Author Topic: pretty-busty-blonde, Chester, Cheshire  (Read 7538 times)


5 review(s) for pretty-blonde-kate (5 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline Heph

Pretty-Busty-Blonde, Chester

External Link/Members Only

I wanted a pretty one. PBB seemed to answer that requirement.

Comms
A swift, coherent and typo-free reply boded well, and an appointment was arranged in short order

Location
Chester: a pleasant and well maintained hotel, a stone's throw from the railway station.

The Dame
AW profile is accurate. The lady is pretty, busty and blonde. Age: 33-37, imo. She has a splendid womanly figure - I'd say the current main picture is accurate, perhaps a few kilos lighter than present, but well within bounds - she's of an admirably slim/normal build by most standards - 5,7' +/- and dress size 8-10, and healthy-looking.

Regrettably, at least for me, lip-filler and other 'enhancements' are present, but despite, rather than because of this, she remains very attractive. She clearly takes care over her appearance, and presented herself in beautiful matching underwear. She's pleasant and agreeable company - no signs of crazy or thousand yard stare.

Events
DFK, RO, face-sitting, OWO, sex, moderate AP.
She was at ease, and in turn made me feel comfortable and relaxed. We indulged pretty much as you might hope to; she was present at all times and seemed to be enjoying our encounter. Importantly - (other WGs take note) there was no attention given to her phone whilst I was there.

Time/Fee:
1hr incall at £170

Summary & Conclusion
A very pleasing rendezvous for me. I'll happily revisit when the occasion presents itself. Can commend.


« Last Edit: September 23, 2024, 04:34:50 pm by Heph »

Offline lewisjones23

Sorry if I'm being thick but what does moderate AP mean?

Offline Heph

Sorry if I'm being thick but what does moderate AP mean?

Rear inquiries

Offline CraftyBob

Sorry if I'm being thick but what does moderate AP mean?

'Anal Play' I would imagine.

Offline Cheshuk

'Anal Play' I would imagine.

I was thinking moderate 'anal penetration', but anal play makes more sense than just putting the tip in  :D

Offline TomTank

I was thinking moderate 'anal penetration', but anal play makes more sense than just putting the tip in  :D

I went through the same thought process

Offline CraftyBob

I was thinking moderate 'anal penetration', but anal play makes more sense than just putting the tip in  :D

 :lol:

To be fair I had a GF in the past who would only let me put the tip in and no more  :(

Offline Cheshuk

:lol:

To be fair I had a GF in the past who would only let me put the tip in and no more  :(

lol sounds pleasurable for neither

Offline Heph

sorry for the tardy follow-on. Yes, per AW nomenclature... AP = digital, in my case, excluding knuckles   :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: September 28, 2024, 02:42:46 am by Heph »

Offline TomTank

sorry for the tardy follow-on. Yes, per AW nomenclature... AP = digital, in my case, excluding knuckles   :thumbsup:

now that's confused me

Offline Cheshuk

op is there anything you can say about this once facial beauty that may be relatable out of 10 or celeb of similar level, basically is she wow or just slightly above average cheers


Offline Heph

op is there anything you can say about this once facial beauty that may be relatable out of 10 or celeb of similar level, basically is she wow or just slightly above average cheers

That's a very subjective matter. I personally found her very pretty and attractive, though there's overt 'work' been done to cheeks and lips etc and I mark that down.

My guess is that she is naturally attractive, and on my scale would hit a very good 7.something, but the work is an unnecessary and regressive step and so I'd adjust that downwards to still very respectable 6.5 ish (ie: well above average).


Offline Cheshuk

That's a very subjective matter. I personally found her very pretty and attractive, though there's overt 'work' been done to cheeks and lips etc and I mark that down.

My guess is that she is naturally attractive, and on my scale would hit a very good 7.something, but the work is an unnecessary and regressive step and so I'd adjust that downwards to still very respectable 6.5 ish (ie: well above average).

nice one thanks  :hi: