Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: ~DEE~ - The best yet. Perhaps even the best it can ever get.  (Read 11496 times)

west8

  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

Today I met Dee.

I’ve never waited for a girl before. Ever. More fool me. If this is the prize that patience can bring, I am set to become a very, very patient man.

Having waited two weeks to meet this beautiful, intelligent and kind woman I am happy to report that it was worth every moment. I was rewarded in ways that seemed unimaginable just a week ago. But before I get to the bit you scoundrels are waiting to read, I think a little background is necessary to ‘set the stage’ as it were.

Dee is unique – but not for the reasons you are probably thinking. She is British and of Latina extraction. The best of both worlds: native spoken English, humour and self-deprecation. Latina skin, lips, body, positive attitude and a gorgeous complexion. Dee is also a woman who knows two very important things: how to please a man – and how to let a man reciprocate and pleasure her.

I had such fun during two sexually charged and laughter filled hours with Dee, I’m at a loss as to how it could ever get better than this. For the first time ever, I actually wanted – really wanted – to give as much pleasure as I received. Not because I felt compelled to do so, but because I wanted to see how Dee responded and whether she would really let herself go and simply let someone else concentrate solely on pleasuring her. I was not disappointed. She is both ravenous and ravishing.

There are two reasons I was more concerned with giving than receiving: Dee is jaw-droppingly sexy. Every inch of her is sublime: the gorgeous eyes, the soft, silky hair and the lips. Those lips. The lips. Dee has naturally large lips which are soft, smooth, tender and made for kissing. They are unusually wide and wildly responsive. FK, DFK, licking, sucking, teasing and gentle biting. I could literally have spent an hour enjoying mouth to mouth were it not for the fact that there was so much more to explore.

In her bare feet, Dee is 5’5/5’6. I’m not 100% certain as I was in formal shoes and Dee was already barefoot as I couldn’t wait to get her on the bed. In addition to her stunningly beautiful face, she has curves in all the places any hot blooded male would stop and stare at. An ample 34DD chest, a tight and curvy behind and long, slender, silky smooth legs. Feminine perfection – even to a seasoned bird spotter like me.

Prior to meeting Dee, I believe I stated that Emily Crème Brulee was dangerously close to my idea of a ‘perfect woman’. That conclusion remains unchanged, but I actually do think Dee -is- my perfect woman because she has two very unique attributes that no other girl I have met possesses: her voice and her honesty. First, the voice. If Ella Fitzgerald and Frank Sinatra had produced a love child – and if that child had been female – it would sound like Dee. Think of the most sophisticated, sexy, creamy and understated female voice that you’d like to hear uttering sexual filth in your ear and you have Dee. Her voice is refined and seductive like no other.

Any discussion of a WG and honesty is problematic. Not because WGs are inherently honest or dishonest but because of the contrived situations that we as punters and the girls as sex workers ordinarily find ourselves in. Moreover, not only do we all know that working girls tell us what they think that we want to hear, but they do so in a manner which (in my experience) doesn’t ordinarily exist in ‘real life’, ie the seriously filthy talk, the compliments about size and technique and the kind things they want us to believe that they as beautiful woman see in us as men.

I mention honesty not because Dee failed to tell me about how good my cock felt deep inside her or because she didn’t compliment me on my tonguemanship, but because Dee told me many things I could never have possibly expected to hear and which only arose as discussion points through coincidence or due to the unproven theory of Six Degrees of Separation. On at least two occasions, Dee and I lived in the same part of the country. I don’t mean the same county or the same city, I mean close enough to have encountered one another on multiple occasions in our ordinary daily lives. Because of this, we were able to discuss things that were extraordinarily specific: a very, very obscure gate at the end of a private gothic passageway in Cambridge that leads to nowhere and a small facet of life that only weekend residents of Canary Wharf would ever have experienced – and at a very specific time many years ago. This was not Dee responding to my questions knowingly, it was me listening to Dee with utter disbelief at specifics she could not have known. Because nobody knows. It was a most surreal set of coincidences.

