Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.




Author Topic: Platinum Cindy - Caveat emptor  (Read 9914 times)

Offline west8

When its agreed by the WG and she accepts your booking. So you ring or email a WG and agree a specific date and time for a punt, if she then doesnt stick to that agreement a review can be done whether you meet her or not.

This could actually be a whole new area of contract law.

Ordinarily an 'invitation to treat' and subsequent 'acceptance' is sufficient to form a contract.

But I wonder whether 'Can I meet you at XX' ... 'Yes, you can' would constitute the same!


When its agreed by the WG and she accepts your booking. So you ring or email a WG and agree a specific date and time for a punt, if she then doesnt stick to that agreement a review can be done whether you meet her or not.

Absolutely, and has been mentioned several times during this thread.

Offline west8

Yes she was assuming it was actually her of course. I cant recall the exact reason for her banning. What i do recall is the punter Bangers and Gash did a negative review on his punt with her and some punters defended her and the thread ran on and on.

Deja vu it would seem. But that's fine, the Cindy army can march on.

I was warned in PM not to write anything disparaging about Cindy .. interesting.

Offline James999

This could actually be a whole new area of contract law.

Ordinarily an 'invitation to treat' and subsequent 'acceptance' is sufficient to form a contract.

But I wonder whether 'Can I meet you at XX' ... 'Yes, you can' would constitute the same!



And likely winner of Wanker of the Week

Offline smiths

This could actually be a whole new area of contract law.

Ordinarily an 'invitation to treat' and subsequent 'acceptance' is sufficient to form a contract.

But I wonder whether 'Can I meet you at XX' ... 'Yes, you can' would constitute the same!

Admin sets the rules on here. If i ring a WG and book her sameday for say 1pm thats an agreed and accepted booking, if the WG reneges on that for any reason i can do a review on her fucking me about as i would view it.

Offline west8

Got it! Cheers smiths

Good to see there are some members who are happy to help with advice - and who have actually met real girls as well as posting here. :)

Deja vu it would seem. But that's fine, the Cindy army can march on.

I was warned in PM not to write anything disparaging about Cindy .. interesting.

But you never met Cindy and further more it's obvious she never agreed or confirmed your
booking hence the only criticism you could make of her is lack of clarity with respect
to communication.

Although she's banned from UKP, I would imagine she's an avid reader of forum threads
about her. Given the fact you're clearly desperate to meet her, why on earth would you
antagonise her by submitting a "non-review" with negative connotations?


Offline wench

  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 5
I don't know if a womans point of view is welcomed on this thread but to be honest I can see why the lady in question was being cautious.

It is reasonably known that a chap who contacts a lady and says a friend recommended us is often a time waster (not saying you are w8).
It can also feel unnerving, difficult to explain but it can be an uncomfortable feeling knowing that someone you have spent 121 time with very intimately has been discussing it with his mate. Who is his mate? Is he someone you might know? Someone a bit dodgy maybe?  Sounds mad when a woman can be reviewed on the web but that is something different and doesn't feel creepy as it is out in the open.

I have not seen guys who have said a friend recommended me as in my experience 99.9% of the time they can't give their friends name or they say a name that doesn't add up.

You should accept the ladies decision w8, and with respect I think if the lady see's this thread it could unnerve her reading what you have written and copying & pasting her correspondence here.

Offline Admin

  • Site Owner
As many here know, this site doesn't tolerate fluffy fanboys who gang up on another punter when they post something negative about their favourite prossie. That's why I previously banned so many.

But in this case it's plainly obvious the negative reaction he's gotten is kind of justified.

Punters must learn to take rejection and move on. Don't keep trying to book a girl.

Offline west8

hence the only criticism you could make of her is lack of clarity with respect
to communication.

Which is precisely what I did?


Although she's banned from UKP, I would imagine she's an avid reader of forum threads
about her. Given the fact you're clearly desperate to meet her, why on earth would you antagonise her by submitting a "non-review" with negative connotations?

Because it was a negative experience.

Or would you honestly think I should only share the negatives?

Offline west8

Thanks wench - very interesting!

Admin - noted with thanks!

It doesn't state confirmed. Nor do any of the other bookings from last week or those forthcoming next week.

As posted above, I only have emails with the ladies phone numbers.

As I understand it, any booking through AW needs to be confirmed by the prossie. Then it will display confirmed in the booking email.

The prossies you saw must have confirmed them as feedback was left by both you and prossies. Feedback can only be left if bookings are confirmed.

 I don't punt as often as I would like so I have only used AW three times, but I am confident that what I have described is how bookings work in AW.

