lulymay1 - Holloway (UKP let me down here!)

[jkandjol]

Profile link: External Link/Members Only
In short: good services, lovely woman.. but IMO she ain't fit. I expected milfy curves. She's rectangular, like a wheely bin Lol.
Also below average face. Funnily enough I think she added face photos shortly after I punted!  . So everyone can judge on the face there.
Body, her pics very flattering IMO. Bunda no where near as nice, and her belly is brick and sloppy.


I paid £140 (or maybe less? Recent price rise?) for an hour


Comms and Venue -

Via Text. All solid. SHe's very clear on her availability and what exactly she can do.

Venue is a dead private residence with at least one other WG there (she mentioned she is Jamaican). Not the most discreet to wait in front of to go up to either. But she moves around it seems, probably won't ever be there again for all we know. Which is why I don't factor venue into my actual ratings.


Formalities, Looks and the Meet itself -

Bubbly and kind natured.

However looks I took reservations with as described.

Services she very sensual with a good touch. She licked me all over Lol she actually had me shaking/flinching a bit as she licked down my torso to build up to giving me head. Fair play.

Some kissing (more on offer than I was receptive to), fingering, and protected sex all without problem. Pussy felt meaty and warm. Milf pussy. Lol.
Good chat and good vibes. But she just ain't a looker IMO.


Ratings -

Face: 2 star
Body: 1 star
Attitude: 5 star
Service: 4 stars

Overall: 12/20. Might be harsh to some but her looks drop her down to a neutral for me.

Rankings to date:

POSITIVES:
1) Carol Queen of Anal 18/20
2) LittleLouisexox 18/20
3) Tammy_xoxo 17/20
4) Elizabeth Romanova 17/20
5) juicy_jasmine 17/20
6) Elite-Jessica 16/20
7) Sensitive_Nympho 16/20
8) lexi.babe 15/20
9) Little-Brat-Jess 15/20
10) Natalia_UK 15/20
11) LatinaCleoRose 14/20
12) CleoEnglish 14/20
13) Angèle 14/20

NEUTRALS:
14) lulymay1 12/20

NEGATIVES:
15) english_tiffany_ 7/20

[jkandjol]

When I say UKP let me down, I just mean IMO her stellar reviews are WAY too kind to her appearance

[last_days_of_logan]

When I say UKP let me down, I just mean IMO her stellar reviews are WAY too kind to her appearance

hey man, you can the lads didn't do right by you. Completely fine. 

It wont be 100% but we will steer your best we can

thanks for the balancing review

[Hobbit]

So, hold on. Are you saying that the pictures she has on her profile are outdated or not her?
She looks attractive to me from what I can see and I was tempted to see her.

[last_days_of_logan]

So, hold on. Are you saying that the pictures she has on her profile are outdated or not her?
She looks attractive to me from what I can see and I was tempted to see her.

OP has set standards/thresholds, he used to be here under a different profile if i remember correctly? (or i might have you confused with someone else)

Plus what we have on profiles might not match reality.

[jkandjol]

So, hold on. Are you saying that the pictures she has on her profile are outdated or not her?
She looks attractive to me from what I can see and I was tempted to see her.

The pics are all her. The face in reality and face pics are no looker for me. If you disagree beauty in eye of beholding and all that.

I think she added face photos shortly after I punted!  . So everyone can judge on the face there.

For the body considerations:

Body, her pics very flattering IMO. Bunda no where near as nice, and her belly is brick and sloppy.

[jkandjol]

OP has set standards/thresholds, he used to be here under a different profile if i remember correctly? (or i might have you confused with someone else)

Plus what we have on profiles might not match reality.

Yup that's me, Axelrod/DylanPerry. I am fairly consistent with time to be fair. See below

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=206688.msg2541914#msg2541914

 

I'm a harsh critic on looks department and for some at times it will be unecessarily harsh. Horses for courses and all tha

[Prince]

I think she tries her best in the service she provides and gets into it (DFK and rimming) but was only worth it when she charges lower prices to compensate her looks.

P

[Hobbit]

The pics are all her. The face in reality and face pics are no looker for me. If you disagree beauty in eye of beholding and all that.
For the body considerations:

Well, I appreciate your honesty in the review.
I'm still a little bit confused as in her pictures she looks to have a fairly attractive body. You can't see everything in the photos and I don't see much photoshopping being used compared to others that have tons.

[jkandjol]

Logan I just noticed you brought up century. Nice one  . I been going a bit crazy this year since single. I brainstormed reviews I can do within the 6 month limitation. I should be able to bring up my half century this week. I think Axelrod had 30 odd reviews, so I'd still be short of 100. But I guess would be there too if not for the 3+ years out.

I think our origin dates on the site are similar. Just flicking through your old reviews. I think I got my review ball rolling summer 2017 so was a bit more of an established member than you at the time. We shared some booty intel, with a few others. I noticed a few of them now banned Lol. Seems some didn't want to change with the times but you did successfully.

