Stacy summer

[monstar]

for the last time this is not Stacy ok!   nor is it Sergei or another pimp or the bloody receptionist!!!!
Yes your correct this is a forum to discuss service providers but just because she put up her rates a little a few get upset.
Yes i will defend her because i know of the problems she has been through over the last months but am not going to discuss them with anyone.
Anyway her rates are back down now so just go see her and enjoy the great experience.
Chill out guys 

Genuine punters don't feel the need to "defend" a WG unless they believe something untrue or deliberately malicious has been said, neither was the case here so you become suspicious.

Either you have EAS which seems to be likely or are financially involved with Stacy, it doesn't matter now as her prices have returned but try to keep the EAS induced posts down!

As for Stacy, I agree with password; at 120 an hour there is competition with top girls reviewed here to consider. She is currently on my ever increasing hotlist below a number of girls, personally I would have paid 120 but at 100 I'm more likely to visit. 

[Sedlmayer]

I know Stacy has a receptionist who it seems is not the brightest of people so double bookings are made by her not Stacy,

It makes precisely zero difference whether the double bookings are made by the prostitute herself or by her pimp. The result is precisely the same - punter fucked about, and possibly rare punting opportunity wasted.
In case you hadn't realised, this forum puts the punter first, second and third, so coming on here defending blatant double booking and subsequent bumping makes you look like a white knight at best.

[raylondoner]

Sounds like she needs one of those automated systems you have at a doctors surgery:

Are you male or female             Enter: Male
Enter month of birth                 Enter: April
Enter date of month of birth      Enter: 1st

"You are checked in to see Stacy at 11.00 am, please go to the waiting area" 

[iPad3]

Wow you guys certainly turn on someone who has always given some of you a great deal of pleasure. How many of you have seen her and has anyone of you left her company in a bad mood after having her, guess the answer to that is no.She is  not a piece of meat she is someone who gives you one of the best times of your life, lets you do what most of your partners don't do.
You think that £120 is to much for an hour with someone who presents herself in a professional manner, who is clean, offers clean facilities and you know you will have a great time with , there are far more expensive wg's around that area
I know Stacy has a receptionist who it seems is not the brightest of people so double bookings are made by her not Stacy, also West 8 I take it you know how the female body works and the cycles of the female body, so ever thought that she maybe is taking a week off due to this? Am sure that Stacy would rather you see her in tip top shape and not through her monthly cycle!!!
Now she has dropped the price back to £100 so you all will be happy again. guys give the lady some slack she has had tough times last few months, go see her and you will be welcomed with a beautifull smile and you will be the ones leaving with a bigger smile,  £120 is still amazing value for what you get though.
Am sure that she probably reads this forum too so some of you should be a little ashamed of your comments, don't forget that when she has your cock in her mouth she may choose to take a bite instead of a suck !!!! only joking!!!!!!

Sirlargeone, you may have the ladies best interests at heart but I could see this coming a mile off, I've no experience but I think you should check yourself on the EAS front.

I agree Stacy is not a peice of meat but she is offering a product and upping the price, regardless of value for money etc, is never going to be received well. It may be that in your house you all cheer when tesco ups the cost of milk but I doubt it. The reaction is of no surprise and a blatant white knight post like yours is just going to lose you credibility here.

I would have paid £120 to see her but it would make it less likely, at £100 I will see her soon, the reality is the price point is up to her and she'll make that decision based on turnover and profit.

[jsparky]

Go and see her before the rate go up again, its one of the best VFM around when many other WG has up the price. I think its only matter of time before she follows the trend, to be fair with her, she has maintain the price for as long as I had known her profiles.

[Sedlmayer]

Go and see her before the rate go up again, its one of the best VFM around when many other WG has up the price. I think its only matter of time before she follows the trend, to be fair with her, she has maintain the price for as long as I had known her profiles.

And another white knight gallops in on his trusty steed.....

[Stealthshagger]

for the last time this is not Stacy ok!   nor is it Sergei or another pimp or the bloody receptionist!!!!
Yes your correct this is a forum to discuss service providers but just because she put up her rates a little a few get upset.
Yes i will defend her because i know of the problems she has been through over the last months but am not going to discuss them with anyone.
Anyway her rates are back down now so just go see her and enjoy the great experience.
Chill out guys 

she is not a piece of meat, true. why do you bring up her problems? it is not for us to discuss them and you say you wont go into them. why bring them up then? if she has chosen to not say anything on the matter, then why are you bringing it up, and then just to not go into them. Lets be real here too, this is business. she is no piece of meat, and we havent acted as if she is. She charges what shelf loaders make a day, per hour before extras. as the buyers/patrons, arent we entitled to discuss service or prices? I know you love her and whatnot (EAS strikes) BUT THIS IS A BUSINESS for her. If we were doing this free, we could sit and talk about it and so on. At 120/100 an hour, I have a right to expect service, discuss it and alternatives, and so forth. get over it.

