Glasses with Cameras heads up

[KKDD18]

So other day was at a stingers party. Was going fine but then there was a bit of an argument kicking off. Turned out one of the women was allegedly wearing glasses which had a built in Camera. At first heard her partner saying don't be stupid etc then her saying they are off. She was initially asked to remove them but said she needed them so was asked to leave as a couple people said they didn't want to be filmed despite her being adaman it wasn't on.

I had always thought you could clearly tell these camera glasses from a distance but it now appears some styles you have to almost be face to face to realise. So just something more to thunk about if your in a situation you don't want to be recorded in.

[Amard]

Stingers party?

[mattmugwump]

Stingers party?

It's like a swingers party, but with more pricks

[DastardlyDick]

It's like a swingers party, but with more pricks

I like that! 
Seriously, I didn't know that these things had improved that much - the lenses for the cameras were very obvious.
This woman must have known that cameras are not permitted at swingers parties, for obvious reasons, so it was a pretty stupid thing to do!

[PilotMan]

It's like a swingers party, but with more pricks

 

[daviemac]

So other day was at a stingers party. Was going fine but then there was a bit of an argument kicking off. Turned out one of the women was allegedly wearing glasses which had a built in Camera. At first heard her partner saying don't be stupid etc then her saying they are off. She was initially asked to remove them but said she needed them so was asked to leave as a couple people said they didn't want to be filmed despite her being adaman it wasn't on.

I had always thought you could clearly tell these camera glasses from a distance but it now appears some styles you have to almost be face to face to realise. So just something more to thunk about if your in a situation you don't want to be recorded in.

What has this got to do with punting?

If you mean a swingers party then discussions are not allowed, if it isn't a swingers party then can you explain what it is and how the fees are for the bookings are paid.

I should add that any escort I've seen who wears glasses has taken them off.

Edit

Just realised this is the second thread you have started about 'stingers parties', you need to explain exactly what they are and if you mean swingers why you are totally disregarding the rules that have been pointed out to you.

[daviemac]

So other day was at a stingers party.

I've sent you a PM reminder that the questions asked on this thread require an answer.

[KKDD18]

The context of where this happend doesn't really have that much of an impact on the thread. What I was highlighting is that if your at any venue where you may not want it known you were there or have recognisable aspects of you recorded then keep an eye out. At this location everyone was advised that phones and other recording devices could not go past the changing rooms.

As firnthe event it was a paid entry to couples only. Definitely got the feeling I was not the only person there with a WG.

[daviemac]

The context of where this happend doesn't really have that much of an impact on the thread. What I was highlighting is that if your at any venue where you may not want it known you were there or have recognisable aspects of you recorded then keep an eye out. At this location everyone was advised that phones and other recording devices could not go past the changing rooms.

As firnthe event it was a paid entry to couples only. Definitely got the feeling I was not the only person there with a WG.

Of course it matters where it happened.

Last time I'm going to ask you, is this and the other thread you started where you mention "stingers club" really about 'swingers'? 

To me it looks like you are deliberately trying to flout the rules by starting threads on topics that have been made very clear to you are not allowed on here. 

[KKDD18]

Think you need to define what you class as swingers for the group as just googled the meaning and as I said there was definitely a couple of others who had WG with them when the dictionary says married or long term relationships. Well I'm not married nor do I have a long term relationship with the WG that I was with. The event said Couples and had no clarification on the definition. Ontop of the arranged fees for the meet I also paid for our tickets which was £50 part of that was cause I had not been before.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[daviemac]

Think you need to define what you class as swingers for the group as just googled the meaning and as I said there was definitely a couple of others who had WG with them when the dictionary says married or long term relationships. Well I'm not married nor do I have a long term relationship with the WG that I was with. The event said Couples and had no clarification on the definition. Ontop of the arranged fees for the meet I also paid for our tickets which was £50 part of that was cause I had not been before.

I can't be bothered arguing the toss with you, you've had enough chances to explain but you still won't give a straight answer. As you are deliberately flouting the rules a ban is the only solution now.

[myothernameis]

So other day was at a stingers party.

Here we go again, a stingers party, either the op is a bad speller, or hoping to get round the rules, and once could be consider a mistake, but twice

[daviemac]

Here we go again, a stingers party, either the op is a bad speller, or hoping to get round the rules, and once could be consider a mistake, but twice

He was banned at 4.49 pm.   

[Ivor Hunch]

so this is genuinely not in any way a challenge to moderation on this site, nor in any way a challenge to the banning of KKDD18

it is a very genuine enquiry

why is posting about swingers parties banned ?  (or even stingers parties!)

I can see that they are not within the strict definition of punting, but at the same time, we who enjoy a paid for fuck, might equally enjoy a non-paid for one.

the shutting down of even discussion about options just seems curious to me.

as i say, absolutely no criticism intended- just curious.

[daviemac]

so this is genuinely not in any way a challenge to moderation on this site, nor in any way a challenge to the banning of KKDD18

it is a very genuine enquiry

why is posting about swingers parties banned ?  (or even stingers parties!)

I can see that they are not within the strict definition of punting, but at the same time, we who enjoy a paid for fuck, might equally enjoy a non-paid for one.

the shutting down of even discussion about options just seems curious to me.

as i say, absolutely no criticism intended- just curious.

Swinging isn't punting, dogging isn't punting nor is webcamming or phone chat and this site is about punting.

[Ivor Hunch]

so, i absolutely see the logic in that.

but, does it harm the site if there is discussion about 'not punting' on the site?

this is something of a community- say someone were to post, on a new thread, for the sake of the argument-  hey guys, what did you make of the liverpool v utd game?

clearly not punting related- but would it be bannable to post such a question?

obvs, i don't know how funding and costs work-  if there is a hosting cost for each thread or post, then it makes perfect sense to limit content to the strictly relevant to keep costs down.

but if not, is there really any harm done by 'off topic' posts.

once again, i stress, just a genuine enquiry, no challenge intended.

