly offer BB for £1000 extra. Even that I find it to be a low sum. It’s not easily accessible to any Tom and dick and at least they have precautions in place to make it safe. 

Let’s hope that you have made an appointment with the clinic before you continue seeing anyone else.

Hmm, where in the review has he come across to be boasting about it? To me it reads like a review and that's it. :unknown:



Offline puntingking

He needs to be sectioned, eradicated and needs a warning under his name.
I do not wish to see any SP who has seen OP to where they have given him something small such as OW.

saying you don't like bareback is one thing. trying to advocate the eradication of a purely good member is another.
Pumpdump has been a member longer than you with more reviews so put a sock in it :dash:


This site welcomes all reviews, the ones that you or I may not agree with is irrelevant. A review is a review.


Offline puntingking

Hmm, where in the review has he come across to be boasting about it? To me it reads like a review and that's it. :unknown:

+1

Offline ArnoldClark

saying you don't like bareback is one thing. trying to advocate the eradication of a purely good member is another.
Pumpdump has been a member longer than you with more reviews so put a sock in it :dash:


This site welcomes all reviews, the ones that you or I may not agree with is irrelevant. A review is a review.

What has being a member for a number of period of time and more reviews than me has anything to do with it? I think that to be irrelevant.

A review and a review, I’m allowed to input my thoughts.

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,633
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125
He needs to be sectioned, eradicated and needs a warning under his name.
I do not wish to see any SP who has seen OP to where they have given him something small such as OW.

And you need to put your head into gear.
The simple fact is that any girl you see could be, and quite possibly is, offering BB services under the counter irrespective of whatever may be said or stated on any online profile.
Reviews like this publicise those girls who offer BB services. They help in two ways: for those who like it, they know who to see. For those who don't, they know who to avoid.
You should be thanking the OP for publicising a girl who doesn't fit your wants and needs profile

Offline puntingking

And you need to put your head into gear.
The simple fact is that any girl you see could be, and quite possibly is, offering BB services under the counter irrespective of whatever may be said or stated on any online profile.
Reviews like this publicise those girls who offer BB services. They help in two ways: for those who like it, they know who to see. For those who don't, they know who to avoid.
You should be thanking the OP for publicising a girl who doesn't fit your wants and needs profile


well said   :thumbsup:

Offline JST

I don't see anything wrong with the review.
BB exists, people have choices. You know who you might want to see or not.
Peace.

Offline jakplo22

He needs to be sectioned, eradicated and needs a warning under his name.
I do not wish to see any SP who has seen OP to where they have given him something small such as OW.

The rules are pretty clear that discussion of BB services is allowed. And if you, like me, want to avoid BB providers, then being transparent about it works out in everyone's favour.

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
What has being a member for a number of period of time and more reviews than me has anything to do with it? I think that to be irrelevant.

A review and a review, I’m allowed to input my thoughts.

What you think is irrelevant, why are you posting on a review you have no interest in and slating a fellow punter for his choices ?

You should be eradicated  :lol:.

Too much of this posting when there is no interest, while others must have alerts set, to post on reviews of their " favourites " which reads like continued promotion, especially when accompanied by repeated reviews  :lol:

Ignore things that do not interest you or trigger you, simples, Scutty has explained clearly why it is of benefit to other users of the forum, both those seeking the service or wanting to avoid it.  :unknown:

It is a review, thats all, and probably more honest than a lot of them  :D.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline hendrix

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,658
  • Likes: 569
  •  
  • Reviews: 63
And you need to put your head into gear.
The simple fact is that any girl you see could be, and quite possibly is, offering BB services under the counter irrespective of whatever may be said or stated on any online profile.
Reviews like this publicise those girls who offer BB services. They help in two ways: for those who like it, they know who to see. For those who don't, they know who to avoid.
You should be thanking the OP for publicising a girl who doesn't fit your wants and needs profile

Exactly this. We all take some risks in punting, and being better informed helps everyone make their own decisions based on the risk they perceive.

