SashasSweetHoney - meeting confirmed, did not turn up, time waster

[pingo]

Link to AW profile: External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Was travelling to Edinburgh for the week and staying in a hotel, so decided to message SashasSweetHoney. She confirmed the outcall meet to the hotel before the day and also the morning of the day of the meet. However 3 hours before the meet she cancelled saying she was 'under the weather'. But that was okay with me, it was not the first time a SP had cancelled, atleast I was informed. This was the start of the week for me in Edinburgh.

 I wished her well and let her know that I was in Edinburgh for the rest of the week and would be glad to see her. She responded saying she was happy to meet and we agreed on another date and a time during the week. On the day of the rearranged meet, we spoke on the phone and SP confirmed via a text message as well that the meet was 'on'. She asked me to meet her in the hotel lobby, which I confirmed I would when she arrives.

10 mins before the meeting time, I texted letting her know I was ready and when she is nearby to let me know. No response to the message. 20 mins go by and I call, phone rings, call disconnected. At this point I wasn't sure if I was 'stood up' or SP is stuck in the traffic or busy with another punter. I messaged 10 mins later asking if she'd like to cancel? - No response.

At the time of writing this review - my texts are unanswered, no AW email or message informing cancellation, and if I try the phone line is busy. SPs often demand that punters inform them of the cancellation, can we not expect the same in return please?

[willie loman]

This girl is well known for this, plenty about her flakiness on uk punting, basically a nasty piece of work, imo. fair enough that she has ignored my texts, calls , emails etc, but to cancel at the last minute, on countless occasions  or worse radio silence. There will of course be some smug smartass who will post about how he never had a problem booking her etc.

[Name Not Found]

It's been her MO for 10+ years. If you'd read her reviews, you would have known what to expect.

[Charlie Richdson]

why did even ppl bother trying   

[Name Not Found]

There will of course be some smug smartass who will post about how he never had a problem booking her etc.

I could be that smartass if you like. never had a problem myself, but always knew it was a possibility and planned accordingly. She was worth the risk 

[Name Not Found]

why did even ppl bother trying   

Because she was bloody good. Is that hard to understand?

[MrMakers]

Because she was bloody good. Is that hard to understand?

She still is pretty damn good

[S.X. MacHine]

One of my first punts about 11 years ago. Initially I thought her rather plain looking but the sex was actually very good. So much so that I booked her again and, guess what? Yep, she cancelled an hour before the meeting.
I never tried again. I’ve since learned that she is notorious for this behaviour. She’s best avoided.

[Charlie Richdson]

Because she was bloody good. Is that hard to understand?

Not that obvious, considering number of negatives she has

[Name Not Found]

Not that obvious, considering number of negatives she has

Every one of her negatives is for cancellation, not for bad sex. Is that hard to understand?

[Charlie Richdson]

Every one of her negatives is for cancellation, not for bad sex. Is that hard to understand?

You have read them all ?

[henry brubaker]

You have read them all ?

It's 7 negatives and took less than a minute to get the theme of each of them.

[Name Not Found]

You have read them all ?

Yeah. I can read whole sentences all in one go. Awesome, I know   

[Charlie Richdson]

Yeah. I can read whole sentences all in one go. Awesome, I know   

Great

[DaVINCI]

Every one of her negatives is for cancellation, not for bad sex. Is that hard to understand?

Yes on her current profile, but on a previous profile there was a Negative for a more concerning issue.     

[Name Not Found]

Yes on her current profile, but on a previous profile there was a Negative for a more concerning issue.   

She's had her current profile since 2014. How old are you....how long does she have to repent? 

[DaVINCI]

She's had her current profile since 2014. How old are you....how long does she have to repent? 

As you were aware, I clearly mentioned a previous profile which her indescretion warranted comment to follow her onto her new profile.

Seems a bit ill judged to be attacking me regarding my age   

[Name Not Found]

Seems a bit ill judged to be attacking me regarding my age   

Well, it must have taken you f'n years to grow that beard 

[MrMakers]

As you were aware, I clearly mentioned a previous profile which her indescretion warranted comment to follow her onto her new profile.