Thinking back now, Dee told me a LOT about who she really is a person: where she is from, what she has experienced as a woman and where she hopes her life journey will ultimately take her. Her frankness in discussing certain aspects of her life was utterly extraordinary and demonstrated a very high degree of transparency and trust. For me, that made the whole encounter all the more intimate as we both knew many of the reasons why we had come together in that hotel room on this particular day – and why we would be certain to meet again.


The Good:

GFE or PSE. Or elements of both. Vanilla or Chocolate and Strawberry with sprinkles and a wafer. When it comes to service provision, versatility and flexibility is Dee’s mantra. I decided to ‘push the boat out’ and see how much pleasure I could give Dee before swapping around and being the lucky recipient of Dee’s superb skillset. It seemed to pay a handsome dividend as Dee’s oral skills are out of this world. She knows how to lick, suck, tease and how to seduce. She is also sexual and appreciative beyond belief when you bring her to a climax. Multiple times. She will do anything and everything to pleasure you – with enthusiasm and to the glorious accompaniment of her beguiling and soothing voice.

Moving beyond the foreplay to the serious sex, Dee gets very, very wet when she is being fucked – first slowly and gently, then hard and firm. Her body responds in so many ways that the sum total is neither GFE nor PSE – it’s a TIE, a Totally Immersive Experience. Nothing that I wanted was unavailable and nor do I imagine for a moment that anything actually would be unavailable. Dee is a giver of pleasure that produces a far, far higher degree of intensity than any drug.

I was massaged and I was kissed. I was sucked and I was fucked. I was exhausted but I was happy.

I was totally satisfied in every conceivable way: sexually, seductively, intimately and intellectually.


The Bad: N/A
Zero. Nada. Zilch.


The Ugly: N/A
Two hours. I don’t think I could scratch the surface in two weeks. There is THAT much to enjoy.


Final words

It is perhaps appropriate that I met Dee before a break I had forgotten even existed: the dreaded half term that begins next week. It means I will have a week with very little, if any, ‘action’. At least with a WG. But you know what, I don’t care. I can think about everything that happened today and look forward knowingly to my next encounter with Dee at a date to be determined in the not too distant future. It will undoubtedly be a while before once again experiencing the pleasures that were forthcoming this afternoon, but I know they will be very much worth the wait – 12/10

To enjoy the femininity and good humour of a woman as magnificent as Dee would be a pleasure to most men. To see her in her underwear a rare treat to a number of fortunate others. But to actually get to go to bed and fully explore a lady this sophisticated, this sexy and this sexually capable is truly a rare and very, very special privilege indeed – 10/10

Overall score – an all-too-brief encounter to remember. For many, many years if not forever – 11/10


PS for the complainers: note I didn’t mention the name of the hotel:
The XXXXXXXX, Kensington, London, W8. :)

Offline che_666999

Stopped reading after "Today I met Dee"
These essays are getting ridiculous

andrei

  • Guest
after bashing cindy and diverting a thread totally off tangent to talk about dee i wondered how long before we would see a dee review

now i have my answer

fredpunter

  • Guest
Be careful, herbie will get jealous!

I'm looking forward to seeing her again next week, I was meant to see her today but the real world intruded.

Offline TreyWalker

And my day has gotten even better.

The end of your essay is clearly trying to antagonise those that are trying to show you the basics of this board and not giving out too much info. But thanks for the review.

I'll be on the lookout for TIE's.

Fb878

  • Guest
West8 may be marmite, but I love these reviews. And this one...

Especially after the hoo har over happypants' review - which I did think bordered on bullying

west8

  • Guest
These essays are getting ridiculous

Almost as ridiculous as making a comment on something you find ridiculous. You might want to look up the definition of 'retrospective' and 'essay'.



after bashing cindy and diverting a thread totally off tangent to talk about dee i wondered how long before we would see a dee review

now i have my answer

Please elaborate - thanks.



The end of your essay is clearly trying to antagonise those that are trying to show you the basics of this board and not giving out too much info. But thanks for the review.

I had intended that as a subtle nod to show I had read and agreed with the comments of others on 'naming'. Admin is welcome to remove it.

To prove my sincerity, I'd like to publicly apologise to you for breaching your trust last week. I was out of line and I know it.