[Jay72]

If Stacy is able, due to the quality of her service, to up her rate to 120 and not see a drop off in numbers of punters then that is market forces and good for her..... Dont see why anyone should get bitter and angry about it. Under the same circumstances I would do it, and contrary to what the whingers might say, so would they.

[monstar]

If Stacy is able, due to the quality of her service, to up her rate to 120 and not see a drop off in numbers of punters then that is market forces and good for her..... Dont see why anyone should get bitter and angry about it. Under the same circumstances I would do it, and contrary to what the whingers might say, so would they.

You are absolutely right except nobody got "bitter and angry about it", there was actually quite a civilised discussion (for UKP standards anyway  ) about her price increase before people started rushing in to defend Stacy with no justification.

[Stealthshagger]

If Stacy is able, due to the quality of her service, to up her rate to 120 and not see a drop off in numbers of punters then that is market forces and good for her..... Dont see why anyone should get bitter and angry about it. Under the same circumstances I would do it, and contrary to what the whingers might say, so would they.

we werent angry, just lost interest in visiting. what was annoying was the white knighting, which also happens to be against the forum rules, as well as etiquette here.

[jsparky]

And another white knight gallops in on his trusty steed.....

'White Knight'? Thanks a lot! That's a first.

All I said is go - f-k her while its cheaper to do so. Not sure if I have any trust in the steed...

[claretandblue]

she is not a piece of meat, true. why do you bring up her problems? it is not for us to discuss them and you say you wont go into them. why bring them up then? if she has chosen to not say anything on the matter, then why are you bringing it up, and then just to not go into them. Lets be real here too, this is business. she is no piece of meat, and we havent acted as if she is. She charges what shelf loaders make a day, per hour before extras. as the buyers/patrons, arent we entitled to discuss service or prices? I know you love her and whatnot (EAS strikes) BUT THIS IS A BUSINESS for her. If we were doing this free, we could sit and talk about it and so on. At 120/100 an hour, I have a right to expect service, discuss it and alternatives, and so forth. get over it.

+1 any problems she may have are no business of mine and no justification for increasing prices

[punk]

If Stacy is able, due to the quality of her service, to up her rate to 120 and not see a drop off in numbers of punters then that is market forces and good for her..... Dont see why anyone should get bitter and angry about it. Under the same circumstances I would do it, and contrary to what the whingers might say, so would they.

Look at it this way £100 for a good looking woman, who includes cim and may be one or two other services is very good, if she was £120 included very good, but when she starts charging £120 +20 for cim,say 20 for anal, 20 for this and that, then she is entering the £160 mark, see where its going, now you have women like michelle independent £100 all in and others.

[Sedlmayer]

'White Knight'? Thanks a lot! That's a first.

All I said is go - f-k her while its cheaper to do so. Not sure if I have any trust in the steed...

It's not a compliment mate 

[west8]

Wow you guys certainly turn on someone who has always given some of you a great deal of pleasure.

I read this thread as being perhaps the single most important for any WG considering a price hike. The criticism of so doing is constructive and Stacy should be happy so many punters and potential punters care enough to contribute here.

The amount of interest in her attempted fee hike shows she is both a popular and very much liked WG.

How many of you have seen her and has anyone of you left her company in a bad mood after having her, guess the answer to that is no.She is  not a piece of meat she is someone who gives you one of the best times of your life, lets you do what most of your partners don't do.

Now you've let yourself down. You almost sound like an aggrieved WG in that sentence. Hopefully not Stacy, but if you are Stacy/her manager, read every word of this thread carefully and swallow the free feedback you've been given.

You think that £120 is to much for an hour with someone who presents herself in a professional manner, who is clean, offers clean facilities and you know you will have a great time with , there are far more expensive wg's around that area

No-one said £120 is 'too much'. What folks are asking is simple: what is the justification for a 20% rise? That is both a valid and pertinent question, particularly given that Stacy has only just returned and I bet there is a fucking long line of punters wanting to sample her pleasures (me included). If Stacy had just relocated to a more expensive part of town (for example) then that would have perhaps justified a hike. Ditto the inclusion of additional / previously pro rata charges.

I know Stacy has a receptionist who it seems is not the brightest of people so double bookings are made by her not Stacy.

Ouch, you're doing it again. Defending a girl you like is one thing, but there really is no excuse for wasting a paying punters time. Moreover, for me personally poor comms is a real killer - in more ways than one.

also West 8 I take it you know how the female body works and the cycles of the female body, so ever thought that she maybe is taking a week off due to this? Am sure that Stacy would rather you see her in tip top shape and not through her monthly cycle!!!

