Charlottex – Incall (Cheadle)

[Cheshuk]

Comms – Fine by text.

Cancelled first booking with fair notice, she messaged to reschedule. I arrived on time, said she’d be 2 minutes but was 20. Finally door number sent, knocked on door and she said can you come back in 2 minutes. 15 minutes later got a text saying she was ready. Same excuse as other punters given, changed rooms/maintenance had to fix something.

Looks: I walked in and was taken aback, a bit repulsed no attraction, a real wtf is that thing moment, couldn’t and still can’t get my head around how others can be into her if she looked the same when I met her. I’ll give a 6/10 for face, plain, body not in shape (not fat but clearly out of shape/bit of extra weight, which may have been fine on a slimmer frame) said she had gained weight and needs to get back in the gym/her body back. I couldn’t walk otherwise would have 100%. She’s tall, broad framed and with her height seems a masculine build.

No way I wanted to do anything, said I’m tired and just wated a bj, closed my eyes throughout picturing some attractive girls, was a decent enough bj, had a feel and suck on her tits as they are good fakes, but still clearly fake.

After a bit left it and just chatted for a little, seemed nice personality wise but wasn’t there for just that. I said well I’m going to get going.

I have seen with girls in the past when they gain weight they can go from hot to not instantly, remember a pornstar Kali Roses, was a hottie than went fat and her face lost its beauty too. So wonder if her weight gain might explain the larger than normal discrepancy in punters opinions here besides/as well as the usual tastes differ.

Overall: crap sp imo, one to forget, unshaggable for me in the condition I met her, probable liar/timewaster, deceptive profile.. since pics may have been accurate before and may be again if she got/gets in shape, dress size almost definitely not 8, maybe 12 i’d guess. Nice girl but took money on the back of deceptive profile pics and either lies or just really unlucky with rooms and maintenance.

Services: owo

30 mins £140

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Hidden Image/Members Only

[nightbot]

Sounds disappointing mate, if I had paid £200 and felt that way I'd be a bit pissed for a week hah.

Her body in pic looks like she's large framed but slip with flat tummy and nice arse. Is that not the case right now?

Anyways how would you describe her face?
Most people have said she's quite naturally pretty but I was wondering what exactly was it that you found quite bad about her face.

I think of the girls that we've both seen are Ruby, Lola, and Scouserosie, so you can use that as a comparison. I think they are all pretty, though I personally wasn't into Lola but I can recognise she was pretty, Rosie is a stunner though fa pally, very naturally pretty.

[Blackpool Rock]

I've been waiting for this review, thanks for confirming she's an out of shape size 12 rather than the advertised size 8, quite some difference that and bang average looking to boot 

Now sit back and wait for her fanboys and WK's to get in battle gear, I can almost hear the clippety clopp from here   

[Cheshuk]

Sounds disappointing mate, if I had paid £200 and felt that way I'd be a bit pissed for a week hah.

Her body in pic looks like she's large framed but slip with flat tummy and nice arse. Is that not the case right now?

Anyways how would you describe her face?
Most people have said she's quite naturally pretty but I was wondering what exactly was it that you found quite bad about her face.

I think of the girls that we've both seen are Ruby, Lola, and Scouserosie, so you can use that as a comparison. I think they are all pretty, though I personally wasn't into Lola but I can recognise she was pretty, Rosie is a stunner though fa pally, very naturally pretty.

Yup waste of time & money.. can't say about now, but body was nothing like the pics when we met, may be back in shape. Ruby was an 8ish, Lola like 6.5 and Rosie 7.8 for my scaling if that helps, just gave me skanky vibes, personally didn't see any natural prettiness, but opinions vary massively on the sp.

I don't like to sleep with anyone I consider below an 8 facially so I may not be the best for advising on this one.. can't pinpoint why I found her unattractive other than she reminded me of Shrek. Never pleasant throwing away money, but was more pissed this coincided with a big punting weekend I had lined up, and took away from performance there. Hope that's somewhat useful mate

[Cheshuk]

I've been waiting for this review, thanks for confirming she's an out of shape size 12 rather than the advertised size 8, quite some difference that and bang average looking to boot 

Now sit back and wait for her fanboys and WK's to get in battle gear, I can almost hear the clippety clopp from here   

yeah but bare in mind she was out of shape, by her own admission so I didn't see the body in the pics, and face can change with weight, so not 100 we all saw the same.