Offline Tailpipe

Are you sure you are not infowanker . :sarcastic:

Hornydevil247

  • Guest


The review itself reminds me of Route 40 in Argentina. Goes on forever and never seems to end but heyho each to their own.

I must get my own booking in to see her myself. It's been too long.

HD




Offline smiths

after bashing cindy and diverting a thread totally off tangent to talk about dee i wondered how long before we would see a dee review

now i have my answer

A well dodgy snake, i dont believe a word West posts. :thumbsdown:

Quesadilla

  • Guest
A well dodgy snake, i dont believe a word West posts. :thumbsdown:
Likewise - he's got a poorly crafted excuse for an internet persona that has not a shred of honesty behind it. Unfortunately Admin doesn't seem to have turned on the "ignore" feature so I can switch him off completely - or have I just not found it yet?

Offline che_666999

A well dodgy snake, i dont believe a word West posts. :thumbsdown:

Agree, there's actually very little detail of the services, just keeps that general with a lot it yada-yada about everything else. The one girl he reviewed that I have seen, I had a very different opinion of her look.

But each to their own, you don't have the read it

Offline smiths

Likewise - he's got a poorly crafted excuse for an internet persona that has not a shred of honesty behind it. Unfortunately Admin doesn't seem to have turned on the "ignore" feature so I can switch him off completely - or have I just not found it yet?

Apparently the ignore function is working though i have no idea how to use it, not something i have ever used or would ever use myself. :hi:

yorkshire123

  • Guest
Are you sure you are not infowanker . :sarcastic:

So its not only me that thinks it?  :hi:
But there again I was always convinced that The Real Midas Touch was also another IS ghost profile but maybe not as Infosneaker wouldn't make such a school boy error as signing up 2 profiles with the same details thus getting caught, or would he?  :unknown:
(I do love a conspiracy theory  ;))

Offline smiths

So its not only me that thinks it?  :hi:
But there again I was always convinced that The Real Midas Touch was also another IS ghost profile but maybe not as Infosneaker wouldn't make such a school boy error as signing up 2 profiles with the same details thus getting caught, or would he?  :unknown:
(I do love a conspiracy theory  ;))

I dont think that though i do believe West is a banned returner, its the cockiness, often a sign in my experience, as ever time will tell, in the meantime i wont be trusting what he posts.

Offline stayer

I must get my own booking in to see her myself. It's been too long.

HD, please stop seeing Dee every other day and give other punters a chance.

Offline TreyWalker

Quote
To prove my sincerity, I'd like to publicly apologise to you for breaching your trust last week. I was out of line and I know it.

I appreciate the gesture but I can't say I plan on taking what you say on face value anymore.

west8

  • Guest
I'm not sure if links to the 'other' site are allowed, but here's where the whole AW thing started back in September:

'looking-for-adultwork-recommendations-in-central-london'

I am not reviewing here (or anywhere else for that matter) to persuade anyone to meet any particular girl. I'm actually choosing the girls based on what you guys have already written. That I have yet to be disappointed should surely show that.

As far as being some sort of shill/tout/snake or whatever else anyone would like to call it, I gave some background on another thread: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=40415.0;all

Substitute 'cockiness' for 'experience' and hence I have a lot to contribute/say or whatever.

Anyway, you guys make of it what you will. I'm not here to win any popularity contest.

Offline iPad3


Substitute 'cockiness' for 'experience' and hence I have a lot to contribute/say or whatever.



There's no question that you have a lot to say..........

Offline monstar

Admittedly I do enjoy reading your reviews, in my opinion to be more useful they could do with less pretentious waffle, more objective matter of fact details and a rational ratings scale, as everyday there is a new "best" WG according to west8.

To each his own.  :drinks:

Dee is on my HL, just the lack of a face pic and decent photos has stopped her being a priority.

west8

  • Guest
Admittedly I do enjoy reading your reviews, in my opinion to be more useful they could do with less pretentious waffle, more objective matter of fact details and a rational ratings scale, as everyday there is a new "best" WG according to west8.