Hi Stacy. I'm sorry to have troubled you during your menstrual cycle - please excuse my dreadful timing. I hope you are feeling better soon and I hope you take all the comments in this thread to show just how much we all appreciate your fine service and high levels of punter care.

Now she has dropped the price back to £100 so you all will be happy again. guys give the lady some slack she has had tough times last few months, go see her and you will be welcomed with a beautifull smile and you will be the ones leaving with a bigger smile,  £120 is still amazing value for what you get though.

Wait, what? Are we supposed to be grateful that Stacy read this thread - agreed with it - then re-adjusted her price back to £100? She should be thanking us for helping her to remain as popular as she is.

Am sure that she probably reads this forum too so some of you should be a little ashamed of your comments, don't forget that when she has your cock in her mouth she may choose to take a bite instead of a suck !!!! only joking!!!!!!

Or proud of the fact that Stacy reconsidered her poor decision and potentially avoided the negative repurcussions that other girls have experienced after a rate rise.

[west8]

now you have women like michelle independent £100 all in and others.

Not a fair comparison at all. West Kensington (Stacy) vs. Waltham Forst / Suburbia (Michelle) - and the considerable difference in rental costs.

It's a bit like comparing the cost of a punt in Glasgow to that of a punt in Edinburgh.

[Stealthshagger]

Not a fair comparison at all. West Kensington (Stacy) vs. Waltham Forst / Suburbia (Michelle) - and the considerable difference in rental costs.

It's a bit like comparing the cost of a punt in Glasgow to that of a punt in Edinburgh.

the salient point is all in. one of my punts I remember with stacy was 160 in total for the hour. Having gone back and looked at the videos, I recall seeing her a few times actually. shes good, but the extras do add up. her friends that worked in the same place before have not hiked their prices up.

[Sedlmayer]

Not a fair comparison at all. West Kensington (Stacy) vs. Waltham Forst / Suburbia (Michelle) - and the considerable difference in rental costs.

It's a perfectly fair comparison, because a lot of London-based punters are obviously not unhappy to spend an hour on the Tube to visit a really good girl - we've all got Oyster cards FFS 

Why should we pay for the girl's higher rent? She either moved there because she thought (right or wrong) that she would get more business, or because she wanted to live/work in a better area. Not our problem either way, I would suggest 

How many other businesses could, entirely voluntarily, increase their overheads and expect their customers to pay for that (given that obviously normal business rules don't even remotely apply to prostitution...) 

[Sedlmayer]

I read this thread as being perhaps the single most important for any WG considering a price hike. The criticism of so doing is constructive and Stacy should be happy so many punters and potential punters care enough to contribute here.

The amount of interest in her attempted fee hike shows she is both a popular and very much liked WG.


Now you've let yourself down. You almost sound like an aggrieved WG in that sentence. Hopefully not Stacy, but if you are Stacy/her manager, read every word of this thread carefully and swallow the free feedback you've been given.


No-one said £120 is 'too much'. What folks are asking is simple: what is the justification for a 20% rise? That is both a valid and pertinent question, particularly given that Stacy has only just returned and I bet there is a fucking long line of punters wanting to sample her pleasures (me included). If Stacy had just relocated to a more expensive part of town (for example) then that would have perhaps justified a hike. Ditto the inclusion of additional / previously pro rata charges.


Ouch, you're doing it again. Defending a girl you like is one thing, but there really is no excuse for wasting a paying punters time. Moreover, for me personally poor comms is a real killer - in more ways than one.



Hi Stacy. I'm sorry to have troubled you during your menstrual cycle - please excuse my dreadful timing. I hope you are feeling better soon and I hope you take all the comments in this thread to show just how much we all appreciate your fine service and high levels of punter care.



Wait, what? Are we supposed to be grateful that Stacy read this thread - agreed with it - then re-adjusted her price back to £100? She should be thanking us for helping her to remain as popular as she is.


Or proud of the fact that Stacy reconsidered her poor decision and potentially avoided the negative repurcussions that other girls have experienced after a rate rise.

I wish you'd post like this more often - you're actually making a lot of sense with this post (in your next, shorter, post you go back to your normal level though, so DO try harder - it suits you) 

[Stealthshagger]

It's a perfectly fair comparison, because a lot of London-based punters are obviously not unhappy to spend an hour on the Tube to visit a really good girl - we've all got Oyster cards FFS 

Why should we pay for the girl's higher rent? She either moved there because she thought (right or wrong) that she would get more business, or because she wanted to live/work in a better area. Not our problem either way, I would suggest 

How many other businesses could, entirely voluntarily, increase their overheads and expect their customers to pay for that (given that obviously normal business rules don't even remotely apply to prostitution...) 

stacy was also 100 per hour when in baker street, hardly a cheap area. I dont think the cost in the new area is 20 percent higher.

