Armanii

[JustaPunter]

Was at a loose end a few weeks ago so opened up AW and had a check of my HotList.

Armanii had her Green Light on so checked the reviews and saw they were pretty mixed.

But I thought, you only live once

External Link/Members Only

Sent a Text and got a reply a short while later and a time was arranged

It was an Incall in Central London Hotel for 1 hour

She has several discounts and offers on her profile at the moment, including 5 hours for £500

£185 for the hour

She seemed nice, polite and friendly

Little bit of kissing and then DATY

She is probably in her early 20’s, a pretty young girl.

Services requested where OWO and Sex

Her reviews seem hit and miss and there was an allegation of BB being offered.

That was definitely never offered to me.

I would visit again without a doubt.

YMMV

[PilotMan]

Whereabouts in Central London? e.g. nearest tube

[JustaPunter]

Whereabouts in Central London? e.g. nearest tube

She changes her incall every time so not really sure of the relevance.

Sometimes she is in Canary Wharf and other times Belgravia

[Stevelondon]

Looks like “Outcalls Only” now

[JustaPunter]

Looks like “Outcalls Only” now

Her profile changes from Outcall only and back to Incall/Outcall

I would assume she doesn’t want to work from her own home and works from Hotels

I thought about seeing her again last weekend and she was showing as in Belgravia

[PilotMan]

She changes her incall every time so not really sure of the relevance.

Sometimes she is in Canary Wharf and other times Belgravia

The relevance is that London is a big place and takes time to travel across.

If I see a review that says Knightsbridge, I don't bother reading it,  it's too far for me.

If it says Canary Wharf,  then I'll read the review.

It's about helping other punters.

[JustaPunter]

The relevance is that London is a big place and takes time to travel across.

If I see a review that says Knightsbridge, I don't bother reading it,  it's too far for me.

If it says Canary Wharf,  then I'll read the review.

It's about helping other punters.

It’s irrelevant because she changes her Incall every time.

So just because somebody saw her in Canary Wharf he next Incall might be in Victoria, then her next Incall might be in Belgravia and the next one in Knightsbridge

If she had a permanent incall location that would be different, but she doesn’t appear to have one.

[Jonestown]

It’s irrelevant because she changes her Incall every time.

So just because somebody saw her in Canary Wharf he next Incall might be in Victoria, then her next Incall might be in Belgravia and the next one in Knightsbridge

If she had a permanent incall location that would be different, but she doesn’t appear to have one.

The convention is that the punter identifies where to meet took place, even if the girl is touring or known to constantly move around.

[JustaPunter]

The convention is that the punter identifies where to meet took place, even if the girl is touring or known to constantly move around.

And where is that convention written down?

The Hotel was in Central London.

Her next Incall will also likely be at a Hotel in Central London.

There is no value in being more specific and I am not going to be more specific as it is pointless.

[jesse4585]

And where is that convention written down?

Here for example: External Link/Members Only

If you were to be kind enough to tell us a nearby tube, the mods could add it to the review title. Then when a punter clicks the "this service provider" link,  it lists all the reviews and punters can see her most common locations, which can be valuable e.g. if a GFE punter looking for a new reg wanted to see if she mostly works from a location in easy reach.

[JustaPunter]

Here for example: External Link/Members Only

If you were to be kind enough to tell us a nearby tube, the mods could add it to the review title. Then when a punter clicks the "this service provider" link,  it lists all the reviews and punters can see her most common locations, which can be valuable e.g. if a GFE punter looking for a new reg wanted to see if she mostly works from a location in easy reach.

She doesn’t work in the same Hotel.

So putting  location, hotel or tube station makes no difference.

The location was a Central London Hotel

In Central London

She will be in a different one the next time she does Incalls.

So in what way does mentioning a one station matter?

She might be in Oxford next time.

[daviemac]

It’s irrelevant because she changes her Incall every time.

So just because somebody saw her in Canary Wharf he next Incall might be in Victoria, then her next Incall might be in Belgravia and the next one in Knightsbridge

If she had a permanent incall location that would be different, but she doesn’t appear to have one.

Where you saw her is relevant, even if she uses several locations members can look out for when she returns to a location convenient for them, but only if they know where that is.

And where is that convention written down?

The Hotel was in Central London.

Her next Incall will also likely be at a Hotel in Central London.

There is no value in being more specific and I am not going to be more specific as it is pointless.

It is written down in the already linked to guide to review writing and is vital information, especially in an area as large as London. I don't know why you want to be so awkward about a simple piece of information that is extremely useful for others. You do know you can also name the hotel if you wish don't you.

Summary
Include in your review (LLL&S):

* Provider's NAME plus LOCATION in the subject field. Generally give the nearest town. Specifically for London, give the closest tube/train station and first part of the post code (and agency/parlour as an option).

* Their AW profile link or contact details at the start of the review. Best to cut and paste the link from bottom of the providers AW page.

[JustaPunter]

Where you saw her is relevant, even if she uses several locations members can look out for when she returns to a location convenient for them, but only if they know where that is.

It is written down in the already linked to guide to review writing and is vital information, especially in an area as large as London. I don't know why you want to be so awkward about a simple piece of information that is extremely useful for others. You do know you can also name the hotel if you wish don't you.

I saw her in a Central London Hotel.

Central London is not a large area.

Central London would imply Zone 1

Her location when I saw her it irrelevant, because the next Incall she did was in a completely different place

But they were both in Central London.

[daviemac]

I saw her in a Central London Hotel.

Central London is not a large area.

Central London would imply Zone 1

Her location when I saw her it irrelevant, because the next Incall she did was in a completely different place

But they were both in Central London.

