Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.

Author Topic: Does RO, DFK and then OWO = bareback?  (Read 967 times)

Do you think RO then DFK then OWO provides an avenue of germ/viral transfer equivalent to bareback sex?

Offline Matium

If that's what you're worried about then don't punt at all.

Offline PumpAction

Bit of a silly question. Yes there are risks with DFK and unprotected oral but no the germ/viral transfer is not equivalent to bareback. A simple google search on STD's will tell you that.

risks of dfk? how can you get a sexually transmitted infection from not having sex?

Offline roo222


Bareback is particularly risky because with all that vigorous thrusting you're both creating tiny tears in the skin which nasties will joyfully jump out of and set up home in. But most of them need *direct* contact.

RO and OWO are potential transmission routes for getting stds orally, but it's really unlikely. For a live nasty to jump across both these two, AND bridge across DFK... it's really not happening.

The worst realistic scenario is getting a bacterial infection from oral-genital contact either way. It's not at all likely, and antibiotics will sort you out if you run out of luck. If you're dumb around sores (don't go near girls with cold sores, and have a good look before you stick it in...) you could get cold sores/herpes by the same route. In all of these scenarios, you're defiantly never getting AIDS or anything.

Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)