I actually agree with you 100%. I think the problem is that I started off with a super hottie (Mel), then it just got better and better. It might get even better still .. Madlin Moon is booked :)

With the benefit of being able to juxtapose all the 9 AW girls, I would actually re-rate on a scale of 1-10, but I wouldn't dramatically alter my initial findings - just elaborate on why I gave a particular score. On the whole, I stand by my enthusiasm for each as I left on cloud nine - albeit for different reasons - after each meet.

But it's difficult as I'm rating for different things: Mel for her uniqueness and beauty, Adele for her personality and service, Brooklyn for her tits, etc, etc.

What bothers me most is that it will be difficult to find much better than the past fortnight has brought.

Offline herbie007

Not sure if I’m still on pre mod when I’m posting anything to do with Dee, so I’ll try and keep within the rules to get my post shown.

Let me get this right, W8 goes out and pays his money to have a punt, he has a good time and posts a positive review, albeit a long one and then he gets ripped to shreds.

Am I missing the point here, I thought what was meant to happen next is the girl got discussed, things such as the service provided the cost of the punt, her attitude etc.

It’s clear by the comments made on this positive review that west8 is hated by a lot of UKP members for whatever reasons but yet he is clearly allowed to continue to post, so IMO this review should be treated the same as any other and the WG and her service should be discussed, not any personal feelings towards W8, which BTW IMO should be discussed on a thread specifically relating to W8.

Now I know I have been called fluffy and it’s also been mentioned that I have EAS where Dee is concerned and that’s fine with me, your all entitled to your own opinions, but let me tell you where I’m coming from when Dee is concerned, I’m sure some of you have heard me mention I have been playing this game for over 30 years and without trying to sound like I’m bragging, I’ve shagged around 1500 girls in that time, ranging from SW to porn stars, I’ve had a lot of shit punts but I’ve also had some brilliant punts, but none of them have come close to the service I’ve got from Dee, hence the reason why I keep going back and IMHO she’s got it all and I’ve not found anyone better.

I would like to ask admin if they would please start a separate thread and remove all the posts that have nothing to do with this review.

BTW Freddie, you sound like the jealous one to me.

carlisle78

  • Guest
Are you sure you are not infowanker . :sarcastic:

Or Vorian?

Actually I enjoyed the review - albeit long.

Offline Clooney

How often is West8 punting????

This amounts to a review a day, at an assumed cost of around £200, let's say a grand a week.

I do ok, but I'd not be able to do that or frankly, be able to justify it.

I am suspicious.

steve1111

  • Guest
All that waffle whats the boat race like :unknown:

Offline Tailpipe

Herbie

I would hope you would a agree for the most part I am considered mild in my posts .

Inffowanker and west get right up my tail pipe and the sooner they fuck off the better.

Dee looks awesome and I am not sure how I have not noticed her before .
Great body and I now want to fuck her  :drinks:

Quesadilla

  • Guest
How often is West8 punting????

This amounts to a review a day, at an assumed cost of around £200, let's say a grand a week.

I do ok, but I'd not be able to do that or frankly, be able to justify it.

I am suspicious.
Sad git that I am I went and tallied them up...

Oct 10 10:58pm - Adele4U (review writtenn 17th but states …"took me a week to write about") £130

Oct 11 04:13am - Brazilian Mel £150

Oct 14 4:32pm - Maggie21 £130

Oct 16 6:45pm - Emily Crème Brulee £160

Oct 16 9:10pm - Kinky Nicole £80

Oct 19 9:18pm - Girlfriend Dior £120

Oct 21 6:08pm - Lola Bell £60

Oct 23 01:55am - Brooklyn Blue £200 (review from Oct 22)

Oct 23 08:09pm - Dee £130 or £260 (review states "hours" rather than "hour")

£150+£130+£130+£160+£80+£120+£60+£200+£260=£1,290.00

So at least £1,160 or maybe as much as £1,290 between roughly 10th Oct and 23rd, averaging £100 per day.

Given that West8 claims he has a family with a young kid he's either a complete fantasist or has a wife with a frontal lobotomy to not notice that kind of money disappearing daily.  But then again, she did marry him.  :D

vinnyadms

  • Guest
£1290 ! - there are punters who spend that on an overnight regularly !