The location you saw her in is relevant to your review, it's a very simple question, what is the nearest tube station to the location of the hotel and for the life of me I can't understand why you want to be so awkward by not giving the information, if central London is zone 1 there are 61 tube stations.

The fact she moves around is irrelevant, the location you saw her in will never change.

The more information we have about where an escort works the better.

[Waterhouse]

It’s also stated in the site rules that location must be added…

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

Baffled as to why OP is being so awkward and refusing to give a location.

[Fuzzyduck]

... Baffled as to why OP is being so awkward and refusing to give a location.

It feels pretty straight forward to me: he's hiding something, most likely his identity (e.g. if she's outcall only, he likely booked the hotel so it would be clear to her who he is) but maybe something else is going on.

He's put the location down in all his other reviews so knows it's expected, but doesn't have the smarts to addresss () this issue in his review. He's dug himself deep now that he looks a bit dodgy whatever he does.

[Waterhouse]

It feels pretty straight forward to me: he's hiding something, most likely his identity (e.g. if she's outcall only, he likely booked the hotel so it would be clear to her who he is) but maybe something else is going on.

He's put the location down in all his other reviews so knows it's expected, but doesn't have the smarts to addresss () this issue in his review. He's dug himself deep now that he looks a bit dodgy whatever he does.

He doesn’t even have to name the hotel, just something like Lambeth, or Kensington, or Paddington for example, would be helpful and more than sufficient.

[daviemac]

It feels pretty straight forward to me: he's hiding something, most likely his identity (e.g. if she's outcall only, he likely booked the hotel so it would be clear to her who he is) but maybe something else is going on.

He's put the location down in all his other reviews so knows it's expected, but doesn't have the smarts to addresss () this issue in his review. He's dug himself deep now that he looks a bit dodgy whatever he does.

She was incall when the OP saw her, she's changed to outcall since.

Don't know what he's hiding, must be something though, did the booking even happen?   

[Fuzzyduck]

She was incall when the OP saw her, she's changed to outcall since.

Don't know what he's hiding, must be something though, did the booking even happen?   

Ah yes, my misunderstanding. Even more odd to be coy about the location.

[JustaPunter]

She was incall when the OP saw her, she's changed to outcall since.

Don't know what he's hiding, must be something though, did the booking even happen?   

It’s called not wanted to be outed by an SP so I can see her again.

I would have thought that was fairly obvious

And no, I don’t submit fake reviews.

But I am not going to put myself

[JustaPunter]

It’s also stated in the site rules that location must be added…

4 Reviews
A new review thread can only be created once a service provider has agreed to a booking. A meeting does not need to occur, and money does not need to change hands. The only criteria are that she had accepted the initial booking. Members can post more than one review about an SP, but touting will result in a ban. Reviews are allowed up to 6 months ( for new members, this rule is currently relaxed to 12 months)after the event(positive or negative)
Only one sex worker can be the subject of a review, not a whole agency/establishment/ brothel. The exception is sex parties, duos etc. and massage establishments where providers do not have names.
Reviews must contain a link, contact details or address (if publicized by the service provider).
No abbreviations of establishments in the title of a review.

Baffled as to why OP is being so awkward and refusing to give a location.

This is a fairly simple concept

Her Incall is a Hotel

The incall changes every time

So if I put a specific area then it would narrow down who had made the review.

What is to be gained from putting a location or Hotel name when she uses a different Central London Hotel every time?

[Iloveoral]

She probably see’s more than one punter in each location, I’d say your pretty safe 

[The_Don]

So if I put a specific area then it would narrow down who had made the review.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Tower Hill.

a flat in Barking.

a Hotel near Heathrow.

Heathrow area.

Location is a reasonable block of flats, look ex Local Authority to be fair.

Just an update


she was doing incalls in a self contained room in NW6


She is working in Norwich

flat in Chelmsford.

[SomTumFucker]

LMAO over the “where in Central London?” interrogation, then read the SP’s profile and now ROTFL - she’s got more discounts than DFS including a loyalty card scheme - priceless!

[PilotMan]

@ The_Don

Quote time...

Priceless 

[Waterhouse]

This is a fairly simple concept

Her Incall is a Hotel

The incall changes every time

So if I put a specific area then it would narrow down who had made the review.

What is to be gained from putting a location or Hotel name when she uses a different Central London Hotel every time?

You’re just being a pillock IMO.  Being awkward for the sake of it.

[JustaPunter]

She probably see’s more than one punter in each location, I’d say your pretty safe 

She was at this location for one day.

She usually does an incall for one day or two days at the most

I am not going to risk outing myself because somebody wants to know a location

It’s irrelevant as she never uses the same Hotel or the same area.

So what exactly is to be gained from saying the area?

Central London is by definition Zone 1.

What difference does it make if it’s Bayswater or Knightsbridge?

[JustaPunter]

Hidden Image/Members Only

Where they all the same SP?

No.

So your point is?

Yawn

[Fuzzyduck]

Where they all the same SP?

No.

So your point is?

Yawn

You really are a dickhead aren't you? I bet everyone else on this thread (including the mods) have moved on with their lives but you seem to want to labour this point and keep resurfacing this thread. You're acting very weirdly for someone who wants to keep this below the radar. She probably knows who you are anyway when she reads this thread.
"Oh yeah, he'll be the dickhead a while back".

[PilotMan]

You really are a dickhead aren't you? I bet everyone else on this thread (including the mods) have moved on with their lives but you seem to want to labour this point and keep resurfacing this thread. You're acting very weirdly for someone who wants to keep this below the radar. She probably knows who you are anyway when she reads this thread.
"Oh yeah, he'll be the dickhead a while back".

Exactly what I was thinking.

Everyone else has moved on, but it seems like the OP can't let it go.

Time to move on, fella.