Author Topic: Osterley girls - Chiswick  (Read 2019 times)

Offline Xungas

Finally managed to squeeze in some time for a massage, and I ended up going to the Osterley girls in Chiswick. They only have 1 girl there so no choice and I didn't ask the name.

If I needed to guess she is probably in her late 40s but in good shape I would say. She had this friendly vibe that instantly puts you at ease. Her English is decent, so we had a bit of light chat at the start, but she’s happy to keep things quiet if that’s more your thing.

Paid £65 for an hour plus £20 for b2b. The massage itself was spot on – a nice balance of firm pressure and relaxing strokes. I could feel my stress melting away. There was no rush, and she threw in some teasing touches here and there, keeping things interesting.

The b2b part was amazing – smooth and sensual. She got undressed and started off while I was still face down, sliding her body all over me. She’s got a way of moving that feels natural and intimate. She had me flip over for the finale, and her technique was slow, teasing, and spot on – none of that rushed business. She listens and adjusts to what you like, which is rare.

Finished up feeling totally relaxed. No short-changing on time either, stayed for the full hour.
Will definitely return!

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,527
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Are you really trying to give back or just avoid a ticking clock expiration?

You've noted the name of girls from Osterley previously and have had best part of at least a dozen visits to one haunt or another in the 3+ years here by your own admitted pattern of opportunity, so how are you not in a position to provide usefully detailed reviews about your regular shooting-your-bolt hole?

How were you going to return without a name?  How could your many possible benefactors here hope to try her services?

Being the regular with Osterley you would know that their roster of girls are on weekly rota whether the location has one or two girls and most girls work more than one location.

Day of week?
Height?
Dress size?
Size of breasts?
Length of hair?
Shape of face?
Colour of skin?

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 156
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
Yes, this seems like a tick-box "review".
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,729
  • Likes: 564
  •  
  • Reviews: 510
Timer removed, though further reviews are required, please contribute like everyone else  :drinks:

Offline 90125

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Admin
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,041
  • Likes: 61
  •  
  • Reviews: 0
Are you really trying to give back or just avoid a ticking clock expiration?

You've noted the name of girls from Osterley previously and have had best part of at least a dozen visits to one haunt or another in the 3+ years here by your own admitted pattern of opportunity, so how are you not in a position to provide usefully detailed reviews about your regular shooting-your-bolt hole?

How were you going to return without a name?  How could your many possible benefactors here hope to try her services?

Being the regular with Osterley you would know that their roster of girls are on weekly rota whether the location has one or two girls and most girls work more than one location.

Day of week?
Height?
Dress size?
Size of breasts?
Length of hair?
Shape of face?
Colour of skin?

Stop being a gobshite wannabe mod and leave it to the Mods to decide.

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 156
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
Stop being a gobshite wannabe mod and leave it to the Mods to decide.

In fairness to LL, it was a bullshit review. There is no piece of information in that review that is useful, how are we supposed to know who the girl is so we can visit her?
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,954
  • Likes: 772
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
In fairness to LL, it was a bullshit review. There is no piece of information in that review that is useful, how are we supposed to know who the girl is so we can visit her?
Who are you or LL to say it's bullshit?? it's a review of a massage, what details do you want?   :unknown:

Maybe try reading the rules and you will see it's not an issue if you don't get the name of the masseuse.

This is acceptable to the mods and admin, if you or anyone else don't find it useful ignore it.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,527
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I mildly criticised the review for being lacking of info, did not call it bs.

I noted his previous experience and ability to note useful intel.

I asked a bunch of questions for details that would help us all, including himself to re-book the lady seen.

Why is that "mod" behaviour"?

What he has posted amounts to "I went to a known extras place and got extras".

Offline PumpDump

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,349
  • Likes: 156
  •  
  • Reviews: 44
Who are you or LL to say it's bullshit?? it's a review of a massage, what details do you want?   :unknown:

Maybe try reading the rules and you will see it's not an issue if you don't get the name of the masseuse.

This is acceptable to the mods and admin, if you or anyone else don't find it useful ignore it.

The details that are useful to know is which girl the OP saw so we can see/avoid her. Even mentioning the day he visited would be enough as they work on a set rota at that establishment.

Ok I just re-read the rules as you suggested and rule 4 states "Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exceptions are sex parties, duos, etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names."

This massage establishment uses regular girls, with names, on a set rota. Doesn't this mean the review should state the name of the girl?
Banned reason: Habitual troll type posts after assuring that sort of thing would stop.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Tony Blair

Stop being a gobshite wannabe mod and leave it to the Mods to decide.

I thought the same. 
Also they never tell you the name while booking or on entry and you have to ask.
And also the names can be very Chinese e.g. Wakey, Wei Kee, who was good 5 years ago, or Monica who seems to be good now.  Never got the names of any others.

Always feel embarrassed asking name as they often ask yours back out of politeness and you have to make up some stupid punting name like Tony Blair.
(Double bluff usually works, I was really a prime minister)

btw, is there a set rota published for this place?
« Last Edit: September 24, 2024, 02:40:16 pm by Tony Blair »

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,954
  • Likes: 772
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
The details that are useful to know is which girl the OP saw so we can see/avoid her. Even mentioning the day he visited would be enough as they work on a set rota at that establishment.

Ok I just re-read the rules as you suggested and rule 4 states "Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exceptions are sex parties, duos, etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names."

This massage establishment uses regular girls, with names, on a set rota. Doesn't this mean the review should state the name of the girl?
For the sake of discretion he does not need to give details of the day he went.

Take notice of reply #7 and leave it at that. If we thought he needed to post any more detail we would have said and the timer would have stayed.