Hardly big money in the world of central London ...

Offline herbie007

Herbie

I would hope you would a agree for the most part I am considered mild in my posts .

Inffowanker and west get right up my tail pipe and the sooner they fuck off the better.

Dee looks awesome and I am not sure how I have not noticed her before .
Great body and I now want to fuck her  :drinks:


Hey TP

I've always respected you and your posts, your a top geezer.

And yes mate, you should see her, she's a top girl IMO

fredpunter

  • Guest
"BTW Freddie, you sound like the jealous one to me"

Absolutely true, I am jealous of W8s available time and money  :lol:

From the way some respond to him I think I'm not the only one.

Offline Clooney

£1290 ! - there are punters who spend that on an overnight regularly !

Hardly big money in the world of central London ...

Sure, but I'd suggest they are in the minority.

I think if you are punting with that level of frequency you are either a millionaire many times over (of which there are a good few in London, granted) or you don't have a hobby, you have a problem.

I punt around twice a month personally. For me that's interesting enough without sliding into something I can't control.

Offline herbie007

"BTW Freddie, you sound like the jealous one to me"

Absolutely true, I am jealous of W8s available time and money  :lol:

From the way some respond to him I think I'm not the only one.


Yea, see what you mean.

Enjoy your punt next week  :drinks:

mrhappypants

  • Guest
I think West8 may achieve the dubious honour of being the first punter to get reviewed on UKP.  My observations are 1). His reviews lack detail and measure.  I think they could be written by someone who has only read other reviews.  2) His personal situation merits explanation, the resources of time, money and sexual energy (for someone nearing 40) to research, travel, punt and review seem boundless.  3) He appears able to book very popular girls easily at short notice which is the absolute opposite of my experience.  4). His review of Mel contained a blatant teaser for the only other girl still working that he had seen that was as attractive as Mel. He did everything other than address this central point that his first review had a distinct promotional feel in a lengthy series of rebuttals. 5) the Psychology is interesting. He certainly has a very high need for attention and his post rate is phenomenal.

That said , his summaries of the popular girls in various categories (Polish etc) are very useful.  And he certainly is not the only one on here who typically writes blandly positive reviews of girls I have seen and have a different view of, and appears to be pursuing a promotional agenda.

Sorry for the detour from Dee and my bit said for a while.

Dave

Offline Tailpipe


Hey TP

I've always respected you and your posts, your a top geezer.

And yes mate, you should see her, she's a top girl IMO

 :hi:

Offline laidbackasiandude

I think West8 may achieve the dubious honour of being the first punter to get reviewed on UKP.  My observations are 1). His reviews lack detail and measure.  I think they could be written by someone who has only read other reviews.  2) His personal situation merits explanation, the resources of time, money and sexual energy (for someone nearing 40) to research, travel, punt and review seem boundless.  3) He appears able to book very popular girls easily at short notice which is the absolute opposite of my experience.  4). His review of Mel contained a blatant teaser for the only other girl still working that he had seen that was as attractive as Mel. He did everything other than address this central point that his first review had a distinct promotional feel in a lengthy series of rebuttals. 5) the Psychology is interesting. He certainly has a very high need for attention and his post rate is phenomenal.

That said , his summaries of the popular girls in various categories (Polish etc) are very useful.  And he certainly is not the only one on here who typically writes blandly positive reviews of girls I have seen and have a different view of, and appears to be pursuing a promotional agenda.

Sorry for the detour from Dee and my bit said for a while.

Dave

You have reviewed "Suzi Lapdancer" positively on UKP. I met her back in the summer of 2013, and she was totally underwhelming
to say the least. Applying your own logic, aren't you then propagating a promotional agenda?

fredpunter

  • Guest
I think West8 may achieve the dubious honour of being the first punter to get reviewed on UKP.  My observations are 1). His reviews lack detail and measure.  I think they could be written by someone who has only read other reviews.  2) His personal situation merits explanation, the resources of time, money and sexual energy (for someone nearing 40) to research, travel, punt and review seem boundless.  3) He appears able to book very popular girls easily at short notice which is the absolute opposite of my experience.  4). His review of Mel contained a blatant teaser for the only other girl still working that he had seen that was as attractive as Mel. He did everything other than address this central point that his first review had a distinct promotional feel in a lengthy series of rebuttals. 5) the Psychology is interesting. He certainly has a very high need for attention and his post rate is phenomenal.