Back to your past reviews. Some blasts from the past there. Angelica Ginger! We both missed out on that.
MettaBaby/Leeyla Kissing is still around under differnt names you know and I somehow still haven't seen her. She pops up in fringe parts of/outside London like Watford and Stevenage nowadays so I have to ask myself if I'm really gonna be taking a trek to pay and fuck a bird 15+ years older than me 
Ali in London! Jheeeeez

Looks like my years out coincided with that Ivy on the scene. I often see her referenced.

[jkandjol]

I think she tries her best in the service she provides and gets into it (DFK and rimming) but was only worth it when she charges lower prices to compensate her looks.

P

DIdn't realise she gives rimming. I would have indulged. The way she was licking and sucking my chest  that would have been a good rim I can tell

[jkandjol]

Well, I appreciate your honesty in the review.
I'm still a little bit confused as in her pictures she looks to have a fairly attractive body. You can't see everything in the photos and I don't see much photoshopping being used compared to others that have tons.

Angles and lingerie! You're right, it doesn't even look like photoshopping. Which is probably why I was even more disappointed. Cos when you go into a punt based off pics you have an idea in your head of the catfish risk. For her I would have considered it low due to seemingly candid photos.
However.......................

[GreyDave]

When I say UKP let me down, I just mean IMO her stellar reviews are WAY too kind to her appearance

  Sir thanks for reveiw.... I find the point of the reveiws are always given from diffrent perspectives and therefore they are to be read as such as a guide only or some times a warning

I quote one of my reveiws where I saw the WG had bad reveiws but little mr Grey wanted to do deed so in Star trekey terms I entered into the Rom zone ...I knew what I would be up against and prepared myself for the worse by I was determined to have a good time the bad reveiws were for me invaluable as they had encountered the negatives when expecting a positive..

Its the fact that I knew what the negatives were going to be i was able to give a positive .... Years ago in the mid 1980`s there was a radio program Robbie Vincent on Radio London ....an old guy rang in and complained that he had gone to see a WG she took his money and started screaming at him to leave ...Robbie took the piss out of him saying what did he want something like OffWat (water complains board ) the Old guy who said well it was my cash and i was tricked so YES! ...fast forward we have this site filter the reveiws for your tastes and the WGs on AW and other sites and youll get an enjoable punt  All Best for Punting in 2024 " The Year of the Whore " 

[Hobbit]

Sir thanks for reveiw.... I find the point of the reveiws are always given from diffrent perspectives and therefore they are to be read as such as a guide only or some times a warning

I quote one of my reveiws where I saw the WG had bad reveiws but little mr Grey wanted to do deed so in Star trekey terms I entered into the Rom zone ...I knew what I would be up against and prepared myself for the worse by I was determined to have a good time the bad reveiws were for me invaluable as they had encountered the negatives when expecting a positive..

Its the fact that I knew what the negatives were going to be i was able to give a positive .... Years ago in the mid 1980`s there was a radio program Robbie Vincent on Radio London ....an old guy rang in and complained that he had gone to see a WG she took his money and started screaming at him to leave ...Robbie took the piss out of him saying what did he want something like OffWat (water complains board ) the Old guy who said well it was my cash and i was tricked so YES! ...fast forward we have this site filter the reveiws for your tastes and the WGs on AW and other sites and youll get an enjoable punt  All Best for Punting in 2024 " The Year of the Whore " 

Oppose to "The year of the chore". Which is what it's been like for the past 5 years or so. Good luck if you think 2024 will be any different.

[sparkus]

When I say UKP let me down, I just mean IMO her stellar reviews are WAY too kind to her appearance

Several on here with similar tastes to mine have strongly recommended her to me but her pics always deterred me.

[jkandjol]

Several on here with similar tastes to mine have strongly recommended her to me but her pics always deterred me.

Really? Guys like you with the eagle eye who can even sniff out misleading photos. I can only aspire to finally learn the craft one day.


I have a review to drop in the coming days on this one: External Link/Members Only. I was soooo disappointed by the body in person. Sizable gut which I didn't pick up on in photos. Funnily enough a few days after I saw her, I saw a comment on here pointing out her pics are angled/she's defo a big gal if you look well. Don't tell me that was your comment? (I can't be bothered to search for it). If so, you really do have the eagle eye.
Eye of the Tiger as that Tarzan used to say 

[Prince]

Really? Guys like you with the eagle eye who can even sniff out misleading photos. I can only aspire to finally learn the craft one day.


I have a review to drop in the coming days on this one: External Link/Members Only. I was soooo disappointed by the body in person. Sizable gut which I didn't pick up on in photos. Funnily enough a few days after I saw her, I saw a comment on here pointing out her pics are angled/she's defo a big gal if you look well. Don't tell me that was your comment? (I can't be bothered to search for it). If so, you really do have the eagle eye.
Eye of the Tiger as that Tarzan used to say 

What ever happened to King Tarzan? I read he was banned but im sure he is lurking around under a different guise. He was a useful reviewer. Not sure what he did to get banned.
P

[MLawro93]

What ever happened to King Tarzan? I read he was banned but im sure he is lurking around under a different guise. He was a useful reviewer. Not sure what he did to get banned.
P

We can't post links, but there is a thread about it on SAAFE, and the banning reason is listed under any of his posts on the site.