Seems a bit ill judged to be attacking me regarding my age   

What did she do to have you think it would still be relevant to punters a decade later?

[willie loman]

What did she do to have you think it would still be relevant to punters a decade later?

my recall is she did a runner with a fair bit of cash.

[willie loman]

The real mystery is why someone who has their number up.as available today, for the last 15 years, yet has comparatively few reviews, and in my experience never replies to any attempt at engagement. While i can accept that she cherry picks her bookings, its the absence of reviews that intrigues, 18 in 8 years, 2 this year. Alanna a romanian has notched up 49 reviews in a way shorter time.

[DaVINCI]

What did she do to have you think it would still be relevant to punters a decade later?

As per Willie’s post, l’m sure it was an overnight booking as well. TBH, doesn’t really matter if it was 10 days or 10 years, going to ground then changing here profile thereafter the situation was bad patter.

If making a booking, if she bothered to fulfil it  l’m sure people would rather know the full situation to tread carefully than get stung, l’m sure you would agree!

[MrMakers]

Absolutely, more information is always good.  Is there a thread or old profile with feedback to look for?

[MrMakers]

The real mystery is why someone who has their number up.as available today, for the last 15 years, yet has comparatively few reviews, and in my experience never replies to any attempt at engagement. While i can accept that she cherry picks her bookings, its the absence of reviews that intrigues, 18 in 8 years, 2 this year. Alanna a romanian has notched up 49 reviews in a way shorter time.

There are some that for some reason don't have the feedback over years or low  feedback here compared to AW - Blueberry Girl in London is one I'm suprised doesnt have more feedback here compared to her AW feedback.

As for the engagement, she seems to be a spacey free spirit type that gets vibes from people and in her words 'is very good at weeding out incompatible people' - how true that is or if its a good business decision is up for debate

[MrMakers]

Absolutely, more information is always good.  Is there a thread or old profile with feedback to look for?

NVM, Found it: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=38087

[TheRealDeal10]

NVM, Found it: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=38087

That’s quite a thread. The poor guys been blamed by her white knights for giving her £500 at the start of an overnighter, which she then stole basically. She’s an out and out thief. Have to agree anyone doing this once will do it multiple times. Seems some people are that desperate for a shot of her she can just start again and keep up a clientele.

One to avoid.

[Name Not Found]

@therealdeal10

That's quite a lot of judgemental comment on all parties packed into one post!

I'll say only two things. From what I recall (and I'm open to being corrected on this) the guy who wrote the post had no real history on here so was an unknown quantity.

Second, nobody has ever heard her side of the story (although of course she could have posted it here assuming she was aware of the thread).

There are two sides to every story...

[TheRealDeal10]

@therealdeal10

That's quite a lot of judgemental comment on all parties packed into one post!

I'll say only two things. From what I recall (and I'm open to being corrected on this) the guy who wrote the post had no real history on here so was an unknown quantity.

Second, nobody has ever heard her side of the story (although of course she could have posted it here assuming she was aware of the thread).

There are two sides to every story...

Agreed on the last part. There’s been a couple of times where my reviews have been disputed by the WG and they have made their voices heard.

Radio silence from this one.

Perhaps the punter was naive but the way she left him at the dinner table doesn’t really seem out of character for her, does it?

I won’t be going near so I shouldn’t waste anymore time on it.

[DaVINCI]

@therealdeal10

That's quite a lot of judgemental comment on all parties packed into one post!

I'll say only two things. From what I recall (and I'm open to being corrected on this) the guy who wrote the post had no real history on here so was an unknown quantity.

Second, nobody has ever heard her side of the story (although of course she could have posted it here assuming she was aware of the thread).

There are two sides to every story...

Yes, you are correct that there is two sides of every story but there was further occurrence with another Punter were she left her Bag full of cr** in exchange for a Overnight fee and done a runner.