That said , his summaries of the popular girls in various categories (Polish etc) are very useful.  And he certainly is not the only one on here who typically writes blandly positive reviews of girls I have seen and have a different view of, and appears to be pursuing a promotional agenda.

Sorry for the detour from Dee and my bit said for a while.

Dave

1) not everyone wants to write or read graphic details of every exchange of bodily fluids, some find it offputting rather than helpful, if a review doesn't contain details you feel are essential then either ask for clarification or just ignore, I don't think you can dictate what people write.

2) his personal situation is nobodys business but his own.

3) seems girls are happier to meet some clients than they are others.

4) don't remember it, can't be bothered looking it up so I will just accept you may be correct.

5) absolutely agree.

yorkshire123

  • Guest
so IMO this review should be treated the same as any other and the WG and her service should be discussed, not any personal feelings towards W8, which BTW IMO should be discussed on a thread specifically relating to W8.


herbie007 first of all please accept my apology for cropping your post down, I've done this so I can address one of your points & not to miss quote you  :hi:

First of all I didn't think it was within the ethos of the forum to start a specific thread about specific members? If so where else can you question the validity of a member than after their posts or within their reviews?

For what its worth here are some of my reasons for thinking the way I do about west8/infosneaker

- Within a couple of posts they were accused of advertising/touting
- Quite a big gap between first post & mass postings
- Posts late into the night/early morning
- Use of a proxy
- Prolific punting prowess on a short period of time
- Like to organise threads into certain categories
- Have a liking for & knowledge of the Polish scene 
- Easily aggravates other members
- Quite similar review layout ending with a nice little summery
- Take pleasure in been voted WOTW
- Arrogance about anonymity
- Very forum savvy
- Very IT savvy

I could go on......

Granted individually this list could be anyone of us but collectively its strong enough for me to openly state that I believe that the 2 members are the same person, If not then west8 has studied Infosneaker's persona quite carefully.
If I'm wrong then I'm wrong & will accept my WOTW nomination with the embarrassment it deserves   :(

Offline smiths

Not sure if I’m still on pre mod when I’m posting anything to do with Dee, so I’ll try and keep within the rules to get my post shown.

Let me get this right, W8 goes out and pays his money to have a punt, he has a good time and posts a positive review, albeit a long one and then he gets ripped to shreds.

Am I missing the point here, I thought what was meant to happen next is the girl got discussed, things such as the service provided the cost of the punt, her attitude etc.

It’s clear by the comments made on this positive review that west8 is hated by a lot of UKP members for whatever reasons but yet he is clearly allowed to continue to post, so IMO this review should be treated the same as any other and the WG and her service should be discussed, not any personal feelings towards W8, which BTW IMO should be discussed on a thread specifically relating to W8.

Now I know I have been called fluffy and it’s also been mentioned that I have EAS where Dee is concerned and that’s fine with me, your all entitled to your own opinions, but let me tell you where I’m coming from when Dee is concerned, I’m sure some of you have heard me mention I have been playing this game for over 30 years and without trying to sound like I’m bragging, I’ve shagged around 1500 girls in that time, ranging from SW to porn stars, I’ve had a lot of shit punts but I’ve also had some brilliant punts, but none of them have come close to the service I’ve got from Dee, hence the reason why I keep going back and IMHO she’s got it all and I’ve not found anyone better.

I would like to ask admin if they would please start a separate thread and remove all the posts that have nothing to do with this review.

BTW Freddie, you sound like the jealous one to me.

