Author Topic: Vicky_28 - Feltham  (Read 3055 times)


65 review(s) for this service provider (AdultWork - 7045013) (53 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Cupid Stuntz]

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
Profile link: External Link/Members Only

I paid £130 for One Hour.


Comms and Venue -

Via text. Was fine. She delayed a bit. Reports say conveyor belt.

Not the most discreet place. Very long quasi cul-de-sac with a school at some point so plenty of potential eyes especially around pick up time.


Formalities, Looks and the Meet itself -

She's pleasant and conversational.

Slim with quite rock hard fake boobs. Everything apart for the boobs is pretty meh. The glimpses of face on profile suggests could be quite pretty. I didn't find her pretty.

During booking did:
Kissing I seem to recall she didn't smell or feel all too fresh.
Oral without she's pretty submissive and tries a lot of deep but can be a bit toothy and dry.
Sex (protected) she can take a hammering for a slim bird.
Anal on her (protected) same as above. Stretchy asshole but it didn't gape.
She rimmed me but that was somehow unrememberable.

Ratings -

Face: 2 stars
Body: 2 stars
Attitude: 5 star
Service: 3 stars

Overall: 12/20. Sounds about right. I'll chuck her at the top of my 12/20 ratings.

Rankings to date:

POSITIVES:
1) Carol Queen of Anal 18/20
2) LittleLouisexox 18/20
3) Scarlette_Wolfe 17/20
4) Tammy_xoxo 17/20
5) Elizabeth Romanova 17/20
6) BUSTY KLARA DEVINE 17/20
7) Brielle 21 17/20
8) Yours_Khloe 17/20
9) juicy_jasmine 17/20
10) Elite-Jessica 16/20
11) Sensitive_Nympho 16/20
12) HarperLAX 16/20
13) lexi.babe 15/20
14) Little-Brat-Jess 15/20
15) Englishslutjessica 15/20
16) Natalia_UK 15/20
17) Lavish Diana 15/20
18) Angel-Alvarez 15/20
19) LatinaCleoRose 14/20
20) CleoEnglish 14/20
21) Angèle 14/20

NEUTRALS:
22) Beky-Bournemouth 13/20
23) BritishJasmineUK 13/20
24) SianBabeXXX 13/20
25) British Lola May 13/20
26) British Dolll Lucy 13/20
27) Vicky_28 12/20
28) lulymay1 12/20
29) TheArabPixie 12/20
30) KeiraKnoxx 12/20

NEGATIVES:
31) Pigeon Mode 11/20
32) English.Ella 11/20
33) Camilly big ass 10/20
34) english_tiffany_ 7/20
« Last Edit: January 03, 2024, 01:08:06 am by jkandjol »
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
I can see height not listed on profile. She's quite tall. Maybe 5 8 or even taller.
Feet were pedicured but bony and not to my liking so didn't indulge. I'm sure she would have been up for all sorts.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2024, 01:04:24 am by jkandjol »
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline SlimShady

Lol body 2 stars
Scarlette_Wolfe body 3 stars

Very realistic and objective ranks  :lol:

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Lol body 2 stars
Scarlette_Wolfe body 3 stars

Very realistic and objective ranks  :lol:

Personally (not that I have seen either in person, so can only go by the pictures) but I would put V way above any of the OPs SP reviews, let alone (like you) Scarlette Wolfe, but that is the beauty of this we all like different shape, sizes, looks and personalities. 

« Last Edit: January 03, 2024, 11:33:53 am by jamiekinkxxx »

Online patelprat

Personally (not that I have seen either in person, so can only go by the pictures) but I would put V way above any of the OPs SP reviews, let alone (like you) Scarlette Wolfe, but that is the beauty of this we all like different shape, sizes, looks and personalities.

Agree, definitely YMMV.
I can see from OPs reviews he goes for maybe slightly bigger, curvier girls.

I personally like slim, gym fit tight chicks.

« Last Edit: January 03, 2024, 11:53:21 am by patelprat »

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
Not at all. Scrolling through my reviews, for body I gave WannaComeAndPlay a 3, Beky a 3, Pixie a 2, Camilly a 2, etc.
Yet Harper a 3 despite no ass whatsoever, Khloe a 4, Sensitive Nympho a 4, this I fancied and enjoyed B&S aside (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=381368.0).
I have stellar reviews to come on External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only
I love my slim, and even tall and slim not just petite and slim, queens as much as the next man. Rather I think here I just didn't rate two forum favourites in Vicky and Pigeon Lol.
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,239
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 131
I think her body is marmite.

