Popular media on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

UKPunting is a free, independent and not-for-profit paid sex buyer site.


Author Topic: Dominatrix breaking the Law  (Read 2423 times)

Offline Matium

Is this dominatrix not breaking the law by revealing the full number?

Certainly a violation of the Data Protection Act.

http://www.mistressmegara.com/#/idiots/4543953521

Offline AnthG

I'm getting

Quote
The requested URL /#/about-me/4543522167 was not found on this server.

Seems to be bad Javascript coding as this occurs on Firefox and Chrome but not IE x64.

*Edit* Viewed it now. Jesus that is pretty shocking. Regarding the data protection act, someone correct be but I believe you need to be registered with the ICO to breach the DPA?

« Last Edit: September 08, 2011, 09:17:22 PM by AnthG »

Offline ladyofthemansion

Surely that can't help her business!!!  :scare:

Don't know how it stands with regard to breaking any laws & definately don't agree with what she's done but it does show that it's a good idea to get a 2nd phone.

Also it does show how many saddos there are out there.  Why do some people go through the hassle of ringing a pro$$ie/dom/whatever to make a booking when they have no interest in actually going through with it?  Some sort of cheap thrill?  Give them something to have a wank over?  Can't get my head round it  :dash:

Offline Matium

Seeing a prostitute for the first time is a big step for a lot of men.

Also they see the huge fees on prostitute websites and start to resent them especially when their own hourly rate is so much lower. So for many it's a thrill to get back at a prostitute by making her waste her time.

Then there's the factor that a lot of men are simply immature when it comes to sex and just talking to a prostitute and making plans to see her is all the fantasy they want or need.

Offline Ali Katt

I can understand her frustrations but having a wall of shame is pretty petty. I know we have a similar thing for bad providers and fake AW profiles but that is beneficial to save some poor sucker getting ripped off. Hers is a vengeance mission. I'm not sure what the internet privacy laws are but according to yahoo answers (a poor and inaccurate resource for most people) :
Quote
Giving a number out knowing it is for an illegal purpose such as harassment makes you an accessory to the crime.

Offline SteveNova

The Information Commissioner may be able to take action if the phone number is considered to be personal information that could identify someone - and I guess it could if someone you knew recognised it.

Offline softlad

Why do some people go through the hassle of ringing a pro$$ie/dom/whatever to make a booking when they have no interest in actually going through with it?  Some sort of cheap thrill? 

Timewasters go with the territory in this game.
So does the unwritten understanding of discretion between Prossie and Punter.

Good to see this twisted bitch is getting her share of timewasters.  :sarcastic:
It's also good of her to let potential decent punters see what kind of low life she is before they risk their security in seeing her,
at least they can all make an informed decission not to bother.
It would be a shame if this stunt back fires and the timewasters fight back ten fold, and put her out of business...  :)

Offline Jimmyredcab

I doubt she has broken the law, in any case who is going to pursue it through the courts and attract more publicity. Let this be a lesson to you all, have a second phone for punting.   ;)

Offline Secret Liaison

Timewasters go with the territory in this game.
So does the unwritten understanding of discretion between Prossie and Punter.


+1

Offline Strawberry

  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,251
Timewasters go with the territory in this game.
So does the unwritten understanding of discretion between Prossie and Punter.

Correct however this line is often used by those who do mess girls around too, some sort of justification. It shouldn't be an excuse and I have seen this approach "Wall of Shame" used both on other WGs websites (can't remember who just can remember seeing it), as well as by one or two businesses. In the case of one which provided a rental service, they displayed names and addresses of those who decided not to return.

Offline Karin

I'm not saying it's ok to have a 'wall of shame', but it's ok for you guys to give numbers and personal details of 'bad' service providers that may have a detrimental effect on their business???

Offline James999

it's ok for you guys to give numbers and personal details of 'bad' service providers that may have a detrimental effect on their business???

I agree, it is ok to out bad providers.

Remember also that Pro$$ies advertise their contact details and as such they are in the public domain, it should only worry the bad / unreliable / scam Pro$$ies, as good / reliable / honest pro$$ies will of course have nothing to worry about  :cool:

As for having a detrimental effect on their business, thats a good thing, it may persuade them to retire and go back to stacking shelves, and stop scamming punters  :D

Offline Jacob

I'm not saying it's ok to have a 'wall of shame', but it's ok for you guys to give numbers and personal details of 'bad' service providers that may have a detrimental effect on their business???

It should only be information that has already been published and so freely available, like any other service provider.

Offline softlad

I'm not saying it's ok to have a 'wall of shame', but it's ok for you guys to give numbers and personal details of 'bad' service providers that may have a detrimental effect on their business???

So what would you recommend we do with 'Bad' providers.......
Keep quiet and let them carry on ripping off their clients, giving all WG's a bad name ?
IMO. They don't deserve to have a business if they aren't bothered about being a good SP.

Offline Jimmyredcab

I'm not saying it's ok to have a 'wall of shame', but it's ok for you guys to give numbers and personal details of 'bad' service providers that may have a detrimental effect on their business???

First of all prostitutes put their details in the public domain, punters don't, regarding your second point if a prostitute has provided a terrible service she deserves to be named and shamed, you have overlooked the fact that we have more positive reports than negative.    :dash:

Offline Sailormack

I'm not saying it's ok to have a 'wall of shame', but it's ok for you guys to give numbers and personal details of 'bad' service providers that may have a detrimental effect on their business???

I don't know why but my )))))))) sisterhood troll ((((((((( antenna is twitchin' again   :diablo:


Offline Jimmyredcab

I don't know why but my )))))))) sisterhood troll ((((((((( antenna is twitchin' again   :diablo:

Yes, I think "Karin" needs to read my signature.   :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Offline AnthG

I don't know why but my )))))))) sisterhood troll ((((((((( antenna is twitchin' again   :diablo:
Why, she has a point. Its a wrong and misguided point but it was still a valid one to raise.

I would say as an answer to it. If a customer buys a product from say Microsoft. He feels its a poor product so phones up to complain.

That customer has a right to post a poor review of Microsoft, the product and also post the companies head office and phone number details.

There is no way on the shape of the earth is Microsoft allowed to publicly post that this customer was awkward and give out publicly his details.

Booking an escort is the above scenario times one thousand as booking escorts is something that is personally damaging to people if it got out into the public.

The whole definition of Escort and service they provide is discretion. Its a discrete relationship you are paying for and the girls time in that discrete relationship.

Offline Matium

I don't know why but my )))))))) sisterhood troll ((((((((( antenna is twitchin' again   :diablo:

After I wrote this on the "Adultwork vs WGs own Websites" thread:

Has anyone noticed that WGs maintain two different price structures - one for Adultwork and one for their own websites and that, invariably, Adultwork is cheaper?

Look, for instance, at this girl, Pandora. On her own website she is:

http://pandora.69d.uk.com/content.php

£150.00 per hour.

On Adultwork, she is:

https://www.adultwork.com/493738

£130.00 per hour!

Same woman, same boobs, same bum - but £20.00 cheaper!

She seems to have sagging boobs though and she looks rough so I wouldn't book her at any price.

It just goes to show how it's it well worth shopping around.

Prices quoted on WGs own website should be taken with a pinch of salt since you'll find you can have the same woman at a cheaper price.

I got an abusive PM from "Karin".

Methinks that Karin and Pandora are one and the same.

Given how rough and saggy she looks, I'm not surprised her phone is covered in dust!

 :diablo:

Offline James999

Anth, you seem to be forgetting that Pro$$ies are not responsible businesses, they are simply girls that want cash, they don't give a fuck about rules / regulations  health and safety insurance or taxes they want the cash and will do whatever they can to get it.

Offline Sailormack

Why, she has a point. Its a wrong and misguided point but it was still a valid one to raise.

I would say as an answer to it. If a customer buys a product from say Microsoft. He feels its a poor product so phones up to complain.

That customer has a right to post a poor review of Microsoft, the product and also post the companies head office and phone number details.

There is no way on the shape of the earth is Microsoft allowed to publicly post that this customer was awkward and give out publicly his details.

Booking an escort is the above scenario times one thousand as booking escorts is something that is personally damaging to people if it got out into the public.

The whole definition of Escort and service they provide is discretion. Its a discrete relationship you are paying for and the girls time in that discrete relationship.

AnthG

Any loyalty I have is to my fellow punters who work hard for the cash and the least they should expect is value and service from any WG.

As I have said before my only interest in women is the 3 holes they have... if they didn't have these then I wouldn't even look at them never mind listen to the noises that they utter.

Offline James999

Given how rough and saggy she looks,

What I find amazing is she seems to have tried to pack her skin out and has made herself very fat, yet she is still saggy,

and as for her age, thats a fucking Joke she's nearer 60 than 40  :scare:

But it's not all bad, at least when she goes on holiday he can tuck her tits in her moneybelt  :sarcastic:

Offline Matium

Given the huge hourly rates that prostitutes charge - hourly rates that men can only dream about - then men have every right to expose WGs with bad working practices, attitudes, behaviour and service.

At least WGs give sex in return, dominatrixes are far, far worse, the maximum physical contact that a man gets is to lick and suck her feet - and he has to beg just to get that.

Because dominatrixes spend their life surrounded by submissive and pitiful men, their attitude, towards men, is one of contempt and derision.

After all, how can any woman respect a man who pays and begs her to hurt him?

AnthG

Any loyalty I have is to my fellow punters who work hard for the cash and the least they should expect is value and service from any WG.

As I have said before my only interest in women is the 3 holes they have... if they didn't have these then I wouldn't even look at them never mind listen to the noises that they utter.

bullseye

 :P


Latest videos on UKEscorting.com (free site!)

Latest images on UKEscorting.com (free site!)