Punters are free to post as they so wish, as West has decided to do reviews its on those threads i shall be posting my views unless admin instructs me not to. I trust thats clear.

west8

  • Guest
Wow, still sceptical. I'm not going to go over this for the 78th time in a week, but a lot of questions should be answered in this post I made a few days ago:

Quote
I was super active before getting married and settling down - at least 6/7 punts a week until 2005 or so. Then it calmed down a lot after the kids were born. Almost fucked everything up when I bumped into one WG in Waitrose in Canary Wharf and got chatting. The wife saw and asked me who she was. Close call ...

Only really started again big time last year as I'm home alone often while the wife is travelling. Bit sad to see how the Asian scene has declined since the glory days of Sylvia, Annabelle, Benita and Tamsin at AEL. I just missed Macy before she stopped and then had a really fucking dodgy experience this Summer that I wrote about on the other board.

First with a fucking TS, then with a meth head who wouldn't fuck off. But hey, it's all good fun.


As far as 'non-specific' reviews, that has got to be a joke. As for how much £ I spend on this, that is my business alone.

Finally, which popular girls did I easily book?

Quote
Out   Booking   08/10/2014 19:20:38   ~DEE~ (687) View Profile   2hr(s) for 200 GBP on 23/10/2014 at 14:00:00 - Confirmed   11/10/2014 11:03:20   


For the record, Dee told me as we were enjoying a glass of wine after I had gotten dressed that she had been 'warned' I had booked her. I didn't ask by whom as I didn't care. I was surprised that she had chosen to tell me and it felt a -little- awkward. She noticed this and said "look, I don't judge people I have never met and I think everyone deserves at least that chance".

Wise words and respect to her for that.


dezzatheblue2

  • Guest
Who needs tv, this is much more entertaining, I didn agree with w8 on his Cindy thread but his reviews make entertaining reading if they are true then great if it is all bullshit then so be it.
  The more people slag him off the more he will react, so why bother, if you don't like what he says ignore it, and westy don't bite mate  :hi:

Offline Tailpipe

Wow, still sceptical. I'm not going to go over this for the 78th time in a week, but a lot of questions should be answered in this post I made a few days ago:


As far as 'non-specific' reviews, that has got to be a joke. As for how much £ I spend on this, that is my business alone.

Finally, which popular girls did I easily book?


For the record, Dee told me as we were enjoying a glass of wine after I had gotten dressed that she had been 'warned' I had booked her. I didn't ask by whom as I didn't care. I was surprised that she had chosen to tell me and it felt a -little- awkward. She noticed this and said "look, I don't judge people I have never met and I think everyone deserves at least that chance".

Wise words and respect to her for that.

If this is proved to be true then whoever did this is out of order .  The forum is for the punter who ever he is along as he
is a good punter, I like to think the members of UKP play by the Rules and behave like punters should.

west8

  • Guest
If this is proved to be true then whoever did this is out of order

Yep. I don't know if it was a forum member or another girl, but the main thing is that he/she/they failed. A younger girl might have been scared off I guess, but Dee had plenty of time to cancel on me. It's to her credit that she didn't.

fredpunter

  • Guest
Yep. I don't know if it was a forum member or another girl, but the main thing is that he/she/they failed. A younger girl might have been scared off I guess, but Dee had plenty of time to cancel on me. It's to her credit that she didn't.

Well who else knew that you had booked her? Can't have been many?

"warned" may have been meant in a tongue in cheek way anyway.

Offline Clooney

Fucking hell!

What kind of nutter or fantasist chats to a WG he has seen when his wife is in close proximity???

Jeez!

You'd have to be very arrogant, very brazen or totally reckless.

I don't believe a word of this.

andrei

  • Guest
Wow, still sceptical. I'm not going to go over this for the 78th time in a week, but a lot of questions should be answered in this post I made a few days ago:


As far as 'non-specific' reviews, that has got to be a joke. As for how much £ I spend on this, that is my business alone.

Finally, which popular girls did I easily book?


For the record, Dee told me as we were enjoying a glass of wine after I had gotten dressed that she had been 'warned' I had booked her. I didn't ask by whom as I didn't care. I was surprised that she had chosen to tell me and it felt a -little- awkward. She noticed this and said "look, I don't judge people I have never met and I think everyone deserves at least that chance".