I think she is too skinny and then when you factor the huge fake tits it's a bit ridiculous to me lol.

I don't mind slim girls if there's some curves involved (like Izzy in my last review has or Adrianna)

But Vicky's curves are non existent.
« Last Edit: January 03, 2024, 12:30:49 pm by JonasG »

Offline The_Don

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 12,395
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 250
I've seen a number of comments about her fake tits some state being hard other soft





Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
They're definitely hard and a bad job. Perhaps it's her skin that is soft/spongy where people get confused. I will claim ultimate jurisdiction here  :P
I'll consider myself a fake tittie expert. I have been with over a hundred, if not hundreds of, women with them between personal and punting, all shapes and sizes. One California bird was impressed I knew her keyhole job with no scars were fake. Similar story available for an American in Dubai who used the injectable fillers route. The giveaway is in the gravity, especially in cowgirl  :drinks:
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline JonasG

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 3,239
  • Likes: 63
  •  
  • Reviews: 131
It's definitely not a great job for me. Both in looks and feel.

Offline jamiekinkxxx

They're definitely hard and a bad job. Perhaps it's her skin that is soft/spongy where people get confused. I will claim ultimate jurisdiction here  :P
I'll consider myself a fake tittie expert. I have been with over a hundred, if not hundreds of, women with them between personal and punting, all shapes and sizes. One California bird was impressed I knew her keyhole job with no scars were fake. Similar story available for an American in Dubai who used the injectable fillers route. The giveaway is in the gravity, especially in cowgirl  :drinks:

Via the armpit

Offline jamiekinkxxx

Not at all. Scrolling through my reviews, for body I gave WannaComeAndPlay a 3, Beky a 3, Pixie a 2, Camilly a 2, etc.
Yet Harper a 3 despite no ass whatsoever, Khloe a 4, Sensitive Nympho a 4, this I fancied and enjoyed B&S aside (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=381368.0).
I have stellar reviews to come on External Link/Members Only and External Link/Members Only
I love my slim, and even tall and slim not just petite and slim, queens as much as the next man. Rather I think here I just didn't rate two forum favourites in Vicky and Pigeon Lol.

seen neither so not favourites of mine, was tempted by Vicky early on but then reviews flooded in and numerous comments about conveyor belt working practices and I went straight off her.

Offline Freewilly1

Not sure what her service skills are like as we don’t get that far.
Looks wise I thought she was ugly and skin looked horrible.
She’s got nothing on the likes of gorgeous Vicky or adrianna.
Eyes of the beholder and all that obviously.

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
Orca whale, you walked?
Good man. I've never had the self control to walk (as much as I should). I think this (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=393426.0) is the only one since my punting comeback and that was probably only easy because she's much older than me.

Back in the day I think I walked twice max, so now three max overall in hundreds of punts. I remember one of those two had terrible, visibly black teeth upon arrival. So it was a no brainer.

I definitely stay and power through too many punts that should be a walk.
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline MLawro93

I definitely stay and power through too many punts that should be a walk.

If you aren't feeling it, always walk. But first scope the place out, don't wanna walk out on a crazy one  :lol:

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
Not at all.

I managed to find a leaderboard or some sort i was producing last decade on my previous profile. So in addition to my recent reviewed I mentioned above.............

Of my top 4 rated WGs last decade, at least at this April 2018 snapshot, it was Suzy Cortez and Lottie Lovelace (who you can all Google to see what their bodies are like) who would probably fit into Patel's judgement; however the other two were:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=194092.msg2012960#msg2012960
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=166372.msg1781538#msg1781538


I simply didn't rate Vicky_28 or Pigeon Mode in the face or body departments.
To their fans, sorry to their fans.............  :hi:


If you're fit you're fit. Skinny or not. Those two just aren't fit, in my eyes (and a few others judging by supporting comments.... I was just the most vocal and willing to stick by head out)
« Last Edit: January 04, 2024, 06:16:17 pm by jkandjol »
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline tantraman

Many thanks for this slew of reviews, jkandjol :hi:

Your mention of ...

... Of my top 4 rated WGs last decade, at least at this April 2018 snapshot, it was Suzy Cortez ...

