Author Topic: Jasmine Thai miss69 @ Paddington  (Read 5882 times)


28 review(s) for Sexy Jasmine Thai (23 positive, 3 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Cupid Stuntz]
32 review(s) for Jasmine Sweet Thai (26 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by scutty brown]

Offline magnetico

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Light on details as I waited too long to write my review.


***** Comms *****
booked via SMS one or two days before, got the address without the flat number, had to send an SMS at the time of the booking to get the flat number.

***** Location/Venue *****
10 minute walk from Lancaster Gate/Paddington station.
Discreet residential street, mostly serviced/business apartments in the area.
Period building.

***** The WG *****
- 25-32yo Thai
- very cute face 9/10 with good make-up
- small natural boobs
- good body, while not gym toned
- smooth skin
- speaks some basic english

***** Price *****
£150 for 1h

***** Services *****
OWO, some DFK, protected sex, CIM
not requested : anal

***** The Punt *****
- Paid fee
- 5 min shower - together at her request (not a fan), and having to brush my teeth ?
- Sex
- 10 min massage
- 5 min shower - together

***** Positive *****
Very good looking girl, with a great natural body
Keen to please, but kind of "business like", no flirting etc.
Very spacious and nice room

***** Neutral *****
Compulsory shower together, not what I was looking for
CIM was good but she didn't want me to sit on her chest, she can only do it me standing and her on her knees
Very weak suction during OWO
« Last Edit: January 08, 2024, 10:36:47 pm by magnetico »

Offline oinki

thanks for the review magnetico. probably had one of my worse ever owo with her.

Not to hijack this thread but if someone can index mine as well would be great to add as a balance to the reviews https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=383949.0

Offline tp69

Cracking looking girl in the photos. On the list if I'm anywhere near the area, though will temper expectations.  :drinks:

Offline lee1

thanks for the review magnetico. probably had one of my worse ever owo with her.

Not to hijack this thread but if someone can index mine as well would be great to add as a balance to the reviews https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=383949.0

I added the link below to your review, the system should now index it.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,306
  • Likes: 181
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
I added the link below to your review, the system should now index it.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

FYI That's not how it works.
Cross-linking as you have done is helpful in the absence of management or helpers indexing it, but the only way for a review to show up in the tally for a given AWID (not name as these can change and the links then don't work) is by the latter action.
If you spot something missed you could pop a PM with the thread link to a Mod/Helper you see active or you could "report to moderator" the post that has the AWID adding a jovial request to index the update.  :hi:

Offline londonchap

Keen to please, but kind of "business like", no flirting etc.
This is the vibe I'm getting of the girls from this agency, based on my experience and reading reviews.

Happy to go through the motions, but really giving at best a 5-6/10 performance.

If you just want to rattle a pretty Asian chick, it's probably grand. If you want something a bit more, you're probably better booking elsewhere.

Offline Surrey1974

I have used Olina half dozen times, starasian & miss69 once each last year. Olina agency are the best as sticking with them from now on as my experience with the other two agencies are basically the same as others have had.

Offline magnetico


This is the vibe I'm getting of the girls from this agency, based on my experience and reading reviews.

Happy to go through the motions, but really giving at best a 5-6/10 performance.

If you just want to rattle a pretty Asian chick, it's probably grand. If you want something a bit more, you're probably better booking elsewhere.

I have used Olina half dozen times, starasian & miss69 once each last year. Olina agency are the best as sticking with them from now on as my experience with the other two agencies are basically the same as others have had.

April @ Miss69 is as good looking as Jasmine in my opinion, but with a better service.

Asian agencies have a mix of girls with different personalities, I don't think one agency is really better than an other, but Olina has a few "top" girls like Maya, and last year Olive, and a few years ago Zelda.






Offline Surrey1974

Not forgetting Anna from Olina as well

Offline I Love Brazilians

I've seen April once and Jasmine 4 times. April was superb but lack of kissing was a negative. Jasmine by far the best of the 4 I've seen from Miss69

Offline johnd80

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 31
  • Likes: 2
  •  
  • Reviews: 3
We don't see too many new thai girls in AW.Has the visa for these ladies been reduced?
Banned reason: Boundary pusher and an embarrassment to the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline tp69

We don't see too many new thai girls in AW.Has the visa for these ladies been reduced?

Plenty new ones in the SE all the time.

Offline magnetico

I've seen April once and Jasmine 4 times. April was superb but lack of kissing was a negative. Jasmine by far the best of the 4 I've seen from Miss69
Jasmine and April are both superb hotties, and Eva got the best boobs of the agency.

We don't see too many new thai girls in AW.Has the visa for these ladies been reduced?
6 months

Offline londonchap

April @ Miss69 is as good looking as Jasmine in my opinion, but with a better service.
I saw April recently, and thought she offered a very average service.

I'm willing to believe she may have had an 'off' day or that we may not have 'clicked'. But when the "W" in WG stands for "working", I expect more than a passive starfish.

Offline magnetico

I saw April recently, and thought she offered a very average service.

I'm willing to believe she may have had an 'off' day or that we may not have 'clicked'. But when the "W" in WG stands for "working", I expect more than a passive starfish.

I've just read your review of April, thanks for sharing this, not a good punt!