Wise words and respect to her for that.

interesting

booked dee on the 8th october

then on the 9th of october suddenly began posting on this site after an absence of 2.5 months since your first 2 posts

3rd post after your "return" snide comments began about cindy

you're well obvious mate, surprised admin has not seen it yet

west8

  • Guest
Fucking hell!

What kind of nutter or fantasist chats to a WG he has seen when his wife is in close proximity???

Jeez!

You'd have to be very arrogant, very brazen or totally reckless.

I don't believe a word of this.


As you seem to care, here is exactly what happened:

I was browsing for ingredients for a Sunday lunch and a WG I had seen more than a dozen times (Pandora) recognised me and, believing I was alone, came over to say hello.

As I had seen her many, many times - both as a WG and in her real life - I would probably have been offended if she hadn't acknowledged me.

She was dressed in her civvies and I foolishly assumed the wife was safely out of sight. Only when we were at the checkout did she ask who 'the Indian girl I was talking to' was.

I told her she lived in the same (huge) apartment complex (Canary Riverside) and that I had spoken with her in Holmes Place a few days prior.

It was never mentioned again.




west8

  • Guest
booked dee on the 8th october

then on the 9th of october suddenly began posting on this site after an absence of 2.5 months since your first 2 posts

3rd post after your "return" snide comments began about cindy

you're well obvious mate, surprised admin has not seen it yet


Interesting theory, but I wouldn't give up the amateur detective work just yet:


Quote
Out   Booking   07/10/2014 01:55:11   X PLATINUM x CINDY X (683) View Profile   2hr(s) for 200 GBP on 22/10/2014 at 12:00:00   07/10/2014 09:29:59   

Quote
Out   Booking   08/10/2014 19:20:38   ~DEE~ (688) View Profile   2hr(s) for 200 GBP on 23/10/2014 at 14:00:00 - Confirmed   11/10/2014 11:03:20   


Offline herbie007

herbie007 first of all please accept my apology for cropping your post down, I've done this so I can address one of your points & not to miss quote you  :hi:

First of all I didn't think it was within the ethos of the forum to start a specific thread about specific members? If so where else can you question the validity of a member than after their posts or within their reviews?

For what its worth here are some of my reasons for thinking the way I do about west8/infosneaker

- Within a couple of posts they were accused of advertising/touting
- Quite a big gap between first post & mass postings
- Posts late into the night/early morning
- Use of a proxy
- Prolific punting prowess on a short period of time
- Like to organise threads into certain categories
- Have a liking for & knowledge of the Polish scene 
- Easily aggravates other members
- Quite similar review layout ending with a nice little summery
- Take pleasure in been voted WOTW
- Arrogance about anonymity
- Very forum savvy
- Very IT savvy

I could go on......

Granted individually this list could be anyone of us but collectively its strong enough for me to openly state that I believe that the 2 members are the same person, If not then west8 has studied Infosneaker's persona quite carefully.
If I'm wrong then I'm wrong & will accept my WOTW nomination with the embarrassment it deserves   :(



Hi Yorkshire

No Need to apologise and thanks for taking the time and going to the trouble to break down your suspicions as to why you think W8 is infoseeker, and I can understand your concerns as we get so many phoney punters trying to crash UKP, but the way I see W8 is that he started off on the wrong foot and rubbed members up the wrong way but not in a malicious way from what I can see, in return he got a lot of stick, some deserved some not so deserved, but he took it and continued to post his reviews and that’s when my doubts about W8 eased.

I’m the type of guy who is willing to give others the benefit of doubt and if I’m wrong I will also hold my hands up and apologise to all who distrust him.

andrei

  • Guest

Interesting theory, but I wouldn't give up the amateur detective work just yet:

so at the time you were lambasting cindy for her lack of decent comms (2 days after you supposedly tried to book her) dee took 3 days to confirm your booking but you didnt even mention anything negative about her - thats pretty weird


Offline herbie007

Punters are free to post as they so wish, as West has decided to do reviews its on those threads i shall be posting my views unless admin instructs me not to. I trust thats clear.


That’s a fair enough, and I wouldn’t expect anything else from you.