Good review OP!  :thumbsup:

Offline massagepuntingfan

Exactly this. We all take some risks in punting, and being better informed helps everyone make their own decisions based on the risk they perceive.

Good review OP!  :thumbsup:

+1. ArnoldClark you come across as overly judgmental.

Offline sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,157
  • Likes: 172
  •  
  • Reviews: 141
I don't see anything wrong with the review.
BB exists, people have choices. You know who you might want to see or not.
Peace.

Simple as that and credit to OP for including the detail in the subject line.

My point was that this WG was someone I was interested in but thanks to this key detail am no longer, so OP has done us a service in reporting this.  I don't think it'll hit her trade, if anything probably intensify her appeal to a certain set of punters.

Offline Garyhart

He needs to be sectioned, eradicated and needs a warning under his name.
I do not wish to see any SP who has seen OP to where they have given him something small such as OW.

First part is a bit harsh, the remainder I agree with

Offline puntingking

Simple as that and credit to OP for including the detail in the subject line.

My point was that this WG was someone I was interested in but thanks to this key detail am no longer, so OP has done us a service in reporting this.  I don't think it'll hit her trade, if anything probably intensify her appeal to a certain set of punters.


also, you can call me a busy body but I very much like to see and know what other punters are getting up to with their wgs. It fills me with joy  :D

Offline Kaluuu276

External Link/Members Only

Short version: great BJ, great bareback fuck and creampie, nice lady, friendly, reasonable prices.

Anna is working from a flat in Croydon. She is independent and answers her own calls/texts. She resembles the photos but with more weight, she has used some filters. She is probably late 40's and a nice friendly lady. Bodywise she is probably size 12/14, with a nice pair of big tits. Pussy is fully shaven.

Anna gave me the address and asked me to call when outside. Once outside she gave me the flat number and buzzed me in. Flat was in a new build apartment block and she was on one of the higher floors. The building looks nice from outside but the flats are seriously small. I feel sorry for people expected to live in these shoeboxes.

Once inside was greeted by Anna, she is friendly and can hold a conversation. We chatted about how long she has been in UK, and where she was living before she came here. In to the bedroom I handed over the money, £60 for 30 mins, she told me to get comfortable while she went to stash it. I got undressed and lay on the bed. Anna returned in a few mins later and immediately stripped. She is quite playful and was lightly spanking my bum telling me I am a naughty boy. She commended on my cock size and began to stroke it. She then began to kiss and lick it, and then took it fully in her mouth, and proceeded to give a very good blow job, nice and deep, sucking like she was enjoying it. I took the opportunity to play with her tits, they are big and natural. Her blow job was very good and it was tempting to blow in her mouth, but I was there to fuck so after a few mins I suggested we start. She asked if I wanted a condom, stupid question! I said I'd rather without, and she told me it would be £20 extra. She then guided me inside, her pussy was quite wet, no lube needed. She fucked me on top for a while, then we changed to missionary so I could control the pace. With the warm up from the great blow job I felt like I was going to blow early so I withdrew and went down on her for a while, which she seemed to enjoy, but she didn't orgasm. Then we resumed missionary and it didn't take me long to blow. Before I reached the point I checked if she was ok for me to unload inside, once confirmed I went full throttle and deposited my load inside, and continued thrusting until I was fully satisfied. I stayed inside for a few mins longer until my cock became limp and fell out. I looked down to survey my work and saw my cum leaking out. I asked Anna to play with her pussy, she obliged and massaged my leaking cum in to her pussy and clit. It was a very nice sight. We then both cleaned up with wet wipes and I was on my way.

I have been back to see Anna a few times and she delivers consistently good service. I don't think she plans to stay in UK long term so I recommend you see her sooner rather than later.



Vivastreet shows £20 for OW / £30 for OWO  :(

Did you go before these charges applied  or you did you pay £90 ? 

Offline Private Member

Personally I welcome PD's candid reviews.

BB is not for me, so based on this review I will not now see this SP. I was previously tempted. Others may now also make the same decision too.