... got my attention :wacko:, so I had to read your review of her from back in the day ...

(((Punt was in Feb)))

The (wo)man, the myth, the legend...lol.

Profile link: External Link/Members Only
£120 for 30 mins


Comms and Venue -

Called. Was cut off and received text saying text only (due to English speaking ability maybe?). Arranged time. She pretty much didn't put 1 hour (or 15 mins) on the table...was determined for 30 mins, "anal only" (I went on to get vaginal sex too anyway).

Private (shared, but no one else was there during booking) apartment. Not luxury. Don't be fooled by the location. A tad indiscrete for me due to the restaurant across the road, amongst other things. A few streetwise civvies w/could clock what's going on, especially after hours.


Formalities, Looks and the Meet itself -

Greeted in her often described OTT fashion. Got the money out and she seemed to not give a fuck. I put it on the bedside table where it wasn't touched, or even looked at throughout the booking...🤔

Lookswise, all there for everyone to see. Personally, I like her smile, but not face on the whole if that makes sense. Body is banging. Boobs are round, soft and squishy. Noticed some corns on her toes which is a slight neg as I'm a bit of a foot man. Legs are incredibly toned...the cross tattoo on her calf looks really sexy. She did some dramatic catwalk style walks down the apartment corridor while naked; a nice sight.

During the booking did OWO (standard, nothing to shout home about...didn't get particularly wet or deep), mish (vag and anal), doggy (vag and anal...asked me to pull her hair), and a few positions in between such as spoons (anal only). She acted as if I was destroying her holes but to be honest I found neither vag or ass particularly tight. Her exquisite ass cheeks held on tightly to the sides of my cock, but her asshole itself didn't feel tight.

Told me how lucky I was to fuck her in her pussy and she only lets "sex machines and boyfriends do that"  :rolleyes:. Also said I should give her extreme props for doing anal with my size  :rolleyes:.


Ratings -

Looks: 8.5/10
Attitude: 9/10
Service: 8.5/10

9.5 for the body (perfect if it wasn't for the corns pretty much lol), 7 for the face. Attitude marked down as just overall a bit too 'busy' (in her typical fashion) so to speak. Service marked down cos of relatively vapid OWO and relatively loose holes.
I recon she should put all of that energy into giving proper sloppy BJs and DT! 😂


At the end of the booking she seemed to want to pillow talk before I showered and sat across me on the bed. Her variation of pillow talk being telling me about x y and z she has done with various footballers and men within the finance industry  :rolleyes:.
At one point got a ball gag and whip out and said we should try domination next time. Not actually sure if she meant me on her or her on me to be honest...either way not really my thing.

Call me foolish, but I'm tempted to try and book her for an hour in the future (I imagine she'll quote about 250 squid). But meh...overall a good experience, and that body is fine...+ she is right to extent, that I can get anal with her, which isn't a guarantee elsewhere at my size. But at the same time I'm well aware that it's largely a novelty punt.

Cheers,

Axe

Overall: 26/30

Looks/Attitude/Service rankings to date:
1) Lottie Lovelace 27/30
2) Suzy Cortez 26/30
3) Anna Flower 25.5/30 (YMMV warning)
4) Maggie 24.5/30
5) SexiiMixedMegan 22.5/30
6) MAYA E13 (Vivastreet) 20/30

... and she remains one of my fav punts ever too :dance:

« Last Edit: January 04, 2024, 06:37:19 pm by tantraman »

Offline jkandjol

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Temp ban until
    07/07/24 @ 13:10
  • Banned
  • Posts: 415
  • Likes: 45
  •  
  • Reviews: 49
 :cool:

She was good. And got a fair amount of tabloid press coverage in and around the 2018 World Cup I remember.
Never was sex work alluded to let alone discussed. Pretty sure it was common knowledge in certain circles in London what she was doing. A reflection of how taboo sex work is in this country - not even tabloids bothered exploring it/outing her.
Banned reason: Unfounded accusations against the site.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline jamiekinkxxx

:cool:

She was good. And got a fair amount of tabloid press coverage in and around the 2018 World Cup I remember.
Never was sex work alluded to let alone discussed. Pretty sure it was common knowledge in certain circles in London what she was doing. A reflection of how taboo sex work is in this country - not even tabloids bothered exploring it/outing her.

Can't remember anything about her