Author Topic: Pigeon Mode - Leicester Square - Excellent oral skills  (Read 4085 times)


51 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 5661814) (45 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by WARSZAWA16]

Offline musicandlove

 https://www.adultwork.com/5661814 or https://www.adultwork.com/Pigeon+Mode+

£250 for 1 hour

Comms: Not as hard as I expected from previous reviews. All it took was a few texts and I was in her a couple of hours later

Venue: Nice modern flat. Very clean and tidy

The girl: She's pretty, young and has a nice pair of tits. She's not a model but definitely not a pass either. If 6 is the average girl I'd give her a 7. Huge plus that hygiene was top notch and she's very pleasant to talk to. Overall, 2 minutes after the door open I knew I was going to have a good time

The action:

I was welcomed in, handed the money and asked to get a shower after a quick chat.
I specifically asked her what her limits are and that I'd like to have a good face fucking session with her. She seemed more than happy to accommodate.
I come out of the shower with just a towel on that she quickly pulls off of me and goes straight for my dick. I stop her as I want to first explore what Is about to be mine. DFK full on as I take off her bra. I turn her around and bend her over. I then pull of her panties and give her a nice spank. No complains so far.
A bit more of DFK, her hands playing with my dick and balls, and eventually I sit on the bed and ask her to get on her knees. I have her sucking there for about 5 minutes,  occasionally grabbing he hair and controlling her head to suck me a bit deeper or come up for a kiss. After a while I grab her hair gently and push her back so I can stand. I put he head sideways on the bed I begin fucking her face. She seems to be taking it fine so I picker up, put her against the wall and fuck her face hard. This must have lasted 10-15 minutes or so and she never complained once. I was thinking of tossing her on the bed to fuck her, but I was turned on and close to finish so I thought I'll sample that pussy on the second round. I turn her around so we're both facing the wall and bend her head back to get a straight line into her throat. I then proceed to insert my dick in balls deep and a few thrusts later I was emptying my balls inside her. The feeling of her throat jerking my cock was just perfect.

We were both cleaning ourselves in the shower when I asked her if that was OK and she told me she loves it.
Cuddles on the bed for some time, and then round two. She is playing with my dick while cudling and she mentioned that I seem ready again. I say I am and she asks if I want one of the same, but I tell her to just start with a blowjob while I lay there. She happily obliges, and after a while I'm hard again. She really knows how to suck. I then ask her to climb on top which she does. She starts going full on but does that front to back motion that I don't find particularly satisfying so I ask her to get on her feet. She immediately knows what to do, so she changes the position and I'm once again in heaven. I feel the sap rising so I bring her closer for some DFK, before I turn around and get on top of her for some missionary with her legs on my shoulders. She is generally very energetic,  doesn't hold back on DFK and can take a hard pounding for as long as I wanted. Final position doggy, where I eventually pulled her arms behind her back to stop her from pushing back. I'm not sure if I'm doing something wrong or not, but when a girl pushes back on doggy it throws me off my rhythm.  Maybe it's just me, so feel free to let me know of any tips about it. Feeling the sap rising, I put her on her back with her head hanging from the bed and I proceed to get down her throat again. I stay in this position for a couple of minutes before I once again cum down her throat. I think the second time I didn't manage to get everything to go down so she went to the shower to dispose what was left in her mouth.
I was offered a quick shower and I left. I was out the door pretty much exactly on the 60 minute mark.
All in all huge positive and would highly recommend.


51 review(s) found for the service provider linked to in above post (45 positive, 4 neutral, 2 negative)

Online patelprat

When you say you texted her to set up, I guess that means you already had her number, so this is not your first time with her.

I thought she doesn't usually publish a number.



Offline musicandlove

When you say you texted her to set up, I guess that means you already had her number, so this is not your first time with her.

I thought she doesn't usually publish a number.

Apologies I should have mentioned that I tried to arrange a meeting a few weeks back but had to cancel on the day

Offline fredhiggins


Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
When you say you texted her to set up, I guess that means you already had her number, so this is not your first time with her.

I thought she doesn't usually publish a number.

Lol. Think he accidentally gave away that he's a regular doing a mitigation job?

This site can get hilarious. I just checked the index and she was reviewed 4 times in the second half of 2023. 3 times in the first half of 2023. After my neg two positives quickly pop up. Both pretty much mitigating negatives points in my review, and negative comments made by others elsewhere on the site, in a box tick fashion
« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 12:56:15 am by jkandjol »
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Online patelprat

Lol. Think he accidentally gave away that he's a regular doing a mitigation job?