The wk are good here, as its giving me a list members to ignore their reviews as wer'e clearly into different girls. Only one I am confused by is Snation who has punted 2 sp's I'd consider proper stunners, yet finds this one 'very naturally beautiful'.

Snation I am curious, if you read this, let me know if you think she's the same league/not close to that of Natalie & Averi who we've both also punted.

[Oldyorkshirepunter]

I’m not one to jump on a thread to defend an SP but I must say I saw her very recently (within the last couple weeks don’t want to give too much away) and she did look different to when I first saw her but in a good way. She has been seeing a PT to the tune of 4 times a week according to her and the results are becoming visible so she might’ve been going through a “fluffy” phase post Christmas    Looked in a mirror and decided to shift it all. She’s also much browner than when I saw her so perhaps has seen the site and started to invest more in her looks 

Who knows but my guess is she got lazy, put on some size, saw the site & a mirror  and thought fxck I’m gonna lose business and had a gym epiphany. Either way my 50 cents is that she’s looking a lot sleeker and toned since my first time (have reviewed)

[nightbot]

Yup waste of time & money.. can't say about now, but body was nothing like the pics when we met, may be back in shape. Ruby was an 8ish, Lola like 6.5 and Rosie 7.8 for my scaling if that helps, just gave me skanky vibes, personally didn't see any natural prettiness, but opinions vary massively on the sp.

I don't like to sleep with anyone I consider below an 8 facially so I may not be the best for advising on this one.. can't pinpoint why I found her unattractive other than she reminded me of Shrek. Never pleasant throwing away money, but was more pissed this coincided with a big punting weekend I had lined up, and took away from performance there. Hope that's somewhat useful mate

Back when she was with an agency she had a profile with them and these two pics were there along with the other pics you see in her AW profile. Her face is blurred but you can make a little bit out of it, but perhaps this is not her and someone else?

Btw in that previous review where you mentioned you had seen her and that it was going to be a negative you said that her body is in good shape but she has a big frame, but in your review you say that she's clearly out of shape. Curious about the change in opinion there.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[manc1987]

Just wondering why this is a negative and miss_charmaine was a neutral? I don’t mean this in an argumentative way just intrigued so I can learn for my own rating as you’re clearly a seasoned punter.

As you rated both a 6, both out of shape, not like the pictures and wish you’d walked. Found both not attractive etc. So just curious why one is neutral vs negative.

[Oldyorkshirepunter]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Yup that’s definitely her albeit she’s blonde now and she is around that shape now vs when I first saw her.

[Cheshuk]

Just wondering why this is a negative and miss_charmaine was a neutral? I don’t mean this in an argumentative way just intrigued so I can learn for my own rating as you’re clearly a seasoned punter.

As you rated both a 6, both out of shape, not like the pictures and wish you’d walked. Found both not attractive etc. So just curious why one is neutral vs negative.

You rate how you feel fit, for me i've usually given neutrals when I'm disappointed by pictures in relation to reality, however making me wait, then sending me the room number saying she's ready, then saying at the door can you come back pushed this to a red.

[Cheshuk]

Back when she was with an agency she had a profile with them and these two pics were there along with the other pics you see in her AW profile. Her face is blurred but you can make a little bit out of it, but perhaps this is not her and someone else?

Btw in that previous review where you mentioned you had seen her and that it was going to be a negative you said that her body is in good shape but she has a big frame, but in your review you say that she's clearly out of shape. Curious about the change in opinion there.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

where had I said she's in good shape, quote me? those pics look fit had I got that.. may of been  better, but were not her body when I met her. If someone has seen her in Feb they can confirm if she is back to that

[Oldyorkshirepunter]

I would say back to the same/near identical but with blonde hair/darker skin

[Cheshuk]

I’m not one to jump on a thread to defend an SP but I must say I saw her very recently (within the last couple weeks don’t want to give too much away) and she did look different to when I first saw her but in a good way. She has been seeing a PT to the tune of 4 times a week according to her and the results are becoming visible so she might’ve been going through a “fluffy” phase post Christmas    Looked in a mirror and decided to shift it all. She’s also much browner than when I saw her so perhaps has seen the site and started to invest more in her looks 

Who knows but my guess is she got lazy, put on some size, saw the site & a mirror  and thought fxck I’m gonna lose business and had a gym epiphany. Either way my 50 cents is that she’s looking a lot sleeker and toned since my first time (have reviewed)

I saw her very early Jan 2024 and she said herself she's put weight on, I need to get back to my pre-Christmas body. We had a conversation about this, saying she's going to get back in the gym and get a pt, using her gym toned pics when she's out of shape is still catfishing, and possible I just booked her at a bad time.

If she's back in shape then so be it, my description may no longer be accurate, especially if the weight gain affected her face. My reviews my experience and got no issue acknowledging I may of caught her at a bad time. I'd way prefer that to be the case, than think I can't go off opinions on taste from others on this board

[Oldyorkshirepunter]

Yeah defo mate. I first saw her myself early 2024 and would say she’s definitely changed appearance wise. But yeah you’ve got to stick to your own opinions when writing reviews that’s what the sites for. I think photos wise it’s probably out of laziness than catfishing given it’s a new profile as I’ve noticed a lot of SPs don’t change their main photos often when they’re starting out until they take some new good ones. But can’t and won’t speak on her behalf.

But yeah like I said definitely have to write reviews based on your own opinions and experiences at the time of your booking it’s what helps form a rounded picture of an SP

[Cheshuk]

Yeah defo mate. I first saw her myself early 2024 and would say she’s definitely changed appearance wise. But yeah you’ve got to stick to your own opinions when writing reviews that’s what the sites for. I think photos wise it’s probably out of laziness than catfishing given it’s a new profile as I’ve noticed a lot of SPs don’t change their main photos often when they’re starting out until they take some new good ones. But can’t and won’t speak on her behalf.

But yeah like I said definitely have to write reviews based on your own opinions and experiences at the time of your booking it’s what helps form a rounded picture of an SP

to my regular disappointment with aw sp's they often don't update when they stop being gym fit, instead would rather catfish, I've started confirming they're gym toned when booking recently. 100% the review stands, but I do acknowledge this review is of limited use on her body and possibly even face (given what I saw with Kali Roses). If she's been in and out of shape the discrepancy on her appearance does make more sense

[SNation]

yeah but bare in mind she was out of shape, by her own admission so I didn't see the body in the pics, and face can change with weight, so not 100 we all saw the same.

The wk are good here, as its giving me a list members to ignore their reviews as wer'e clearly into different girls. Only one I am confused by is Snation who has punted 2 sp's I'd consider proper stunners, yet finds this one 'very naturally beautiful'.

Snation I am curious, if you read this, let me know if you think she's the same league/not close to that of Natalie & Averi who we've both also punted.

I liked all of their bookings but wouldn’t call Natalie beautiful. She was attractive in a sexy way but facially kind of average, with quite a wide squashed nose. She used to have private gallery face pics that weren’t edited and you could see her natural face on those. To me there’s no comparison to this girls features.

Averi I thought was pretty but can’t remember her well enough to compare anymore tbh. I never even thought of seeing her after the first time, so I can’t have been that blown away.

Charlotte is the one I’ve booked more than once of the 3 and going by that I’d say she’s easily the most beautiful. She also works much further from me than the other two, so I was bothering to travel to see her after the first booking.

[Cheshuk]

I liked all of their bookings but wouldn’t call Natalie beautiful. She was attractive in a sexy way but facially kind of average, with quite a wide squashed nose. She used to have private gallery face pics that weren’t edited and you could see her natural face on those. To me there’s no comparison to this girls features.

Averi I thought was pretty but can’t remember her well enough to compare anymore tbh. I never even thought of seeing her after the first time, so I can’t have been that blown away.

Charlotte is the one I’ve booked more than once of the 3 and going by that I’d say she’s easily the most beautiful. She also works much further from me than the other two, so I was bothering to travel to see her after the first booking.

that makes sense, I thought you were into Charlotte Averi and Natalie. If you find Charlotte the best and both Natalie & Averi nothing special, both of which were stunners for my type, we do probs have different types

[lewisjones23]

Never got round to seeing her again, too many reviews messing punters round

Probably won't bother again now.

Cheer for the review 👍🏻

[shaft10]

Good honest review, I'd removed her from my HL following previous reviews of her pissing punters about, this just confirms she'll remain off it

[marc_hotsteppa]

I couldn’t walk otherwise would have 100%.

If you know you don't fancy an SP but still go ahead then it's going to be a red for sure - Can I ask why you couldn't walk?

[Cheshuk]

If you know you don't fancy an SP but still go ahead then it's going to be a red for sure - Can I ask why you couldn't walk?

If an sp asked for a booking request, essentially can't walk out or the cost can be much more than her rate.

Good honest review, I'd removed her from my HL following previous reviews of her pissing punters about, this just confirms she'll remain off it

 

[Cheshuk]

Never got round to seeing her again, too many reviews messing punters round

Probably won't bother again now.

Cheer for the review 👍🏻

 

[nightbot]

where had I said she's in good shape, quote me? those pics look fit had I got that.. may of been  better, but were not her body when I met her. If someone has seen her in Feb they can confirm if she is back to that

I was actually more curious about the face, but I see oldyorkshirepunter has already confirmed that's her. Eventhough the face is blurred, I feel like you can make out a fair bit and if she looked like that facially, I'd be pretty alright with it tbh. For reference I personally didn't find either Ruby or Lola attractive facially, eventhough I do recognise that objectively they are attractive and others may find them pretty.

To me when I think facially stunning I think someone like Jesica/TeenGabby or Lilith Noir, whereas Rosie would be one step below them.

As for the quote regarding her being in good shape, here you go

sorry mate.. its not laziness I can't do a detailed review yet, I bold the bits from her last review I agree with.

Facially very average, not ugly but I just didnt find her attractive one bit. Too be fair her body is in good shape but she isnt petite, shes a big girl..not in a fat way but big boned if you know what i mean. Nice tits to be fair and pleasant and friendly but just not my type AT ALL and to be honest i cringed abit and almost walked but for a B&G decided to go ahead.

She seems to be an acquired taste (def not mine) far from mainstream attractive imo, certainly can't say she's not for anyone/who will like her.. but I'd go ready to walk.. especially if you're into generic hot girls

Hope that helps, gonna leave the discussion as don't want to accidentally say too much detail. Will review as soon as I can

Anyways, it's all good man. This one definitely seems to have varying opinions. And it sucks you had a poor time.

[Cheshuk]

I was actually more curious about the face, but I see oldyorkshirepunter has already confirmed that's her. Eventhough the face is blurred, I feel like you can make out a fair bit and if she looked like that facially, I'd be pretty alright with it tbh. For reference I personally didn't find either Ruby or Lola attractive facially, eventhough I do recognise that objectively they are attractive and others may find them quite pretty. To me someone when I think facially pretty I think someone like Jesica/TeenGabby 

As for the quote regarding her being in good shape, here you go

ffs Nightbot learn to read & comprehend, that post you quoted clearly states 'I bold the bits from her last review I agree with'. Anything about her being in good shape was 'NOT' highlighted. No beef, but you've gotta check your facts are straight before questioning

As I said body wasn't like the old pics you attached and there though blurred facially seems worlds apart from what I encountered (hair and makeup not done/scruffy looking and face possibly due to weight gain of no resemblance).

Yeah Gabby I found similar level to Rosie, If you're interested in this chick, go see her. Reviews are not here to say go or don't go, I do them to pull my weight.. and they help/provide perspective, couldn't care less if someone sees her or not

[marc_hotsteppa]

If an sp asked for a booking request, essentially can't walk out or the cost can be much more than her rate.

 

Ah, of course - didn't think about that aspect of it.

Thanks for the review btw, she was on my HL but now removed. 

[Shabaz]

I booked a WG at Lymm hotel one day and saw pretty much all the other girls working that day checking in or in the corridor.  By searching who was available i could put all the faces to a profile.  I saw Charlotte too as she parked next to me and i guessed it was her so waited for her to get out of her car to take a better look.
Took her off my HL after seeing her.  By no means a munter but for the money i thought i wouldnt be booking her

[manc1987]

If she’d just arrived you have to give her some time to get ready at least  I’ve seen SPs turn up in baggy PJs/clothes before and had her open the door looking completely refreshed and obviously better.

How was her parking? 

[nightbot]

ffs Nightbot learn to read & comprehend, that post you quoted clearly states 'I bold the bits from her last review I agree with'. Anything about her being in good shape was 'NOT' highlighted. No beef, but you've gotta check your facts are straight before questioning

As I said body wasn't like the old pics you attached and there though blurred facially seems worlds apart from what I encountered (hair and makeup not done/scruffy looking and face possibly due to weight gain of no resemblance).

Yeah Gabby I found similar level to Rosie, If you're interested in this chick, go see her. Reviews are not here to say go or don't go, I do them to pull my weight.. and they help/provide perspective, couldn't care less if someone sees her or not

Yes my bad but mate that post of yours is hardly clear despite the mention about the bolded being the things you agree with. You can't tell where the quote ends and where your own writing starts.

Regardless, I don't want to be pedantic and side track this any further. I already said I made a mistake anyway.

[Shabaz]

If she’d just arrived you have to give her some time to get ready at least  I’ve seen SPs turn up in baggy PJs/clothes before and had her open the door looking completely refreshed and obviously better.

How was her parking? 

I would have rear ended her if she wasnt in the bay correctly. Ha

I just meqn i have seen several comments on her and her prettiness and body.  I was expecting something else.  Like has already been discusser prettiness is subjective

[Cheshuk]

Ah, of course - didn't think about that aspect of it.

Thanks for the review btw, she was on my HL but now removed. 

is quite possible I caught her at her worst, but glad it helped nonetheless

Yes my bad but mate that post of yours is hardly clear despite the mention about the bolded being the things you agree with. You can't tell where the quote ends and where your own writing starts.

Regardless, I don't want to be pedantic and side track this any further. I already said I made a mistake anyway.

fair we all make mistakes, its forgotten

[jampratt]

Ive also been waiting for this review with interest Chesuk...as per my review I can only agree with you (apart from the comms which were fine for me) she is a very very average looking bird and deffo of a masculine build.
I thought I was going a little mad after my neutral review when a few fan boys came out. Its hard to believe the such vast differences in opinions on this one.

Just to confuse things more i dont think that is the same girl in the pics posted, even thou her face is blurred Id be almost sure that isnt her (them pics do look much better than her imo). I saw her early/mid Jan.

PS I used to love (literally lol) Kali Roses..I havent seen what she looks like now thou....

[lewisjones23]

Didn't she get flagged for using fake pictures on her original agency profile?

[Oldyorkshirepunter]

The blurred pictures are definitely her. If you look at the wrist and hip you can see the tattoos match those she has (you’ll know which if you’ve seen her) She was Meganx2000/Charlotte2001 in the past just before she deleted and created Isabellamae and they were her original main photos on aw aswell as agency. She is just in better shape in that picture than she was in January and with brunette hair.

Looks are definitely subjective with this girl I don’t think she is mainstream attractive but I personally do think she’s fit. I think she’s always going to get mixed reviews but I would say she looks better now than January. A lot slimmer/toned and tanned. Maybe she should’ve taken January off 

[Oldyorkshirepunter]

Didn't she get flagged for using fake pictures on her original agency profile?

That wasn’t those pictures ^^^. It was 3 pictures of isabellaroach when Isabella used to be blonde. They’re on a thread somewhere

[Blackpool Rock]

Ive also been waiting for this review with interest Chesuk...as per my review I can only agree with you (apart from the comms which were fine for me) she is a very very average looking bird and deffo of a masculine build.
I thought I was going a little mad after my neutral review when a few fan boys came out. Its hard to believe the such vast differences in opinions on this one.

Just to confuse things more i dont think that is the same girl in the pics posted, even thou her face is blurred Id be almost sure that isnt her (them pics do look much better than her imo). I saw her early/mid Jan.

PS I used to love (literally lol) Kali Roses..I havent seen what she looks like now thou....