 :hi:

Offline akauya

West8 you sound a bit dodgy mate, seriously. Too much email/sms/whatsapp ping pong just to see a prossie. Seeing prostitutes is not going on a date!

Also what bothers me is that you posted your private conversations (emails) online.  I would have understood it if she had scammed you and you wanted to prove it - but she didn't.  I can imagine now that she and other prossies will be shitting themselves wondering if every Tom, Dick and Jimmy is going to plaster all their private conversations on UKP. Not good for anyone, punters and prossies. Discretion is paramount in this game.

And before anyone accuses me of being a fanboy I have not seen Cindy. Not sure if I even want to see her at present.


Offline west8

Fair point akauya - and lesson learned.

I did make sure there was no personal info about either Cindy or myself in the messages posted in this thread. They are all very, very vanilla!

I think that in time - and if you guys know my AW ID - it will become apparent that I am simply too transparent.

I don't tell tall tales and nor do I lie, cheat or steal to get what I want. Never have and never will.

Perhaps I am honest to fault. If so, I am happy to apologise both to Cindy and to the readership.

Online vt

Just to add a lighter note here, El Guapo's conversation with El Jefe in The Three Amigos is very enlightening on this subject, from around 1:30 onwards...just substitute Carmen with Cindy...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b6E682C7Jj4

 :D


W8 interests me.

He seemed obsessed with fact that people might have a pop at him for slagging off cindy (rather than just because he comes off as a bell end).

I wonder if the members who he claimed told him not to slag off Cindy will post on this thread confirming this.

All seems very strange to me. I wonder if the point of this thread was to try and get other members banned for slagging him off.

Unfortunately for Holland Park he just came across as a bit of odd bod who seemed a bit obsessed.

Offline James999

I don't tell tall tales and nor do I lie, cheat or steal to get what I want. Never have and never will.
Perhaps I am honest to fault. If so, I am happy to apologise both to Cindy and to the readership.

Well earlier in the thread you told us you sent her a picture / link saying you were third on the left, you later said the picture was not you, as such it's evident you do lie to get what you want  :thumbsdown:

Offline west8

Cindy just suggested I post this - hopefully it at least shows that I was wrong and wench was correct:


Quote
Here's something for you that I'm hoping you will understand:

The booking you have made for 22/10/2014 @ 12:00 WILL NOT BE HAPPENING!!!! I have NOT accepted it and I'm not planning to do so. You have put me off you so much with your bad, needy attitude that your future childish comments about me will not matter to me.

Like you've said yourself, you are used to do calling up agencies and choosing any girl anytime - that's NOT me. I am not interested in what you are used to, xxxxxxxxxxxxxx or who your xxxxxx. Clearly you do not care exposing him as you told me his full name...

I treat all clients with respect but the way you have acted and gone to such extend.... I kindly ask you to leave me alone and please do not reply. Feel free to post this on UKP for others to see that I am stating the truth and I do NOT wish to meet you, E-V-E-R.


I'm grateful to Cindy for confirming my story vis-a-vis my friend - who told me to mention him by name. But nevermind.

Needless to say, I shall never contact Cindy again.



I think that in time - and if you guys know my AW ID - it will become apparent that I am simply too transparent.



I think in time your probably be banned.

And why would any of us what to know your AW ID... I am guessing its some kind of clever play on words on transparent or the W8 post code

Offline west8

It's nothing special - just an ordinary word.

Again you missed the point: I have been polite and respectful to the ladies I have met and they have written so.

If I'm going to be banned for posting an account of my experience, then so be it. At the end of the day no-one is going to lose any sleep over it.


As others have said, just move on and leave this behind you.

Just curious...what have you blocked out with the 'x's?

Offline west8

As others have said, just move on and leave this behind you.

Just curious...what have you blocked out with the 'x's?

I agree 100%. No idea why Cindy is so upset and neurotic, but that is her prerogative.

'xxxxxx' part is the fact I am retired and my friend. I didn't cover up the bit where I asked Cindy to dress up as a man! :)

Offline monstar

I agree 100%. No idea why Cindy is so upset and neurotic, but that is her prerogative.

'xxxxxx' part is the fact I am retired and my friend. I didn't cover up the bit where I asked Cindy to dress up as a man! :)

You are so polite and respectful..  :rolleyes:

Offline west8

I try. First time I ever had a WG so upset about nothing - which is odd considering I first punted almost 20 years ago.

Same modus operandi with every single AW girl I have met too: polite introductory email, followed by a booking request.

No-one else had a problem with it as meetings were duly arranged.

So you first punted 20 years ago as an Undergrad and now retired at say 41. (Well done W8)

Strange you mentioned to her your retired as that would imply to most people 55+

Anyway I am sure we can all move on from this strange mess




Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)