This site can get hilarious. I just checked the index and she was reviewed 4 times in the second half of 2023. 3 times in the first half of 2023. After my neg two positives quickly pop up. Both pretty much mitigating negatives points in my review, and negative comments made by others elsewhere on the site, in a box tick fashion

And now she apparently allows heavy face fucking with throatpie/swallow!

Offline delta69

And now she apparently allows heavy face fucking with throatpie/swallow!
She probably only allows it with regulars or if she finds you cute

Online patelprat

She probably only allows it with regulars or if she finds you cute

Plausible I guess! Could be the former in this case? Her profile does state she can do PSE with some long term regular clients.
So either that, or the OP got very lucky or is super attractive for her.

« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 01:12:52 am by patelprat »

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline musicandlove

Just to clarify a few things.
I only met her once. I do my reviews a few months after the event to protect my anonymity, so naturally I sometimes forget to do a review and get reminded when I see someone else's review about a girl I met.
Oh, and by the way you're right. I'm young and quite in shape so some find me attractive, lol. Not sure if that's the case with Gia, but she did let me facefuck her and cum down her throat

Online patelprat

Ok, well hats off to you. Sounds like a result. It means she is up for PSE at her discretion with new clients too.

So it seems you weren't slightly disappointed with her looks as a few seem to report.
« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 09:08:25 am by patelprat »

Offline musicandlove

So it seems you weren't slightly disappointed with her looks as a few seem to report.

I wasn't, I'd say she's slightly above average. The photos are a pretty good representation of her body, but they are flattering as usual which is something I expected. Again, she's not a model but she's definitely not ugly in my opinion.

I said she's a 7, so here's my ratings for a few other girls just for reference:

10/10: Kate Upton  :D
9/10: Natalya_ External Link/Members Only
8.5/: Stunning Ellee External Link/Members Only
8/10: EnglishSlutMillie External Link/Members Only
7.5/10: Petite Vicky External Link/Members Only
6/10: Vicky_28 External Link/Members Only

All the above are providers with good service by the way, so they are all recommended. Also, 6 is the average girl you see on the street below 40 y/o, so a 7 is not a spinner but she's not ugly either.
I hope this makes things clear
« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 09:54:49 am by musicandlove »

Online patelprat

I wasn't, I'd say she's slightly above average. The photos are a pretty good representation of her body, but they are flattering as usual which is something I expected. Again, she's not a model but she's definitely not ugly in my opinion.

I said she's a 7, so  :Dhere's my ratings for a few other girls just for reference:

10/10: Kate Upton  :D
9/10: Natalya_ External Link/Members Only
8.5/: Stunning Ellee External Link/Members Only
8/10: EnglishSlutMillie External Link/Members Only
7.5/10: Petite Vicky External Link/Members Only
6/10: Vicky_28 External Link/Members Only

All the above are providers with good service by the way, so they are all recommended. Also, 6 is the average girl you see on the street below 40 y/o, so a 7 is not a spinner but she's not ugly either.
I hope this makes things clear

Nice. I've seen a few of those girls (but sadly not including the first one  :D )

Didn't see your petite viki review though. Will you post? Definitely YMMV, as I'd personally put her above Natalya facially, although Natalya is clearly pretty and nice too.


« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 10:04:42 am by patelprat »

Offline musicandlove

Nice. I've seen a few of those girls (but sadly not including the first one  :D )

Didn't see your petite viki review though.

Hahah, I must admit I didn't see the first one either unfortunately. Incoming reviews for Petite Vicky and Ivy Ray, both very positive

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
Damn Kate Upton. Good reference  :D
Ivy Rae, I never got around to having the privilege. I remember buying her content, good moans etc. rare one of looking YOUNGER than age on profile IMO
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Online patelprat

I was considering Ivy Ray, just there is no way I could justify (to myself) paying that much for an escort.

« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 10:27:39 am by patelprat »

Offline musicandlove

Damn Kate Upton. Good reference  :D
Ivy Rae, I never got around to having the privilege. I remember buying her content, good moans etc. rare one of looking YOUNGER than age on profile IMO

She does look younger indeed. Basically from what she explained, a review on ukpunting prompted adultwork to ask her for age verification, not sure how this works. In terms of "adultwork age" she is easily on the early to mid twenties mark, which says a lot about the adultwork verification system. In general, it would be nice if there was a way to get adultwork to make better background checks as it seems they occasionally do...