The same ones as on this thread or are they popping up like whack-a-mole 

[Oldyorkshirepunter]

If aimed at me - haven’t meant to come across as a fan boy. Chesh said he didn’t know if she had gone ahead getting a pt (not those exact words but had said she mentioned getting one and then he said he didn’t know if she looks different since early jan) and I was just mentioning I had seen her recently and she does look different/much better.

Then the pics were posted so thought I’d confirm they’re her and where they’ve been previously. I haven’t been shouting from the rooftops how sexy I find her and how great she is.

But I’ll take a step back before I get branded a WK

[Blackpool Rock]

If aimed at me - haven’t meant to come across as a fan boy. Chesh said he didn’t know if she had gone ahead getting a pt (not those exact words but had said she mentioned getting one and then he said he didn’t know if she looks different since early jan) and I was just mentioning I had seen her recently and she does look different/much better.

Then the pics were posted so thought I’d confirm they’re her and where they’ve been previously. I haven’t been shouting from the rooftops how sexy I find her and how great she is.

But I’ll take a step back before I get branded a WK

Hidden Image/Members Only

[jampratt]

The blurred pictures are definitely her. If you look at the wrist and hip you can see the tattoos match those she has (you’ll know which if you’ve seen her) She was Meganx2000/Charlotte2001 in the past just before she deleted and created Isabellamae and they were her original main photos on aw aswell as agency. She is just in better shape in that picture than she was in January and with brunette hair.

Looks are definitely subjective with this girl I don’t think she is mainstream attractive but I personally do think she’s fit. I think she’s always going to get mixed reviews but I would say she looks better now than January. A lot slimmer/toned and tanned. Maybe she should’ve taken January off 

I cant remember seeing any tatts on her....although I did only hav a B&G (thankfully)...and I cudnt get out of the door quick enough once I was done so I could of easily missed them (i missed them in the photos too tbh. Had to zoom in a fair few times!)

[Cheshuk]

Ive also been waiting for this review with interest Chesuk...as per my review I can only agree with you (apart from the comms which were fine for me) she is a very very average looking bird and deffo of a masculine build.
I thought I was going a little mad after my neutral review when a few fan boys came out. Its hard to believe the such vast differences in opinions on this one.

Just to confuse things more i dont think that is the same girl in the pics posted, even thou her face is blurred Id be almost sure that isnt her (them pics do look much better than her imo). I saw her early/mid Jan.

PS I used to love (literally lol) Kali Roses..I havent seen what she looks like now thou....

not going mad, just think you've got more mainstream taste. I mean the girl in the review below (with face pics) is Natalie discussed above as an example of the differences in types here. Snation thinks less of her than Charlotte, and he's entitle to that, to me Natalie is a stunner an 8 or slightly more, and Charlotte leagues below.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=359790.msg3704027#msg3704027

Seems unusual such an average looking girl has such a fan club, personally def don't get the hype.. but whatever we certainly won't be seeing her again and infos on the forum for people to make up their own minds.

Also Kali before and after, granted Charlotte wasn't as big, but why I do accept weight gain can affect facial beauty

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[jampratt]

Mmmm yes going off them pics Natalie looks very very much my type!

God Kali Roses really was fit wasnt she, I remember a scene on swallowed.com with her in a purple bikini that was as close to perfection (imo) as ive ever seen....but what a huge difference that is 

I also get what you mean about weight gain effecting looks...i wonder did you ever see Sabrina in Euro Cosmopolitan...she was a stunner (parlour type service thou)..I saw her 3 times but then the 4th time i went she had changed quite dramatically (bit of weight gain, change of hair colour, tattoes etc) I made my excuses and bailed (easy to do in a parlour)...she went from being an 8+ to a 6 in a matter of wks!

[Cheshuk]

Mmmm yes going off them pics Natalie looks very very much my type!