This is acceptable to the mods and admin, if you or anyone else don't find it useful ignore it.

This thread shows exactly why the 'wannabe mod' rule was brought in. We want to encourage new member / posters, not put them off posting.

BTW the lack of name in the OP's review is acceptable to those who run the site so I would advise against quoting the rules and what your interpretation of them is.
« Last Edit: September 24, 2024, 04:37:42 pm by daviemac »

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,527
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I thought the same. 
Also they never tell you the name while booking or on entry and you have to ask.
And also the names can be very Chinese e.g. Wakey, Wei Kee, who was good 5 years ago, or Monica who seems to be good now.  Never got the names of any others.

Always feel embarrassed asking name as they often ask yours back out of politeness and you have to make up some stupid punting name like Tony Blair.
(Double bluff usually works, I was really a prime minister)

btw, is there a set rota published for this place?

Sorry Tony but in similar time frame whenever I've called to enquire they have never had a problem telling me the names of the girls working at any/all of the sites, most of those names have been Anglicised ones but even a Chinese one that may sound alien to our ears are still using many phonemes we can utter as English speakers (no matter how much we might mangle them).  If you have a favourite they have no problem (assuming you're not being weird about it) telling you the locations she's rota'd for, their concern is to get your business not make it difficult to spend money with them, even more so as a "dependable" Chinese operation.

E.g.
Melody . Size 10, attractive
Michelle, size 10, toned body
Alisa, size 8, attractive, horny
Ellen, size 12, pretty face, horny second visit
Rita, size 8? Tall, slim attractive.
Vicky, not seen.

These are the names of the girls at Northfield's at the moment I think.
I think I found a thread with these details ages ago but can't find it today

This organisation have a rota and a fairly stable collection of girls, I've not seen reports of any new additions for many months (I may have missed), many of the girls have been on the books for well over a year.  Monica has been about 2+, I reviewed her July '22.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,527
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
For the sake of discretion he does not need to give details of the day he went.

Take notice of reply #7 and leave it at that. If we thought he needed to post any more detail we would have said and the timer would have stayed.

This thread shows exactly why the 'wannabe mod' rule was brought in. We want to encourage new member / posters, not put them off posting.

BTW the lack of name in the OP's review is acceptable to those who run the site so I would advise against quoting the rules and what your interpretation of them is.

DM, we're not arguing mandatory information we're requesting useful enough into to make it possible for others to follow in an OP's footsteps otherwise why have a review site at all?  Hiding behind the interpretation you've just set out ALL reviews could literally be "I went to x and paid for extras".  No punter would have any security concerns and thus no excuse to not contribute but just how useful would this site be for those looking for girls with looks or attitude or skill that best suit them?

Offline daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 31,954
  • Likes: 772
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
DM, we're not arguing mandatory information we're requesting useful enough into to make it possible for others to follow in an OP's footsteps otherwise why have a review site at all?  Hiding behind the interpretation you've just set out ALL reviews could literally be "I went to x and paid for extras".  No punter would have any security concerns and thus no excuse to not contribute but just how useful would this site be for those looking for girls with looks or attitude or skill that best suit them?
It's a massage review, he didn't get her name, deal with it.

2 mods and Admin have posted on this thread saying the review is acceptable, you and PumpDump need to leave it at that.

To reiterate. -

Members should read reviews, take from them the infomation they find useful and act accordingly, if there is no information useful to them then ignore it.

 

Offline Tony Blair

Sorry Tony but in similar time frame whenever I've called to enquire they have never had a problem telling me the names of the girls working at any/all of the sites, most of those names have been Anglicised ones but even a Chinese one that may sound alien to our ears are still using many phonemes we can utter as English speakers (no matter how much we might mangle them).  If you have a favourite they have no problem (assuming you're not being weird about it) telling you the locations she's rota'd for, their concern is to get your business not make it difficult to spend money with them, even more so as a "dependable" Chinese operation.

E.g.
This organisation have a rota and a fairly stable collection of girls, I've not seen reports of any new additions for many months (I may have missed), many of the girls have been on the books for well over a year.  Monica has been about 2+, I reviewed her July '22.

Sorry LL, you appear to be giving out to me.   I just stated that you don't get the name unless you ask.  I reviewed before and did not get the name of the Osterley girl but I got support from the comments and actual progress on who it might me rather than mildly criticised.   

And it would appear there is no published rota, a list of names from 2019 is not likely to be that current.
You may want to stop digging a hole for yourself at this stage.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,527
  • Likes: 191
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Sorry LL, you appear to be giving out to me.   I just stated that you don't get the name unless you ask.  I reviewed before and did not get the name of the Osterley girl but I got support from the comments and actual progress on who it might me rather than mildly criticised.   

And it would appear there is no published rota, a list of names from 2019 is not likely to be that current.
You may want to stop digging a hole for yourself at this stage.

Sorry Tony  :hi:, I should have said agreed you do have to ask, something I would do if I liked the girl and wanted to return and I hadn't asked the booking agent who it was I was seeing beforehand.
The list (prefaced E.g.) was an example of a rota at that time likely determined by asking and visits by the gent who offered it and indeed isn't published on their ads (I'm not aware if they have a website), I was not suggesting it was current.  As with many establishments a rota might be subject to change week to week.  All being said, they are an organised lot who take advanced bookings (days or a week ahead) for named individuals if they know when she's down to work, they will otherwise suggest to call closer to the time (within the same week) if a girl isn't currently confirmed for the location enquired about.  They likely would also tell if she's at another of their sites, has left or is on holiday, at least they have with me.