Author Topic: Alice Thai - Miss69 - underwhelming neutral - Gloucester Road  (Read 2897 times)


8 review(s) for alicethai (3 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Cupid Stuntz]
9 review(s) for Hazel Thai lady (4 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline flamingice

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Basics
When: January 2024
Location: Gloucester Road
Duration: 1 Hour
Type: Incall
Price: £150
Services: Sex 2 rounds, LIMITED DFK and LFK, OWO, CIM, 69 (requested and NOT provided), A level, shared shower to start

Comms
Saw a couple of weeks ago.  Second time booking and going to her apartment.  First time was end of last year where there seemed to be some confusion when I arrived when I was confirming two rounds in the booking, and she seemed to only have one condom (and I walked).

This time I contacted the AW number, rather than the Miss69 number.  Quick response, available when requested, services confirmed upfront.

Apartment
Equidistant between Gloucester Road and Earl’s Court tube.  Flat fit for purpose up several flights of stairs.  Shares with another girl who seemed to be there and busy.

The Girl
Cute. Facially similar to the pics but I would suggest a bit tubbier than pictures portray.

Service
Seemed to remember me from last time when I walked.  She had a bottle of champagne open which she’d been drinking with her flatmate and poured me a glass without asking.  Ok - thanks.  I only had a sip or so but ok.  I am not one to accept drinks from strangers.

Time for shower.  Offered me mouthwash, and think it was an assisted shower (although couple of weeks ago and fading memory if she joined me.  Certainly didn’t for the clean up afterwards).  Once back in room she left again to go to the toilet, which I found a bit weird.  Now on reflection perhaps she was on period and stuffing something up there.  Who knows.

Eventually came back in and started with some DFK which very quickly went to LFK and eventually to almost no kiss at all, despite my attempts to re-engage.

Was pretty vanilla OWO.  Lack of eye contact.  I asked to move to 69, which was denied on the basis she’d been to the toilet.  Not great.

Eventually moved to her on top, then me on top, tried to do anal but some reason I wasn’t getting hard enough (probably down to lack to DFK), so eventually moved back to OWO for CIM finish.  Took me ages but eventually got there.

Started round two after she’d been to the bathroom.  Could not really master my strength round two and eventually got soft even when penetrating her (very unusual for me but guess it happens to the best of us).  Eventually I was exhausted and called it a day.  Showered alone and was out.

Underwhelming experience.  She was very sweet but just was not the sexual fire I usually hope in such encounters.

To recap my negatives:

Delay tactics.  Left in the room several times.  Firstly for her to stash money, next to get towel, after shower and before action for her to go to toilet, again after the first round, and at the end when she had her shower.  I also felt the champagne gambit may have been another prop she was hoping would delay and eat up time.

Limited DFK and LFK.  Small amount of DFK right at the start which soon morphed to only LFK, and then generally being a bit evasive.  She even made a comment at one point “you like to kiss?”  Well yes, I do.  This is probably what killed it and led to my non performance.

No 69 on offer.  Used the excuse she had been to the toilet.  I mean I don’t understand why you’d have a shower and then go to the toilet right before we start.

Bit tubbier than the pics.

Conclusion
Will I see her again?  No.  It’s not a negative because she had a good attitude and provided mostly everything, but she certainly wasn’t a screaming positive and lack of DFK really killed it.  Left feeling pretty indifferent, if not that I’d just washed £150 down the drain.

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only
« Last Edit: January 24, 2024, 02:15:25 am by flamingice »

Offline magnetico

5th neutral in a row!

Refusing the 69 because she's used the toilets is just dumb.

She initially refused a CIM with me as we had anal sex before, saying that she will get poo in her mouth. How stupid is that?
« Last Edit: January 24, 2024, 08:09:22 pm by magnetico »

Offline flamingice

5th neutral in a row!

Refusing the 69 because she's used the toilets is just dumb.

She initially refused a CIM with me as we had anal sex before, saying that she will get poo in her mouth. How stupid is that?

More dumb to shower and then go back to the toilet before starting.  No excuse on that really - she knew when I was going to arrive, there’s plenty notice, so be ready.

I read your review and saw the string of neutrals after my visit. Probably should have checked here first.  At least it’s pretty clear she’s a consistent non-performer.  Also seems no one managed to get a proper DFK experience with her.

Offline SoapyTW

Sorry OP. The service list with this one is a bit weird. I got decent cim and kissing but no anal. Others the opposite. I agree her looks were disappointing vs the photos. Quite an impressive streak now. She’s the ultimate slightly disappointing WG

Offline magnetico