Author Topic: Lucky B*st*rds - or Guys punching above their weight  (Read 22992 times)

Offline Ali Katt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,971
  • Likes: 33
  •  
  • Reviews: 28
Money can get you anyone.
We all know this. Our money lets us shag hot escorts. Get hot sugarbabies.
So ovs all these celebrities with their cash get the sexiest wifes.

Bernies wife only has to put up with him for a bit and shes minted after.
Andrew Tate is one who springs to mind, even before his court cases. Always seems to be preaching to incel dudes, never seen much evidence of him interact with a woman other than in a way which is a pointless debate. In other words I don't think he is charming or good with women.

Offline sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,197
  • Likes: 173
  •  
  • Reviews: 142
Andrew Tate is one who springs to mind, even before his court cases. Always seems to be preaching to incel dudes, never seen much evidence of him interact with a woman other than in a way which is a pointless debate. In other words I don't think he is charming or good with women.

The hilarious thing is his legions of male admirers think he's living da dream etc

Offline Trafalgarlaw17

In my personal opinion, every girl wants someone who can take care of them, which often means financial stability. A high percentage of women won’t date men who aren’t doing well financially. On the other hand, men are generally willing to date any woman or "date down" as long as they find her attractive. There’s a reason why athletes, movie stars, or people with fame get a lot of attention from women—it’s because of the combination of money and status.

As a man, if your body fat is below 15% and you’re financially successful (not necessarily earning seven or eight figures, but just doing well), you can attract a lot of women. Your dating options increase significantly. However, if you’re just an average guy who has accepted life as it is and settled for anyone, that’s fine. But eventually, when kids enter the picture, you might feel the pressure to earn more and take on more responsibility.

Offline clittielicker

Once Bernie Ecclestone and Nick Knowles were on these pages this post should have been considered closed, though my own favourite other half has got to be Jorginho's Cat Harding. I watched the entire Amazon series "married to the game" , and with a little bit of patience you see her at home in a bikini, a real yummy mummy.

image.png


« Last Edit: October 12, 2024, 06:42:20 am by clittielicker »

Offline clittielicker


Hidden Image/Members Only

Yes, it took me over 30 minutes to post a photo.
« Last Edit: October 12, 2024, 07:17:41 am by clittielicker »

Offline mr.bluesky

Hidden Image/Members Only

Yes, it took me over 30 minutes to post a photo.

That's the best looking Cat I've ever seen.
Married to a footballer she knows all about " two up front"

Hidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: October 12, 2024, 08:17:33 am by mr.bluesky »

Offline Ali Katt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,971
  • Likes: 33
  •  
  • Reviews: 28
In my personal opinion, every girl wants someone who can take care of them, which often means financial stability. A high percentage of women won’t date men who aren’t doing well financially. On the other hand, men are generally willing to date any woman or "date down" as long as they find her attractive. There’s a reason why athletes, movie stars, or people with fame get a lot of attention from women—it’s because of the combination of money and status.

As a man, if your body fat is below 15% and you’re financially successful (not necessarily earning seven or eight figures, but just doing well), you can attract a lot of women. Your dating options increase significantly. However, if you’re just an average guy who has accepted life as it is and settled for anyone, that’s fine. But eventually, when kids enter the picture, you might feel the pressure to earn more and take on more responsibility.
Half truths that perpetuate the male dating community. While looks may get dated, whether that's being jacked or being rich; they're not a substitute for personality. It's a bit like the prossies we've seen who look great but are boring at sex - we don't go back.

Ultimately what will get dates is having a skill such as being a builder, playing an instrument or singing or being a chef. Far better long term than spending time in the gym. Men will indeed punch down, have you seen fabswingers? Old hags fucking young fit men.

There is however two trueisms. An ugly single mother of 6 will have more options than a guy who looks like Ryan Gosling, at least in terms of sex, not necessarily meaningful relationships. And you are indeed correct in that people date within their economic circles; exceptions are the likes of Megan Markle and age is a key factor. Once again there are exceptions such as women who are early 20s who want to fuck a man their Dad's age, but for the most part people rarely date past 10 years each way. Oddly, in the gay community age isn't an issue.