God Kali Roses really was fit wasnt she, I remember a scene on swallowed.com with her in a purple bikini that was as close to perfection (imo) as ive ever seen....but what a huge difference that is 

I also get what you mean about weight gain effecting looks...i wonder did you ever see Sabrina in Euro Cosmopolitan...she was a stunner (parlour type service thou)..I saw her 3 times but then the 4th time i went she had changed quite dramatically (bit of weight gain, change of hair colour, tattoes etc) I made my excuses and bailed (easy to do in a parlour)...she went from being an 8+ to a 6 in a matter of wks!

parlours aren't my scene anymore, but I get you..seen it with few girls so can accept that's possibly a factor here. fwiw I do think there is a general consensus on facial beauty, what I call mainstream hot (Natalie & Kali for example) at the end of the day its down to facial symmetry and cheek bone height/positioning which is objective.

It's a discussion in and of itself, and theres people who disagree, saying it's entirely subjective. I started a thread on the main board once about it.

just gotta find those with similar tastes here and you're good.. Kali was an example as she's well known, but yeh pretty shocking/tragic, but there'll be those that prefer her that way 

[Oldyorkshirepunter]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=359790.msg3704027#msg3704027[/b]

She’s a good looking girl. Have you seen her? Couldn’t find a review from you but maybe it hasn’t been linked. Her reviews make for an interesting read don’t they 

[Cheshuk]

She’s a good looking girl. Have you seen her? Couldn’t find a review from you but maybe it hasn’t been linked. Her reviews make for an interesting read don’t they 

Never reviewed her. Some girls I have forgotten to review but think I saw her before I joined ukp.. certainly an interesting girl she's unreliable, kicks off regularly & completely out the blue but gives sensational head & is faf

[silverspoon]

Never reviewed her. Some girls I have forgotten to review but think I saw her before I joined ukp.. certainly an interesting girl she's unreliable, kicks off regularly & completely out the blue but gives sensational head & is faf

The picture in your comments is in the Liverpool section AW as Maisy External Link/Members Only

[silverspoon]

The picture in your comments is in the Liverpool section AW as Maisy External Link/Members Only

Now im confused after looking on various threads,why is the girl in lots of replies ?

[Cheshuk]

The picture in your comments is in the Liverpool section AW as Maisy External Link/Members Only

no clue what you're talking about tbh, Maisy was formerly Milly Fox, a well known Chinese girl in this region.. and nothing to do with this thread

[silverspoon]

when i open the thread this is what appears on my screen,dont know what the fuck is going on

Hidden Image/Members Only

[EUGENE TACKLEBERRY]

not going mad, just think you've got more mainstream taste. I mean the girl in the review below (with face pics) is Natalie discussed above as an example of the differences in types here. Snation thinks less of her than Charlotte, and he's entitle to that, to me Natalie is a stunner an 8 or slightly more, and Charlotte leagues below.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=359790.msg3704027#msg3704027

Seems unusual such an average looking girl has such a fan club, personally def don't get the hype.. but whatever we certainly won't be seeing her again and infos on the forum for people to make up their own minds.

Also Kali before and after, granted Charlotte wasn't as big, but why I do accept weight gain can affect facial beauty

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Cheers Cheshuk

Everything is subjective for example I prefer how the this pornstar kali looks on the right.

Like you, I too like a looker or a glamour puss so I'll heed your opinion somewhat and give her a miss, coupled to the high end fee id sooner play safe with a reg or look and research elsewhere 

I was very close to arranging a booking with Charlotte about 2 weeks ago, the neg reviews before this one pointed towards disorganization, sadly that leads to lack of common decency to the unlucky punters who get ignored when doubled booked,  but that had seemed to have stopped, or at least I hope it has/had.

In the end I just went to a reg, having read this im pleased with my choice, 200 notes is a lot to come out thinking "i wish id not bothered!"  this review will keep her down my pecking order if not even off it completely.

Thankyou

[Cheshuk]

when i open the thread this is what appears on my screen,dont know what the fuck is going on

Hidden Image/Members Only

wtf that's weird, i'm not techy but I have learnt first thing I try when stuff is acting up on a site is to close and 'clear cache' maybe google how for your device.. see if that helps.. otherwise not really sure but there is a 'post forum issues thread' where they may be able to advise

[Cheshuk]

Cheers Cheshuk

Everything is subjective for example I prefer how the this pornstar kali looks on the right.

honestly that's wild.. truthfully I'm not totally convinced either way subjective or more objective with anamolies, don't want to derail though.

Anyway glad the review was helpful