Well imagine if he'd married Camilla back then and not had any kids then i'm thinking that Prince Andrew Andrew Mountbatten Windsor would be next in line
If Charles hadn't prevaricated over it, he could have married Camilla when she could have had his kids. He took so long,, she got bored and married Parker - Bowles instead.
His current offspring ain't winning no modelling competitions, and that is with Diana's genes.Imagine the offspring him and Camilla would have produced
Indeed On both No Lady Di & I can't recall there being any ginger whingers in the parental lineage ?
you are assuming they both share his genes
I wonder if any of them have done a sneaky DNA test?Knowing the history, if I was in that situation (either parent or offspring) I certainly would be checking.
Just guessing but i'd assume that any new royal baby would automatically have their DNA taken just in case something weird happened so they could prove whether it was the right child or not etc
why would you assume that ?The Firm arent exactly known for embracing the latest technology and anyway historically its probably been the way that a bit of more normal DNA has been introduced into the line
Mr Leonardo DiCaprio (51) for Vittoria Ceretti (27)Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
You know how even as a straight bloke you sometimes look at other men who seem to be fighting women off and think "OK yeah I can see why women fancy him", with DiCaprio I just never got why, in fact I always thought he was a bit of a weird looking fucker
Apparently, he has a lovely personality.
So do I so what's the difference Ah yes I wasn't famous and he had a few more 0's on his bank balance
Carrying on from my Melissa Bell post on WYWWE,Melissa and her husband.Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
or maybe not? Hidden Image/Members Only
Great to see Gregg Wallace back on his feet and having a fresh start down under.
Great boobs though
What would Madge and Harold say?
From just £36 per year