Of course, those that look for BB providers will no doubt be part of a queue that's already forming.

Offline pumps

I very much enjoy reading about these bareback punts  :hi:

Maybe one day when there's a cure for everything I'll indulge too.

Offline Stevelondon

I very much enjoy reading about these bareback punts  :hi:

Maybe one day when there's a cure for everything I'll indulge too.


 :D :lol:    I’d rather not need the cure. But I catch your drift  :D

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
He needs to be sectioned, eradicated and needs a warning under his name.
I do not wish to see any SP who has seen OP to where they have given him something small such as OW.

I won't listen to criticism from hypocrites who also participate in unprotected sexual services.
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
I very much enjoy reading about these bareback punts  :hi:

Maybe one day when there's a cure for everything I'll indulge too.

A cure for what? What are you worried about catching Pumps?
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Online scutty brown

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 25,633
  • Likes: 533
  •  
  • Reviews: 125

Offline Stevelondon

Worse still……… Dumps 😱😂

Offline oinki

Appreciate the review and also highlighting the subject line for this, makes it easier when I do my research in case there would be crossover. Each to their own on BB, but from a review perspective this is helpful.

Online patelprat

Amazing how this fairly average looking SP generates so many hits and interest in a short space of time just due to bareback being mentioned in the title   :D

« Last Edit: December 09, 2024, 01:41:36 pm by patelprat »

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
Amazing how this fairly average looking SP generates so many hits and interest in a short space of time just due to bareback being mentioned in the title   :D

Indeed, 5000+ views in 3 days. Granted, a lot of it is curiosity, but there are definitely a lot of closet barebackers who for whatever reason are scared to come out of the closet. I can't really understand why as we are all anonymous names on a screen. It would be better for all of us if people who do bareback admit to it in their reviews.
« Last Edit: December 09, 2024, 02:25:48 pm by PumpDump »
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Azucar D Artagnan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,124
  • Likes: 56
  •  
  • Reviews: 163

I was more surprised about the O.P. stating "natural boobs" rather than take a full load of "cum " up her  :lol: She does seem to have a cute look about her  :dancegirl:

Online patelprat

I can't really understand why as we are all anonymous names on a screen. It would be better for all of us if people who do bareback admit to it in their reviews.

That is itself a big risk. Many providers who use UKP and work out who you are and read you are doing bareback may blacklist you in future, plus I know a few escorts who check whether clients have seen bareback providers from their AW feedback and won't book them in if so.

So it's all fine to admit and review, so long as you accept there could be blowback.

« Last Edit: December 09, 2024, 05:43:14 pm by patelprat »

Offline jordan452


Offline genghis69

This happens almost every time the OP writes a BB review. Judgemental people come on criticising him. He's just relaying his experience. And actually he's doing a good service to the spick and span legions of men who visit prostitutes and exchange all manner of bodily fluids with them before wearing a rubber on their dicks and slapping themselves on the back for being really clean and disease free. OP is actually telling us which SP to steer clear of we are those judgemental super clean variety of whore users. Leave the OP alone. Read his review and move on cos he's not gonna change.

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,284
  • Likes: 546
  •  
  • Reviews: 502
Just to add

25 Allegations of sexually transmitted diseases
Past incidents have shown that such extreme and damaging allegations are malicious and from troublemakers. Therefore, it is generally not acceptable to make such allegations against others.

No more if it please gents  :drinks:

Offline Azucar D Artagnan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,124
  • Likes: 56
  •  
  • Reviews: 163
This happens almost every time the OP writes a BB review. Judgemental people come on criticising him. He's just relaying his experience. And actually he's doing a good service to the spick and span legions of men who visit prostitutes and exchange all manner of bodily fluids with them before wearing a rubber on their dicks and slapping themselves on the back for being really clean and disease free. OP is actually telling us which SP to steer clear of we are those judgemental super clean variety of whore users. Leave the OP alone. Read his review and move on cos he's not gonna change.