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
That may well be the reason I never saw her. Every time I checked the price went up more and then gets to the point where you think I could get this pornstar or X "courtesan" escort instead for this change

(Reply to Patel/
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
Interesting intel mr music.

My understanding is recent sign ups to aw have it rough  and it will go and keep tabs with their ID DOB as submitted. But there was a time where various tricks can be played and if you are from that time you can still play those tricks although new sign ups can't

I suppose we shouldn't particularly care if they look good, but it's worrying how many WGs understate their age and significantly (as we both imply, Ivy could get away with much younger, and you point out she did up to a point). It's bad in the sense that we are a paying customer and people should remember, especially for the likes of Ivy or even the WG on this thread OP..neither side is doing anything illegal. So my point is how often do you buy a three, potentially four figure worth product in your life and fall foul of asymmetric information? Makes you think. I guess it's why we call it punting


Patel, I think it was you who disagreed with me on Yaesmin potential real age, right? I of course will claim I rec I'm right and you're wrong. Yaesmin was just my judgement but other punters have given confirmed intel on real age of some popular WGs. Quite worrying really.
Reminds me of something I saw of that Dan Blitzerian guy. He made a boastful comment about yachts filled with teenage hotties. Long story short a hater managed to contact some of the teenage hotties and they claimed to be escorts and strippeds who understate their age by 10 years and laugh behind his back
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Online patelprat

Interesting intel mr music.

My understanding is recent sign ups to aw have it rough  and it will go and keep tabs with their ID DOB as submitted. But there was a time where various tricks can be played and if you are from that time you can still play those tricks although new sign ups can't

I suppose we shouldn't particularly care if they look good, but it's worrying how many WGs understate their age and significantly (as we both imply, Ivy could get away with much younger, and you point out she did up to a point). It's bad in the sense that we are a paying customer and people should remember, especially for the likes of Ivy or even the WG on this thread OP..neither side is doing anything illegal. So my point is how often do you buy a three, potentially four figure worth product in your life and fall foul of asymmetric information? Makes you think. I guess it's why we call it punting


Patel, I think it was you who disagreed with me on Yaesmin potential real age, right? I of course will claim I rec I'm right and you're wrong. Yaesmin was just my judgement but other punters have given confirmed intel on real age of some popular WGs. Quite worrying really.
Reminds me of something I saw of that Dan Blitzerian guy. He made a boastful comment about yachts filled with teenage hotties. Long story short a hater managed to contact some of the teenage hotties and they claimed to be escorts and strippeds who understate their age by 10 years and laugh behind his back

I don't think I wrote I disagreed, but now you raise it I do think yasemin looks younger than you thought, but that's just me. I'm not the best with ages. She giggles a lot like a schoolgirl and is quite playful which also makes her overall demeanour come across as younger.

« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 11:08:04 am by patelprat »

Offline jamiekinkxxx

I don't think I wrote I disagreed, but now you raise it I do think yasemin looks younger than you thought, but that's just me. I'm not the best with ages. She giggles a lot like a schoolgirl and is quite playful which also makes her overall demeanour come across as younger.

giggling would be enough to put me off, loath the baby-ish giggles some girls seem to think makes them, girly, sweet and innocent  :D

Online patelprat

giggling would be enough to put me off, loath the baby-ish giggles some girls seem to think makes them, girly, sweet and innocent  :D

Each to their own. It's one of the things I really like about her  :D
But I can see how it may annoy some, as I put in my review at the time.

« Last Edit: January 05, 2024, 01:01:50 pm by patelprat »

Offline MLawro93

giggling would be enough to put me off, loath the baby-ish giggles some girls seem to think makes them, girly, sweet and innocent  :D

I wouldn't describe it as baby-ish giggles, she just can just occasionally giggle/laugh. I'll admit that baby-ish giggling would put me off straight away, I'd bolt out of there. Just a tad bit too creepy

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
I would say she definitely carries herself in a way by which she comes across younger (not I'm a weird or creepy way IMO) and a lot prettier than she actually is. Some woman just have that X Factor/effect and she is one, IMO
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
Just checked and it was Lawro who disagreed with me on the age shout, but Patel was also on that thread Haa
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac