Author Topic: LatinaIna - Sloane Sq  (Read 4348 times)


25 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7147863) (23 positive, 1 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline NotThe


External Link/Members Only

Well reviewed here:https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=34584

When: 1st half of 2024

Where: a flat near Slone square. No, not in the bulding with "10 floors of whores" owned by a Tory donor :) External Link/Members Only

Price: £200 for the hour + 20 DFK + 40 OWO

Looks: She said she is a mix of Mexican, Colombian and Japanese, and I think you can see some Asian traits in her face. The pictures are very representative. facially I think she's cure, but YMMV. The boobs are natural and amazing. I wonder if they'll be saggy in 10 years, but right now they're simply amazing. The ass is not too big, so great for me but not for culo grande fans

Services: no DFK (despite paying for it), OWO, sex in multiple positions

The deed: After paperwork and shower, she almost jumps on me, starts kissing me (but no tongue), grabs my hands and makes sure I explore those natural melons, etc. In summary: off to a great start!
We move onto the bed, we keep exploring each other, and some alarm bells start going off because the kissing is sensual but it's clear there is no tongue, none at all.
She starts blowing me, but the oral ain't anything to write home about: even if I ask her to slow down, the pace is still too fast and she uses her hands a bit too much,
Glove on, and I alternate various positions (doggy, CG, missionary); of course seeing those natural melons bouncing up and down was really something. Round 1 ends in CG but the disappointment was that, even if I asked her to slow down, she basically didn't.

I don't know if she was intentionally trying to make me cum as quickly as possible to get me out of there, or if it was all in good faith and that's just how she fucks, Either way, it was a slight disappointment.

In the post-nut clarity period we chat a bit about the parts of Mexico I have seen and other random stuff. There is no round 2 because round 1 lasted quite a while and I'm no longer a teenage stallion :)

Would I go back? No. She's hot, but the lack of DFK, the oral technique and the fact she wouldn't slow down her pace all add up to a slight disappointment for this price. I'd probably be able to overlook 1 of these thigs but not all 3.





Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline penisilin

At best, it sounds more like a neutral to me given that you paid for DFK and she didn't offer it - another thief she is for taking money she didn't earn.

Offline SonofAJohn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,179
  • Likes: 66
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
OP, did you not stop and remind her of the services that you have paid for?
Not sure why you didn't show more assertion.
Banned reason: Unacceptable abuse of other members.
Banned by: daviemac

Online rebelscum

Yep, didn't provide the service you paid for, didn't slow down when you told her to-I'd have been more forgiving if she gave your money back for the unfulfilled DFK, but she didn't. 

Offline NotThe

I got the impression she wasn't comfortable with DFK.
It would never cross my mind to be assertive to get a service a girl isn't comfortable with.

I could have asked for a refund, at least at the end of the session. I imagine many punters would. I figured it wasn't worth it.

Offline SonofAJohn

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 1,179
  • Likes: 66
  •  
  • Reviews: 27
You are paying for it.
Don't be afraid to speak up if something is not to your liking. The escort should listen and take what you are saying on board.
Banned reason: Unacceptable abuse of other members.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline stewpid

Thanks for the review. Does sound more neutral than positive but it's your rating.

Was looking at this one for the near future but I've just had a similar disappointing latina experience  and Ina is even more expensive with the extras I would take (and probably not receive based on your review) so will avoid  :thumbsup:

Online punter10

Have seen her a couple times and agree kissing is not passionate enough nor enough tongue and she can talk too much if you let her lol.
But i feel she is much better value than agency girls and her body is incredible and all natural.
Maybe I have EAS but I will see her again when funds allow.

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,237
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 130
Saw her a time where i paid for DFK and i thought it was good tbh. Lots of tongue and constant, great kisser IIRC. This was last year though so maybe she's flagging now?

But it's actually a scandal some guys aren't getting proper DFK off her when it's EXTRA! DFK should never be extra for a start.

That's not right because she's overpriced as it is so she should be delivering consistently doesn't matter how fit she is. Especially when you're paying extra on top of an already ludicrous base rate.

I would've been very annoyed.
« Last Edit: June 22, 2024, 05:55:48 pm by JonasG »

Offline Robert Musil

Paid extra for DFK as well (this time last year) and didn't get DFK either. Only reason I haven't been back to see her. No issue with girls not wanting to do certain things at their discretion, but as an agreed /upfront extra it's basically taking money for something you're not prepared to provide.

Offline Ronaldjones89

Hmm not sure maybe a change or she is not comfortable / preference with some guys?. I had no holds barred DFK tongue and all

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,237
  • Likes: 62
  •  
  • Reviews: 130
Yeah same but tbh it's still not right that we got it and others aren't.

It makes her a shambles of a WG where she's charging extra for DFK and not providing this at all. She's literally stealing money.

I would've given her an automatic negative if this was me.