Never understood why those that pay for sex are so judgemental of those who also pay for legal aged , consensual sex with a professional from the opposite sex .

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,284
  • Likes: 546
  •  
  • Reviews: 502
This happens almost every time the OP writes a BB review. Judgemental people come on criticising him. He's just relaying his experience. And actually he's doing a good service to the spick and span legions of men who visit prostitutes and exchange all manner of bodily fluids with them before wearing a rubber on their dicks and slapping themselves on the back for being really clean and disease free. OP is actually telling us which SP to steer clear of we are those judgemental super clean variety of whore users. Leave the OP alone. Read his review and move on cos he's not gonna change.

I do tend to agree, the OP has been straight and honest.
He could have kept this to himself, and respect to him for sharing his experience and letting us know.
Easy on the comments against him
« Last Edit: December 10, 2024, 12:25:54 am by Iloveoral »

Offline Raven

I really like reading PumpDump adventures! Although not for me, I kinda like living vicariously through his al ways entertaining escapades. Each to their own I say.  :hi: Good on you Pump.

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
Amazing how this fairly average looking SP generates so many hits and interest in a short space of time just due to bareback being mentioned in the title   :D

Including you, and of course you cannot resist posting your intimate knowledge of Sp,s and comment on her looks  :lol:.
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline lillythesavage

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 2,666
  • Likes: 36
  •  
  • Reviews: 17
That is itself a big risk. Many providers who use UKP and work out who you are and read you are doing bareback may blacklist you in future, plus I know a few escorts who check whether clients have seen bareback providers from their AW feedback and won't book them in if so.

So it's all fine to admit and review, so long as you accept there could be blowback.

You would know all about it of course, having changed your AW username and using several phone numbers since reports on other sites, despite the easy link to your usernames being pointed out to you sometime back and you saying it was not a problem.

Hearsay from the report I know, but it says you use this forum as a weapon, you were very quick to post a negative of a SP who exercised her right not to see you,  :unknown:.
Your repeated reviews of your " Roster of favourites" , glowing comments on reviews of them posted by others reads like promotion, often posting personal information on a public forum.
Your reviews always start by mentioning previous reviews which suggests you take more from this forum than you give back, have you ever given any new info to this forum?
Your regular comments about size and looks of SP,s on reviews you obviously have no interest in suggest disdain for the likes of other punters , just like posting on this thread does.

Very judgemental and hypocritical ?
Banned reason: Undesirable, previously banned, still attacking members, discussing UKP with SP, toxic personality, it’s a no from me!,
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline puntingking

I really like reading PumpDump adventures! Although not for me, I kinda like living vicariously through his al ways entertaining escapades. Each to their own I say.  :hi: Good on you Pump.

he is a great contributor to this forum.  :)

Offline MLawro93

You would know all about it of course, having changed your AW username and using several phone numbers since reports on other sites, despite the easy link to your usernames being pointed out to you sometime back and you saying it was not a problem.

Hearsay from the report I know, but it says you use this forum as a weapon, you were very quick to post a negative of a SP who exercised her right not to see you,  :unknown:.
Your repeated reviews of your " Roster of favourites" , glowing comments on reviews of them posted by others reads like promotion, often posting personal information on a public forum.
Your reviews always start by mentioning previous reviews which suggests you take more from this forum than you give back, have you ever given any new info to this forum?
Your regular comments about size and looks of SP,s on reviews you obviously have no interest in suggest disdain for the likes of other punters , just like posting on this thread does.

Very judgemental and hypocritical ?

Whilst we are all entitled to our opinions, the fact that you keep honing in on PP comes across as a tad obsessed, mate. If he bothers you so much, put him on ignore  :unknown:

Online patelprat

I need to report him. Really no need for his hate and puts me off writing anything more here. Re abuse towards other members in the rules.
And his posts mostly add zero value, never contributes anything useful or insightful to the forum.

« Last Edit: December 10, 2024, 09:52:11 am by patelprat »