[last_days_of_logan]

Logan I just noticed you brought up century. Nice one  . I been going a bit crazy this year since single. I brainstormed reviews I can do within the 6 month limitation. I should be able to bring up my half century this week. I think Axelrod had 30 odd reviews, so I'd still be short of 100. But I guess would be there too if not for the 3+ years out.

I think our origin dates on the site are similar. Just flicking through your old reviews. I think I got my review ball rolling summer 2017 so was a bit more of an established member than you at the time. We shared some booty intel, with a few others. I noticed a few of them now banned Lol. Seems some didn't want to change with the times but you did successfully.

Back to your past reviews. Some blasts from the past there. Angelica Ginger! We both missed out on that.
MettaBaby/Leeyla Kissing is still around under differnt names you know and I somehow still haven't seen her. She pops up in fringe parts of/outside London like Watford and Stevenage nowadays so I have to ask myself if I'm really gonna be taking a trek to pay and fuck a bird 15+ years older than me 
Ali in London! Jheeeeez

Looks like my years out coincided with that Ivy on the scene. I often see her referenced.

"MettaBaby/Leeyla Kissing|" is still working?! what's her profile

The sentiments of you Post are echoed by the way...it was different times back then. Didnt appreciate it but the ladies were dirt cheap in comparison to now, and the hobby was in full flow

Ahhhh angelica ginger, yes...i had her once and never got the chance again. I swear she was one of the few to genuinely make GLM turn his head 

My situation is a complete U-turn to you..., ie where you have upped the activity, i have significantly retreated and curbed mine. Although the odd review from others makes me want to increase frequency LOL. But my sector has been hit hard with world events, so very cautious these days

[CalQueLon]

Just wanted too say thanks for your contributions and general info and stuff younas well Logan. Im in the middle I can punt more now for often but Im way more selective now than before after the last punt I reviewed I have not done one since.

Not too derail the thread but I did punt the OP's SP same feelings she is not a looker but overall service is very good.

[jkandjol]

"MettaBaby/Leeyla Kissing|" is still working?! what's her profile

External Link/Members Only 
I vaguely remember the Stratford place you describe in your review. She usually worked with another Hungarian milfy type (probably 5-10 years younger than her) and another much younger Hungarian young enough to be their daughter. I only ever saw the latter, and quite regularly. The other milfy one I describe was quite up my street and I remember she used to post a lot of leg and feet pics which was even more up my street.
But I spent too much time being a regular of the youngster and never booked the milfs (tbf I ended up getting to see this WG on personal terms/off the clock so you win some and lose some Lol). But one thing I have learned since my comeback is to spread my punts about more and don't get bogged down with regulars. Hence I'm in a position to churn out so many reviews right now

[ID98765]

Profile link: External Link/Members Only
In short: good services, lovely woman.. but IMO she ain't fit. I expected milfy curves. She's rectangular, like a wheely bin Lol.
Also below average face. Funnily enough I think she added face photos shortly after I punted!  . So everyone can judge on the face there.
Body, her pics very flattering IMO. Bunda no where near as nice, and her belly is brick and sloppy.


I paid £140 (or maybe less? Recent price rise?) for an hour


Comms and Venue -

Via Text. All solid. SHe's very clear on her availability and what exactly she can do.

Venue is a dead private residence with at least one other WG there (she mentioned she is Jamaican). Not the most discreet to wait in front of to go up to either. But she moves around it seems, probably won't ever be there again for all we know. Which is why I don't factor venue into my actual ratings.


Formalities, Looks and the Meet itself -

Bubbly and kind natured.

However looks I took reservations with as described.

Services she very sensual with a good touch. She licked me all over Lol she actually had me shaking/flinching a bit as she licked down my torso to build up to giving me head. Fair play.

Some kissing (more on offer than I was receptive to), fingering, and protected sex all without problem. Pussy felt meaty and warm. Milf pussy. Lol.
Good chat and good vibes. But she just ain't a looker IMO.


Ratings -

Face: 2 star
Body: 1 star
Attitude: 5 star
Service: 4 stars

Overall: 12/20. Might be harsh to some but her looks drop her down to a neutral for me.

Rankings to date:

POSITIVES:
1) Carol Queen of Anal 18/20
2) LittleLouisexox 18/20
3) Tammy_xoxo 17/20
4) Elizabeth Romanova 17/20
5) juicy_jasmine 17/20
6) Elite-Jessica 16/20
7) Sensitive_Nympho 16/20
8) lexi.babe 15/20
9) Little-Brat-Jess 15/20
10) Natalia_UK 15/20
11) LatinaCleoRose 14/20
12) CleoEnglish 14/20
13) Angèle 14/20

NEUTRALS:
14) lulymay1 12/20

NEGATIVES:
15) english_tiffany_ 7/20

I saw this Bhunda for £70 and I managed to get 2 pops in.  So for me was great VFM.  However I dont disagree with your comments particularly on the body! 

Good reviews today BTW.