[west8]

It's a perfectly fair comparison, because a lot of London-based punters are obviously not unhappy to spend an hour on the Tube to visit a really good girl - we've all got Oyster cards FFS 

Why should we pay for the girl's higher rent? She either moved there because she thought (right or wrong) that she would get more business, or because she wanted to live/work in a better area. Not our problem either way, I would suggest 

How many other businesses could, entirely voluntarily, increase their overheads and expect their customers to pay for that (given that obviously normal business rules don't even remotely apply to prostitution...) 

Not entirely true.

When I shop at my local Waitrose (Belgravia, London) the prices are considerably higher than when I shop (usually at the weekends) at my other local Waitrose (Headington, Oxfordshire).

This price differential is due to three factors:
i.) Higher overheads;
ii.) Local competition;
iii.) Relative affluence of the local populace.

As such I accept having to pay more for precisely the same items. Ditto WGs ... I'd ALWAYS pay a premium to avoid having to waste my time trekking to fuck knows where for a shag.

Stacy @ £100 is without a doubt superb value given her accessible location.

[Stealthshagger]

Not entirely true.

When I shop at my local Waitrose (Belgravia, London) the prices are considerably higher than when I shop (usually at the weekends) at my other local Waitrose (Headington, Oxfordshire).

This price differential is due to three factors:
i.) Higher overheads;
ii.) Local competition;
iii.) Relative affluence of the local populace.

As such I accept having to pay more for precisely the same items. Ditto WGs ... I'd ALWAYS pay a premium to avoid having to waste my time trekking to fuck knows where for a shag.

Stacy @ £100 is without a doubt superb value given her accessible location.

her baker street location wasnt fuck knows where. 100/h

[west8]

her baker street location wasnt fuck knows where. 100/h

I didn't mention Baker Street?

'Fuck knows where' was in response to this comment:

a lot of London-based punters are obviously not unhappy to spend an hour on the Tube to visit a really good girl - we've all got Oyster cards FFS

[Stealthshagger]

I didn't mention Baker Street?

'Fuck knows where' was in response to this comment:

she was 100 when she was in baker street, like the other wgs that work in her group. they havent changed rates. for that matter they havent dropped rates  when moving further away, like merton or wimbledon either.

[west8]

she was 100 when she was in baker street, like the other wgs that work in her group. they havent changed rates. for that matter they havent dropped rates  when moving further away, like merton or wimbledon either.

Now THAT would the greatest PR move a WG could ever pull:

Hey, guys, I've just moved from Zone 1 to the suburbs. I know that will mean a slightly longer journey for you horny punters, but there is an upside: as my rent is lower here I've decided to lower my rates by £20/whatever per hour

Any girl who did that would get my admiration - and cash - immediately.

[smiths]

It's a perfectly fair comparison, because a lot of London-based punters are obviously not unhappy to spend an hour on the Tube to visit a really good girl - we've all got Oyster cards FFS 

Why should we pay for the girl's higher rent? She either moved there because she thought (right or wrong) that she would get more business, or because she wanted to live/work in a better area. Not our problem either way, I would suggest 

How many other businesses could, entirely voluntarily, increase their overheads and expect their customers to pay for that (given that obviously normal business rules don't even remotely apply to prostitution...) 

Indeed, i rarely punt with WGs in Central London 121 as many charge too much compared to others i fancy outside the centre. Not all of us have got oyster cards though, i dont use public transport so dont need one.

My company does business with a few other companies who happen to be based in Central London, they dont charge anymore than a company that happens to be based outside the centre. Totally agree they chose to be based in such an expensive area, why on earth should i pay more for their decisions.

However, what other punters wish to pay is of course up to them. The amount of London Agencies who cover Central London tells me there is no shortage of punters willing to pay Central London prices.

[punk]

Not a fair comparison at all. West Kensington (Stacy) vs. Waltham Forst / Suburbia (Michelle) - and the considerable difference in rental costs.

It's a bit like comparing the cost of a punt in Glasgow to that of a punt in Edinburgh.

 i am talking about what is included in price / service level comparing  two different woman with similar looks etc, if the rent is too high for her she could move, if you not happy comparing michelle,try the polish women, new polish girl i think it is, she is more central and offers similar services.

[west8]

i am talking about what is included in price / service level comparing  two different woman with similar looks etc, if the rent is too high for her she could move, if you not happy comparing michelle,try the polish women, new polish girl i think it is, she is more central and offers similar services.

Her service may indeed be good, but from the comments about her size it would seem that New Polish Girl is never going to become as popular as Stacy Summer. Moreover, comparing service 'offerings' between girls is pointless - unless they happen to be twin sisters.

I know many folks profess that service is what counts, but I beg to differ. If a girl isn't beautiful I walk - regardless of her service provision. After all, there won't be any service if I can't get it up ..