I understand the booking went well for you  but she has Fu**** over a couple of punters on overnights, never mind the constant Radio Silence on current bookings!

[scutty brown]

I've reindexed all her old reviews that I could find
Now shows 23 reviews, 11 red

[Lesdoit]

I've reindexed all her old reviews that I could find
Now shows 23 reviews, 11 red

11 red and a report of being a thieving skank. But it’s ok with some as she’s a good shag apparently.

[Jock D]

11 red and a report of being a thieving skank. But it’s ok with some as she’s a good shag apparently.

 

[Name Not Found]

The real mystery is why someone who has their number up.as available today, for the last 15 years, yet has comparatively few reviews, and in my experience never replies to any attempt at engagement. While i can accept that she cherry picks her bookings, its the absence of reviews that intrigues, 18 in 8 years, 2 this year.

First, it's incorrect to say she is always 'available today'. Most of the time when I see her appear in my searches, she isn't. I doubt there's any meaningful reason behind the small number of reviews. Maybe people feel they have nothing to add to the reviews that are already there. Some girls get lots of reviews, some don't. No real point in trying to work out why.

Yes, you are correct that there is two sides of every story but there was further occurrence with another Punter were she left her Bag full of cr** in exchange for a Overnight fee and done a runner.

Thanks for that. I wasn't aware of the second incident. Well before my time.

....But it’s ok with some as she’s a good shag apparently.

I haven't seen anyone, except you, make that rationalisation.

[willie loman]

You seem to want to pick a fight all the time, if i say she is almost always showing as available today, its because she is, as a general rule girls who see clients get reviewed, its that simple. You seem to feel smugly superior over the fact that she accepts your bookings, though most of your experiences in this punting life  could be categorised as "historic punting", talking about staff at london st from 30 years ago.

[Name Not Found]

You seem to want to pick a fight all the time, if i say she is almost always showing as available today, its because she is, as a general rule girls who see clients get reviewed, its that simple. You seem to feel smugly superior over the fact that she accepts your bookings, though most of your experiences in this punting life  could be categorised as "historic punting", talking about staff at london st from 30 years ago.

What a load of inaccurate, rambling bollocks. It doesn't even warrant a serious reply.  Idiot.

[willie loman]

What a load of inaccurate, rambling bollocks. It doesn't even warrant a serious reply.  Idiot.

go on tell us that hilarious story about the london st parrot, and what ricky said to becky carlyle, i never get tired of hearing it.

[Name Not Found]

go on tell us that hilarious story about the london st parrot, and what ricky said to becky carlyle, i never get tired of hearing it.

What's so funny about this is that you are so confident in your opinion of me, while also having completely mistaken me for someone else     I'm sure those are great stories, but they're not mine 

Feeling a bit of a plonker yet ? 

[willie loman]

What's so funny about this is that you are so confident in your opinion of me, while also having completely mistaken me for someone else     I'm sure those are great stories, but they're not mine 

Feeling a bit of a plonker yet ? 

you might be right, and if so i apologise, but that you posture as a man of the world, the complete punter, who never puts a foot wrong,  is not to be denied.

[Name Not Found]

Your opinion of me, based on mistaken identity, which you're now trying to over-compensate for, is of no interest. Goodbye silly little man. 

[MrMakers]

you might be right, and if so i apologise, but that you posture as a man of the world, the complete punter, who never puts a foot wrong,  is not to be denied.

Just take the L man, this is a perfect example of why the phrase was invented.  Though it is mildly amusing calling someone out for repetitive stories considering how much of your post history is about old sauna stories that aren't relevant to anything these days.  Self awareness is awesome. 

[willie loman]

Your opinion of me, based on mistaken identity, which you're now trying to over-compensate for, is of no interest. Goodbye silly little man.

in what sense am i overcompensating? i think you are a dull arse, your posts on this thread alone are  sufficient to come to that conclusion., you have been having a pop at me over the years , and seem miffed if someone has a go back.