Your dating options vastly increase if you have patter, are easy going and don't take shit that doesn't matter seriously. Obviously if you are talking to women in real life, on apps and are social you increase your chances more than any other methods. Usually the single men that spend all their time in the gym, talking to bros or watching bullshit seminars and debates and wonder why they haven't got a date; it's because they haven't even tried.
« Last Edit: October 19, 2024, 10:27:35 am by Ali Katt »

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,277
  • Likes: 339
  •  
  • Reviews: 206

Ultimately what will get dates is having a skill such as being a builder, playing an instrument or singing or being a chef.

Ultimately, really?

Is that because every woman needs someone to put up their shelves, or fix the bog, sing them a song because they like live music, or cook them a nice meal?

Utter tosh.

A man having a skill means diddly squat to a woman. A fat poor builder who can sing and cook a nice dinner, ain't at the top of a woman's criteria for desirability.

However, if you're talking about having a skill that means you can provide financially, then that's a different thing altogether.

But then that's what Trafalgarlaw said already.


Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,277
  • Likes: 339
  •  
  • Reviews: 206

And you are indeed correct in that people date within their economic circles;

No, people will date within their social circles first, or to where they can reach out to.

Economics are secondary, and in my personal experience, a mismatch in economics isn't a barrier.

If you ain't in front of the person, it doesn't matter your economic situation.

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
Half truths that perpetuate the male dating community. While looks may get dated, whether that's being jacked or being rich; they're not a substitute for personality. It's a bit like the prossies we've seen who look great but are boring at sex - we don't go back.

Ultimately what will get dates is having a skill such as being a builder, playing an instrument or singing or being a chef. Far better long term than spending time in the gym. Men will indeed punch down, have you seen fabswingers? Old hags fucking young fit men.

There is however two trueisms. An ugly single mother of 6 will have more options than a guy who looks like Ryan Gosling, at least in terms of sex, not necessarily meaningful relationships. And you are indeed correct in that people date within their economic circles; exceptions are the likes of Megan Markle and age is a key factor. Once again there are exceptions such as women who are early 20s who want to fuck a man their Dad's age, but for the most part people rarely date past 10 years each way. Oddly, in the gay community age isn't an issue.

Your dating options vastly increase if you have patter, are easy going and don't take shit that doesn't matter seriously. Obviously if you are talking to women in real life, on apps and are social you increase your chances more than any other methods. Usually the single men that spend all their time in the gym, talking to bros or watching bullshit seminars and debates and wonder why they haven't got a date; it's because they haven't even tried.

You are only correct in that women will date guys like that for fun. But when they are thinking about a long-term partner who will take care of them and their children, what Trafalgarlaw17 said hits the nail on the head. Do you know how fucking broke musicians are? It's not going to be a very happy life if the woman wants to stay at home and take care of the kids, they will be broke.
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Ali Katt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,971
  • Likes: 33
  •  
  • Reviews: 28
No, people will date within their social circles first, or to where they can reach out to.

Economics are secondary, and in my personal experience, a mismatch in economics isn't a barrier.

If you ain't in front of the person, it doesn't matter your economic situation.
I agree with you, I think economics dictates social circles to an extent. I think it's changed a lot because of dating apps, but occupation is a huge factor in who we can potentially date.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,971
  • Likes: 33
  •  
  • Reviews: 28
Ultimately, really?

Is that because every woman needs someone to put up their shelves, or fix the bog, sing them a song because they like live music, or cook them a nice meal?

Utter tosh.

A man having a skill means diddly squat to a woman. A fat poor builder who can sing and cook a nice dinner, ain't at the top of a woman's criteria for desirability.

However, if you're talking about having a skill that means you can provide financially, then that's a different thing altogether.

But then that's what Trafalgarlaw said already.
I should have put a skilled trade. I've yet to meet a poor qualified builder. I didn't express it well.

Offline Ali Katt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,971
  • Likes: 33
  •  
  • Reviews: 28
You are only correct in that women will date guys like that for fun. But when they are thinking about a long-term partner who will take care of them and their children, what Trafalgarlaw17 said hits the nail on the head. Do you know how fucking broke musicians are? It's not going to be a very happy life if the woman wants to stay at home and take care of the kids, they will be broke.
I think I'm also correct in that the odds are stacked way against men, especially on apps.

Happy to admit I got it wrong

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,277
  • Likes: 339
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
I agree with you, I think economics dictates social circles to an extent. I think it's changed a lot because of dating apps, but occupation is a huge factor in who we can potentially date.

After social reach (including dating apps) I would say money and security of income, rather than occupation are the key determining factors.

I saw a clever timeline countdown, it showed how people met their partners since the 1930's.

At the top for a long time was either meeting someone through family or friends (social), work was very low in the 1930's, but gradually increased and started to have a reasonable influence after the 70's and 80's. I would guess that this had to do with gender equality (especially in the workplace) that came in to society at this time.

After the dawn of online in the 1990's, online quickly went from nowhere to the number one place to meet someone, friends is still number two, but is a fraction of what it was.

By 2024 work has diminished to less than 9% and family is almost non existent at just 4.5%.

You can see the Infographic here.

External Link/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline webpunter

Al Pacino 84 & Noor Alfallah 30
50 yrs+ difference
She must have had to shag him once as they have a little-un
& she's now his ex GF
She's now sorted & a leg up as she's a film producer
External Link/Members Only
"Court documents also revealed that Pacino was ordered to pay $30,000 per month in child support"
$30k a month * say 20 years = $7.2m
Inflation linked no doubt extras on top & their son will be in his will, her too most likely

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 155
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
Al Pacino 84 & Noor Alfallah 30
50 yrs+ difference
She must have had to shag him once as they have a little-un
& she's now his ex GF
She's now sorted & a leg up as she's a film producer
External Link/Members Only
"Court documents also revealed that Pacino was ordered to pay $30,000 per month in child support"
$30k a month * say 20 years = $7.2m
Inflation linked no doubt extras on top & their son will be in his will, her too most likely

Hidden Image/Members Only

He must have known she is a gold digger. She was with Mick Jagger before him. It's ridiculous that she gets to maintain the lifestyle the had with him after they split up. One of the benefits of being with him should be the lifestyle, if she leaves then it should be back to how her life was before she met him.
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline DastardlyDick

Al Pacino 84 & Noor Alfallah 30
50 yrs+ difference
She must have had to shag him once as they have a little-un
& she's now his ex GF
She's now sorted & a leg up as she's a film producer
External Link/Members Only
"Court documents also revealed that Pacino was ordered to pay $30,000 per month in child support"
$30k a month * say 20 years = $7.2m
Inflation linked no doubt extras on top & their son will be in his will, her too most likely

Hidden Image/Members Only
How does a 1year old get through $30K per month? He doesn't have a lifestyle to which he's accustomed to maintain?

Offline RandomGuy99

Al Pacino 84 & Noor Alfallah 30
50 yrs+ difference
She must have had to shag him once as they have a little-un
& she's now his ex GF
She's now sorted & a leg up as she's a film producer
External Link/Members Only
"Court documents also revealed that Pacino was ordered to pay $30,000 per month in child support"
$30k a month * say 20 years = $7.2m
Inflation linked no doubt extras on top & their son will be in his will, her too most likely

Hidden Image/Members Only
That's a sweet deal. He can fuck me once if he pays me $7.2m

Offline webpunter

That's a sweet deal. He can fuck me once if he pays me $7.2m

He can use me as a condom @ this amount
Or you are the condom in the reverse
We go 50/50  :lol: :scare:

Offline JontyR

He must have known she is a gold digger. She was with Mick Jagger before him. It's ridiculous that she gets to maintain the lifestyle the had with him after they split up. One of the benefits of being with him should be the lifestyle, if she leaves then it should be back to how her life was before she met him.

Wow... what kind of power dynamic would that afford?

Offline webpunter

He must have known she is a gold digger. She was with Mick Jagger before him. It's ridiculous that she gets to maintain the lifestyle the had with him after they split up. One of the benefits of being with him should be the lifestyle, if she leaves then it should be back to how her life was before she met him.