[daviemac]

so, i absolutely see the logic in that.

but, does it harm the site if there is discussion about 'not punting' on the site?

this is something of a community- say someone were to post, on a new thread, for the sake of the argument-  hey guys, what did you make of the liverpool v utd game?

clearly not punting related- but would it be bannable to post such a question?

obvs, i don't know how funding and costs work-  if there is a hosting cost for each thread or post, then it makes perfect sense to limit content to the strictly relevant to keep costs down.

but if not, is there really any harm done by 'off topic' posts.

once again, i stress, just a genuine enquiry, no challenge intended.

The rules are the rules and if you are in any doubt about them there's a link at the bottom of every page. If you don't like the fact there are topics that can't be discussed find a forum where they can be.

To reiterate swinging etc isn't allowed deal with it.

Edit

Look in the 'off topic' section, there's a thread about the 2023/24 football season so discussing a football match is allowed.   

[Ivor Hunch]

I have no problem at all with following rules.

and clearly those who run the site can impose whatever rules they like- and if users don't like them, as you say, they can accept them or fuck off.  all clear and fair.

i was just seeking to understand what the rationale was.  that is all.

i hadn't noticed the 'off-topic' section before

so presumably that means if someone wants to discuss swinging, they could do so in that section of the website? But if, despite clear warnings, they continue to discuss it in the main section, they get banned?

that is understandable and clear.

[daviemac]

I have no problem at all with following rules.

and clearly those who run the site can impose whatever rules they like- and if users don't like them, as you say, they can accept them or fuck off.  all clear and fair.

i was just seeking to understand what the rationale was.  that is all.

i hadn't noticed the 'off-topic' section before

so presumably that means if someone wants to discuss swinging, they could do so in that section of the website? But if, despite clear warnings, they continue to discuss it in the main section, they get banned?

that is understandable and clear.

Are you totally stupid, pissed or just trolling.

SWINGING ETC IS NOT ALLOWED

[kingmg]

Are you totally stupid, pissed or just trolling.

SWINGING ETC IS NOT ALLOWED

Have seen reviews of singers parties on here that are fixed fee and have Wgs as hostesses.

[daviemac]

Have seen reviews of singers parties on here that are fixed fee and have Wgs as hostesses.

You have seen reviews of parties where individual punters pay to attend and are hosted by SPs who are there for any one of them to shag.

Swinging is where men and women turn up as a couple and each party 'chats up' someone of the opposite sex they fancy on a 'wife swapping' basis.

Read and accept the rules as explained several times above.

[mr.bluesky]

Have seen reviews of singers parties on here that are fixed fee and have Wgs as hostesses.

SINGERS parties isn't that another word for Karaoke 

[marc_hotsteppa]

SINGERS parties isn't that another word for Karaoke 

I thought it might be a sewing machine party 

[Blackpool Rock]

I thought it might be a sewing machine party 

I almost got stitched up at one of those   

[Southernbloke]

SINGERS parties isn't that another word for Karaoke 

Good Thread 😆

[daviemac]

Good Thread 😆

If you mean good for getting people banned then maybe, depends if you count that as good.

[Southernbloke]

If you mean good for getting people banned then maybe, depends if you count that as good.

Sorry about that, I just meant it as a play on words. Won’t do it again

[JustaPunter]

On the subject of these glasses with cameras.

Only a wrong un would try and film an SP with them without permission.

[daviemac]

On the subject of these glasses with cameras.

Only a wrong un would try and film an SP with them without permission.

This thread is not about punting.

[A Decent Fist]

Having looked up Rule 17, I have a hypothetical question. If I paid an escort to be my partner at a swingers’ party would a review of that escort based on that experience be allowed or not? If the rule is applied strictly and literally it would appear not, but I don’t see the logic in that.

[daviemac]

Having looked up Rule 17, I have a hypothetical question. If I paid an escort to be my partner at a swingers’ party would a review of that escort based on that experience be allowed or not? If the rule is applied strictly and literally it would appear not, but I don’t see the logic in that.

I don't know how many times this has to be explained but for the last time the rule clearly states swinging is not allowed, how you get there and who you go with is totally irrelevant, a swinging party is a swinging party.

17 Dogging / Swinging / Webcamming / Phone Chat / Porn
Not Allowed.

It has also been explained several times what the difference is between a swingers party and a sex party which is allowed.

I suppose if you can provide the details of all the other women there so other members can contact them in the same way as escorts at a sex party then that might be allowed. However for the sake of keeping things simple and not complicating the rules I would doubt it.

The OP has been banned because of this thread it would be a shame for others to follow because they can't accept the simple rule that swinging isn't allowed.

[PumpDump]

Guys, just to return to the subject which is "Glasses with Cameras", do you see any risk with a regular meet with an SP? I don't think it would be a problem. I don't even recall being with an escort who wore glasses. And even if she did, taking a look at some of the spy glasses online it is pretty easy to see the lens. I think there is a lot more risk from cameras being hidden elsewhere in the room. I don't worry about it too much, I don't think many people would be interested in seeing a video of me stark naked banging a SP. As for the blackmail aspect I take sensible precautions to hide any info which may reveal my true identity.

[spiralnotebook]

I suppose it’s similar to having a doorbell with a camera, SMILE PLEASE!

[PumpDump]

I suppose it’s similar to having a doorbell with a camera, SMILE PLEASE!

It's a bit different, I am not usually naked at the door!

[spiralnotebook]

It places you at a time and location and I suppose could link to your contact method.