So she's been targeting old blokes
Me thinks MJ will have wedged her up too one way or another
Doesnt make any difference to either of them financially especially MJ
Might as well try & spend some of the amassed fortune [tho APs is considerably less] they cant take it with them

She does have a little un to look after so difficult to go back to how things were before
& its not how things work especially in the US
AP would need to be a 1st class cunt expecting her to revert entirely to her previous life
& i'm pretty sure he knew what he was getting himself into


Offline Blackpool Rock

So she's been targeting old blokes
Me thinks MJ will have wedged her up too one way or another
Doesnt make any difference to either of them financially especially MJ
Might as well try & spend some of the amassed fortune [tho APs is considerably less] they cant take it with them

She does have a little un to look after so difficult to go back to how things were before
& its not how things work especially in the US
AP would need to be a 1st class cunt expecting her to revert entirely to her previous life
& i'm pretty sure he knew what he was getting himself into
So whose the Godfather then eh  ;)  :unknown:

Offline berksboy

Not as if she is that hot , sure as hell not $7M+ hot. Must have a very good line in BS for them.

Offline webpunter


Offline Denhamhoop

It doesn’t always come down to money and looks not everyone is shallow
True but many are

Offline Clitheroelad

The hilarious thing is his legions of male admirers think he's living da dream etc

I reckon he does a bit of Uphill Gardening on the sly.

Offline timsussex

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,344
  • Likes: 94
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Michael Gove and Dr Lola Salem "32 year old academic who lectures in music and French at Oxford" were apparently getting quite amourus at London seafood restaurant J Sheekey, where caviar costs £195 (blinis included) and, more shockingly, a green salad is £7.50

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only
« Last Edit: December 16, 2024, 02:30:07 am by timsussex »

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,277
  • Likes: 339
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
Michael Gove and Dr Lola Salem "32 year old academic who lectures in music and French at Oxford" were apparently getting quite amourus at London seafood restaurant J Sheekey, where caviar costs £195 (blinis included) and, more shockingly, a green salad is £7.50

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

That's actually cheap for a rated London restaurant, expect to pay over £10 in most places.

Pizza Express is £5.95 for a garden salad,  a green gate salad at sticks and Sushi is £17

Offline MLawro93

Michael Gove and Dr Lola Salem "32 year old academic who lectures in music and French at Oxford" were apparently getting quite amourus at London seafood restaurant J Sheekey, where caviar costs £195 (blinis included) and, more shockingly, a green salad is £7.50

Hidden Image/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

Gove always had a reputation for shagging anything that moves.  :lol:

Offline Watts.E.Dunn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,613
  • Likes: 65
  •  
  • Reviews: 47
Gove always had a reputation for shagging anything that moves.  :lol:

Yep! like most all of us degenerates!...

Offline DastardlyDick

Gove always had a reputation for shagging anything that moves.  :lol:
As well as (allegedly) dirtying his credit card on a frequent basis.

Offline chrishornx

Money can get you anyone.
We all know this. Our money lets us shag hot escorts. Get hot sugarbabies.


Bollocks

Offline PilotMan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 6,277
  • Likes: 339
  •  
  • Reviews: 206
Money can get you anyone.
We all know this. Our money lets us shag hot escorts. Get hot sugarbabies.
So ovs all these celebrities with their cash get the sexiest wifes.


We don't "all know this" - it's utter bollox just inside your own head

Bollocks

+1 



As for Dr Lola Salem, I don't think she's much of a looker anyway. More like a 32 year old woman who looks 45. I doubt she'd make much as an escort  :D

Offline Watts.E.Dunn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,613
  • Likes: 65
  •  
  • Reviews: 47
No i don't suppose she would, but i woundn't mind an evening out with her, seems to me to be a very intresting person espcially to take to Glyndbourne for the day:)..

External Link/Members Only

Offline timsussex

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,344
  • Likes: 94
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
No i don't suppose she would, but i woundn't mind an evening out with her, seems to me to be a very intresting person espcially to take to Glyndbourne for the day:)..

External Link/Members Only

Agreed -  I was thinking a bit more than just Barbie types and frankly virtually any female with less than 4 legs is a win for Gove (nasty obsequious little man)
« Last Edit: December 16, 2024, 06:12:13 pm by timsussex »

Offline mills_and_bhuna

:
As for Dr Lola Salem, I don't think she's much of a looker anyway. More like a 32 year old woman who looks 45. I doubt she'd make much as an escort  :D
She looks okay to me.
Certainly not 45.
I've paid for worse.
And I suspect you have too.
« Last Edit: December 16, 2024, 06:44:40 pm by mills_and_bhuna »

Offline alabama1

In reply to the OP, appearances can be deceptive. Maybe the stunning missus has no sense of humour, is selfish, jealous, narcissist, etc. Maybe it is she who is punching above her weight  :unknown:

Offline Ali Katt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,971
  • Likes: 33
  •  
  • Reviews: 28
In reply to the OP, appearances can be deceptive. Maybe the stunning missus has no sense of humour, is selfish, jealous, narcissist, etc. Maybe it is she who is punching above her weight  :unknown:
Possibly the case with Victoria Coren Mitchell.

Offline The Gambling Whale

Possibly the case with Victoria Coren Mitchell.

I'm sure she used to be quite sexy but seems a right mumsy overweight plain Jane now.
Banned reason: Previously banned 8MillionDollarMan + repeating reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Blackpool Rock

I'm sure she used to be quite sexy but seems a right mumsy overweight plain Jane now.
Yeah I remember her being quite fit when she was first around but these days she comes across as you say "Mumsy" but I just feels she comes across a bit patronising and condescending  :unknown:

Offline Ali Katt

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,971
  • Likes: 33
  •  
  • Reviews: 28
Yeah I remember her being quite fit when she was first around but these days she comes across as you say "Mumsy" but I just feels she comes across a bit patronising and condescending  :unknown:
She does have great tits, but I can imagine there's more life in a blow up doll.

Offline Davey Dykes

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,657
  • Likes: 19
  •  
  • Reviews: 111
She's also massively unfunny to the point of delusion on Only Connect.

But she's not alone on that, seems the whole production seems to think it's a jolly wheeze.

All that said, I'd be more than happy to pump her for an hour or so.  :rose:

Offline timsussex

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,344
  • Likes: 94
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
She's also massively unfunny to the point of delusion on Only Connect.

But she's not alone on that, seems the whole production seems to think it's a jolly wheeze.

All that said, I'd be more than happy to pump her for an hour or so.  :rose:

Perhaps she is just fitting in with the programs vibes; I rather enjoy her sense of humour although more on 8 out of 10 cats & QI

Offline lostandfound

Perhaps she is just fitting in with the programs vibes; I rather enjoy her sense of humour although more on 8 out of 10 cats & QI

I too enjoy her sense of humour, and it amuses me that she writes a column for the Telegraph, and her husband writes one for the Guardian.

Never fancied her though - she's not my type. (I fancy athletic women, eg, someone in the public eye, Gal Gadot).

Offline Blackpool Rock

I too enjoy her sense of humour, and it amuses me that she writes a column for the Telegraph, and her husband writes one for the Guardian.

Never fancied her though - she's not my type. (I fancy athletic women, eg, someone in the public eye, Gal Gadot).
Hasn't she been world poker champion twice or something like that  :unknown:
Just took the game to an analytical level and is presumably really good at the maths   :unknown:

Offline JontyR

Can't stand her, or her brother.

Loved their Dad, though.

Offline timsussex

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 1,344
  • Likes: 94
  •  
  • Reviews: 33
Can't stand her, or her brother.

Loved their Dad, though.

I remember his article on Why 1984 & Big Brother could never happen in the UK - based on how nationalised industries work
In room 101
"So Smith I see your particular dread is rats - big hungry rats"
the interrogator continues to wind Smith up  until his boss breaks in
"Smithers you know rats have been on back order for 3 weeks but we got another delivery of spiders today. That makes 107 boxes "

anyone who worked in the NHS would know the feeling

Offline PepeMAGA

David Mitchell with Victoria Coren

Offline sparkus

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 13,197
  • Likes: 173
  •  
  • Reviews: 142
David Mitchell with Victoria Coren

Has she had reduction surgery? They don't seem as huge as before.

Offline PepeMAGA

Has she had reduction surgery? They don't seem as huge as before.
I see what you mean, that would be criminal if true. maybe hormonal from getting older or David suckling them every night.